{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,30]],"date-time":"2026-10-30T20:23:06Z","timestamp":1793391786634,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":44,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,6]],"date-time":"2024-08-06T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1722902400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,6]],"date-time":"2024-08-06T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1722902400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"Alma Mater Studiorum - Universit\u00e0 di Bologna"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Orthop Trauma Surg"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Introduction<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic fractures (PFF) are associated with stem instability and often require a demanding stem implant revision (SR) or internal fixation (ORIF). This latter surgery is increasingly performed in the last few years instead of SR, but it is unclear which is the best treatment to manage PFF patients. The aim of this study is the compare the outcomes of B2\/B3 PFF managed by either ORIF or SR, by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis of current literature.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Materials and methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Cochrane Database, PubMed, Google Scholar and MEDLINE were examined to find out relevant publications dealing with the different outcomes of SR vs. ORIF in B2\/B3 PFF of the hip. The effect model (EM) was calculated using Cohen\u00b4s d index.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Fifteen studies were included, reporting on a total of 1629 patients (564 ORIF and 1065 SR). The pooled random EM estimates for reoperation was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.39\u20131.96; I2\u2009=\u200978%) in favor of ORIF surgery; EM for complications was 1.01 (95% CI, 0.45\u20132.27; I2\u2009=\u200985%) without difference among procedures. The EM for transfusion was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.46\u20131.12; I2\u2009=\u200962%) in favor of fixation.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>ORIF and SR were both suitable and effective options in PFF patients, being associated to similar complications rates. Our results show that ORIF performance in PFF patients is associated to significantly less in blood loss, surgical time and in-hospital stay. These advantages are particularly appealing in patients with multiple comorbidities.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00402-024-05469-1","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,6]],"date-time":"2024-08-06T13:08:23Z","timestamp":1722949703000},"page":"3787-3796","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":17,"title":["Stem revision vs. internal fixation in Vancouver B2\/B3 periprosthetic hip fractures: systematic review and metanalysis"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"144","author":[{"given":"Alberto","family":"Di Martino","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Matteo","family":"Brunello","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Eleonora","family":"Villari","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Claudio","family":"D\u2019Agostino","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Monica","family":"Cosentino","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Barbara","family":"Bordini","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Fabrizio","family":"Rivera","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Cesare","family":"Faldini","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,6]]},"reference":[{"key":"5469_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1673","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-015-2721-y","volume":"39","author":"CC Sidler-Maier","year":"2015","unstructured":"Sidler-Maier CC, Waddell JP (2015) Incidence and predisposing factors of periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures: a literature review. Int Orthop (SICOT) 39:1673\u20131682. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00264-015-2721-y","journal-title":"Int Orthop (SICOT)"},{"key":"5469_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1186\/s10195-022-00632-z","volume":"23","author":"A Di Martino","year":"2022","unstructured":"Di Martino A, Pederiva D, Bordini B et al (2022) Proximal femoral replacement for non-neoplastic conditions: a systematic review on current outcomes. J Orthop Traumatol 23:18. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s10195-022-00632-z","journal-title":"J Orthop Traumatol"},{"key":"5469_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1186\/s10195-022-00656-5","volume":"23","author":"Y Zhang","year":"2022","unstructured":"Zhang Y, Gao Z, Zhang B et al (2022) The application of custom-made 3D-printed titanium augments designed through surgical simulation for severe bone defects in complex revision total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Traumatol 23:37. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s10195-022-00656-5","journal-title":"J Orthop Traumatol"},{"key":"5469_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-023-07866-3","author":"A Di Martino","year":"2023","unstructured":"Di Martino A, Bordini B, Geraci G et al (2023) Impact of previous lumbar spine surgery on total hip arthroplasty and vice versa: how long should we be concerned about mechanical failure? Eur Spine J. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00586-023-07866-3","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"5469_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.11138\/ccmbm\/2017.14.1.189","volume":"14","author":"A Capone","year":"2017","unstructured":"Capone A, Congia S, Civinini R, Marongiu G (2017) Periprosthetic fractures: epidemiology and current treatment. Clin Cases Min Bone Metab 14:189\u2013196. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.11138\/ccmbm\/2017.14.1.189","journal-title":"Clin Cases Min Bone Metab"},{"key":"5469_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1576","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.90B12.20681","volume":"90","author":"F Rayan","year":"2008","unstructured":"Rayan F, Dodd M, Haddad FS (2008) European validation of the Vancouver classification of periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90:1576\u20131579. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/0301-620X.90B12.20681","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Br"},{"key":"5469_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"857","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2005.02.001","volume":"20","author":"H Lindahl","year":"2005","unstructured":"Lindahl H, Malchau H, Herberts P, Garellick G (2005) Periprosthetic femoral fractures classification and demographics of 1049 periprosthetic femoral fractures from the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Register. J Arthroplasty 20:857\u2013865. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2005.02.001","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"5469_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"215145932210976","DOI":"10.1177\/21514593221097608","volume":"13","author":"N Mondanelli","year":"2022","unstructured":"Mondanelli N, Troiano E, Facchini A et al (2022) Treatment algorithm of Periprosthetic Femoral Fracturens. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 13:21514593221097608. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/21514593221097608","journal-title":"Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil"},{"key":"5469_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.99B4.BJJ-2016-1311.R1","volume":"99\u2013B","author":"T Khan","year":"2017","unstructured":"Khan T, Grindlay D, Ollivere BJ et al (2017) A systematic review of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures. Bone Joint J 99\u2013B:17\u201325. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/0301-620X.99B4.BJJ-2016-1311.R1","journal-title":"Bone Joint J"},{"key":"5469_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1381","DOI":"10.1007\/s00402-020-03332-7","volume":"140","author":"K Stoffel","year":"2020","unstructured":"Stoffel K, Blauth M, Joeris A et al (2020) Fracture fixation versus revision arthroplasty in Vancouver type B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures: a systematic review. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 140:1381\u20131394. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00402-020-03332-7","journal-title":"Arch Orthop Trauma Surg"},{"key":"5469_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s12306-023-00792-z","author":"M Brunello","year":"2023","unstructured":"Brunello M, Di Martino A, Ruta F et al (2023) Which patient benefit most from minimally invasive direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty in terms of perioperative blood loss? A retrospective comparative study from a cohort of patients with primary degenerative hips. Musculoskelet Surg. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12306-023-00792-z","journal-title":"Musculoskelet Surg"},{"key":"5469_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"569","DOI":"10.3390\/clinpract13030052","volume":"13","author":"A Di Martino","year":"2023","unstructured":"Di Martino A, Brunello M, Pederiva D et al (2023) Fast track protocols and early Rehabilitation after surgery in total hip arthroplasty: a narrative review. Clin Pract 13:569\u2013582. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/clinpract13030052","journal-title":"Clin Pract"},{"key":"5469_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.1111\/ans.12884","volume":"85","author":"LB Solomon","year":"2015","unstructured":"Solomon LB, Hussenbocus SM, Carbone TA et al (2015) Is internal fixation alone advantageous in selected B2 periprosthetic fractures? ANZ J Surg 85:169\u2013173. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/ans.12884","journal-title":"ANZ J Surg"},{"key":"5469_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e2021581","DOI":"10.23750\/abm.v92iS3.12581","volume":"92","author":"G Canton","year":"2022","unstructured":"Canton G, Rasio N, kristan A et al (2022) Should age be a factor in treatment choice of periprosthetic Vancouver B2-B3 proximal femur fractures? A retrospective analysis of mortality and functional outcomes in elderly patients. Acta Biomed Atenei Parmensis 92:e2021581. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.23750\/abm.v92iS3.12581","journal-title":"Acta Biomed Atenei Parmensis"},{"key":"5469_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.18637\/jss.v036.i03","volume":"36","author":"W Viechtbauer","year":"2010","unstructured":"Viechtbauer W (2010) Conducting Meta-analyses in R with the metafor Package. J Stat Softw 36:1\u201348. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18637\/jss.v036.i03","journal-title":"J Stat Softw"},{"key":"5469_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.1136\/ebmental-2019-300117","volume":"22","author":"S Balduzzi","year":"2019","unstructured":"Balduzzi S, R\u00fccker G, Schwarzer G (2019) How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial. BMJ Ment Health 22:153\u2013160. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/ebmental-2019-300117","journal-title":"BMJ Ment Health"},{"key":"5469_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"021","DOI":"10.5301\/hip.2011.6301","volume":"21","author":"G Pavlou","year":"2011","unstructured":"Pavlou G, Panteliadis P, Macdonald D et al (2011) A review of 202 periprosthetic fractures - stem revision and allograft improves outcome for type B fractures. HIP Int 21:021\u2013029. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5301\/hip.2011.6301","journal-title":"HIP Int"},{"key":"5469_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"38","DOI":"10.1302\/2633-1462.41.BJO-2022-0145.R1","volume":"4","author":"H Takami","year":"2023","unstructured":"Takami H, Takegami Y, Tokutake K et al (2023) Mortality and clinical outcomes of Vancouver type B periprosthetic femoral fractures: a multicentre retrospective study. Bone Jt Open 4:38\u201346. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/2633-1462.41.BJO-2022-0145.R1","journal-title":"Bone Jt Open"},{"key":"5469_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2023.03.024","author":"GR Toci","year":"2023","unstructured":"Toci GR, Stambough JB, Martin JR et al (2023) Effect of fracture type, treatment and surgeon training on reoperation after Vancouver B Periprosthetic Femur fractures. J Arthroplasty S0883540323002553. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2023.03.024","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty S0883540323002553"},{"key":"5469_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1913","DOI":"10.1007\/s00068-021-01832-8","volume":"48","author":"P Pfl\u00fcger","year":"2022","unstructured":"Pfl\u00fcger P, Bolierakis E, Wurm M et al (2022) Revision rate is higher in patients with periprosthetic femur fractures following revision arthroplasty in comparison with ORIF following our algorithm: a two-center 1 analysis of 129 patients. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 48:1913\u20131918. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00068-021-01832-8","journal-title":"Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg"},{"key":"5469_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"215145931987685","DOI":"10.1177\/2151459319876859","volume":"10","author":"C Baum","year":"2019","unstructured":"Baum C, Leimbacher M, Kriechling P et al (2019) Treatment of Periprosthetic femoral fractures Vancouver Type B2: revision arthroplasty Versus Open reduction and internal fixation with locking Compression plate. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 10:2151459319876859. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/2151459319876859","journal-title":"Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil"},{"key":"5469_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e2021022","DOI":"10.23750\/abm.v92iS3.11734","volume":"92","author":"C Concina","year":"2021","unstructured":"Concina C, Crucil M, Gherlinzoni F (2021) Factors influencing results and complications in proximal periprosthetic femoral fractures: a retrospective study at 1- to 8-year follow-up. Acta Biomed 92:e2021022. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.23750\/abm.v92iS3.11734","journal-title":"Acta Biomed"},{"key":"5469_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1215","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.E.00457","volume":"88","author":"H Lindahl","year":"2006","unstructured":"Lindahl H, Garellick G, Regn\u00e9r H et al (2006) Three hundred and twenty-one periprosthetic femoral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:1215\u20131222. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/JBJS.E.00457","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"5469_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3589","DOI":"10.1007\/s00402-021-03953-6","volume":"142","author":"S Martinov","year":"2022","unstructured":"Martinov S, D\u2019ulisse S, Haumont E et al (2022) Comparative study of Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic fractures treated by internal fixation versus stem revision. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 142:3589\u20133597. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00402-021-03953-6","journal-title":"Arch Orthop Trauma Surg"},{"key":"5469_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1222","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.103B7.BJJ-2020-1809.R1","volume":"103\u2013B","author":"PA Slullitel","year":"2021","unstructured":"Slullitel PA, Garcia-Barreiro GG, O\u00f1ativia JI et al (2021) Selected Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures around cemented polished femoral components can be safely treated with osteosynthesis. Bone Joint J 103\u2013B:1222\u20131230. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/0301-620X.103B7.BJJ-2020-1809.R1","journal-title":"Bone Joint J"},{"key":"5469_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"871","DOI":"10.1007\/s00402-020-03568-3","volume":"141","author":"A Flury","year":"2021","unstructured":"Flury A, Hasler J, Pagenstert G et al (2021) Open reduction and internal fixation might be a valuable alternative to stem revision in Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures, irrespective of the stem\u2019s design. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 141:871\u2013878. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00402-020-03568-3","journal-title":"Arch Orthop Trauma Surg"},{"key":"5469_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"309","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.103B2.BJJ-2020-0695.R1","volume":"103\u2013B","author":"MFR Powell-Bowns","year":"2021","unstructured":"Powell-Bowns MFR, Oag E, Ng N et al (2021) Vancouver B and C periprosthetic fractures around the cemented Exeter Stem: sex is associate with fracture pattern. Bone Joint J 103\u2013B:309\u2013320. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/0301-620X.103B2.BJJ-2020-0695.R1","journal-title":"Bone Joint J"},{"key":"5469_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3318","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2021.05.003","volume":"36","author":"D Gonz\u00e1lez-Mart\u00edn","year":"2021","unstructured":"Gonz\u00e1lez-Mart\u00edn D, Pais-Brito JL, Gonz\u00e1lez-Casamayor S et al (2021) Periprosthetic hip fractures with a Loose Stem: open reduction and internal fixation Versus Stem Revision. J Arthroplasty 36:3318\u20133325. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2021.05.003","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"5469_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.102B3.BJJ-2019-0935.R1","volume":"102\u2013B","author":"H Zheng","year":"2020","unstructured":"Zheng H, Gu H, Shao H et al (2020) Treatment and outcomes of Vancouver type B periprosthetic femoral fractures: a retrospective study of 97 cases. Bone Joint J 102\u2013B:293\u2013300. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/0301-620X.102B3.BJJ-2019-0935.R1","journal-title":"Bone Joint J"},{"key":"5469_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"228","DOI":"10.1097\/BOT.0000000000002277","volume":"36","author":"A Barghi","year":"2022","unstructured":"Barghi A, Hanna P, Merchan N et al (2022) Outcomes after operative fixation of Vancouver B2 and B3 type periprosthetic fractures. J Orthop Trauma 36:228\u2013233. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BOT.0000000000002277","journal-title":"J Orthop Trauma"},{"key":"5469_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"124","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.105B2.BJJ-2022-0685.R1","volume":"105\u2013B","author":"S Jain","year":"2023","unstructured":"Jain S, Farook MZ, Aslam-Pervez N et al (2023) A multicentre comparative analysis of fixation versus revision surgery for periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty with a cemented polished taper-slip femoral component. Bone Joint J 105\u2013B:124\u2013134. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/0301-620X.105B2.BJJ-2022-0685.R1","journal-title":"Bone Joint J"},{"key":"5469_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3221","DOI":"10.1007\/s00402-021-04113-6","volume":"142","author":"MFR Powell-Bowns","year":"2022","unstructured":"Powell-Bowns MFR, Oag E, Martin D et al (2022) Vancouver B and C periprosthetic fractures around the cemented Exeter Stem: sex is associate with fracture pattern. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 142:3221\u20133228. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00402-021-04113-6","journal-title":"Arch Orthop Trauma Surg"},{"key":"5469_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"797","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.75B5.8376443","volume":"75","author":"MJ Parker","year":"1993","unstructured":"Parker MJ, Palmer CR (1993) A new mobility score for predicting mortality after hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75:797\u2013798. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/0301-620X.75B5.8376443","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Br"},{"key":"5469_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"737","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-196951040-00012","volume":"51","author":"WH Harris","year":"1969","unstructured":"Harris WH (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51:737\u2013755","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"5469_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1097\/BOT.0000000000002148","volume":"36","author":"DP Lewis","year":"2022","unstructured":"Lewis DP, Tarrant SM, Cornford L, Balogh ZJ (2022) Management of Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures, Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Versus Open reduction and internal fixation: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. J Orthop Trauma 36:7\u201316. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BOT.0000000000002148","journal-title":"J Orthop Trauma"},{"key":"5469_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Haider T, Hanna P, Mohamadi A et al (2021) Revision arthroplasty Versus Open reduction and internal fixation of Vancouver Type-B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures. JBJS Rev 9. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/JBJS.RVW.21.00008","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.RVW.21.00008"},{"key":"5469_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1007\/s00068-022-02032-8","volume":"49","author":"D Gonz\u00e1lez-Mart\u00edn","year":"2023","unstructured":"Gonz\u00e1lez-Mart\u00edn D, Hern\u00e1ndez-Castillejo LE, Herrera-P\u00e9rez M et al (2023) Osteosynthesis versus revision arthroplasty in Vancouver B2 periprosthetic hip fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 49:87\u2013106. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00068-022-02032-8","journal-title":"Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg"},{"key":"5469_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"395","DOI":"10.1016\/j.injury.2019.10.035","volume":"51","author":"SC Voeten","year":"2020","unstructured":"Voeten SC, Nijmeijer WS, Vermeer M et al (2020) Validation of the fracture mobility score against the Parker mobility score in hip fracture patients. Injury 51:395\u2013399. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.injury.2019.10.035","journal-title":"Injury"},{"issue":"Suppl 11","key":"5469_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S200","DOI":"10.1002\/acr.20549","volume":"63","author":"A Nilsdotter","year":"2011","unstructured":"Nilsdotter A, Bremander A (2011) Measures of hip function and symptoms: Harris Hip score (HHS), hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS), Oxford Hip score (OHS), Lequesne Index of Severity for Osteoarthritis of the hip (LISOH), and American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) hip and knee questionnaire. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 63(Suppl 11):S200\u2013207. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/acr.20549","journal-title":"Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)"},{"key":"5469_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"629","DOI":"10.1016\/j.injury.2010.01.102","volume":"41","author":"RG Zuurmond","year":"2010","unstructured":"Zuurmond RG, van Wijhe W, van Raay JJAM, Bulstra SK (2010) High incidence of complications and poor clinical outcome in the operative treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures: an analysis of 71 cases. Injury 41:629\u2013633. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.injury.2010.01.102","journal-title":"Injury"},{"key":"5469_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"184","DOI":"10.1177\/1120700018772163","volume":"29","author":"J Moreta","year":"2019","unstructured":"Moreta J, Uriarte I, Ormaza A et al (2019) Outcomes of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty in elderly patients. HIP Int 29:184\u2013190. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1120700018772163","journal-title":"HIP Int"},{"key":"5469_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"251","DOI":"10.22540\/JFSF-07-251","volume":"7","author":"E Papagrigorakis","year":"2022","unstructured":"Papagrigorakis E, Galanis A, Vlachos C et al (2022) Periprosthetic fracture of total hip replacement in patients with osteopetrosis: a case presentation and review of literature. J Frailty Sarcopenia Falls 7:251\u2013256. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.22540\/JFSF-07-251","journal-title":"J Frailty Sarcopenia Falls"},{"key":"5469_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Morgan S, Bourget-Murray J, Garceau S, Grammatopoulos G (2023) Revision total hip arthroplasty for periprosthetic fracture: epidemiology, outcomes, and factors associated with success. Annals Joint 8. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.21037\/aoj-23-16","DOI":"10.21037\/aoj-23-16"},{"key":"5469_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"124","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jor.2022.03.008","volume":"31","author":"JW Kennedy","year":"2022","unstructured":"Kennedy JW, Hrycaiczuk A, Ng NYB et al (2022) Cement-in-cement versus uncemented modular stem revision for Vancouver B2 periprosthetic fractures. J Orthop 31:124\u2013128. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jor.2022.03.008","journal-title":"J Orthop"}],"container-title":["Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00402-024-05469-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00402-024-05469-1\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00402-024-05469-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,23]],"date-time":"2024-09-23T02:04:18Z","timestamp":1727057058000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00402-024-05469-1"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,6]]},"references-count":44,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,8]]}},"alternative-id":["5469"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00402-024-05469-1","relation":{},"ISSN":["1434-3916"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1434-3916","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,6]]},"assertion":[{"value":"4 March 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"18 July 2024","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"6 August 2024","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}},{"value":"The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}]}}