{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,11]],"date-time":"2026-10-11T22:06:45Z","timestamp":1791756405718,"version":"4.3.4"},"reference-count":41,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,3]],"date-time":"2026-06-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1780444800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,3]],"date-time":"2026-06-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1780444800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100006260","name":"Technion - Israel Institute of Technology","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100006260","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Orthop Trauma Surg"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femur fractures (PPFF) have posed significant treatment challenges due to stem instability and lack of adequate femoral bone stock. This study investigated subsidence, survivorship, and outcomes of Vancouver B2 and B3 fractures, based on the order in which revision stem placement and fracture reduction occurred during revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      This retrospective, cohort study included 46 rTHAs between June 2011 and April 2023. Included patients underwent rTHA for Vancouver B2 or B3 PPFF with minimum one-year radiographic and two-year clinical follow-up. All patients were treated with diaphyseal-engaging tapered fluted titanium stems and stem modularity decisions were based on surgeon preference. Cohorts were separated based on if stem placement (SF,\n                      <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u200919), or fracture reduction (RF,\n                      <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u200927) occurred first. Patient demographics, intraoperative information, and clinical and radiographic outcomes were collected.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      The SF and RF cohort showed no statistically significant differences in rate of subsidence \u22655\u00a0mm [26.3%[SF], 22.2%[RF],\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.749), rate of subsidence \u2265\u200910\u00a0mm (15.8%[SF], 14.8%[RF],\n                      <jats:italic>P\u2009=<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u20090.928), nor average subsidence (4.1\u00a0mm[SF], 4.4\u00a0mm[RF],\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.861). We found no statistically significant differences in surgery-related clinical outcomes or all-cause revision rates within a two-year follow-up period. The groups demonstrated comparable rates of procedure-related 90-day emergency department visits(\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.370) and readmissions(\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.712). The SF group underwent four revisions for three PJIs and one acetabular component aseptic loosening. The RF cohort underwent four revisions for one acetabular component aseptic loosening, one dislocation, one PPFF, and one PJI. Rates of all-cause revision were comparable(\n                      <jats:italic>P\u2009=<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u20090.583). There was one case within the RF cohort to explant the trochanteric plate with no revision of arthroplasty components.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The present analysis suggests the order in which intraoperative femoral stem implantation and fracture reduction occurs does not affect short-term clinical and radiographic outcomes. This intraoperative decision should be based upon patient anatomy, fracture patterns, and surgeon discretion.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00402-026-06351-y","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,3]],"date-time":"2026-06-03T09:37:13Z","timestamp":1780479433000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Does the order matter? Comparing the order of stem placement and fracture reduction in revision total hip arthroplasty for Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femur fractures"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"146","author":[{"given":"Sophia S.","family":"Antonioli","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Farouk","family":"Khury","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mitchell F.","family":"Kennedy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Muhammad A.","family":"Haider","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alexander","family":"Duke","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ran","family":"Schwarzkopf","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Vinay K.","family":"Aggarwal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,3]]},"reference":[{"key":"6351_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e2200112","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.OA.22.00112","volume":"8","author":"I Shichman","year":"2023","unstructured":"Shichman I, Roof M, Askew N, Nherera L, Rozell JC, Seyler TM et al (2023) Projections and Epidemiology of Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in Medicare Patients to 2040\u20132060. JB JS Open Access 8:e2200112. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/JBJS.OA.22.00112","journal-title":"JB JS Open Access"},{"key":"6351_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101152","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artd.2023.101152","volume":"21","author":"I Shichman","year":"2023","unstructured":"Shichman I, Askew N, Habibi A, Nherera L, Macaulay W, Seyler T et al (2023) Projections and Epidemiology of Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States to 2040\u20132060. Arthroplast Today 21:101152. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.artd.2023.101152","journal-title":"Arthroplast Today"},{"key":"6351_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S79","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2020.02.030","volume":"35","author":"AM Schwartz","year":"2020","unstructured":"Schwartz AM, Farley KX, Guild GN, Bradbury TL (2020) Projections and Epidemiology of Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States to 2030. J Arthroplasty 35:S79\u201385. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2020.02.030","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"6351_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"80","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-200403000-00012","volume":"420","author":"BA Masri","year":"2004","unstructured":"Masri BA, Meek RMD, Duncan CP (2004) Periprosthetic Fractures Evaluation and Treatment: Clinical Orthopaedics and. Relat Res 420:80\u201395. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00003086-200403000-00012","journal-title":"Relat Res"},{"key":"6351_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e27","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.ST.17.00007","volume":"7","author":"JA Rodriguez","year":"2017","unstructured":"Rodriguez JA, Berliner ZP, Williams CA, Robinson J, Hepinstall MS, Cooper HJ (2017) Management of Vancouver Type-B2 and B3 Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures: Restoring Femoral Length via Preoperative Planning and Surgical Execution Using a Cementless, Tapered, Fluted Stem. JBJS Essent Surg Techniques 7:e27. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/JBJS.ST.17.00007","journal-title":"JBJS Essent Surg Techniques"},{"key":"6351_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e63","DOI":"10.5435\/JAAOS-D-15-00664","volume":"25","author":"JA Scolaro","year":"2017","unstructured":"Scolaro JA, Schwarzkopf R (2017) Management of Interprosthetic Femur Fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 25:e63\u2013e69. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5435\/JAAOS-D-15-00664","journal-title":"J Am Acad Orthop Surg"},{"key":"6351_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Rozell JC, Delagrammaticas DE, Schwarzkopf R Interprosthetic femoral fractures: management challenges. ORR 2019;Volume 11:119\u2013128. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2147\/ORR.S209647","DOI":"10.2147\/ORR.S209647"},{"key":"6351_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S10","DOI":"10.1097\/BOT.0000000000001568","volume":"33","author":"JC Rozell","year":"2019","unstructured":"Rozell JC, Donegan DJ (2019) Periprosthetic Femur Fractures Around a Loose Femoral Stem. J Orthop Trauma 33:S10\u2013S13. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BOT.0000000000001568","journal-title":"J Orthop Trauma"},{"key":"6351_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.3928\/01477447-20250217-01","volume":"48","author":"BP Zitsch","year":"2025","unstructured":"Zitsch BP, Byrd JJ, Buckner B, Konigsberg BS, Hartman CW, Tapered (2025) Fluted, Titanium Stems in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. Orthopedics 48:79\u201386. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3928\/01477447-20250217-01","journal-title":"Orthopedics"},{"key":"6351_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1304","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2023.10.057","volume":"39","author":"TJ Baldwin","year":"2024","unstructured":"Baldwin TJ, Deckard ER, Buller LT, Meneghini RM (2024) Incidence and Predictors of Subsidence Using Modular, Tapered, Fluted Titanium Femoral Stems in Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 39:1304\u20131311. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2023.10.057","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"6351_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"551","DOI":"10.1302\/2633-1462.48.BJO-2022-0160.R1","volume":"4","author":"J Thomas","year":"2023","unstructured":"Thomas J, Shichman I, Ohanisian L, Stoops TK, Lawrence KW, Ashkenazi I et al (2023) Monoblock tapered stems in management of UCS B2 and B3 periprosthetic fractures in revision total hip arthroplasty. Bone Jt Open 4:551\u2013558. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/2633-1462.48.BJO-2022-0160.R1","journal-title":"Bone Jt Open"},{"key":"6351_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"475","DOI":"10.1177\/11207000211004383","volume":"32","author":"AA Koutalos","year":"2022","unstructured":"Koutalos AA, Varitimidis S, Malizos KN, Karachalios T (2022) Clinical, functional and radiographic outcomes after revision total hip arthroplasty with tapered fluted modular or non-modular stems: a systematic review. HIP Int 32:475\u2013487. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/11207000211004383","journal-title":"HIP Int"},{"key":"6351_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S299","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2020.03.008","volume":"35","author":"AJ Clair","year":"2020","unstructured":"Clair AJ, Gabor JA, Patel KS, Friedlander S, Deshmukh AJ, Schwarzkopf R (2020) Subsidence Following Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Modular and Monolithic Components. J Arthroplast 35:S299\u2013303. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2020.03.008","journal-title":"J Arthroplast"},{"key":"6351_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.1053\/j.sart.2017.03.010","volume":"27","author":"RP Nadeau","year":"2016","unstructured":"Nadeau RP, Garbuz DS (2016) Monoblock or modular tapered stems: Making the right choice. Semin Arthroplast 27:261\u2013263. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1053\/j.sart.2017.03.010","journal-title":"Semin Arthroplast"},{"key":"6351_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S292","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2019.03.007","volume":"34","author":"AJ Clair","year":"2019","unstructured":"Clair AJ, Cizmic Z, Vigdorchik JM, Poultsides LA, Schwarzkopf R, Rathod PA et al (2019) Nonmodular Stems Are a Viable Alternative to Modular Stems in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 34:S292\u2013S296. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2019.03.007","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"6351_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2967","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2018.05.006","volume":"33","author":"JA Parry","year":"2018","unstructured":"Parry JA, Hernandez NM, Berry DJ, Abdel MP, Yuan BJ (2018) Risk Factors for Subsidence of Modular Fluted Tapered Stems Used During Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Hip Fractures. J Arthroplast 33:2967\u20132970. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2018.05.006","journal-title":"J Arthroplast"},{"key":"6351_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1576","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.90B12.20681","volume":"90\u2013B","author":"F Rayan","year":"2008","unstructured":"Rayan F, Dodd M, Haddad FS (2008) European validation of the Vancouver classification of periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br Volume 90\u2013B:1576\u20131579. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/0301-620X.90B12.20681","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Br Volume"},{"key":"6351_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"438","DOI":"10.2340\/17453674.2023.18263","volume":"94","author":"A SATTAR","year":"2023","unstructured":"SATTAR A, K\u00c4RRHOLM J, M\u00d6LLER M (2023) Fracture pattern and risk factors for reoperation after treatment of 156 periprosthetic fractures around an anatomic cemented hip stem. Acta Orthop 94:438\u2013446. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2340\/17453674.2023.18263","journal-title":"Acta Orthop"},{"key":"6351_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"121","DOI":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2010.10.006","volume":"97","author":"J Girard","year":"2011","unstructured":"Girard J, Roche O, Wavreille G, Canovas F, Le B\u00e9guec P (2011) Stem subsidence after total hip revision: 183 cases at 5.9 years follow-up. Orthop Traumatology: Surg Res 97:121\u2013126. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.otsr.2010.10.006","journal-title":"Orthop Traumatology: Surg Res"},{"key":"6351_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"873","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.16.00423","volume":"99","author":"MP Abdel","year":"2017","unstructured":"Abdel MP, Cottino U, Larson DR, Hanssen AD, Lewallen DG, Berry DJ (2017) Modular Fluted Tapered Stems in Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 99:873\u2013881. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/JBJS.16.00423","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg"},{"key":"6351_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"599","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-013-2936-4","volume":"472","author":"MP Abdel","year":"2014","unstructured":"Abdel MP, Lewallen DG, Berry DJ (2014) Periprosthetic Femur Fractures Treated With Modular Fluted, Tapered Stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:599\u2013603. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11999-013-2936-4","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"6351_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e38614","DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.38614","volume":"15","author":"M Perry","year":"2023","unstructured":"Perry M, Rivera J-L, Wesolowski M, Eikani C, Lack W, Cohen J et al (2023) Treatment of Vancouver B2 Femur Fractures With Open Reduction Internal Fixation Versus Revision Arthroplasty. Cureus 15:e38614. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.38614","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"key":"6351_CR23","first-page":"293","volume":"44","author":"CP Duncan","year":"1995","unstructured":"Duncan CP, Masri BA (1995) Fractures of the femur after hip replacement. Instr Course Lect 44:293\u2013304","journal-title":"Instr Course Lect"},{"key":"6351_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Hannon CP, Abdel MP (2023) Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Modular Fluted Tapered Stem for a Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture. JBJS Essent Surg Tech 13. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/JBJS.ST.22.00023. e22.00023","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.ST.22.00023"},{"key":"6351_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"95","DOI":"10.1016\/s0020-1383(02)00257-7","volume":"34","author":"E Tsiridis","year":"2003","unstructured":"Tsiridis E, Haddad FS, Gie GA (2003) The management of periprosthetic femoral fractures around hip replacements. Injury 34:95\u2013105. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0020-1383(02)00257-7","journal-title":"Injury"},{"key":"6351_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3108","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2017.05.021","volume":"32","author":"Y Huang","year":"2017","unstructured":"Huang Y, Zhou Y, Shao H, Gu J, Tang H, Tang Q (2017) What Is the Difference Between Modular and Nonmodular Tapered Fluted Titanium Stems in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 32:3108\u20133113. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2017.05.021","journal-title":"J Arthroplast"},{"key":"6351_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"186","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-016-5091-x","volume":"475","author":"NA Sandiford","year":"2017","unstructured":"Sandiford NA, Garbuz DS, Masri BA, Duncan CP (2017) Nonmodular Tapered Fluted Titanium Stems Osseointegrate Reliably at Short Term in Revision THAs. Clin Orthop Relat Res 475:186\u2013192. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11999-016-5091-x","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"6351_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"13692","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-020-70626-6","volume":"10","author":"S Feng","year":"2020","unstructured":"Feng S, Zhang Y, Bao Y-H, Yang Z, Zha G-C, Chen X-Y (2020) Comparison of modular and nonmodular tapered fluted titanium stems in femoral revision hip arthroplasty: a minimum 6-year follow-up study. Sci Rep 10:13692. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-020-70626-6","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"key":"6351_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1188","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.21.01168","volume":"104","author":"CP Hannon","year":"2022","unstructured":"Hannon CP, Sheehan KP, Duong SQ, Yuan BJ, Lewallen DG, Berry DJ et al (2022) Modular Fluted Tapered Stems for Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures: Excellent Results in 171 Cases. J Bone Joint Surg 104:1188\u20131196. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/JBJS.21.01168","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg"},{"key":"6351_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"590","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-013-3087-3","volume":"472","author":"JT Munro","year":"2014","unstructured":"Munro JT, Garbuz DS, Masri BA, Duncan CP (2014) Tapered Fluted Titanium Stems in the Management of Vancouver B2 and B3 Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:590\u2013598. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11999-013-3087-3","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"6351_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1069","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2019.11.039","volume":"35","author":"JE Otero","year":"2020","unstructured":"Otero JE, Martin JR, Rowe TM, Odum SM, Mason JB (2020) Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Modular Tapered Fluted Stems for Femoral Revision for Paprosky III and IV Femoral Defects or Vancouver B2 and B3 Femoral Fractures. J Arthroplast 35:1069\u20131073. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2019.11.039","journal-title":"J Arthroplast"},{"key":"6351_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.I.01589","volume":"93","author":"D Lakstein","year":"2011","unstructured":"Lakstein D, Eliaz N, Levi O, Backstein D, Kosashvili Y, Safir O et al (2011) Fracture of Cementless Femoral Stems at the Mid-Stem Junction in Modular Revision Hip Arthroplasty Systems. J Bone Joint Surg 93:57\u201365. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/JBJS.I.01589","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg"},{"key":"6351_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1342","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2023.01.034","volume":"38","author":"B Passano","year":"2023","unstructured":"Passano B, Oakley CT, Lutes WB, Incavo SJ, Park KJ, Schwarzkopf R (2023) Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of a Monoblock Fluted Titanium-Tapered Stem for Paprosky IIIa, IIIb, and IV Femoral Bone Defects. J Arthroplast 38:1342\u20131348. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2023.01.034","journal-title":"J Arthroplast"},{"key":"6351_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"191","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.102B2.BJJ-2019-0743.R1","volume":"102\u2013B","author":"JA Gabor","year":"2020","unstructured":"Gabor JA, Padilla JA, Feng JE, Schnaser E, Lutes WB, Park KJ et al (2020) Short-term outcomes with the REDAPT monolithic, tapered, fluted, grit-blasted, forged titanium revision femoral stem. Bone Joint J 102\u2013B:191\u2013197. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/0301-620X.102B2.BJJ-2019-0743.R1","journal-title":"Bone Joint J"},{"key":"6351_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"102021","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcot.2022.102021","volume":"34","author":"E Pomeroy","year":"2022","unstructured":"Pomeroy E, Flynn SO, Grigoras M, Murphy TP, Stavrakis AI, Rowan FE (2022) Subsidence of monoblock and modular titanium fluted tapered stems in revision hip arthroplasty: A retrospective multicentre comparison study. J Clin Orthop Trauma 34:102021. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcot.2022.102021","journal-title":"J Clin Orthop Trauma"},{"key":"6351_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S223","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2023.03.034","volume":"38","author":"E Pomeroy","year":"2023","unstructured":"Pomeroy E, Lim JBT, Vasarhelyi EM, Naudie DDR, Lanting B, MacDonald SJ et al (2023) No Difference in Subsidence Between Modern Monoblock and Modular Titanium Fluted Tapered Femoral Stems. J Arthroplast 38:S223\u2013S228. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2023.03.034","journal-title":"J Arthroplast"},{"key":"6351_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1007\/s002640050006","volume":"24","author":"J R\u00f6sler","year":"2000","unstructured":"R\u00f6sler J, Perka C (2000) The effect of anatomical positional relationships on kinetic parameters after total hip replacement. Int Orthop 24:23\u201327. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s002640050006","journal-title":"Int Orthop"},{"key":"6351_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1270","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2009.07.013","volume":"24","author":"M-S Park","year":"2009","unstructured":"Park M-S, Lim Y-J, Chung W-C, Ham D-H, Lee S-H (2009) Management of Periprosthetic Femur Fractures Treated With Distal Fixation Using a Modular Femoral Stem Using an Anterolateral Approach. J Arthroplast 24:1270\u20131276. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2009.07.013","journal-title":"J Arthroplast"},{"key":"6351_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"43","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcot.2018.08.021","volume":"11","author":"S Yu","year":"2020","unstructured":"Yu S, Saleh H, Bolz N, Buza J, Iorio R, Rathod PA et al (2020) Re-revision total hip arthroplasty: Epidemiology and factors associated with outcomes. J Clin Orthop Trauma 11:43\u201346. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcot.2018.08.021","journal-title":"J Clin Orthop Trauma"},{"key":"6351_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1626","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2022.03.057","volume":"37","author":"NO Sarpong","year":"2022","unstructured":"Sarpong NO, Kaidi AC, Syku M, Mensah C, Blevins JL, Chalmers BP (2022) Survivorship and Risk Factors for Re-Revision after Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Aged\u2009\u2264\u200955 Years. J Arthroplasty 37:1626\u20131630. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2022.03.057","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"6351_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-200012000-00005","volume":"381","author":"TP Schmalzried","year":"2000","unstructured":"Schmalzried TP, Shepherd EF, Dorey FJ, Jackson WO, Dela Rosa M, Fa???vae F et al (2000) Wear Is a Function of Use, Not Time. Clin Orthop Relat Res 381:36\u201346. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00003086-200012000-00005","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"}],"container-title":["Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00402-026-06351-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00402-026-06351-y","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00402-026-06351-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,3]],"date-time":"2026-06-03T09:37:14Z","timestamp":1780479434000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00402-026-06351-y"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,3]]},"references-count":41,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,12]]}},"alternative-id":["6351"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00402-026-06351-y","relation":{},"ISSN":["1434-3916"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1434-3916","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"10 October 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"7 May 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"3 June 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}],"article-number":"209"}}