{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,20]],"date-time":"2026-08-20T16:20:23Z","timestamp":1787242823409,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":67,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"10","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,30]],"date-time":"2021-09-30T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1632960000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,30]],"date-time":"2021-09-30T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1632960000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Orthop Trauma Surg"],"DOI":"10.1007\/s00402-021-04186-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,30]],"date-time":"2021-09-30T16:03:28Z","timestamp":1633017808000},"page":"2965-2977","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":21,"title":["Periprosthetic joint infection rates across primary total hip arthroplasty surgical approaches: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 653,633 procedures"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"142","author":[{"given":"Alexander J.","family":"Acu\u00f1a","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Michael T.","family":"Do","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Linsen T.","family":"Samuel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Daniel","family":"Grits","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jesse E.","family":"Otero","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9214-2756","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Atul F.","family":"Kamath","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,30]]},"reference":[{"key":"4186_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.H.00155","volume":"91","author":"KJ Bozic","year":"2009","unstructured":"Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E et al (2009) The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the united states. J Bone Jt Surg Ser A 91:128\u2013133. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/JBJS.H.00155","journal-title":"J Bone Jt Surg Ser A"},{"key":"4186_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pivec R, Johnson AJ, Mears SC, Mont MA (2012) Hip arthroplasty. In: The Lancet. Lancet, pp 1768\u20131777","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(12)60607-2"},{"key":"4186_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1004","DOI":"10.1016\/S1473-3099(18)30345-1","volume":"18","author":"E Lenguerrand","year":"2018","unstructured":"Lenguerrand E, Whitehouse MR, Beswick AD et al (2018) Risk factors associated with revision for prosthetic joint infection after hip replacement: a prospective observational cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis 18:1004\u20131014. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S1473-3099(18)30345-1","journal-title":"Lancet Infect Dis"},{"key":"4186_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2056","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2017.02.023","volume":"32","author":"RA Henderson","year":"2017","unstructured":"Henderson RA, Austin MS (2017) Management of periprosthetic joint infection: the more we learn, the less we know. J Arthroplasty 32:2056\u20132059. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2017.02.023","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"4186_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"334","DOI":"10.1093\/cid\/cir402","volume":"53","author":"E Senneville","year":"2011","unstructured":"Senneville E, Joulie D, Legout L et al (2011) Outcome and predictors of treatment failure in total hip\/knee prosthetic joint infections due to Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Infect Dis 53:334\u2013340. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/cid\/cir402","journal-title":"Clin Infect Dis"},{"key":"4186_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"471","DOI":"10.1086\/499234","volume":"42","author":"CE Marculescu","year":"2006","unstructured":"Marculescu CE, Berbari EF, Hanssen AD et al (2006) Outcome of prosthetic joint infections treated with debridement and retention of components. Clin Infect Dis 42:471\u2013478. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1086\/499234","journal-title":"Clin Infect Dis"},{"key":"4186_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1157","DOI":"10.1086\/374554","volume":"36","author":"JR Lentino","year":"2003","unstructured":"Lentino JR (2003) Prosthetic joint infections: bane of orthopedists, challenge for infectious disease specialists. Clin Infect Dis 36:1157\u20131161. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1086\/374554","journal-title":"Clin Infect Dis"},{"key":"4186_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"181","DOI":"10.1111\/J.1469-0691.2011.03758.X","volume":"19","author":"TN Peel","year":"2013","unstructured":"Peel TN, Dowsey MM, Buising KL et al (2013) Cost analysis of debridement and retention for management of prosthetic joint infection. Clin Microbiol Infect 19:181\u2013186. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/J.1469-0691.2011.03758.X","journal-title":"Clin Microbiol Infect"},{"key":"4186_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1422","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2016.01.021","volume":"31","author":"BH Kapadia","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kapadia BH, Banerjee S, Cherian JJ et al (2016) The economic impact of periprosthetic infections after total hip arthroplasty at a specialized tertiary-care center. J Arthroplasty 31:1422\u20131426. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2016.01.021","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"4186_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2623","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-017-5289-6","volume":"475","author":"PH Gundtoft","year":"2017","unstructured":"Gundtoft PH, Pedersen AB, Varnum C, Overgaard S (2017) Increased mortality after prosthetic joint infection in primary THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 475:2623\u20132631. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11999-017-5289-6","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"4186_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2177","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.L.00789","volume":"95","author":"B Zmistowski","year":"2013","unstructured":"Zmistowski B, Karam JA, Durinka JB et al (2013) Periprosthetic joint infection increases the risk of one-year mortality. J Bone Jt Surgery Am 95:2177\u20132184. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/JBJS.L.00789","journal-title":"J Bone Jt Surgery Am"},{"key":"4186_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1891","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-017-5333-6","volume":"475","author":"TJ Parisi","year":"2017","unstructured":"Parisi TJ, Konopka JF, Bedair HS (2017) What is the long-term economic societal effect of periprosthetic infections after THA? A markov analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 475:1891\u20131900. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11999-017-5333-6","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"4186_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"335","DOI":"10.1186\/s12916-020-01803-7","volume":"18","author":"K Garfield","year":"2020","unstructured":"Garfield K, Noble S, Lenguerrand E et al (2020) What are the inpatient and day case costs following primary total hip replacement of patients treated for prosthetic joint infection: a matched cohort study using linked data from the National Joint Registry and Hospital Episode Statistics. BMC Med 18:335. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12916-020-01803-7","journal-title":"BMC Med"},{"key":"4186_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3238","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2018.05.042","volume":"33","author":"SM Kurtz","year":"2018","unstructured":"Kurtz SM, Lau EC, Son MS et al (2018) are we winning or losing the battle with periprosthetic joint infection: trends in periprosthetic joint infection and mortality risk for the medicare population. J Arthroplasty 33:3238\u20133245. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2018.05.042","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"4186_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/17453674.2020.1851533","author":"H Dale","year":"2020","unstructured":"Dale H, H\u00f8vding P, Tveit SM et al (2020) Increasing but levelling out risk of revision due to infection after total hip arthroplasty: a study on 108,854 primary THAs in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register from 2005 to 2019. Acta Orthop. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/17453674.2020.1851533","journal-title":"Acta Orthop"},{"key":"4186_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1884","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2018.01.021","volume":"33","author":"JO Smith","year":"2018","unstructured":"Smith JO, Frampton CMA, Hooper GJ, Young SW (2018) The impact of patient and surgical factors on the rate of postoperative infection after total hip arthroplasty\u2014a New Zealand joint registry study. J Arthroplasty 33:1884\u20131890. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2018.01.021","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"4186_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"794","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.K.00072","volume":"94","author":"KJ Bozic","year":"2012","unstructured":"Bozic KJ, Lau E, Kurtz S et al (2012) Patient-related risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection and postoperative mortality following total hip arthroplasty in medicare patients. J Bone Jt Surgery-American 94:794\u2013800. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/JBJS.K.00072","journal-title":"J Bone Jt Surgery-American"},{"key":"4186_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"503","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.19.00537","volume":"102","author":"(MAC) MAC,","year":"2020","unstructured":"(MAC) MAC, (2020) Risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection following primary total hip arthroplasty: a 15-year, population-based cohort study. J Bone Jt Surg - Am 102:503\u2013509. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/JBJS.19.00537","journal-title":"J Bone Jt Surg - Am"},{"key":"4186_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1651","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2020.01.033","volume":"35","author":"M Charney","year":"2020","unstructured":"Charney M, Paxton EW, Stradiotto R et al (2020) A comparison of risk of dislocation and cause-specific revision between direct anterior and posterior approach following elective cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 35:1651\u20131657. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2020.01.033","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"4186_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Aggarwal VK, Weintraub S, Klock J, et al (2019) 2019 Frank Stinchfield Award: A comparison of prosthetic joint infection rates between direct anterior and non-anterior approach total hip arthroplasty. In: Bone and Joint Journal. British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery, pp 2\u20138","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.101B6.BJJ-2018-0786.R1"},{"issue":"e20","key":"4186_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"00047","DOI":"10.2106\/jbjs.rvw.20.00047","volume":"9","author":"CM O\u2019Connor","year":"2021","unstructured":"O\u2019Connor CM, Anoushiravani AA, Acosta E et al (2021) Direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty is not associated with increased infection rates. JBJS Rev 9(e20):00047. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/jbjs.rvw.20.00047","journal-title":"JBJS Rev"},{"key":"4186_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S24","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2019.02.006","volume":"34","author":"MP Abdel","year":"2019","unstructured":"Abdel MP, Berry DJ (2019) Current practice trends in primary hip and knee arthroplasties among members of the american association of hip and knee surgeons: a long-term update. J Arthroplasty 34:S24\u2013S27. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2019.02.006","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"4186_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1595","DOI":"10.1007\/s00402-013-1828-0","volume":"133","author":"O Chechik","year":"2013","unstructured":"Chechik O, Khashan M, Lador R et al (2013) Surgical approach and prosthesis fixation in hip arthroplasty world wide. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133:1595\u20131600. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00402-013-1828-0","journal-title":"Arch Orthop Trauma Surg"},{"key":"4186_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"574","DOI":"10.1302\/2058-5241.3.180023","volume":"3","author":"G Kyriakopoulos","year":"2018","unstructured":"Kyriakopoulos G, Poultsides L, Christofilopoulos P (2018) Total hip arthroplasty through an anterior approach: The pros and cons. EFORT Open Rev 3:574\u2013583. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/2058-5241.3.180023","journal-title":"EFORT Open Rev"},{"key":"4186_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Woolson ST (2020) A survey of Hip Society surgeons concerning the direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty. In: Bone and Joint Journal. British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery, pp 57\u201361","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.102B7.BJJ-2019-1493.R1"},{"key":"4186_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1070","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2020.0785","volume":"323","author":"D Pincus","year":"2020","unstructured":"Pincus D, Jenkinson R, Paterson M et al (2020) Association between surgical approach and major surgical complications in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. JAMA J Am Med Assoc 323:1070\u20131076. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.2020.0785","journal-title":"JAMA J Am Med Assoc"},{"key":"4186_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1874","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.19.01289","volume":"102","author":"W Hoskins","year":"2020","unstructured":"Hoskins W, Bingham R, Lorimer M et al (2020) Early rate of revision of total hip arthroplasty related to surgical approach: an analysis of 122,345 primary total hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 102:1874\u20131882. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/JBJS.19.01289","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"4186_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/1120700020977166","author":"GR Sprowls","year":"2020","unstructured":"Sprowls GR, Allen BC, Lundquist KF et al (2020) Incision site fat thickness and 90-day complications for direct anterior and posterior approach total hip arthroplasty. HIP Int. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1120700020977166","journal-title":"HIP Int"},{"key":"4186_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Buchalter DB, Teo GM, Kirby DJ, et al (2020) Surgical Approach to Total Hip Arthroplasty Affects the Organism Profile of Early Periprosthetic Joint Infections. JBJS Open Access 5:e20.00111\u2013e20.00111. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/jbjs.oa.20.00111","DOI":"10.2106\/jbjs.oa.20.00111"},{"key":"4186_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1658","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2020.01.082","volume":"35","author":"MP Siljander","year":"2020","unstructured":"Siljander MP, Whaley JD, Koueiter DM et al (2020) Length of stay, discharge disposition, and 90-day complications and revisions following primary total hip arthroplasty: a comparison of the direct anterior, posterolateral, and direct superior approaches. J Arthroplasty 35:1658\u20131661. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2020.01.082","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"4186_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2021.02.016","author":"N Shohat","year":"2021","unstructured":"Shohat N, Goswami K, Clarkson S et al (2021) Direct anterior approach to the hip does not increase the risk for subsequent periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplasty. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2021.02.016","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"4186_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"473","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-008-0560-5","volume":"467","author":"J Palan","year":"2009","unstructured":"Palan J, Beard DJ, Murray DW et al (2009) Which approach for total hip arthroplasty: Anterolateral or posterior? Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:473\u2013477. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11999-008-0560-5","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"4186_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) PRISMA Checklist. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pmed1000097","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed1000097"},{"key":"4186_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"591","DOI":"10.1177\/1120700018759617","volume":"28","author":"C Tissot","year":"2018","unstructured":"Tissot C, Vautrin M, Luyet A, Borens O (2018) Are there more wound complications or infections with direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty? HIP Int 28:591\u2013598. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1120700018759617","journal-title":"HIP Int"},{"key":"4186_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1097\/CORR.0000000000000439","volume":"477","author":"KE Mjaaland","year":"2019","unstructured":"Mjaaland KE, Kivle K, Svenningsen S, Nordsletten L (2019) Do Postoperative results differ in a randomized trial between a direct anterior and a direct lateral approach in THA? Clin Orthop Relat Res 477:145\u2013155. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/CORR.0000000000000439","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"4186_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-016-1332-0","volume":"17","author":"T Ilchmann","year":"2016","unstructured":"Ilchmann T, Zimmerli W, Bolliger L et al (2016) Risk of infection in primary, elective total hip arthroplasty with direct anterior approach or lateral transgluteal approach: a prospective cohort study of 1104 hips. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 17:1\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12891-016-1332-0","journal-title":"BMC Musculoskelet Disord"},{"key":"4186_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"597","DOI":"10.1177\/1120700018825237","volume":"29","author":"GK Triantafyllopoulos","year":"2019","unstructured":"Triantafyllopoulos GK, Memtsoudis SG, Wang H et al (2019) Surgical approach does not affect deep infection rate after primary total hip arthroplasty. HIP Int 29:597\u2013602. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1120700018825237","journal-title":"HIP Int"},{"key":"4186_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"646","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.101B6.BJJ-2018-1474.R1","volume":"101B","author":"VK Aggarwal","year":"2019","unstructured":"Aggarwal VK, Elbuluk A, Dundon J et al (2019) Surgical approach significantly affects the complication rates associated with total hip arthroplasty. Bone Jt J 101B:646\u2013651. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/0301-620X.101B6.BJJ-2018-1474.R1","journal-title":"Bone Jt J"},{"key":"4186_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1780","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2018.01.014","volume":"33","author":"MR Angerame","year":"2018","unstructured":"Angerame MR, Fehring TK, Masonis JL et al (2018) Early failure of primary total hip arthroplasty: is surgical approach a risk factor? J Arthroplasty 33:1780\u20131785. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2018.01.014","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"4186_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"220","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2017.07.047","volume":"33","author":"RL Purcell","year":"2018","unstructured":"Purcell RL, Parks NL, Cody JP, Hamilton WG (2018) Comparison of wound complications and deep infections with direct anterior and posterior approaches in obese hip arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplasty 33:220\u2013223. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2017.07.047","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"4186_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"754","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.98B6.36608","volume":"98-B","author":"IA Malek","year":"2016","unstructured":"Malek IA, Royce G, Bhatti SU et al (2016) A comparison between the direct anterior and posterior approaches for total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 98-B:754\u2013760. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/0301-620X.98B6.36608","journal-title":"Bone Joint J"},{"key":"4186_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1839","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2014.04.036","volume":"29","author":"CP Christensen","year":"2014","unstructured":"Christensen CP, Karthikeyan T, Jacobs CA (2014) Greater prevalence of wound complications requiring reoperation with direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 29:1839\u20131841. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2014.04.036","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"4186_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1001","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2016.09.012","volume":"32","author":"S Eto","year":"2017","unstructured":"Eto S, Hwang K, Huddleston JI et al (2017) The direct anterior approach is associated with early revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 32:1001\u20131005. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2016.09.012","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"4186_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2681","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2019.06.046","volume":"34","author":"A Hart","year":"2019","unstructured":"Hart A, Wyles CC, Abdel MP et al (2019) Thirty-day major and minor complications following total hip arthroplasty\u2014a comparison of the direct anterior, lateral, and posterior approaches. J Arthroplasty 34:2681\u20132685. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2019.06.046","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"4186_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2296","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2015.06.016","volume":"30","author":"CD Watts","year":"2015","unstructured":"Watts CD, Houdek MT, Wagner ER et al (2015) High risk of wound complications following direct anterior total hip arthroplasty in obese patients. J Arthroplasty 30:2296\u20132298. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2015.06.016","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"4186_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3401","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-015-4230-0","volume":"473","author":"D Sheth","year":"2015","unstructured":"Sheth D, Cafri G, Inacio MCS et al (2015) Anterior and anterolateral approaches for tha are associated with lower dislocation risk without higher revision risk. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473:3401\u20133408. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11999-015-4230-0","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"4186_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jor.2016.10.025","volume":"14","author":"J Jelsma","year":"2017","unstructured":"Jelsma J, Pijnenburg R, Boons HW et al (2017) Limited benefits of the direct anterior approach in primary hip arthroplasty: A prospective single centre cohort study. J Orthop 14:53\u201358. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jor.2016.10.025","journal-title":"J Orthop"},{"key":"4186_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1421","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2017.11.053","volume":"33","author":"DY Ponzio","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ponzio DY, Poultsides LA, Salvatore A et al (2018) In-hospital morbidity and postoperative revisions after direct anterior vs posterior total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 33:1421-1425.e1. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2017.11.053","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"4186_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"157","DOI":"10.2174\/1874325001509010157","volume":"9","author":"S Tsukada","year":"2015","unstructured":"Tsukada S, Wakui M (2015) Lower dislocation rate following total hip arthroplasty via direct anterior approach than via posterior approach: five-year-average follow-up results. Open Orthop J 9:157\u2013162. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2174\/1874325001509010157","journal-title":"Open Orthop J"},{"key":"4186_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3652","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2017.07.008","volume":"32","author":"K Rykov","year":"2017","unstructured":"Rykov K, Reininga IHF, Sietsma MS et al (2017) Posterolateral vs direct anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty (POLADA Trial): a randomized controlled trial to assess differences in serum markers. J Arthroplasty 32:3652-3658.e1. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2017.07.008","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"4186_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"395","DOI":"10.1080\/17453674.2017.1317515","volume":"88","author":"WP Zijlstra","year":"2017","unstructured":"Zijlstra WP, De Hartog B, Van Steenbergen LN et al (2017) Effect of femoral head size and surgical approach on risk of revision for dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: An analysis of 166,231 procedures in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI). Acta Orthop 88:395\u2013401. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/17453674.2017.1317515","journal-title":"Acta Orthop"},{"key":"4186_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.i4919","author":"JA Sterne","year":"2016","unstructured":"Sterne JA, Hern\u00e1n MA, Reeves BC et al (2016) ROBINS-I: A tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.i4919","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"4186_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"712","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1445-2197.2003.02748.x","volume":"73","author":"K Slim","year":"2003","unstructured":"Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D et al (2003) Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 73:712\u2013716. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1046\/j.1445-2197.2003.02748.x","journal-title":"ANZ J Surg"},{"key":"4186_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/2325967119838533","author":"A \u00d6hlin","year":"2019","unstructured":"\u00d6hlin A, Karlsson L, Senorski EH et al (2019) Quality assessment of prospective cohort studies evaluating arthroscopic treatment for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: a systematic review. Orthop J Sport Med. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/2325967119838533","journal-title":"Orthop J Sport Med"},{"key":"4186_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.l4898","author":"JAC Sterne","year":"2019","unstructured":"Sterne JAC, Savovi\u0107 J, Page MJ et al (2019) RoB 2: A revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.l4898","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"4186_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"255","DOI":"10.1016\/0895-4356(92)90085-2","volume":"45","author":"AS Detsky","year":"1992","unstructured":"Detsky AS, Naylor CD, O\u2019Rourke K et al (1992) Incorporating variations in the quality of individual randomized trials into meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 45:255\u2013265. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0895-4356(92)90085-2","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"4186_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"909","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2010.08.014","volume":"26","author":"R Sharma","year":"2011","unstructured":"Sharma R, Farrokhyar F, McKnight LL et al (2011) Quality of assessment of randomized controlled trials in blood conservation after joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 26:909\u2013913. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2010.08.014","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"4186_CR58","unstructured":"Cochrane Training Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions | Cochrane Training. https:\/\/training.cochrane.org\/cochrane-handbook-systematic-reviews-interventions. Accessed 23 Feb 2021"},{"key":"4186_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"289","DOI":"10.1080\/17453674.2018.1438694","volume":"89","author":"LE Miller","year":"2018","unstructured":"Miller LE, Gondusky JS, Kamath AF et al (2018) Influence of surgical approach on complication risk in primary total hip arthroplasty: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Orthop 89:289\u2013294. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/17453674.2018.1438694","journal-title":"Acta Orthop"},{"key":"4186_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1449","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2017.12.005","volume":"33","author":"CI Esposito","year":"2018","unstructured":"Esposito CI, Carroll KM, Sculco PK et al (2018) Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients With Fixed Spinopelvic Alignment Are at Higher Risk of Hip Dislocation. J Arthroplasty 33:1449\u20131454. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2017.12.005","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"4186_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S57","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2019.01.012","volume":"34","author":"TA Luthringer","year":"2019","unstructured":"Luthringer TA, Vigdorchik JM (2019) A preoperative workup of a \u201chip-spine\u201d total hip arthroplasty patient: a simplified approach to a complex problem. J Arthroplasty 34:S57\u2013S70. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2019.01.012","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"4186_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000002126","author":"C Yue","year":"2015","unstructured":"Yue C, Kang P, Pei F (2015) Comparison of direct anterior and lateral approaches in total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA). Med (United States). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MD.0000000000002126","journal-title":"Med (United States)"},{"key":"4186_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S48","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2019.01.006","volume":"34","author":"CA DeCook","year":"2019","unstructured":"DeCook CA (2019) Outpatient joint arthroplasty: transitioning to the ambulatory surgery center. J Arthroplasty 34:S48\u2013S50. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2019.01.006","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"4186_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1941","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2020.02.022","volume":"35","author":"M Jaibaji","year":"2020","unstructured":"Jaibaji M, Volpin A, Haddad FS, Konan S (2020) Is outpatient arthroplasty safe? a systematic review. J Arthroplasty 35:1941\u20131949. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2020.02.022","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"4186_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1384","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2015.03.002","volume":"30","author":"MW Russo","year":"2015","unstructured":"Russo MW, Macdonell JR, Paulus MC et al (2015) Increased complications in obese patients undergoing direct anterior total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 30:1384\u20131387. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2015.03.002","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"4186_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2018.09.003","volume":"34","author":"NJ Greco","year":"2019","unstructured":"Greco NJ, Lombardi AV, Morris MJ et al (2019) Direct anterior approach and perioperative fracture with a single-taper wedge femoral component. J Arthroplasty 34:145\u2013150. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2018.09.003","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"4186_CR67","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2295","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2016.03.007","volume":"31","author":"KR Berend","year":"2016","unstructured":"Berend KR, Mirza AJ, Morris MJ, Lombardi AV (2016) Risk of periprosthetic fractures with direct anterior primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 31:2295\u20132298. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2016.03.007","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"}],"container-title":["Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00402-021-04186-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00402-021-04186-3\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00402-021-04186-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,5]],"date-time":"2022-10-05T12:19:23Z","timestamp":1664972363000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00402-021-04186-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,30]]},"references-count":67,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,10]]}},"alternative-id":["4186"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00402-021-04186-3","relation":{},"ISSN":["1434-3916"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1434-3916","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,30]]},"assertion":[{"value":"19 June 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"19 September 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"30 September 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"A.F.K. reports the following disclosures: research support (Signature Orthopaedics), paid presenter or speaker (DePuy Synthes and Zimmer Biomet), paid consultant (DePuy Synthes and Zimmer Biomet), stock or stock options (Zimmer Biomet, Johnson & Johnson, and Procter & Gamble), IP royalties (Innomed), and board or committee member (AAOS, AAHKS, and Anterior Hip Foundation). J.E.O. reports the following disclosures: board or committee member (AAHKS), paid consultant (Depuy), and research support (DePuy). A.J.A., L.T.S., M.T.D., and D.G. have nothing to disclose.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"Our analysis included de-identified information and therefore, IRB approval and patient consent were not required.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval\/informed consent"}}]}}