{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,20]],"date-time":"2026-10-20T06:05:03Z","timestamp":1792476303144,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":56,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"12","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,20]],"date-time":"2022-01-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1642636800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,20]],"date-time":"2022-01-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1642636800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Orthop Trauma Surg"],"DOI":"10.1007\/s00402-021-04302-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,19]],"date-time":"2022-01-19T19:03:46Z","timestamp":1642619026000},"page":"4075-4085","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":16,"title":["Post-operative peri-prosthetic fracture rates following the use of cemented polished taper-slip stems for primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"142","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2807-1965","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Kwaku","family":"Baryeh","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"David H.","family":"Sochart","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,20]]},"reference":[{"key":"4302_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.F.01538","author":"T Bhattacharyya","year":"2007","unstructured":"Bhattacharyya T, Chang D, Meigs JB et al (2007) Mortality after periprosthetic fracture of the femur. JBJS. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/JBJS.F.01538","journal-title":"JBJS"},{"key":"4302_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1949","DOI":"10.1016\/j.injury.2013.03.008","volume":"44","author":"EJ Griffiths","year":"2013","unstructured":"Griffiths EJ, Cash DJW, Kalra S, Hopgood PJ (2013) Time to surgery and 30-day morbidity and mortality of periprosthetic hip fractures. Injury 44:1949\u20131952. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.injury.2013.03.008","journal-title":"Injury"},{"key":"4302_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Lamb JN, Matharu GS, Redmond A, et al (2019) Patient and implant survival following intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures during primary total hip arthroplasty: an analysis from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man. Bone Jt J 101B: 1199\u20131208. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/0301-620X.101B10.BJJ-2018-1596.R1","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.101B10.BJJ-2018-1596.R1"},{"key":"4302_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1673","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-015-2721-y","volume":"39","author":"CC Sidler-Maier","year":"2015","unstructured":"Sidler-Maier CC, Waddell JP (2015) Incidence and predisposing factors of periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures: a literature review. Int Orthop 39:1673\u20131682. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00264-015-2721-y","journal-title":"Int Orthop"},{"key":"4302_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"558","DOI":"10.1302\/2058-5241.5.200003","volume":"5","author":"A Ramavath","year":"2020","unstructured":"Ramavath A, Lamb JN, Palan J et al (2020) Postoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture around total hip replacements: current concepts and clinical outcomes. EFORT Open Rev 5:558\u2013567. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/2058-5241.5.200003","journal-title":"EFORT Open Rev"},{"key":"4302_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"651","DOI":"10.1016\/j.injury.2007.02.048","volume":"38","author":"H Lindahl","year":"2007","unstructured":"Lindahl H (2007) Epidemiology of periprosthetic femur fracture around a total hip arthroplasty. Injury 38:651\u2013654. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.injury.2007.02.048","journal-title":"Injury"},{"key":"4302_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.M.00643","author":"TM Thien","year":"2014","unstructured":"Thien TM, Chatziagorou G, Garellick G et al (2014) Periprosthetic femoral fracture within two years after total hip replacement: analysis of 437,629 operations in the Nordic arthroplasty register association database. JBJS. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/JBJS.M.00643","journal-title":"JBJS"},{"key":"4302_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.99B1.BJJ-2016-0220.R1","volume":"99B","author":"AV Carli","year":"2017","unstructured":"Carli AV, Negus JJ, Haddad FS (2017) Hip arthroplasty: avoiding and managing problems periprosthetic femoral fractures and trying to avoid them what is the contribution of femoral component design to the increased risk of periprosthetic femoral fracture? Bone Jt J 99B:50\u201359. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/0301-620X.99B1.BJJ-2016-0220.R1","journal-title":"Bone Jt J"},{"key":"4302_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"461","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.98B4.37201","volume":"98B","author":"MP Abdel","year":"2016","unstructured":"Abdel MP, Watts CD, Houdek MT et al (2016) Epidemiology of periprosthetic fracture of the femur in 32 644 primary total hip arthroplasties: a 40-year experience. Bone Jt J 98B:461\u2013467. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/0301-620X.98B4.37201","journal-title":"Bone Jt J"},{"key":"4302_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"214","DOI":"10.1080\/17453674.2019.1582680","volume":"90","author":"HA Kazi","year":"2019","unstructured":"Kazi HA, Whitehouse SL, Howell JR, Timperley AJ (2019) Not all cemented hips are the same: a register-based (NJR) comparison of taper-slip and composite beam femoral stems. Acta Orthop 90:214\u2013219. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/17453674.2019.1582680","journal-title":"Acta Orthop"},{"key":"4302_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"655","DOI":"10.1016\/j.injury.2007.02.049","volume":"38","author":"J Franklin","year":"2007","unstructured":"Franklin J, Malchau H (2007) Risk factors for periprosthetic femoral fracture. Injury 38:655\u2013660. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.injury.2007.02.049","journal-title":"Injury"},{"key":"4302_CR12","unstructured":"Registry NJ (2020) National joint registry\u201417th Annual Report 2020. Natl Jt Regist"},{"key":"4302_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"594","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joca.2014.12.022","volume":"23","author":"D Culliford","year":"2015","unstructured":"Culliford D, Maskell J, Judge A et al (2015) Future projections of total hip and knee arthroplasty in the UK: results from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Osteoarthr Cartil 23:594\u2013600. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.joca.2014.12.022","journal-title":"Osteoarthr Cartil"},{"key":"4302_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Palan J, Smith MC, Gregg P, et al (2016) The influence of cemented femoral stem choice on the incidence of revision for periprosthetic fracture after primary total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of national joint registry data. Bone Jt J 98-B:1347\u20131354. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/0301-620X.98B10.36534","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.98B10.36534"},{"key":"4302_CR15","unstructured":"Briggs T (2015) A national review of adult elective orthopaedic services in England getting IT right first time"},{"key":"4302_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1053\/j.sart.2016.06.017","volume":"27","author":"TP Schmalzried","year":"2016","unstructured":"Schmalzried TP (2016) Not all cementless stems are created equal: a selection algorithm. Semin Arthroplasty 27:11\u201314. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1053\/j.sart.2016.06.017","journal-title":"Semin Arthroplasty"},{"key":"4302_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.n71","volume":"372","author":"MJ Page","year":"2021","unstructured":"Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372:n71. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.n71","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"4302_CR18","first-page":"293","volume":"44","author":"CP Duncan","year":"1995","unstructured":"Duncan CP, Masri BA (1995) Fractures of the femur after hip replacement. Instr Course Lect 44:293\u2013304","journal-title":"Instr Course Lect"},{"key":"4302_CR19","unstructured":"National Heart and Blood Institute L (2019) Study quality assessment tools [https:\/\/www.nhlbi.nih.gov\/health-topics\/study-quality-assessment-tools]"},{"key":"4302_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.3109\/17453674.2014.971388","volume":"86","author":"C Brod\u00e9n","year":"2015","unstructured":"Brod\u00e9n C, Mukka S, Muren O et al (2015) High risk of early periprosthetic fractures after primary hip arthroplasty in elderly patients using a cemented, tapered, polished stem: an observational, prospective cohort study on 1,403 hips with 47 fractures after mean follow-up time of 4 years. Acta Orthop 86:169\u2013174. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/17453674.2014.971388","journal-title":"Acta Orthop"},{"key":"4302_CR21","first-page":"292","volume":"84","author":"S Ghijselings","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ghijselings S, Simon JP, Corten K (2018) Is there a place for conservative treatment of a Vancouver B2 fracture around a cemented polished tapered stem? Acta Orthop Belg 84:292\u2013297","journal-title":"Acta Orthop Belg"},{"key":"4302_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1120","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2017.11.003","volume":"33","author":"T Scott","year":"2018","unstructured":"Scott T, Salvatore A, Woo P et al (2018) Polished, collarless, tapered, cemented stems for primary hip arthroplasty may exhibit high rate of periprosthetic fracture at short-term follow-up. J Arthroplasty 33:1120\u20131125. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2017.11.003","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"4302_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"531","DOI":"10.1080\/17453670510041529","volume":"76","author":"E Tsiridis","year":"2005","unstructured":"Tsiridis E, Narvani AA, Timperley JA, Gie GA (2005) Dynamic compression plates for Vancouver type B periprosthetic femoral fractures: a 3-year follow-up of 18 cases. Acta Orthop 76:531\u2013537. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/17453670510041529","journal-title":"Acta Orthop"},{"key":"4302_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"309","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.103B2.BJJ-2020-0695.R1","volume":"103-B","author":"MFR Powell-Bowns","year":"2021","unstructured":"Powell-Bowns MFR, Oag E, Ng N et al (2021) Vancouver B periprosthetic fractures involving the Exeter cemented stem. Bone Joint J 103-B:309\u2013320. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/0301-620X.103B2.BJJ-2020-0695.R1","journal-title":"Bone Joint J"},{"key":"4302_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"889","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.94B7.28799","volume":"94","author":"BJ Burston","year":"2012","unstructured":"Burston BJ, Barnett AJ, Amirfeyz R et al (2012) Clinical and radiological results of the collarless polished tapered stem at 15 years follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94:889\u2013894","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Br"},{"key":"4302_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"730","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.91B6.21627","volume":"91","author":"NC Carrington","year":"2009","unstructured":"Carrington NC, Sierra RJ, Gie GA et al (2009) The exeter universal cemented femoral component at 15 to 17 years: an update on the first 325 hips. J Bone Jt Surg Ser B 91:730\u2013737. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/0301-620X.91B6.21627","journal-title":"J Bone Jt Surg Ser B"},{"key":"4302_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1652","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-008-0289-1","volume":"466","author":"RE Cook","year":"2008","unstructured":"Cook RE, Jenkins PJ, Walmsley PJ et al (2008) Risk factors for periprosthetic fractures of the hip: a survivorship analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:1652\u20131656. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11999-008-0289-1","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"4302_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"94","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2004.08.012","volume":"20","author":"ET Ek","year":"2005","unstructured":"Ek ET, Choong PFM (2005) Comparison between triple-tapered and double-tapered cemented femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty: a prospective study comparing the C-Stem versus the Exeter Universal early results after 5 years of clinical experience. J Arthroplasty 20:94\u2013100","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"4302_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"511","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2009.02.002","volume":"24","author":"RSM Ling","year":"2009","unstructured":"Ling RSM, Charity J, Lee AJC et al (2009) The long-term results of the original Exeter polished cemented femoral component: a follow-up report. J Arthroplasty 24:511\u2013517","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"4302_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1441","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.98B11.37668","volume":"98-B","author":"TG Petheram","year":"2016","unstructured":"Petheram TG, Whitehouse SL, Kazi HA et al (2016) The exeter universal cemented femoral stem at 20 to 25 years. Bone Joint J 98-B:1441\u20131449. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/0301-620X.98B11.37668","journal-title":"Bone Joint J"},{"key":"4302_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1002","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.100B8.BJJ-2017-1535.R1","volume":"100B","author":"RW Westerman","year":"2018","unstructured":"Westerman RW, Whitehouse SL, Hubble MJW et al (2018) The Exeter V40 cemented femoral component at a minimum 10-year follow-up. Bone Jt J 100B:1002\u20131009. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/0301-620X.100B8.BJJ-2017-1535.R1","journal-title":"Bone Jt J"},{"key":"4302_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2194","DOI":"10.1016\/j.injury.2017.07.017","volume":"48","author":"ST Goudie","year":"2017","unstructured":"Goudie ST, Patil S, Patton JT, Keating JF (2017) Outcomes following osteosynthesis of periprosthetic hip fractures around cemented tapered polished stems. Injury 48:2194\u20132200. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.injury.2017.07.017","journal-title":"Injury"},{"key":"4302_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.90B1.19546","volume":"90","author":"PJ Yates","year":"2008","unstructured":"Yates PJ, Burston BJ, Whitley E, Bannister GC (2008) Collarless polished tapered stem: clinical and radiological results at a minimum of ten years\u2019 follow-up. J Bone Jt Surg Ser B 90:16\u201322. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/0301-620X.90B1.19546","journal-title":"J Bone Jt Surg Ser B"},{"key":"4302_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.99B2.38045","volume":"99","author":"M Schmitz","year":"2017","unstructured":"Schmitz M, Bronsema E, de Kam DCJ et al (2017) Results of the cemented Exeter femoral component in patients under the age of 40: an update at ten to 20 years\u2019 follow-up. Bone Joint J 99:192\u2013198","journal-title":"Bone Joint J"},{"key":"4302_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1118","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2006.01.008","volume":"21","author":"JJ Sherfey","year":"2006","unstructured":"Sherfey JJ, McCalden RW (2006) Mid-term results of exeter vs endurance cemented stems. J Arthroplasty 21:1118\u20131123. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2006.01.008","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"4302_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00005131-199704000-00006","author":"GJ McLauchlan","year":"1997","unstructured":"McLauchlan GJ, Robinson CM, Singer BR, Christie J (1997) Results of an operative policy in the treatment of periprosthetic femoral fracture. J Orthop Trauma. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00005131-199704000-00006","journal-title":"J Orthop Trauma"},{"key":"4302_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.20.01829","author":"EB Gausden","year":"2021","unstructured":"Gausden EB, Abdel MP, Mabry TM et al (2021) Midterm results of primary exeter cemented stem in a select patient population. JBJS. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/JBJS.20.01829","journal-title":"JBJS"},{"key":"4302_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2051","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2019.04.047","volume":"34","author":"F Diaz-Dilernia","year":"2019","unstructured":"Diaz-Dilernia F, Slullitel PA, O\u00f1ativia JI et al (2019) Impaction bone grafting or uncemented modular stems for the treatment of type b3 periprosthetic femoral fractures? A complication rate analysis. J Arthroplasty 34:2051\u20132057. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2019.04.047","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"4302_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1319","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.102B10.BJJ-2019-1454.R1","volume":"102","author":"F Khatun","year":"2020","unstructured":"Khatun F, Gill DF, Atrey A, Porteous M (2020) Exeter Universal cemented femoral component: a 20-year follow-up study from a district general hospital. Bone Jt J 102:1319\u20131323. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/0301-620X.102B10.BJJ-2019-1454.R1","journal-title":"Bone Jt J"},{"key":"4302_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1271","DOI":"10.1016\/j.injury.2011.01.008","volume":"42","author":"G Grammatopoulos","year":"2011","unstructured":"Grammatopoulos G, Pandit H, Kambouroglou G et al (2011) A unique peri-prosthetic fracture pattern in well fixed femoral stems with polished, tapered, collarless design of total hip replacement. Injury 42:1271\u20131276. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.injury.2011.01.008","journal-title":"Injury"},{"key":"4302_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"414","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.102B4.BJJ-2019-0656.R1","volume":"102 B","author":"DP Gwynne-Jones","year":"2020","unstructured":"Gwynne-Jones DP, Gray AR (2020) Cemented or uncemented acetabular fixation in combination with the Exeter Universal cemented stem. Bone Jt J 102 B:414\u2013422. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/0301-620X.102B4.BJJ-2019-0656.R1","journal-title":"Bone Jt J"},{"key":"4302_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/17453674.2019.1595390","author":"PB J\u00f8rgensen","year":"2019","unstructured":"J\u00f8rgensen PB, Lamm M, S\u00f8balle K, Stilling M (2019) Equivalent hip stem fixation by Hi-Fatigue G and Palacos R+ G bone cement: a randomized radiostereometric controlled trial of 52 patients with 2 years\u2019 follow-up. Acta Orthop. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/17453674.2019.1595390","journal-title":"Acta Orthop"},{"key":"4302_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1042","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2019.11.009","volume":"35","author":"P Keeling","year":"2020","unstructured":"Keeling P, Howell JR, Kassam AAM et al (2020) Long-term survival of the cemented exeter universal stem in patients 50 years and younger: an update on 130 Hips. J Arthroplasty 35:1042\u20131047. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2019.11.009","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"4302_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"427","DOI":"10.1080\/17453674.2019.1624339","volume":"90","author":"J Mohammed","year":"2019","unstructured":"Mohammed J, Mukka S, Hedbeck CJ et al (2019) Reduced periprosthetic fracture rate when changing from a tapered polished stem to an anatomical stem for cemented hip arthroplasty: an observational prospective cohort study with a follow-up of 2 years. Acta Orthop 90:427\u2013432. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/17453674.2019.1624339","journal-title":"Acta Orthop"},{"key":"4302_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1367","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2012.10.030","volume":"28","author":"B Purbach","year":"2013","unstructured":"Purbach B, Kay PR, Siney PD et al (2013) The C-stem in clinical practice: fifteen-year follow-up of a triple tapered polished cemented stem. J Arthroplasty 28:1367\u20131371. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2012.10.030","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"4302_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Schmitz MWJL, Timmer C, Rijnen WHC, et al (2013) Clinical and radiological outcome of the cemented Contemporary acetabular component in patients < 50 years of age. Bone Jt J 95B:1617\u20131625. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/0301-620X.95B12.31292","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.95B12.31292"},{"key":"4302_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2020-042371","volume":"10","author":"A Bottle","year":"2020","unstructured":"Bottle A, Griffiths R, White S et al (2020) Periprosthetic fractures: the next fragility fracture epidemic? A national observational study. BMJ Open 10:1\u201310. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2020-042371","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"4302_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"126","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2012.03.010","volume":"28","author":"JA Singh","year":"2013","unstructured":"Singh JA, Jensen MR, Harmsen SW, Lewallen DG (2013) Are gender, comorbidity, and obesity risk factors for postoperative periprosthetic fractures after primary total hip arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 28:126-131.e2. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2012.03.010","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"4302_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"139","DOI":"10.1177\/1457496914543979","volume":"104","author":"Y Zhu","year":"2015","unstructured":"Zhu Y, Chen W, Sun T et al (2015) Risk factors for the periprosthetic fracture after total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Surg 104:139\u2013145. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1457496914543979","journal-title":"Scand J Surg"},{"key":"4302_CR50","unstructured":"Listed N et al. (2019) National joint registry: national joint registry for England, wales and Northern Ireland; 16th Annual Report, 2019"},{"key":"4302_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1386","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.N.01141","volume":"97","author":"HM Kremers","year":"2014","unstructured":"Kremers HM, Larson DR, Crowson CS et al (2014) Prevalence of total hip and knee replacement in the United States. J Bone Jt Surg Am 97:1386\u20131397. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/JBJS.N.01141","journal-title":"J Bone Jt Surg Am"},{"key":"4302_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1080\/00016470410001708030","volume":"75","author":"R Sarvilinna","year":"2004","unstructured":"Sarvilinna R, Huhtala H, Sovelius R et al (2004) Factors predisposing to periprosthetic fracture after hip arthroplasty A case (n = 31)-control study. Acta Orthop Scand 75:16\u201320. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/00016470410001708030","journal-title":"Acta Orthop Scand"},{"key":"4302_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Drew JM, Griffin WL, Odum SM, et al (2016) Survivorship after periprosthetic femur fracture: factors affecting outcome. J Arthroplasty 31:1283\u20131288. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2015.11.038","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2015.11.038"},{"key":"4302_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Chatziagorou G, Lindahl H, K\u00e4rrholm J (2019) Surgical treatment of vancouver type B periprosthetic femoral fractures. Bone Joint J 101-B:1447\u20131458. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/0301-620X.101B11.BJJ-2019-0480.R2","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.101B11.BJJ-2019-0480.R2"},{"key":"4302_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1783","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2019.03.051","volume":"34","author":"C Fenelon","year":"2019","unstructured":"Fenelon C, Murphy EP, Baig MN et al (2019) Breaking bad: a comparative descriptive analysis of periprosthetic fractures around cemented and uncemented femoral stems. J Arthroplasty 34:1783\u20131786. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2019.03.051","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"4302_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1080\/17453674.2019.1574387","volume":"90","author":"G Chatziagorou","year":"2019","unstructured":"Chatziagorou G, Lindahl H, K\u00e4rrholm J (2019) The design of the cemented stem influences the risk of Vancouver type B fractures, but not of type C: an analysis of 82,837 Lubinus SPII and Exeter Polished stems. Acta Orthop 90:135\u2013142. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/17453674.2019.1574387","journal-title":"Acta Orthop"}],"container-title":["Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00402-021-04302-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00402-021-04302-3\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00402-021-04302-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,25]],"date-time":"2022-10-25T09:26:59Z","timestamp":1666690019000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00402-021-04302-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,20]]},"references-count":56,"journal-issue":{"issue":"12","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,12]]}},"alternative-id":["4302"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00402-021-04302-3","relation":{},"ISSN":["1434-3916"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1434-3916","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,20]]},"assertion":[{"value":"3 September 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"4 December 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"20 January 2022","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no conflicts of interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":5,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}}]}}