{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,15]],"date-time":"2026-10-15T11:04:35Z","timestamp":1792062275899,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":37,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2009,1,8]],"date-time":"2009-01-08T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1231372800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,9]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-008-0915-x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2009,1,7]],"date-time":"2009-01-07T01:09:50Z","timestamp":1231290590000},"page":"357-362","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":35,"title":["Comparison of the Bishop score, body mass index and transvaginal cervical length in predicting the success of labor induction"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"280","author":[{"given":"Yildiz","family":"Uyar","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gurcan","family":"Erbay","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Bilge Cetinkaya","family":"Demir","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yesim","family":"Baytur","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2009,1,8]]},"reference":[{"key":"915_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"623","DOI":"10.1046\/j.0960-7692.2001.00580.x","volume":"18","author":"GK Pandis","year":"2001","unstructured":"Pandis GK, Papageorghiou AT, Ramanathan VG, Thompson MO, Nicolaides KH (2001) Preinduction sonographic measurement of cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 18:623\u2013628. doi: 10.1046\/j.0960-7692.2001.00580.x","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"915_CR2","unstructured":"Crowley P (2003) Interventions for preventing or improving the outcome of delivery at or beyond term. The Cochrane Library, issue 2. http:\/\/www . update-software.com. Accessed 14 Dec 2003"},{"issue":"2","key":"915_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"224","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-199506000-00005","volume":"38","author":"A Fuentes","year":"1995","unstructured":"Fuentes A, Williams M (1995) Cervical assessment. Clin Obstet Gynecol 38(2):224\u2013231. doi: 10.1097\/00003081-199506000-00005","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"915_CR4","first-page":"266","volume":"24","author":"EH Bishop","year":"1964","unstructured":"Bishop EH (1964) Pelvic scoring for elective induction. Obstet Gynecol 24:266\u2013268","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"915_CR5","first-page":"269","volume":"10","author":"G Sadoul","year":"1981","unstructured":"Sadoul G, Beuret T, Lewin D (1981) The different elements constituting the Bishop score in the induction of labour with epidural analgesia (author\u2019s transl). J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 10(3):269\u2013273","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"},{"issue":"2","key":"915_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"214","DOI":"10.3109\/01443619209013646","volume":"79","author":"GM Jackson","year":"1992","unstructured":"Jackson GM, Ludmir J, Bader TJ (1992) The accuracy of digital examination and ultrasound in the evaluation of cervical length. Obstet Gynecol 79(2):214\u2013218","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"915_CR7","first-page":"635","volume":"48","author":"MJ Hughey","year":"1976","unstructured":"Hughey MJ, McElin TW, Bird CC (1976) An evaluation of preinduction scoring systems. Obstet Gynecol 48(6):635\u2013641","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"915_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"309","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.1987.tb01015.x","volume":"27","author":"K Dhall","year":"1987","unstructured":"Dhall K, Mittal SC, Kumar A (1987) Evaluation of preinduction scoring systems. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 27(4):309\u2013311. doi: 10.1111\/j.1479-828X.1987.tb01015.x","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"915_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"722","DOI":"10.3346\/jkms.2007.22.4.722","volume":"22","author":"KH Park","year":"2007","unstructured":"Park KH (2007) Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement in predicting failed labor induction and cesarean delivery for failure to progress in nulliparous women. J Korean Med Sci 22(4):722\u2013727","journal-title":"J Korean Med Sci"},{"issue":"7","key":"915_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"799","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340701409858","volume":"86","author":"AM G\u00f3mez Laencina","year":"2007","unstructured":"G\u00f3mez Laencina AM, S\u00e1nchez FG, Gimenez JH, Mart\u00ednez MS, Valverde Mart\u00ednez JA, Vizca\u00edno VM (2007) Comparison of ultrasonographic cervical length and the Bishop score in predicting successful labor induction. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 86(7):799\u2013804. doi: 10.1080\/00016340701409858","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"6","key":"915_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"521","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610600797459","volume":"26","author":"MR Elghorori","year":"2006","unstructured":"Elghorori MR, Hassan I, Dartey W, Abdel-Aziz E, Bradley M (2006) Comparison between subjective and objective assessments of the cervix before induction of labour. J Obstet Gynaecol 26(6):521\u2013526. doi: 10.1080\/01443610600797459","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"915_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"254","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2002.00643.x","volume":"19","author":"R Gabriel","year":"2002","unstructured":"Gabriel R, Darnaud T, Chalot F, Gonzalez N, Leymarie F, Quereux C (2002) Transvaginal sonography of the uterine cervix prior to labor induction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 19(3):254\u2013257. doi: 10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2002.00643.x","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"915_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1030","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.105399","volume":"182","author":"V Ware","year":"2000","unstructured":"Ware V, Raynor BD (2000) Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement as a predictor of successful labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182(5):1030\u20131032. doi: 10.1067\/mob.2000.105399","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"915_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"990","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(96)00321-3","volume":"88","author":"WJ Watson","year":"1996","unstructured":"Watson WJ, Stevens D, Welter S, Day D (1996) Factors predicting successful labor induction. Obstet Gynecol 88(6):990\u2013992. doi: 10.1016\/S0029-7844(96)00321-3","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"915_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1081","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(94)90040-X","volume":"171","author":"F Boozarjomehri","year":"1994","unstructured":"Boozarjomehri F, Timor-Tritsch I, Chao CR, Fox HE (1994) Transvaginal ultrasonographic evaluation of the cervix before labor: presence of cervical wedging is associated with shorter duration of induced labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 171(4):1081\u20131087","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"915_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"440","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-200009000-00004","volume":"43","author":"RK Edwards","year":"2000","unstructured":"Edwards RK, Richards DS (2000) Preinduction cervical assessment. Clin Obstet Gynecol 43(3):440\u2013446. doi: 10.1097\/00003081-200009000-00004","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"915_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"573","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-200609000-00017","volume":"49","author":"JM Crane","year":"2006","unstructured":"Crane JM (2006) Factors predicting labor induction success: a critical analysis. Clin Obstet Gynecol 49(3):573\u2013584. doi: 10.1097\/00003081-200609000-00017","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"915_CR18","unstructured":"RCOG 5 October 2006 press releases. http:\/\/www.rcog.org.uk\/index.asp?PageID=97&PressReleaseID=126"},{"issue":"8","key":"915_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1175","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.ijo.0801670","volume":"25","author":"NJ Sebire","year":"2001","unstructured":"Sebire NJ, Jolly M, Harris JP, Wadsworth J, Joffe M, Beard RW, Regan L, Robinson S (2001) Maternal obesity and pregnancy outcome: a study of 287,213 pregnancies in London. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 25(8):1175\u20131182. doi: 10.1038\/sj.ijo.0801670","journal-title":"Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord"},{"key":"915_CR20","first-page":"293","volume":"12","author":"B Abrams","year":"1988","unstructured":"Abrams B, Parker J (1988) Overweight and pregnancy complications. Int J Obes 12:293\u2013303","journal-title":"Int J Obes"},{"issue":"1","key":"915_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.165","volume":"22","author":"SM Rane","year":"2003","unstructured":"Rane SM, Pandis GK, Guirgis RR, Higgins B, Nicolaides KH (2003) Pre-induction sonographic measurement of cervical length in prolonged pregnancy: the effect of parity in the prediction of induction-to-delivery interval. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 22(1):40\u201344. doi: 10.1002\/uog.165","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"915_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"538","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1100","volume":"24","author":"SM Rane","year":"2004","unstructured":"Rane SM, Guirgis RR, Higgins B, Nicolaides KH (2004) The value of ultrasound in the prediction of successful induction of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 24(5):538\u2013549. doi: 10.1002\/uog.1100","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"7","key":"915_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"933","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2005.24.7.933","volume":"24","author":"L Rovas","year":"2005","unstructured":"Rovas L, Sladkevicius P, Strobel E, Valentin L (2005) Three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound assessment of the cervix for the prediction of successful induction of labor with prostaglandin in prolonged pregnancy. J Ultrasound Med 24(7):933\u2013939","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"issue":"5","key":"915_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"568","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.4018","volume":"29","author":"PC Tan","year":"2007","unstructured":"Tan PC, Vallikkannu N, Suguna S, Quek KF, Hassan J (2007) Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length vs. Bishop score in labor induction at term: tolerability and prediction of Cesarean delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 29(5):568\u2013573. doi: 10.1002\/uog.4018","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"915_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1016\/S0929-8266(98)00042-1","volume":"7","author":"R Gonen","year":"1998","unstructured":"Gonen R, Degani S, Ron A (1998) Prediction of successful induction of labor: comparison of transvaginal ultrasonography and the Bishop score. Eur J Ultrasound 7(3):183\u2013187. doi: 10.1016\/S0929-8266(98)00042-1","journal-title":"Eur J Ultrasound"},{"issue":"1","key":"915_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1016\/0028-2243(91)90039-N","volume":"40","author":"S Paterson-Brown","year":"1991","unstructured":"Paterson-Brown S, Fisk NM, Edmonds DK, Rodeck CH (1991) Preinduction cervical assessment by Bishop\u2019s score and transvaginal ultrasound. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 40(1):17\u201323","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol."},{"issue":"1","key":"915_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.166","volume":"22","author":"SM Rane","year":"2003","unstructured":"Rane SM, Guirgis RR, Higgins B, Nicolaides KH (2003) Pre-induction sonographic measurement of cervical length in prolonged pregnancy: the effect of parity in the prediction of the need for Cesarean section. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 22(1):45\u201348. doi: 10.1002\/uog.166","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"915_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"312","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.126200","volume":"187","author":"TK Young","year":"2002","unstructured":"Young TK, Woodmansee B (2002) Factors that are associated with cesarean delivery in a large private practice: the importance of prepregnancy body mass index and weight gain. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187(2):312\u2013318. doi: 10.1067\/mob.2002.126200","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"915_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"436","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.91.3.436","volume":"91","author":"JM Baeten","year":"2001","unstructured":"Baeten JM, Bukusi EA, Lambe M (2001) Pregnancy complications and outcomes among overweight and obese nulliparous women. Am J Public Health 91(3):436\u2013440. doi: 10.2105\/AJPH.91.3.436","journal-title":"Am J Public Health"},{"issue":"4 Pt 1","key":"915_CR30","first-page":"501","volume":"92","author":"R Cnattingius","year":"1998","unstructured":"Cnattingius R, Cnattingius S, Notzon FC (1998) Obstacles to reducing cesarean rates in a low-cesarean setting: the effect of maternal age, height, and weight. Obstet Gynecol 92(4 Pt 1):501\u2013506. doi: 10.1016\/S0029-7844(98)00244-0","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"915_CR31","first-page":"39","volume":"97","author":"PS Kaiser","year":"2001","unstructured":"Kaiser PS, Kirby RS (2001) Obesity as a risk factor for cesarean in a low-risk population. Obstet Gynecol 97(1):39\u201343. doi: 10.1016\/S0029-7844(00)01078-4","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2 Pt 1","key":"915_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"227","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000196508.11431.c0","volume":"107","author":"E Peregrine","year":"2006","unstructured":"Peregrine E, O\u2019Brien P, Omar R, Jauniaux E (2006) Clinical and ultrasound parameters to predict the risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol 107(2 Pt 1):227\u2013233","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"915_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"456","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0001-6349.2005.00620.x","volume":"84","author":"R Cnattingius","year":"2005","unstructured":"Cnattingius R, H\u00f6glund B, Kieler H (2005) Emergency cesarean delivery in induction of labor: an evaluation of risk factors. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 84(5):456\u2013462. doi: 10.1111\/j.0001-6349.2005.00620.x","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"6","key":"915_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"768","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00546.x","volume":"112","author":"TS Usha Kiran","year":"2005","unstructured":"Usha Kiran TS, Hemmadi S, Bethel J, Evans J (2005) Outcome of pregnancy in a woman with an increased body mass index. BJOG 112(6):768\u2013772. doi: 10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00546.x","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"2","key":"915_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"164","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.12.004","volume":"135","author":"G Braems","year":"2007","unstructured":"Braems G, Norhausen I (2007) Induction of labor with prostaglandins for medical reasons: determining explanatory variables of the induction to delivery time interval for vaginal deliveries and caesarean section. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 135(2):164\u2013169. doi: 10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.12.004","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"3","key":"915_CR36","first-page":"452","volume":"103","author":"FS Nuthalapaty","year":"2004","unstructured":"Nuthalapaty FS, Rouse DJ, Owen J (2004) The association of maternal weight with cesarean risk, labor duration, and cervical dilation rate during labor induction. Obstet Gynecol 103(3):452\u2013456","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"915_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"928","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.06.051","volume":"191","author":"W Kabiru","year":"2004","unstructured":"Kabiru W, Raynor BD (2004) Obstetric outcomes associated with increase in BMI category during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191(3):928\u2013932. doi: 10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.06.051","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-008-0915-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-008-0915-x\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-008-0915-x","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,28]],"date-time":"2019-05-28T13:53:46Z","timestamp":1559051626000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-008-0915-x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2009,1,8]]},"references-count":37,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,9]]}},"alternative-id":["915"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-008-0915-x","relation":{},"ISSN":["0932-0067","1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0932-0067","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-0711","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2009,1,8]]}}}