{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,7]],"date-time":"2026-10-07T15:04:40Z","timestamp":1791385480084,"version":"4.3.3"},"reference-count":25,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,7]],"date-time":"2026-10-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1791331200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,7]],"date-time":"2026-10-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1791331200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Orthop Trauma Surg"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To determine whether suture shape (flat-tape vs. round-wire) influences biomechanical performance at the suture-anchor\u2013bone interface in interference-fit anchors used for rotator cuff and glenoid labrum repair.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Four matched pairs of human cadaveric shoulders were used for the glenoid model, with six anchor sites per glenoid. Five matched pairs of cadaveric humeri were used for the rotator cuff model, with three anchor sites per humerus. Each model tested multiple suture-anchor constructs under cyclic loading followed by load-to-failure. Biomechanical outcomes included cyclic displacement, yield characteristics, ultimate failure strength, stiffness, and force at fixed displacements. A linear mixed-effects model was used to compare suture types, with suture type and anchor position as fixed effects and specimen as a random effect.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      In the glenoid\/labrum model, there were no significant differences among suture types in cyclic displacement (cycles 1, 50, or 100;\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.376, 0.101, 0.109), displacement at yield (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.406), yield force (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.880), force at 1\u00a0mm (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.264) or 5\u00a0mm (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.085), or ultimate failure strength (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.204). Stiffness (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.050) and force at 2\u00a0mm displacement (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.033) differed at the overall model level, however, no significant pairwise differences were observed. In the humerus\/rotator cuff model, displacement at cycle 50 (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.022) and cycle 100 (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.019) differed overall, although post hoc comparisons were not significant. Ultimate strength (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.037), yield force (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.012), and stiffness (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.005) differed among groups, with post hoc analysis showing greater ultimate strength, yield force, and stiffness for 2-mm FiberTape compared with 2-mm XbraidTT. No other pairwise comparisons were significant.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Suture shape did not meaningfully influence interference-fit fixation properties in the glenoid and humeral models evaluated in this study. Tape-type and round-type sutures demonstrated comparable biomechanical performance at the suture\u2013anchor interface within the tested constructs.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Level of evidence<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Controlled Laboratory Study.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00402-026-06524-9","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,7]],"date-time":"2026-10-07T14:43:05Z","timestamp":1791384185000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Round versus tape sutures with interference fit anchors perform similarly in cadaveric glenoid and greater tuberosity biomechanical testing"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"146","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0006-8907-7240","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"James D","family":"Dimitroff","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Conor","family":"Smith","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Stefan","family":"Hanish","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6968-5568","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Lasun O.","family":"Oladeji","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Will","family":"Bezold","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Clayton W","family":"Nuelle","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Matthew J","family":"Smith","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,7]]},"reference":[{"issue":"5","key":"6524_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1601","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asmr.2022.05.012","volume":"4","author":"TR Hoffman","year":"2022","unstructured":"Hoffman TR, Lamplot JD, McClish SJ, Payne C, Denard PJ (2022) Three Medial All Suture Anchors Improves Contact Force Compared to Two Hard Body Anchors in a Biomechanical Two-Tendon Rotator Cuff Tear Model. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 4(5):e1601\u2013e1607. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.asmr.2022.05.012","journal-title":"Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil"},{"issue":"744","key":"6524_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"eadd8273","DOI":"10.1126\/scitranslmed.add8273","volume":"16","author":"BP Marshall","year":"2024","unstructured":"Marshall BP, Ashinsky BG, Ferrer XE et al (2024) The subacromial bursa modulates tendon healing after rotator cuff injury in rats. Sci Transl Med 16(744):eadd8273. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/scitranslmed.add8273","journal-title":"Sci Transl Med"},{"key":"6524_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Wang E, Holmstrom JA, Moore ML, Koschmeder KT, Lin E, Hassebrock JD, By (2050) Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repairs Will Double While Open Repairs Will Decline to One-Fifth Based on United States Medicare Patients Aged 65 or Older. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg Off Publ Arthrosc Assoc N Am Int Arthrosc Assoc. Published online April 23, 2026. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/arj.70186","DOI":"10.1002\/arj.70186"},{"issue":"6","key":"6524_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.5435\/00124635-200606000-00003","volume":"14","author":"SS Burkhart","year":"2006","unstructured":"Burkhart SS, Lo IKY (2006) Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 14(6):333\u2013346. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5435\/00124635-200606000-00003","journal-title":"J Am Acad Orthop Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"6524_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"789","DOI":"10.1007\/s00776-012-0275-z","volume":"17","author":"A De Carli","year":"2012","unstructured":"De Carli A, Lanzetti RM, Monaco E, Labianca L, Mossa L, Ferretti A (2012) The failure mode of two reabsorbable fixation systems: Swivelock with Fibertape versus Bio-Corkscrew with Fiberwire in bovine rotator cuff. J Orthop Sci Off J Jpn Orthop Assoc 17(6):789\u2013795. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00776-012-0275-z","journal-title":"J Orthop Sci Off J Jpn Orthop Assoc"},{"issue":"4","key":"6524_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"232596711770121","DOI":"10.1177\/2325967117701212","volume":"5","author":"RW Liu","year":"2017","unstructured":"Liu RW, Lam PH, Shepherd HM, Murrell GAC (2017) Tape Versus Suture in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: Biomechanical Analysis and Assessment of Failure Rates at 6 Months. Orthop J Sports Med 5(4):2325967117701212. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/2325967117701212","journal-title":"Orthop J Sports Med"},{"issue":"9","key":"6524_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1705","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2018.03.004","volume":"27","author":"Y Ono","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ono Y, Joly DA, Thornton GM, Lo IKY (2018) Mechanical and imaging evaluation of the effect of sutures on tendons: tape sutures are protective to suture pulling through tendon. J Shoulder Elb Surg 27(9):1705\u20131710. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jse.2018.03.004","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elb Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"6524_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"264","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546521998318","volume":"50","author":"K Boksh","year":"2022","unstructured":"Boksh K, Haque A, Sharma A, Divall P, Singh H (2022) Use of Suture Tapes Versus Conventional Sutures for Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repairs: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 50(1):264\u2013272. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0363546521998318","journal-title":"Am J Sports Med"},{"issue":"8","key":"6524_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2619","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm14082619","volume":"14","author":"T Ke\u00e7eci","year":"2025","unstructured":"Ke\u00e7eci T, Polat Y, \u015eahin AA, Alparslan M, Sipahio\u011flu S, \u00c7\u0131rakl\u0131 A (2025) Comparison of All-Suture Anchors and Metal Anchors in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: Short-Term Clinical Outcomes and Anchor Pullout Risk. J Clin Med 14(8):2619. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/jcm14082619","journal-title":"J Clin Med"},{"issue":"11","key":"6524_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1622","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2012.04.150","volume":"28","author":"K Wieser","year":"2012","unstructured":"Wieser K, Farshad M, Vlachopoulos L, Ruffieux K, Gerber C, Meyer DC (2012) Suture slippage in knotless suture anchors as a potential failure mechanism in rotator cuff repair. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg Off Publ Arthrosc Assoc N Am Int Arthrosc Assoc 28(11):1622\u20131627. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2012.04.150","journal-title":"Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg Off Publ Arthrosc Assoc N Am Int Arthrosc Assoc"},{"issue":"2","key":"6524_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1067\/mse.2003.21","volume":"12","author":"CA Cummins","year":"2003","unstructured":"Cummins CA, Murrell GAC (2003) Mode of failure for rotator cuff repair with suture anchors identified at revision surgery. J Shoulder Elb Surg 12(2):128\u2013133. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1067\/mse.2003.21","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elb Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"6524_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e52","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2019.07.032","volume":"29","author":"C Rosso","year":"2020","unstructured":"Rosso C, Weber T, Dietschy A, de Wild M, M\u00fcller S (2020) Three anchor concepts for rotator cuff repair in standardized physiological and osteoporotic bone: a biomechanical study. J Shoulder Elb Surg 29(2):e52\u2013e59. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jse.2019.07.032","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elb Surg"},{"issue":"8","key":"6524_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1156","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2013.12.036","volume":"23","author":"FM Pfeiffer","year":"2014","unstructured":"Pfeiffer FM, Smith MJ, Cook JL, Kuroki K (2014) The histologic and biomechanical response of two commercially available small glenoid anchors for use in labral repairs. J Shoulder Elb Surg 23(8):1156\u20131161. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jse.2013.12.036","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elb Surg"},{"key":"6524_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clinbiomech.2018.10.002","volume":"60","author":"JH Lee","year":"2018","unstructured":"Lee JH, Itami Y, Hedayati B et al (2018) Biomechanical effects of position and angle of insertion for all-suture anchors in arthroscopic Bankart repair. Clin Biomech Bristol Avon 60:45\u201350. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.clinbiomech.2018.10.002","journal-title":"Clin Biomech Bristol Avon"},{"issue":"5","key":"6524_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"642","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2011.10.024","volume":"28","author":"AD Mazzocca","year":"2012","unstructured":"Mazzocca AD, Chowaniec D, Cote MP et al (2012) Biomechanical evaluation of classic solid and novel all-soft suture anchors for glenoid labral repair. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg Off Publ Arthrosc Assoc N Am Int Arthrosc Assoc 28(5):642\u2013648. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2011.10.024","journal-title":"Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg Off Publ Arthrosc Assoc N Am Int Arthrosc Assoc"},{"issue":"6","key":"6524_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1523","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2020.01.046","volume":"36","author":"L Lacheta","year":"2020","unstructured":"Lacheta L, Brady A, Rosenberg SI et al (2020) Biomechanical Evaluation of Knotless and Knotted All-Suture Anchor Repair Constructs in 4 Bankart Repair Configurations. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg Off Publ Arthrosc Assoc N Am Int Arthrosc Assoc 36(6):1523\u20131532. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2020.01.046","journal-title":"Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg Off Publ Arthrosc Assoc N Am Int Arthrosc Assoc"},{"issue":"1","key":"6524_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-025-09439-5","volume":"27","author":"WH Chang","year":"2025","unstructured":"Chang WH, Kuan FC, Chen Y, Hong CK, Su WR, Hsu KL (2025) Transosseous all-suture anchor fixation for bony Bankart lesions: a biomechanical study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 27(1):61. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12891-025-09439-5","journal-title":"BMC Musculoskelet Disord"},{"issue":"11","key":"6524_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1406","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2014.05.030","volume":"30","author":"D Hurwit","year":"2014","unstructured":"Hurwit D, Fanton G, Tella M, Behn A, Hunt KJ (2014) Viscoelastic properties of common suture material used for rotator cuff repair and arthroscopic procedures. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg Off Publ Arthrosc Assoc N Am Int Arthrosc Assoc 30(11):1406\u20131412. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2014.05.030","journal-title":"Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg Off Publ Arthrosc Assoc N Am Int Arthrosc Assoc"},{"issue":"3","key":"6524_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"708","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2019.08.048","volume":"36","author":"ME Taha","year":"2020","unstructured":"Taha ME, Schneider K, Clarke EC et al (2020) A Biomechanical Comparison of Different Suture Materials Used for Arthroscopic Shoulder Procedures. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg Off Publ Arthrosc Assoc N Am Int Arthrosc Assoc 36(3):708\u2013713. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2019.08.048","journal-title":"Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg Off Publ Arthrosc Assoc N Am Int Arthrosc Assoc"},{"issue":"2","key":"6524_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"186","DOI":"10.1016\/s0749-8063(98)70039-8","volume":"14","author":"CA Roth","year":"1998","unstructured":"Roth CA, Bartolozzi AR, Ciccotti MG et al (1998) Failure properties of suture anchors in the glenoid and the effects of cortical thickness. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg Off Publ Arthrosc Assoc N Am Int Arthrosc Assoc 14(2):186\u2013191. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0749-8063(98)70039-8","journal-title":"Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg Off Publ Arthrosc Assoc N Am Int Arthrosc Assoc"},{"issue":"11","key":"6524_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2805","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2020.06.010","volume":"36","author":"DP Trofa","year":"2020","unstructured":"Trofa DP, Ruder JA, Yeatts NC et al (2020) Cyclic and Load-to-Failure Properties of All-Suture Anchors in Human Cadaveric Shoulder Greater Tuberosities. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg Off Publ Arthrosc Assoc N Am Int Arthrosc Assoc 36(11):2805\u20132811. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2020.06.010","journal-title":"Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg Off Publ Arthrosc Assoc N Am Int Arthrosc Assoc"},{"issue":"12","key":"6524_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1270","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2006.08.019","volume":"22","author":"PB Wright","year":"2006","unstructured":"Wright PB, Budoff JE, Yeh ML, Kelm ZS, Luo ZP (2006) Strength of damaged suture: an in vitro study. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg Off Publ Arthrosc Assoc N Am Int Arthrosc Assoc 22(12):1270\u20131275e3. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2006.08.019","journal-title":"Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg Off Publ Arthrosc Assoc N Am Int Arthrosc Assoc"},{"issue":"11","key":"6524_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2047","DOI":"10.1016\/j.injury.2018.09.004","volume":"49","author":"L Huntington","year":"2018","unstructured":"Huntington L, Coles-Black J, Richardson M et al (2018) The use of suture-tape and suture-wire in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A comparative biomechanics study. Injury 49(11):2047\u20132052. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.injury.2018.09.004","journal-title":"Injury"},{"issue":"8","key":"6524_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"721","DOI":"10.1016\/s0268-0033(03)00122-0","volume":"18","author":"M Baleani","year":"2003","unstructured":"Baleani M, Schrader S, Veronesi CA, Rotini R, Giardino R, Toni A (2003) Surgical repair of the rotator cuff: a biomechanical evaluation of different tendon grasping and bone suture fixation techniques. Clin Biomech Bristol Avon 18(8):721\u2013729. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0268-0033(03)00122-0","journal-title":"Clin Biomech Bristol Avon"},{"issue":"5","key":"6524_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"907","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546508314793","volume":"36","author":"LJ Bisson","year":"2008","unstructured":"Bisson LJ, Manohar LM, Wilkins RD, Gurske-Deperio J, Ehrensberger MT (2008) Influence of suture material on the biomechanical behavior of suture-tendon specimens: a controlled study in bovine rotator cuff. Am J Sports Med 36(5):907\u2013912. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0363546508314793","journal-title":"Am J Sports Med"}],"container-title":["Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00402-026-06524-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00402-026-06524-9","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00402-026-06524-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,7]],"date-time":"2026-10-07T14:43:06Z","timestamp":1791384186000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00402-026-06524-9"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,7]]},"references-count":25,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,12]]}},"alternative-id":["6524"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00402-026-06524-9","relation":{},"ISSN":["1434-3916"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1434-3916","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,7]]},"assertion":[{"value":"24 May 2026","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"21 September 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"7 October 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"Dr. Clayton Nuelle reports consulting fees from Guidepoint Consulting and Arthrex, Inc.; honoraria for lectures, presentations, or educational activities from Arthrex, Inc., Vericel, Inc., and AO Foundation; support for attending meetings and\/or travel from AO North America, Arthroscopy Journal, and the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS); and leadership or committee roles with Arthroscopy Journal, the Arthroscopy Association of North America (AANA), the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), and AAOS. Dr. Matthew Smith reports royalties\/licenses from Johnson & Johnson MedTech and Ignite Orthopedics; consulting fees from Johnson & Johnson MedTech; participation on an advisory board for Johnson & Johnson MedTech; and stock or stock options in Ignite Orthopedics. All other authors declare that they have no competing interests.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","label":"Conflict of interest","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}}],"article-number":"362"}}