{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,3]],"date-time":"2026-09-03T03:26:36Z","timestamp":1788405996417,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,9]],"date-time":"2021-07-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1625788800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,9]],"date-time":"2021-07-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1625788800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Orthop Trauma Surg"],"DOI":"10.1007\/s00402-021-04056-y","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,9]],"date-time":"2021-07-09T17:03:27Z","timestamp":1625850207000},"page":"265-268","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":10,"title":["Reoperation rates and patient-reported outcomes of single and two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"143","author":[{"given":"James S.","family":"Chambers","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Robert G.","family":"Kropp","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4230-4411","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Raymond J.","family":"Gardocki","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,9]]},"reference":[{"issue":"3","key":"4056_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000002273","volume":"43","author":"GR Buttermann","year":"2018","unstructured":"Buttermann GR (2018) Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion outcomes over 10 years: a prospective study. Spine 43(3):207\u2013214. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0000000000002273 (Phila Pa 1976)","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"7","key":"4056_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"703","DOI":"10.1177\/2192568218765398","volume":"8","author":"AK Andresen","year":"2018","unstructured":"Andresen AK, Paulsen RT, Busch F, Isenberg-J\u00f8rgensen A, Carreon LY, Andersen M (2018) Patient-reported outcomes and patient-reported satisfaction after surgical treatment for cervical radiculopathy. Global Spine J 8(7):703\u2013708. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/2192568218765398","journal-title":"Global Spine J"},{"issue":"22","key":"4056_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2431","DOI":"10.1097\/01.BRS.0000031261.66972.B1","volume":"27","author":"JC Eck","year":"2002","unstructured":"Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Lim TH et al (2002) Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion. Spine 27(22):2431\u20132434. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.BRS.0000031261.66972.B1 (Phila Pa 1976)","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"4","key":"4056_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"519","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-199904000-00009","volume":"81","author":"AS Hilibrand","year":"1999","unstructured":"Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo MA, Jones PK, Bohlman HH (1999) Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Jt Surg Am 81(4):519\u2013528. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/00004623-199904000-00009","journal-title":"J Bone Jt Surg Am"},{"issue":"4","key":"4056_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"341","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2010.01.006","volume":"10","author":"BW Cunningham","year":"2010","unstructured":"Cunningham BW, Hu N, Zorn CM, McAfee PC (2010) Biomechanical comparison of single-and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics. Spine J 10(4):341\u2013349. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2010.01.006","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"6","key":"4056_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"433","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31822699fa","volume":"37","author":"X Zhang","year":"2012","unstructured":"Zhang X, Zhang X, Chen C et al (2012) Randomized, controlled, multicenter, clinical trial comparing BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion in China. Spine 37(6):433\u2013438. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31822699fa (Phila Pa 1976)","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"9","key":"4056_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"711","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3182797592","volume":"38","author":"R Delamarter","year":"2019","unstructured":"Delamarter R, Zigler J (2019) Five-year reoperation rates, cervical total disc replacement versus fusion, results of a prospective randomized clinical trial. Spine 38(9):711\u2013717. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3182797592 (Phila Pa 1976)","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"4056_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1305","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31817329a1","volume":"33","author":"PA Anderson","year":"2008","unstructured":"Anderson PA, Sasso RC, Riew KD (2008) Comparison of adverse events between the Bryan artificial cervical disc and anterior cervical arthrodesis. Spine 33:1305\u20131312. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31817329a1","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"6","key":"4056_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"555","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.K.00599","volume":"95","author":"Y Gao","year":"2013","unstructured":"Gao Y, Liu M, Li T, Huang F, Tang T, Xiang Z (2013) A meta-analysis comparing the results of cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the treatment of symptomatic cervical disc disease. J Bone Jt Surg Am 95(6):555\u2013561. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/JBJS.K.00599","journal-title":"J Bone Jt Surg Am"},{"issue":"5","key":"4056_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1307","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-016-4707-5","volume":"474","author":"ZM Zhong","year":"2016","unstructured":"Zhong ZM, Zhu SY, Zhuang JS, Wu Q, Chen JT (2016) Reoperation after cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 474(5):1307\u20131316. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11999-016-4707-5","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"issue":"21","key":"4056_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1738","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.N.01186","volume":"97","author":"ME Janssen","year":"2015","unstructured":"Janssen ME, Zigler JE, Spivak JM, Delamarter RB, Darden BV, Kopjar B (2015) ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for single-level symptomatic cervical disc disease: seven-year follow-up of the prospective randomized US Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study. J Bone Jt Surg Am 97(21):1738\u20131747. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/JBJS.N.01186","journal-title":"J Bone Jt Surg Am"},{"issue":"26","key":"4056_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2253","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000052","volume":"38","author":"K Verma","year":"2013","unstructured":"Verma K, Gandhi SD, Maltenfort M et al (2013) Rate of adjacent segment disease in cervical disc arthroplasty versus single-level fusion: meta-analysis of prospective studies. Spine 38(26):2253\u20132257. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000052 (Phila Pa 1976)","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"4056_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"348","DOI":"10.3171\/2017.5.SPINE16824","volume":"15","author":"D Coric","year":"2011","unstructured":"Coric D, Nunley PD, Guyer RD et al (2011) Prospective, randomized, multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty: 269 patients from the Kineflexj C artificial disc investigational device exemption study with a minimum 2-year follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine 15:348\u2013358. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2017.5.SPINE16824","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"4056_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"198","DOI":"10.3171\/spi.2007.6.3.198","volume":"6","author":"PV Mummaneni","year":"2007","unstructured":"Mummaneni PV, Burkus JK, Haid RW et al (2007) Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine 6:198\u2013209. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/spi.2007.6.3.198","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"4","key":"4056_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000001746","volume":"42","author":"WR Sasso","year":"2017","unstructured":"Sasso WR, Smucker JD, Sasso MP, Sasso RC (2017) Long-term clinical outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Spine 42(4):209\u2013216. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0000000000001746 (Phila Pa 1976)","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"9","key":"4056_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2434","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-017-5218-0","volume":"26","author":"M Skeppholm","year":"2017","unstructured":"Skeppholm M, Henriques T, Tullberg T (2017) Higher reoperation rate following cervical disc replacement in a retrospective, long-term comparative study of 715 patients. Eur Spine J 26(9):2434\u20132440. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00586-017-5218-0","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"4056_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jocn.2016.10.047","volume":"37","author":"KE Chang","year":"2017","unstructured":"Chang KE, Pham MH, Hsieh PC (2017) Adjacent segment disease requiring reoperation in cervical total disc arthroplasty: a literature review and update. J Clin Neurosci 37:20\u201324. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jocn.2016.10.047","journal-title":"J Clin Neurosci"},{"key":"4056_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"372","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2012.02.005","volume":"12","author":"K Singh","year":"2012","unstructured":"Singh K, Phillips FM, Park DK et al (2012) Factors affecting reoperations after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion within and outside of a Federal Drug Administration investigational device exemption cervical disc replacement trial. Spine J 12:372\u2013378. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2012.02.005","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"20","key":"4056_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1632","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000001085","volume":"40","author":"KH Guppy","year":"2015","unstructured":"Guppy KH, Harris J, Paxton LW, Alvarez JL, Bernbeck JA (2015) Reoperation rates for symptomatic nonunions in anterior cervical fusions from a national spine registry. Spine 40(20):1632\u20131637. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0000000000001085 (Phila Pa 1976)","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"4056_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3171\/2019.11.SPINE19788","author":"ZE Teton","year":"2020","unstructured":"Teton ZE, Cheaney B, Obayashi JT, Than KD (2020) PEEK interbody devices for multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: association with more than 6-fold higher rates of pseudarthrosis compared to structural allograft. J Neurosurg. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2019.11.SPINE19788 (Advance online publication)","journal-title":"J Neurosurg"}],"container-title":["Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00402-021-04056-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00402-021-04056-y\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00402-021-04056-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,30]],"date-time":"2023-01-30T16:26:26Z","timestamp":1675095986000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00402-021-04056-y"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,9]]},"references-count":20,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,1]]}},"alternative-id":["4056"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00402-021-04056-y","relation":{},"ISSN":["1434-3916"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1434-3916","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"28 October 2020","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"2 July 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"9 July 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Authors JSC and RGK declare they have no financial or non-financial interests. Author RJG has received teaching honoraria from Joimax, teaching honoraria and consulting payments from Integrity Implants. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Tennessee (approval #1604543-XP).","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}},{"value":"As a retrospective chart review consent was not deemed necessary.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to participate"}},{"value":"As a retrospective chart review consent was not deemed necessary.","order":5,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Content for publication"}}]}}