{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,26]],"date-time":"2026-08-26T15:01:22Z","timestamp":1787756482698,"version":"build-2784847793"},"reference-count":61,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,3,11]],"date-time":"2023-03-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1678492800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,3,11]],"date-time":"2023-03-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1678492800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int J Colorectal Dis"],"DOI":"10.1007\/s00384-023-04355-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,3,11]],"date-time":"2023-03-11T06:02:45Z","timestamp":1678514565000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":17,"title":["Cleaning effect and tolerance of 16 bowel preparation regimens on adult patients before colonoscopy: a network meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"38","author":[{"given":"Ming","family":"Sun","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Guangzhao","family":"Yang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yu","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,3,11]]},"reference":[{"key":"4355_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 61(2):69\u201390.\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3322\/caac.20107","DOI":"10.3322\/caac.20107"},{"issue":"5","key":"4355_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"584","DOI":"10.1097\/cm9.0000000000002108","volume":"135","author":"C Xia","year":"2022","unstructured":"Xia C, Dong X, Li H et al (2022) Cancer statistics in China and United States, 2022: profiles, trends, and determinants. Chin Med J 135(5):584\u2013590. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/cm9.0000000000002108","journal-title":"Chin Med J"},{"issue":"45","key":"4355_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7748","DOI":"10.3748\/wjg.v27.i45.7748","volume":"27","author":"M Di Leo","year":"2021","unstructured":"Di Leo M, Iannone A, Arena M et al (2021) Novel frontiers of agents for bowel cleansing for colonoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 27(45):7748\u20137770. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3748\/wjg.v27.i45.7748","journal-title":"World J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"4355_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Bednarska O, Nyhlin N, Schmidt PT, Johansson GW, Toth E, Lindfors P (2022) The effectiveness and tolerability of a very low-volume bowel preparation for colonoscopy compared to low and high-volume polyethylene glycol-solutions in the real-life setting. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) 12(5).\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/diagnostics12051155","DOI":"10.3390\/diagnostics12051155"},{"issue":"11","key":"4355_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1225","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cgh.2012.08.029","volume":"10","author":"BK Enestvedt","year":"2012","unstructured":"Enestvedt BK, Tofani C, Laine LA, Tierney A, Fennerty MB (2012) 4-Liter split-dose polyethylene glycol is superior to other bowel preparations, based on systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Off Clin Pract J Am Gastroenterol Assoc 10(11):1225\u20131231. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cgh.2012.08.029","journal-title":"Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association"},{"issue":"3","key":"4355_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"408","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gie.2013.08.035","volume":"79","author":"M Brahmania","year":"2014","unstructured":"Brahmania M, Ou G, Bressler B et al (2014) 2 L versus 4 L of PEG3350 + electrolytes for outpatient colonic preparation: a randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 79(3):408-416.e4. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.gie.2013.08.035","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc"},{"issue":"6","key":"4355_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1542","DOI":"10.3349\/ymj.2014.55.6.1542","volume":"55","author":"SH Lee","year":"2014","unstructured":"Lee SH, Lee DJ, Kim KM et al (2014) Comparison of the efficacy and safety of sodium phosphate tablets and polyethylene glycol solution for bowel cleansing in healthy Korean adults. Yonsei Med J 55(6):1542\u20131555. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3349\/ymj.2014.55.6.1542","journal-title":"Yonsei Med J"},{"issue":"4","key":"4355_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"494","DOI":"10.5009\/gnl14010","volume":"9","author":"HG Kim","year":"2015","unstructured":"Kim HG, Huh KC, Koo HS et al (2015) Sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate (SPMC) plus laxative is a good alternative to conventional large volume polyethylene glycol in bowel preparation: a multicenter randomized single-blinded trial. Gut Liver 9(4):494\u2013501. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5009\/gnl14010","journal-title":"Gut and liver"},{"issue":"8","key":"4355_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"775","DOI":"10.1055\/a-0959-0505","volume":"51","author":"C Hassan","year":"2019","unstructured":"Hassan C, East J, Radaelli F et al (2019) Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2019. Endoscopy 51(8):775\u2013794. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/a-0959-0505","journal-title":"Endoscopy"},{"key":"4355_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Tian X, Shi B, Chen H et al (2019) Comparative efficacy of 2 L polyethylene glycol alone or with ascorbic acid vs. 4 L polyethylene glycol for colonoscopy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled trials. Front Med 6:182.\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fmed.2019.00182","DOI":"10.3389\/fmed.2019.00182"},{"key":"4355_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. PLoS Med 18(3):e1003583.\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pmed.1003583","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1003583"},{"issue":"4","key":"4355_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"423","DOI":"10.5009\/gnl.2013.7.4.423","volume":"7","author":"SE Bae","year":"2013","unstructured":"Bae SE, Kim KJ, Eum JB et al (2013) A comparison of 2 L of polyethylene glycol and 45 mL of sodium phosphate versus 4 L of polyethylene glycol for bowel cleansing: a prospective randomized trial. Gut Liver 7(4):423\u2013429. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5009\/gnl.2013.7.4.423","journal-title":"Gut and Liver"},{"key":"4355_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Bai Y, Fang J, Zhao SB et al (2018) Impact of preprocedure simethicone on adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: a multicenter, endoscopist-blinded randomized controlled trial. Journal Article; Multicenter Study; Randomized Controlled Trial. Endoscopy 50(2):128\u2010136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/s-0043-119213","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0043-119213"},{"issue":"5","key":"4355_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2166","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-016-5214-1","volume":"31","author":"S Chaussade","year":"2017","unstructured":"Chaussade S, Schm\u00f6cker C, Toulemonde P, Mu\u00f1oz-Navas M, O\u2019Mahony V, Henri F (2017) Phosphate tablets or polyethylene glycol for preparation to colonoscopy? A multicentre non-inferiority randomized controlled trial. Art Surg Endosc 31(5):2166\u20132173. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-016-5214-1","journal-title":"Article Surgical Endoscopy"},{"key":"4355_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Choi SJ, Kim ES, Choi BK et al (2018) A randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of 1-L polyethylene glycol solution with ascorbic acid plus prucalopride versus 2-L polyethylene glycol solution with ascorbic acid for bowel preparation. Comparative Study; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial. Scand J Gastroenterol 53(12):1619\u20101624. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/00365521.2018.1543450","DOI":"10.1080\/00365521.2018.1543450"},{"issue":"11","key":"4355_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1923","DOI":"10.1111\/jgh.15101","volume":"35","author":"Y Coskun","year":"2020","unstructured":"Coskun Y, Yuksel I (2020) Polyethylene glycol versus split high-dose senna for bowel preparation: a comparative prospective randomized study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 35(11):1923\u20131929. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jgh.15101","journal-title":"J Gastroenterol Hepatol"},{"key":"4355_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"DeMicco MP, Clayton LB, Pilot J, Epstein MS (2018) Novel 1 L polyethylene glycol-based bowel preparation NER1006 for overall and right-sided colon cleansing: a randomized controlled phase 3 trial versus trisulfate. Gastrointest Endosc 87(3):677-+.\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.gie.2017.07.047","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gie.2017.07.047"},{"issue":"6","key":"4355_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"951","DOI":"10.1038\/ajg.2017.53","volume":"112","author":"AZ Gimeno-Garcia","year":"2017","unstructured":"Gimeno-Garcia AZ, Hernandez G, Aldea A et al (2017) Comparison of two intensive bowel cleansing regimens in patients with previous poor bowel preparation: a randomized controlled study. Am J Gastroenterol 112(6):951\u2013958. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/ajg.2017.53","journal-title":"Am J Gastroenterol"},{"issue":"3","key":"4355_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"897","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-010-1293-6","volume":"25","author":"MM Haapam\u00e4ki","year":"2011","unstructured":"Haapam\u00e4ki MM, Lindstr\u00f6m M, Sandz\u00e9n B (2011) Low-volume bowel preparation is inferior to standard 4 1 polyethylene glycol. Surg Endosc 25(3):897\u2013901. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-010-1293-6","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"4355_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Hookey LC, Depew WT, Vanner SJ (2006) Combined low volume polyethylene glycol solution plus stimulant laxatives versus standard volume polyethylene glycol solution: a prospective, randomized study of colon cleansing before colonoscopy. Comparative Study; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non\u2010U.S. Gov't. J Canadien De Gastroenterologie 20(2):101\u2010105. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2006\/621367","DOI":"10.1155\/2006\/621367"},{"issue":"6","key":"4355_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"294","DOI":"10.1111\/1751-2980.12755","volume":"20","author":"JS Hung","year":"2019","unstructured":"Hung JS, Yi CH, Liu TT, Lei WY, Wong MW, Chen CL (2019) Does prucalopride reduce the dose of sodium phosphate in bowel preparation? A single-blind, randomized, and prospective study. J Dig Dis 20(6):294\u2013300. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1751-2980.12755","journal-title":"J Dig Dis"},{"key":"4355_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Hung SY, Chen HC, Chen WT (2020) A randomized trial comparing the bowel cleansing efficacy of sodium picosulfate\/magnesium citrate and polyethylene glycol\/bisacodyl (The Bowklean Study). Sci Rep 10(1):5604. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-020-62120-w","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-020-62120-w"},{"issue":"5","key":"4355_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"428","DOI":"10.3748\/wjg.v27.i5.428","volume":"27","author":"SY Hung","year":"2021","unstructured":"Hung SY, Chen HC, Ke TW et al (2021) Noninferiority clinical trial comparing the bowel cleansing efficacy of sodium phosphate tablets (Quiklean(\u00ae)) with a polyethylene glycol\/bisacodyl kit. World J Gastroenterol 27(5):428\u2013441. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3748\/wjg.v27.i5.428","journal-title":"World J Gastroenterol"},{"issue":"2","key":"4355_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"251","DOI":"10.1007\/s00384-014-2066-9","volume":"30","author":"SR Jeon","year":"2015","unstructured":"Jeon SR, Kim HG, Lee JS et al (2015) Randomized controlled trial of low-volume bowel preparation agents for colonic bowel preparation: 2-L polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid versus sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate. Int J Colorectal Dis 30(2):251\u2013258. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00384-014-2066-9","journal-title":"Int J Colorectal Dis"},{"issue":"42","key":"4355_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"15845","DOI":"10.3748\/wjg.v20.i42.15845","volume":"20","author":"YS Jung","year":"2014","unstructured":"Jung YS, Lee CK, Kim HJ, Eun CS, Han DS, Park DI (2014) Randomized controlled trial of sodium phosphate tablets vs polyethylene glycol solution for colonoscopy bowel cleansing. World J Gastroenterol 20(42):15845\u201315851. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3748\/wjg.v20.i42.15845","journal-title":"World J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"4355_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Kang SH, Jeen YT, Lee JH et al (2017) Comparison of a split-dose bowel preparation with 2 liters of polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid and 1 liter of polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid and bisacodyl before colonoscopy. Comparative Study; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial. Gastrointest Endosc 86(2):343\u2010348.\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.gie.2016.10.040","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gie.2016.10.040"},{"issue":"3","key":"4355_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"401","DOI":"10.1038\/ajg.2012.441","volume":"108","author":"PO Katz","year":"2013","unstructured":"Katz PO, Rex DK, Epstein M et al (2013) A dual-action, low-volume bowel cleanser administered the day before colonoscopy: results from the SEE CLEAR II study. Am J Gastroenterol 108(3):401\u2013409. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/ajg.2012.441","journal-title":"Am J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"4355_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Kim HG, Huh KC, Koo HS et al (2015) Sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate (SPMC) plus laxative is a good alternative to conventional large volume polyethylene glycol in bowel preparation: a multicenter randomized single-blinded trial. Comparative study; Journal Article; Multicenter Study; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non\u2010U.S. Gov't. Gut Liver 9(4):494\u2010501. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5009\/gnl14010","DOI":"10.5009\/gnl14010"},{"issue":"4","key":"4355_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"600","DOI":"10.1111\/den.13548","volume":"32","author":"SH Kim","year":"2020","unstructured":"Kim SH, Kim ER, Kim K et al (2020) Combination of bisacodyl suppository and 1 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid is a non-inferior and comfortable regimen compared to 2 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid. Dig Endosc 32(4):600\u2013607. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/den.13548","journal-title":"Dig Endosc"},{"key":"4355_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Kim SH, Kim JH, Keum B et al (2020) A randomized, endoscopist-blinded, prospective trial to compare the efficacy and patient tolerability between bowel preparation protocols using sodium picosulfate magnesium citrate and polyethylene-glycol (1 L and 2 L) for colonoscopy. J Art Gastroenterol Res Pract\u00a02020.\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2020\/9548171","DOI":"10.1155\/2020\/9548171"},{"key":"4355_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Kwon JE, Lee JW, Im JP et al (2016) Comparable efficacy of a 1-L PEG and ascorbic acid solution administered with bisacodyl versus a 2-L PEG and ascorbic acid solution for colonoscopy preparation: a prospective, randomized and investigator-blinded trial. Comparative study; Journal Article; Multicenter Study; Randomized Controlled Trial. PloS ONE 11(9):e0162051. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0162051","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0162051"},{"key":"4355_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Kwon KH, Lee JA, Lim YJ et al (2020) A prospective randomized clinical study evaluating the efficacy and compliance of oral sulfate solution and 2-L ascorbic acid plus polyethylene glycol. Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial.\u00a0Korean J Int Med 35(4):873\u2010880.\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3904\/kjim.2017.275","DOI":"10.3904\/kjim.2017.275"},{"key":"4355_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Lee HH, Lim CH, Kim JS et al (2019) Comparison between an oral sulfate solution and a 2 L of polyethylene glycol\/ascorbic acid as a split dose bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Journal: Article. J Clin Gastroenterol 53(10):e431\u2010e437.\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MCG.0000000000001137","DOI":"10.1097\/MCG.0000000000001137"},{"issue":"10","key":"4355_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3041","DOI":"10.3748\/wjg.v21.i10.3041","volume":"21","author":"KJ Lee","year":"2015","unstructured":"Lee KJ, Park HJ, Kim HS et al (2015) Electrolyte changes after bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a randomized controlled multicenter trial. World J Gastroenterol 21(10):3041\u20133048. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3748\/wjg.v21.i10.3041","journal-title":"World J Gastroenterol"},{"issue":"9","key":"4355_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2137","DOI":"10.1097\/mib.0000000000000463","volume":"21","author":"G Manes","year":"2015","unstructured":"Manes G, Fontana P, de Nucci G, Radaelli F, Hassan C, Ardizzone S (2015) Colon cleansing for colonoscopy in patients with ulcerative colitis: efficacy and acceptability of a 2-L PEG plus bisacodyl versus 4-L PEG. Inflamm Bowel Dis 21(9):2137\u20132144. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/mib.0000000000000463","journal-title":"Inflamm Bowel Dis"},{"key":"4355_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Mathus-Vliegen EMH, Karin van der Vliet RN, Inge J, Wignand-van der Storm RN, John S, Stadwijk RN (2018) Efficacy and safety of sodium picosulfate\/ magnesium citrate for bowel preparation in a physically disabled outpatient population: a randomized, endoscopist-blinded comparison with ascorbic acid-enriched polyethylene glycol solution plus bisacodyl (The PICO-MOVI Study). Article. Dis Colon Rectum 61(2):239\u2013249. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/DCR.0000000000000956","DOI":"10.1097\/DCR.0000000000000956"},{"issue":"1","key":"4355_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gie.2019.03.018","volume":"90","author":"S Moraveji","year":"2019","unstructured":"Moraveji S, Casner N, Bashashati M et al (2019) The role of oral simethicone on the adenoma detection rate and other quality indicators of screening colonoscopy: a randomized, controlled, observer-blinded clinical trial. Gastrointest Endosc 90(1):141\u2013149. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.gie.2019.03.018","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc"},{"key":"4355_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Munsterman ID, Cleeren E, van der Ploeg T, Brohet R, van der Hulst R (2015) 'Pico-Bello-Klean study': effectiveness and patient tolerability of bowel preparation agents sodium picosulphate-magnesium citrate and polyethylene glycol before colonoscopy. A single-blinded randomized trial. European J Gastroenterol Hepatol 27(1):29\u201338. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MEG.0000000000000192","DOI":"10.1097\/MEG.0000000000000192"},{"issue":"9","key":"4355_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1026","DOI":"10.1002\/jgh3.12626","volume":"5","author":"K Nalankilli","year":"2021","unstructured":"Nalankilli K, Gibson DJ, Anwar S et al (2021) Split-dose 1 L polyethylene glycol (PEG) with ascorbate is non-inferior to split-dose PEG with sodium picosulfate and magnesium citrate with similar tolerability: a randomized study. Jgh Open 5(9):1026\u20131032. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jgh3.12626","journal-title":"Jgh Open"},{"key":"4355_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Repici A, Spada C, Cannizzaro R et al (2021) Novel 1-L polyethylene glycol + ascorbate versus high-volume polyethylene glycol regimen for colonoscopy cleansing: a multicenter, randomized, phase IV study. Clinical Trial, Phase IV; Journal Article; Multicenter Study; Randomized Controlled Trial. Gastrointest Endosc 94(4):823\u2010831.e9.\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.gie.2021.04.020","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gie.2021.04.020"},{"issue":"1","key":"4355_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"132","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gie.2013.02.024","volume":"78","author":"DK Rex","year":"2013","unstructured":"Rex DK, Katz PO, Bertiger G et al (2013) Split-dose administration of a dual-action, low-volume bowel cleanser for colonoscopy: the SEE CLEAR I study. Gastrointest Endosc 78(1):132\u2013141. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.gie.2013.02.024","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc"},{"issue":"1","key":"4355_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"73","DOI":"10.1055\/a-0639-5070","volume":"51","author":"S Schreiber","year":"2019","unstructured":"Schreiber S, Baumgart DC, Drenth JPH et al (2019) Colon cleansing efficacy and safety with 1 L NER1006 versus sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate: a randomized phase 3 trial. Endoscopy 51(1):73\u201384. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/a-0639-5070","journal-title":"Endoscopy"},{"issue":"5","key":"4355_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"541","DOI":"10.1007\/s00384-018-2989-7","volume":"33","author":"SI Seo","year":"2018","unstructured":"Seo SI, Kang JG, Kim HS, Jang MK, Kim HY, Shin WG (2018) Efficacy and tolerability of 2-L polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid versus sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 33(5):541\u2013548. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00384-018-2989-7","journal-title":"Int J Colorectal Dis"},{"issue":"3","key":"4355_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"174","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0039-3401963","volume":"10","author":"BB Shah","year":"2019","unstructured":"Shah BB, Patel B, Goenka MK (2019) Oral sulfate solution versus polyethylene glycol as a single-day preparation for colonoscopy: a randomized control trial. J Dig Endosc 10(3):174\u2013177. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/s-0039-3401963","journal-title":"Journal of Digestive Endoscopy"},{"issue":"1","key":"4355_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1111\/jgh.13477","volume":"32","author":"HJ Yang","year":"2017","unstructured":"Yang HJ, Park SK, Kim JH et al (2017) Randomized trial comparing oral sulfate solution with 4-L polyethylene glycol administered in a split dose as preparation for colonoscopy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 32(1):12\u201318. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jgh.13477","journal-title":"J Gastroenterol Hepatol"},{"key":"4355_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Yoo IK, Jeen YT, Kang SH et al (2016) Improving of bowel cleansing effect for polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid using simethicone A randomized controlled trial. Medicine 95(28).\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MD.0000000000004163","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000004163"},{"key":"4355_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Yoo IK, Lee JS, Chun HJ et al (2015) A randomized, prospective trial on efficacy and tolerability of low-volume bowel preparation methods for colonoscopy. Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial. Dig liver Dis 47(2):131\u2010137.\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.dld.2014.10.019","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dld.2014.10.019"},{"key":"4355_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Zhang H, Liu J, Ma SL et al (2021) Impact of simethicone on bowel cleansing during colonoscopy in Chinese patients. Journal: Article. World J Clin Cases\u00a09(10):2238\u20102246. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.12998\/wjcc.v9.i10.2238","DOI":"10.12998\/wjcc.v9.i10.2238"},{"issue":"4","key":"4355_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"412","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0043-121337","volume":"50","author":"S Zhang","year":"2018","unstructured":"Zhang S, Zheng D, Wang J et al (2018) Simethicone improves bowel cleansing with low-volume polyethylene glycol: a multicenter randomized trial. Endoscopy 50(4):412\u2013422. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/s-0043-121337","journal-title":"Endoscopy"},{"key":"4355_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Matro R, Tupchong K, Daskalakis C, Gordon V, Katz L, Kastenberg D (2012) The effect on colon visualization during colonoscopy of the addition of simethicone to polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution: a randomized single-blind study. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 3(11):e26.https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/ctg.2012.16","DOI":"10.1038\/ctg.2012.16"},{"issue":"24","key":"4355_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3032","DOI":"10.3748\/wjg.15.3032","volume":"15","author":"S Tongprasert","year":"2009","unstructured":"Tongprasert S, Sobhonslidsuk A, Rattanasiri S (2009) Improving quality of colonoscopy by adding simethicone to sodium phosphate bowel preparation. World J Gastroenterol 15(24):3032\u20133037. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3748\/wjg.15.3032","journal-title":"World J Gastroenterol"},{"issue":"2","key":"4355_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0043-119213","volume":"50","author":"Y Bai","year":"2018","unstructured":"Bai Y, Fang J, Zhao SB et al (2018) Impact of preprocedure simethicone on adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: a multicenter, endoscopist-blinded randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 50(2):128\u2013136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/s-0043-119213","journal-title":"Endoscopy"},{"issue":"4","key":"4355_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"781","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gie.2014.09.048","volume":"81","author":"JR Saltzman","year":"2015","unstructured":"Saltzman JR, Cash BD, Pasha SF et al (2015) Bowel preparation before colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 81(4):781\u2013794. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.gie.2014.09.048","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc"},{"issue":"3","key":"4355_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"134","DOI":"10.1111\/1751-2980.13084","volume":"23","author":"RR Cao","year":"2022","unstructured":"Cao RR, Wang L, Gao C et al (2022) Effect of oral simethicone on the quality of colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Dig Dis 23(3):134\u2013148. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1751-2980.13084","journal-title":"J Dig Dis"},{"key":"4355_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jin Z, Lu Y, Zhou Y, Gong B (2016) Systematic review and meta-analysis: sodium picosulfate\/magnesium citrate vs. polyethylene glycol for colonoscopy preparation. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 72(5):523\u201332.\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00228-016-2013-5","DOI":"10.1007\/s00228-016-2013-5"},{"key":"4355_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Clark BT, Rustagi T, Laine L (2014) What level of bowel prep quality requires early repeat colonoscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of preparation quality on adenoma detection rate.\u00a0Am J Gastroenterol 109(11):1714\u201323.\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/ajg.2014.232","DOI":"10.1038\/ajg.2014.232"},{"issue":"9","key":"4355_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2607","DOI":"10.1007\/s10620-019-05599-2","volume":"64","author":"H Kim","year":"2019","unstructured":"Kim H, Ko BM, Goong HJ et al (2019) Optimal timing of simethicone addition for bowel preparation using polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid. Dig Dis Sci 64(9):2607\u20132613. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10620-019-05599-2","journal-title":"Dig Dis Sci"},{"issue":"10","key":"4355_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4841","DOI":"10.1007\/s10620-021-07354-y","volume":"67","author":"SH Jung","year":"2022","unstructured":"Jung SH, Lim CH, Gweon TG et al (2022) Comparison of 2 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid and 4 L polyethylene glycol in elderly patients aged 60\u201379: a prospective randomized study. Dig Dis Sci 67(10):4841\u20134850. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10620-021-07354-y","journal-title":"Dig Dis Sci"},{"issue":"2","key":"4355_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"82","DOI":"10.1159\/000448887","volume":"94","author":"YS Jung","year":"2016","unstructured":"Jung YS, Lee CK, Eun CS, Park DI, Han DS, Kim HJ (2016) Low-volume polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid for colonoscopy preparation in elderly patients: a randomized multicenter study. Digestion 94(2):82\u201391. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000448887","journal-title":"Digestion"},{"issue":"12","key":"4355_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1763","DOI":"10.1007\/s00384-017-2901-x","volume":"32","author":"V Kojecky","year":"2017","unstructured":"Kojecky V, Matous J, Keil R et al (2017) A head-to-head comparison of 4-L polyethylene glycol and low-volume solutions before colonoscopy: which is the best? A multicentre, randomized trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 32(12):1763\u20131766. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00384-017-2901-x","journal-title":"Int J Colorectal Dis"},{"issue":"4","key":"4355_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"426","DOI":"10.1097\/dcr.0000000000000759","volume":"60","author":"B Kim","year":"2017","unstructured":"Kim B, Lee SD, Han KS et al (2017) Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid and an oral sulfate solution in a split method for bowel preparation: a randomized, multicenter phase III clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum 60(4):426\u2013432. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/dcr.0000000000000759","journal-title":"Dis Colon Rectum"}],"container-title":["International Journal of Colorectal Disease"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00384-023-04355-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00384-023-04355-3\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00384-023-04355-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,12,21]],"date-time":"2023-12-21T11:14:02Z","timestamp":1703157242000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00384-023-04355-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,3,11]]},"references-count":61,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,12]]}},"alternative-id":["4355"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00384-023-04355-3","relation":{},"ISSN":["1432-1262"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1432-1262","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,3,11]]},"assertion":[{"value":"20 February 2023","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"11 March 2023","order":2,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":5,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"69"}}