{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,22]],"date-time":"2026-10-22T03:18:56Z","timestamp":1792639136763,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":66,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"11","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,9]],"date-time":"2024-09-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1725840000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,9]],"date-time":"2024-09-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1725840000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"Klinikum der Universit\u00e4t M\u00fcnchen"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Orthop Trauma Surg"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Introduction<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>In recent years, there has been an increasing demand for patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to assess the outcome following orthopedic surgery. But, we are lacking  a standard set of PROMs to assess the outcome of\u00a0hallux valgus surgery. The aim of this study was to analyze the chosen patient rated outcome scores used in studies reporting on hallux valgus surgery.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Materials and methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>The study was based on a previously published living systematic review. Included were prospective,\u00a0comparative studies of different surgical procedures or the same procedure for different degrees of deformity. Four common databases were searched for the last decade. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were made by two independent reviewers. Data assessed were the individual PROMs used to assess the outcome of hallux valgus surgery.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>46 studies (30 RCTs and 16 non-randomized prospective studies) met the inclusion criteria. The most commonly used clinical outcome measures were the AOFAS (55%) and the VAS (30%). No differences were found between frequency of the individual scores per the level of evidence or the type of osteotomy.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Based on a systematic literature review, the AOFAS and VAS are the most frequently used outcome tools in studies assessing the outcome following hallux valgus surgery. Based on the literature available, the MOXFQ is a more valid alternative.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Level of evidence<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Level I; systematic review of prospective comparative (level II) and randomized controlled trials (level I).<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00402-024-05523-y","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,9]],"date-time":"2024-09-09T12:02:10Z","timestamp":1725883330000},"page":"4745-4752","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":10,"title":["Patient-reported outcome measures in studies on hallux valgus surgery: what should be assessed"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"144","author":[{"given":"F. T.","family":"Spindler","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"S.","family":"Ettinger","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"D.","family":"Arbab","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"name":"D. A. F. Scientific Committee","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Christina","family":"Stukenborg-Colsman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sabine","family":"Ochman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Stefan","family":"Rammelt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hans","family":"Polzer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Natalia","family":"Gutteck","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Norbert","family":"Harrasser","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Christian","family":"Plaa\u00df","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6287-6206","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"S. F.","family":"Baumbach","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,9]]},"reference":[{"key":"5523_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ettinger S, Spindler FT, Savli M, committee DAFs, Baumbach SF (2023) Correction potential and outcome of various surgical procedures for hallux valgus surgery \u2013 a living systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg (under review). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00402-024-05521-0","DOI":"10.1007\/s00402-024-05521-0"},{"issue":"9","key":"5523_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"790","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rec.2021.07.010","volume":"74","author":"MJ Page","year":"2021","unstructured":"Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) 74(9):790\u2013799. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.rec.2021.07.010","journal-title":"Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed)"},{"issue":"3","key":"5523_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"508","DOI":"10.1590\/s0104-11692007000300023","volume":"15","author":"CM da Costa Santos","year":"2007","unstructured":"da Costa Santos CM, de Mattos Pimenta CA, Nobre MR (2007) The PICO strategy for the research question construction and evidence search. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem 15(3):508\u2013511. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1590\/s0104-11692007000300023","journal-title":"Rev Lat Am Enfermagem"},{"issue":"1","key":"5523_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200301000-00001","volume":"85","author":"JG Wright","year":"2003","unstructured":"Wright JG, Swiontkowski MF, Heckman JD (2003) Introducing levels of evidence to the journal. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85(1):1\u20133","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"5523_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"l4898","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.l4898","volume":"366","author":"JAC Sterne","year":"2019","unstructured":"Sterne JAC, Savovic J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I et al (2019) RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 366:l4898. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.l4898","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"5523_CR6","unstructured":"Wells GA, Wells G, Shea B, Shea B, O'Connell D, Peterson J et al (eds) (2014) The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses"},{"issue":"1","key":"5523_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6","DOI":"10.18621\/eurj.302186","volume":"4","author":"B Avcu","year":"2017","unstructured":"Avcu B, Akalin Y, Cevik N, \u00d6zt\u00fcrk A, Sahin N, \u00d6ztas S et al (2017) Scarf osteotomy or Mau osteotomy for correction of moderate to severe hallux valgus deformity: a prospective, randomized study. Eur Res J 4(1):6\u201315. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18621\/eurj.302186","journal-title":"Eur Res J"},{"issue":"1","key":"5523_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"157","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-016-0491-x","volume":"11","author":"C Biz","year":"2016","unstructured":"Biz C, Fosser M, Dalmau-Pastor M, Corradin M, Roda MG, Aldegheri R et al (2016) Functional and radiographic outcomes of hallux valgus correction by mini-invasive surgery with Reverdin-Isham and Akin percutaneous osteotomies: a longitudinal prospective study with a 48-month follow-up. J Orthop Surg Res 11(1):157. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13018-016-0491-x","journal-title":"J Orthop Surg Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"5523_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1053\/j.jfas.2018.07.012","volume":"58","author":"AV Boychenko","year":"2019","unstructured":"Boychenko AV, Solomin LN, Belokrylova MS, Tyulkin EO, Davidov DV, Krutko DM (2019) Hallux valgus correction with rotational scarf combined with adductor hallucis tendon transposition. J Foot Ankle Surg 58(1):34\u201337. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1053\/j.jfas.2018.07.012","journal-title":"J Foot Ankle Surg"},{"issue":"12","key":"5523_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1268","DOI":"10.1177\/1071100714550647","volume":"35","author":"R Buciuto","year":"2014","unstructured":"Buciuto R (2014) Prospective randomized study of chevron osteotomy versus Mitchell\u2019s osteotomy in hallux valgus. Foot Ankle Int 35(12):1268\u20131276. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1071100714550647","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Int"},{"issue":"11","key":"5523_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2933","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-021-05106-1","volume":"45","author":"JY Choi","year":"2021","unstructured":"Choi JY, Kim BH, Suh JS (2021) A prospective study to compare the operative outcomes of minimally invasive proximal and distal chevron metatarsal osteotomy for moderate-to-severe hallux valgus deformity. Int Orthop 45(11):2933\u20132943. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00264-021-05106-1","journal-title":"Int Orthop"},{"issue":"6","key":"5523_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e150","DOI":"10.7417\/CT.2016.1960","volume":"167","author":"L Di Giorgio","year":"2016","unstructured":"Di Giorgio L, Sodano L, Touloupakis G, De Meo D, Marcellini L (2016) Reverdin-Isham osteotomy versus Endolog system for correction of moderate hallux valgus deformity: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Ter 167(6):e150\u2013e154. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7417\/CT.2016.1960","journal-title":"Clin Ter"},{"issue":"3","key":"5523_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"359","DOI":"10.3390\/medicina58030359","volume":"58","author":"S Dragosloveanu","year":"2022","unstructured":"Dragosloveanu S, Popov VM, Cotor DC, Dragosloveanu C, Stoica CI (2022) Percutaneous chevron osteotomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Medicina (Kaunas) 58(3):359. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/medicina58030359","journal-title":"Medicina (Kaunas)"},{"issue":"4","key":"5523_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"469","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fas.2018.02.017","volume":"25","author":"O Elshazly","year":"2019","unstructured":"Elshazly O, Abdel Rahman AF, Fahmy H, Sobhy MH, Abdelhadi W (2019) Scarf versus long chevron osteotomies for the treatment of hallux valgus: a prospective randomized controlled study. Foot Ankle Surg 25(4):469\u2013477. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fas.2018.02.017","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"5523_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"486","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200403000-00005","volume":"86","author":"FW Faber","year":"2004","unstructured":"Faber FW, Mulder PG, Verhaar JA (2004) Role of first ray hypermobility in the outcome of the Hohmann and the Lapidus procedure. A prospective, randomized trial involving one hundred and one feet. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86(3):486\u2013495. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/00004623-200403000-00005","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"issue":"9","key":"5523_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1222","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.95B9.31560","volume":"95-B","author":"FW Faber","year":"2013","unstructured":"Faber FW, van Kampen PM, Bloembergen MW (2013) Long-term results of the Hohmann and Lapidus procedure for the correction of hallux valgus: a prospective, randomised trial with eight- to 11-year follow-up involving 101 feet. Bone Joint J 95-B(9):1222\u20131226. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/0301-620X.95B9.31560","journal-title":"Bone Joint J"},{"issue":"5","key":"5523_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"515","DOI":"10.1177\/1071100718818577","volume":"40","author":"A Frigg","year":"2019","unstructured":"Frigg A, Zaugg S, Maquieira G, Pellegrino A (2019) Stiffness and range of motion after minimally invasive chevron-akin and open scarf-akin procedures. Foot Ankle Int 40(5):515\u2013525. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1071100718818577","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Int"},{"issue":"7","key":"5523_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2305","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-013-2912-z","volume":"471","author":"S Giannini","year":"2013","unstructured":"Giannini S, Cavallo M, Faldini C, Luciani D, Vannini F (2013) The SERI distal metatarsal osteotomy and Scarf osteotomy provide similar correction of hallux valgus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(7):2305\u20132311. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11999-013-2912-z","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"issue":"19","key":"5523_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1585","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.M.00231","volume":"96","author":"M Glazebrook","year":"2014","unstructured":"Glazebrook M, Copithorne P, Boyd G, Daniels T, Lalonde KA, Francis P et al (2014) Proximal opening wedge osteotomy with wedge-plate fixation compared with proximal chevron osteotomy for the treatment of hallux valgus: a prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96(19):1585\u20131592. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/JBJS.M.00231","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"issue":"4","key":"5523_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"218","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fas.2013.05.002","volume":"19","author":"N Gutteck","year":"2013","unstructured":"Gutteck N, Wohlrab D, Zeh A, Radetzki F, Delank KS, Lebek S (2013) Comparative study of Lapidus bunionectomy using different osteosynthesis methods. Foot Ankle Surg 19(4):218\u2013221. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fas.2013.05.002","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"5523_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"594","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0032-1327933","volume":"150","author":"SG Hofstaetter","year":"2012","unstructured":"Hofstaetter SG, Schuh R, Trieb K, Trnka HJ (2012) Modified chevron osteotomy with lateral release and screw fixation for treatment of severe hallux deformity. Z Orthop Unfall 150(6):594\u2013600. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/s-0032-1327933","journal-title":"Z Orthop Unfall"},{"issue":"7","key":"5523_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"687","DOI":"10.1177\/1071100716639574","volume":"37","author":"RM Jeuken","year":"2016","unstructured":"Jeuken RM, Schotanus MG, Kort NP, Deenik A, Jong B, Hendrickx RP (2016) Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial comparing scarf to chevron osteotomy in hallux valgus correction. Foot Ankle Int 37(7):687\u2013695. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1071100716639574","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Int"},{"issue":"3","key":"5523_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"445","DOI":"10.1053\/j.jfas.2017.01.002","volume":"56","author":"CRJ Jowett","year":"2017","unstructured":"Jowett CRJ, Bedi HS (2017) Preliminary results and learning curve of the minimally invasive chevron akin operation for hallux valgus. J Foot Ankle Surg 56(3):445\u2013452. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1053\/j.jfas.2017.01.002","journal-title":"J Foot Ankle Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"5523_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"343","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-018-4006-8","volume":"43","author":"G Kaufmann","year":"2019","unstructured":"Kaufmann G, Dammerer D, Heyenbrock F, Braito M, Moertlbauer L, Liebensteiner M (2019) Minimally invasive versus open chevron osteotomy for hallux valgus correction: a randomized controlled trial. Int Orthop 43(2):343\u2013350. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00264-018-4006-8","journal-title":"Int Orthop"},{"issue":"10","key":"5523_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"873","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.19.00981","volume":"102","author":"G Kaufmann","year":"2020","unstructured":"Kaufmann G, Mortlbauer L, Hofer-Picout P, Dammerer D, Ban M, Liebensteiner M (2020) Five-year follow-up of minimally invasive distal metatarsal chevron osteotomy in comparison with the open technique: a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 102(10):873\u2013879. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/JBJS.19.00981","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"issue":"4","key":"5523_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2187","DOI":"10.21873\/invivo.12490","volume":"35","author":"G Kaufmann","year":"2021","unstructured":"Kaufmann G, Weiskopf D, Liebensteiner M, Ulmer H, Braito M, Endstrasser F et al (2021) Midterm results following minimally invasive distal chevron osteotomy: comparison with the minimally invasive Reverdin-Isham osteotomy by means of meta-analysis. In Vivo 35(4):2187\u20132196. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.21873\/invivo.12490","journal-title":"In Vivo"},{"issue":"5","key":"5523_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"880","DOI":"10.1053\/j.jfas.2018.12.031","volume":"58","author":"G Kiyak","year":"2019","unstructured":"Kiyak G, Esemenli T (2019) Should we use intermetatarsal angle as primary determinant to define the limits of distal chevron osteotomy? J Foot Ankle Surg 58(5):880\u2013885. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1053\/j.jfas.2018.12.031","journal-title":"J Foot Ankle Surg"},{"issue":"8","key":"5523_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"847","DOI":"10.1177\/1071100717706153","volume":"38","author":"T Klemola","year":"2017","unstructured":"Klemola T, Leppilahti J, Laine V, Pentikainen I, Ojala R, Ohtonen P et al (2017) Effect of first tarsometatarsal joint derotational arthrodesis on first ray dynamic stability compared to distal chevron osteotomy. Foot Ankle Int 38(8):847\u2013854. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1071100717706153","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Int"},{"issue":"6","key":"5523_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1111","DOI":"10.1053\/j.jfas.2015.07.022","volume":"54","author":"JM Lamo-Espinosa","year":"2015","unstructured":"Lamo-Espinosa JM, Fl\u00f3rez B, Villas C, Pons-Villanueva J, Bond\u00eda JM, Aquerreta JD et al (2015) The relationship between the sesamoid complex and the first metatarsal after hallux valgus surgery without lateral soft-tissue release: a prospective study. J Foot Ankle Surg 54(6):1111\u20131115. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1053\/j.jfas.2015.07.022","journal-title":"J Foot Ankle Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"5523_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1007\/s00402-011-1385-3","volume":"132","author":"P Lechler","year":"2012","unstructured":"Lechler P, Feldmann C, K\u00f6ck FX, Schaumburger J, Grifka J, Handel M (2012) Clinical outcome after Chevron-Akin double osteotomy versus isolated Chevron procedure: a prospective matched group analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132(1):9\u201313. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00402-011-1385-3","journal-title":"Arch Orthop Trauma Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"5523_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"202","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.97B2.34449","volume":"97-B","author":"KB Lee","year":"2015","unstructured":"Lee KB, Cho NY, Park HW, Seon JK, Lee SH (2015) A comparison of proximal and distal Chevron osteotomy, both with lateral soft-tissue release, for moderate to severe hallux valgus in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral correction: a prospective randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint J 97-B(2):202\u2013207. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/0301-620X.97B2.34449","journal-title":"Bone Joint J"},{"issue":"8","key":"5523_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"838","DOI":"10.1177\/1071100717704941","volume":"38","author":"M Lee","year":"2017","unstructured":"Lee M, Walsh J, Smith MM, Ling J, Wines A, Lam P (2017) Hallux valgus correction comparing percutaneous chevron\/akin (PECA) and open scarf\/akin osteotomies. Foot Ankle Int 38(8):838\u2013846. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1071100717704941","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Int"},{"key":"5523_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jot.2020.04.009","volume":"23","author":"SKK Ling","year":"2020","unstructured":"Ling SKK, Wu YM, Li C, Lui TH, Yung PS (2020) Randomised control trial on the optimal duration of non-weight-bearing walking after hallux valgus surgery. J Orthop Translat 23:61\u201366. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jot.2020.04.009","journal-title":"J Orthop Translat"},{"issue":"11","key":"5523_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1316","DOI":"10.1177\/1071100715595618","volume":"36","author":"B Loh","year":"2015","unstructured":"Loh B, Chen JY, Yew AK, Chong HC, Yeo MG, Tao P et al (2015) Prevalence of metatarsus adductus in symptomatic hallux valgus and its influence on functional outcome. Foot Ankle Int 36(11):1316\u20131321. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1071100715595618","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Int"},{"issue":"2","key":"5523_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fas.2015.05.012","volume":"22","author":"D Mahadevan","year":"2016","unstructured":"Mahadevan D, Lines S, Hepple S, Winson I, Harries W (2016) Extended plantar limb (modified) chevron osteotomy versus scarf osteotomy for hallux valgus correction: a randomised controlled trial. Foot Ankle Surg 22(2):109\u2013113. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fas.2015.05.012","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"5523_CR36","first-page":"280","volume":"80","author":"GA Matricali","year":"2014","unstructured":"Matricali GA, Vermeersch G, Busschots E, Fieuws S, Deschamps K (2014) Prospective randomized comparative study on V-Y and pants-over-vest capsulorraphy in chevron and scarf osteotomy. Acta Orthop Belg 80(2):280\u2013287","journal-title":"Acta Orthop Belg"},{"key":"5523_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7547\/20-071","author":"M Milczarek","year":"2021","unstructured":"Milczarek M, Nowak K, Tomasik B, Milczarek J, Laganowski P, Domzalski M (2021) Additional akin proximal phalanx procedure has a limited effect on the outcome of scarf osteotomy for hallux valgus surgery. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7547\/20-071","journal-title":"J Am Podiatr Med Assoc"},{"key":"5523_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fas.2021.03.024","author":"M Mosca","year":"2021","unstructured":"Mosca M, Russo A, Caravelli S, Massimi S, Vocale E, Grassi A et al (2021) Piezoelectric tools versus traditional oscillating saw for distal linear osteotomy in hallux valgus correction: triple-blinded, randomized controlled study. Foot Ankle Surg. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fas.2021.03.024","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Surg"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"5523_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"110","DOI":"10.1007\/s43465-020-00209-0","volume":"55","author":"E Palmanovich","year":"2021","unstructured":"Palmanovich E, Ohana N, David S, Small I, Hetsroni I, Amar E et al (2021) Distal chevron osteotomy vs the simple, effective, rapid, inexpensive technique (SERI) for mild to moderate isolated hallux valgus: a randomized controlled study. Indian J Orthop 55(Suppl 1):110\u2013118. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s43465-020-00209-0","journal-title":"Indian J Orthop"},{"issue":"4","key":"5523_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"510","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.95B4.30464","volume":"95-B","author":"HW Park","year":"2013","unstructured":"Park HW, Lee KB, Chung JY, Kim MS (2013) Comparison of outcomes between proximal and distal chevron osteotomy, both with supplementary lateral soft-tissue release, for severe hallux valgus deformity: a prospective randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint J 95-B(4):510\u2013516. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/0301-620X.95B4.30464","journal-title":"Bone Joint J"},{"issue":"21","key":"5523_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e158","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.L.01017","volume":"95","author":"YB Park","year":"2013","unstructured":"Park YB, Lee KB, Kim SK, Seon JK, Lee JY (2013) Comparison of distal soft-tissue procedures combined with a distal chevron osteotomy for moderate to severe hallux valgus: first web-space versus transarticular approach. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(21):e158. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/JBJS.L.01017","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"issue":"3","key":"5523_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"228","DOI":"10.1177\/1938640018782608","volume":"12","author":"S Patel","year":"2019","unstructured":"Patel S, Garg P, Fazal MA, Shahid MS, Park DH, Ray PS (2019) A comparison of two designs of postoperative shoe on function, satisfaction, and back pain after hallux valgus surgery. Foot Ankle Spec 12(3):228\u2013232. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1938640018782608","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Spec"},{"issue":"12","key":"5523_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1262","DOI":"10.1177\/1071100714548703","volume":"35","author":"I Pentikainen","year":"2014","unstructured":"Pentikainen I, Ojala R, Ohtonen P, Piippo J, Leppilahti J (2014) Preoperative radiological factors correlated to long-term recurrence of hallux valgus following distal chevron osteotomy. Foot Ankle Int 35(12):1262\u20131267. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1071100714548703","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Int"},{"issue":"3","key":"5523_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"356","DOI":"10.1053\/j.jfas.2014.08.001","volume":"54","author":"I Pentikainen","year":"2015","unstructured":"Pentikainen I, Piippo J, Ohtonen P, Junila J, Leppilahti J (2015) Role of fixation and postoperative regimens in the long-term outcomes of distal chevron osteotomy: a randomized controlled two-by-two factorial trial of 100 patients. J Foot Ankle Surg 54(3):356\u2013360. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1053\/j.jfas.2014.08.001","journal-title":"J Foot Ankle Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"5523_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"255","DOI":"10.1111\/os.12400","volume":"10","author":"SE Puchner","year":"2018","unstructured":"Puchner SE, Trnka HJ, Willegger M, Staats K, Holinka J, Windhager R et al (2018) Comparison of plantar pressure distribution and functional outcome after scarf and austin osteotomy. Orthop Surg 10(3):255\u2013263. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/os.12400","journal-title":"Orthop Surg"},{"issue":"11","key":"5523_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1539","DOI":"10.1007\/s00402-012-1585-5","volume":"132","author":"YA Radwan","year":"2012","unstructured":"Radwan YA, Mansour AM (2012) Percutaneous distal metatarsal osteotomy versus distal chevron osteotomy for correction of mild-to-moderate hallux valgus deformity. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132(11):1539\u20131546. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00402-012-1585-5","journal-title":"Arch Orthop Trauma Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"5523_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.1016\/j.aott.2018.02.008","volume":"52","author":"N Sahin","year":"2018","unstructured":"Sahin N, Cansabuncu G, Cevik N, Turker O, Ozkaya G, Ozkan Y (2018) A randomized comparison of the proximal crescentic osteotomy and rotational scarf osteotomy in the treatment of hallux valgus. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 52(4):261\u2013266. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.aott.2018.02.008","journal-title":"Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc"},{"issue":"2","key":"5523_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.1053\/j.jfas.2012.11.005","volume":"52","author":"A Saxena","year":"2013","unstructured":"Saxena A, St Louis M (2013) Medial locking plate versus screw fixation for fixation of the Ludloff osteotomy. J Foot Ankle Surg 52(2):153\u2013157. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1053\/j.jfas.2012.11.005","journal-title":"J Foot Ankle Surg"},{"issue":"8","key":"5523_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"982","DOI":"10.1177\/10711007211003565","volume":"42","author":"J Torrent","year":"2021","unstructured":"Torrent J, Baduell A, Vega J, Malagelada F, Luna R, Rabat E (2021) Open vs minimally invasive scarf osteotomy for hallux valgus correction: a randomized controlled trial. Foot Ankle Int 42(8):982\u2013993. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/10711007211003565","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Int"},{"issue":"3","key":"5523_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"255","DOI":"10.3944\/AOTT.2016.14.0272","volume":"50","author":"E Uygur","year":"2016","unstructured":"Uygur E, Ozkan NK, Akan K, Cift H (2016) A comparison of Chevron and Lindgren-Turan osteotomy techniques in hallux valgus surgery: a prospective randomized controlled study. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 50(3):255\u2013261. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3944\/AOTT.2016.14.0272","journal-title":"Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc"},{"issue":"1","key":"5523_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"26","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fas.2015.04.006","volume":"22","author":"JU Wester","year":"2016","unstructured":"Wester JU, Hamborg-Petersen E, Herold N, Hansen PB, Froekjaer J (2016) Open wedge metatarsal osteotomy versus crescentic osteotomy to correct severe hallux valgus deformity\u2014a prospective comparative study. Foot Ankle Surg 22(1):26\u201331. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fas.2015.04.006","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Surg"},{"key":"5523_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1475-925X-12-62","author":"H Windhagen","year":"2013","unstructured":"Windhagen H, Radtke K, Weizbauer A, Diekmann J, Noll Y, Kreimeyer U et al (2013) Biodegradable magnesium-based screw clinically equivalent to titanium screw in hallux valgus surgery: short term results of the first prospective, randomized, controlled clinical pilot study. BioMed Cent. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1475-925X-12-62","journal-title":"BioMed Cent"},{"issue":"7","key":"5523_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"349","DOI":"10.1177\/107110079401500701","volume":"15","author":"HB Kitaoka","year":"1994","unstructured":"Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, Nunley JA, Myerson MS, Sanders M (1994) Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int 15(7):349\u2013353. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/107110079401500701","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Int"},{"issue":"12","key":"5523_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1145","DOI":"10.3113\/FAI.2012.1145","volume":"33","author":"L Chen","year":"2012","unstructured":"Chen L, Lyman S, Do H, Karlsson J, Adam SP, Young E et al (2012) Validation of foot and ankle outcome score for hallux valgus. Foot Ankle Int 33(12):1145\u20131155. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3113\/FAI.2012.1145","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Int"},{"issue":"9","key":"5523_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"841","DOI":"10.3113\/FAI.2011.0841","volume":"32","author":"E Pinsker","year":"2011","unstructured":"Pinsker E, Daniels TR (2011) AOFAS position statement regarding the future of the AOFAS clinical rating systems. Foot Ankle Int 32(9):841\u2013842. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3113\/FAI.2011.0841","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Int"},{"issue":"10","key":"5523_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"779","DOI":"10.1177\/107110070102201003","volume":"22","author":"GP Guyton","year":"2001","unstructured":"Guyton GP (2001) Theoretical limitations of the AOFAS scoring systems: an analysis using Monte Carlo modeling. Foot Ankle Int 22(10):779\u2013787. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/107110070102201003","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Int"},{"issue":"2","key":"5523_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e012884","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2016-012884","volume":"7","author":"EM Van Lieshout","year":"2017","unstructured":"Van Lieshout EM, De Boer AS, Meuffels DE, Den Hoed PT, Van der Vlies CH, Tuinebreijer WE et al (2017) American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Score: a study protocol for the translation and validation of the Dutch language version. BMJ Open 7(2):e012884. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2016-012884","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"issue":"1","key":"5523_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1177\/107110070302400108","volume":"24","author":"NF SooHoo","year":"2003","unstructured":"SooHoo NF, Shuler M, Fleming LL, American Orthopaedic F, Ankle S (2003) Evaluation of the validity of the AOFAS clinical rating systems by correlation to the SF-36. Foot Ankle Int 24(1):50\u201355. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/107110070302400108","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Int"},{"issue":"5","key":"5523_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"624","DOI":"10.1177\/1071100720977842","volume":"42","author":"JM Sutherland","year":"2021","unstructured":"Sutherland JM, Albanese CM, Wing K, Zhang YJ, Younger A, Veljkovic A et al (2021) Effect of patient demographics on minimally important difference of ankle osteoarthritis scale among end-stage ankle arthritis patients. Foot Ankle Int 42(5):624\u2013632. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1071100720977842","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Int"},{"issue":"10","key":"5523_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"788","DOI":"10.1177\/107110070102201004","volume":"22","author":"EM Roos","year":"2001","unstructured":"Roos EM, Brandsson S, Karlsson J (2001) Validation of the foot and ankle outcome score for ankle ligament reconstruction. Foot Ankle Int 22(10):788\u2013794. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/107110070102201004","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Int"},{"issue":"2","key":"5523_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"88","DOI":"10.2519\/jospt.1998.28.2.88","volume":"28","author":"EM Roos","year":"1998","unstructured":"Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, Ekdahl C, Beynnon BD (1998) Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)\u2014development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 28(2):88\u201396. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2519\/jospt.1998.28.2.88","journal-title":"J Orthop Sports Phys Ther"},{"issue":"2","key":"5523_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"187","DOI":"10.3109\/17453674.2014.889979","volume":"85","author":"MC Coster","year":"2014","unstructured":"Coster MC, Bremander A, Rosengren BE, Magnusson H, Carlsson A, Karlsson MK (2014) Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Self-reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS) in forefoot, hindfoot, and ankle disorders. Acta Orthop 85(2):187\u2013194. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/17453674.2014.889979","journal-title":"Acta Orthop"},{"issue":"2","key":"5523_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"92","DOI":"10.1016\/j.foot.2011.02.002","volume":"21","author":"J Dawson","year":"2011","unstructured":"Dawson J, Boller I, Doll H, Lavis G, Sharp R, Cooke P et al (2011) The MOXFQ patient-reported questionnaire: assessment of data quality, reliability and validity in relation to foot and ankle surgery. Foot (Edinb) 21(2):92\u2013102. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.foot.2011.02.002","journal-title":"Foot (Edinb)"},{"issue":"7","key":"5523_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1211","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-006-0061-5","volume":"15","author":"J Dawson","year":"2006","unstructured":"Dawson J, Coffey J, Doll H, Lavis G, Cooke P, Herron M et al (2006) A patient-based questionnaire to assess outcomes of foot surgery: validation in the context of surgery for hallux valgus. Qual Life Res 15(7):1211\u20131222. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11136-006-0061-5","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"issue":"3","key":"5523_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fas.2018.01.003","volume":"25","author":"D Arbab","year":"2019","unstructured":"Arbab D, Kuhlmann K, Schnurr C, Luring C, Konig D, Bouillon B (2019) Comparison of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) and the Self-Reported Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (SEFAS) in patients with foot or ankle surgery. Foot Ankle Surg 25(3):361\u2013365. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fas.2018.01.003","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"5523_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"295","DOI":"10.1053\/j.jfas.2022.08.003","volume":"62","author":"CC Tan","year":"2023","unstructured":"Tan CC, Sayampanathan AA, Kwan YH, Yeo W, Yeo NEM (2023) Validity and reliability of the European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS) score in patients with hallux valgus in Singapore. J Foot Ankle Surg 62(2):295\u2013299. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1053\/j.jfas.2022.08.003","journal-title":"J Foot Ankle Surg"}],"container-title":["Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00402-024-05523-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00402-024-05523-y\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00402-024-05523-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,21]],"date-time":"2024-11-21T16:03:38Z","timestamp":1732205018000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00402-024-05523-y"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,9]]},"references-count":66,"journal-issue":{"issue":"11","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,11]]}},"alternative-id":["5523"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00402-024-05523-y","relation":{},"ISSN":["1434-3916"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1434-3916","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"4 March 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"26 August 2024","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"9 September 2024","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at  and declare: all authors had no financial support for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}}]}}