{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,20]],"date-time":"2026-02-20T17:24:37Z","timestamp":1771608277886,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":24,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2010,9,14]],"date-time":"2010-09-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1284422400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,8]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-010-1671-2","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2010,9,13]],"date-time":"2010-09-13T16:57:09Z","timestamp":1284397029000},"page":"337-341","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":11,"title":["Is induced labour in the nullipara associated with more maternal and perinatal morbidity?"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"284","author":[{"given":"Dan","family":"Selo-Ojeme","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Cathy","family":"Rogers","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ashok","family":"Mohanty","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Naseem","family":"Zaidi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Rose","family":"Villar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Panicos","family":"Shangaris","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2010,9,14]]},"reference":[{"key":"1671_CR1","unstructured":"Government Statistical Service for the Department of Health (2009) NHS maternity statistics, England: 2007\u20132008"},{"key":"1671_CR2","unstructured":"National Institute for Clinical Excellence (2001) Clinical guideline D: induction of labor. National Institute for Clinical Excellence, London"},{"issue":"2","key":"1671_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"240","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.119643","volume":"186","author":"H Cammu","year":"2002","unstructured":"Cammu H, Martens G, Ruyssinck G, Amy JJ (2002) Outcome after elective labor induction in nulliparous women: a matched cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 186(2):240\u2013244","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"1671_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"600","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(99)00377-4","volume":"94","author":"ST Seyb","year":"1999","unstructured":"Seyb ST, Berka RJ, Socol ML, Dooley SL (1999) Risk of caesarean delivery with elective induction of labour at term in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 94(4):600\u2013607","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"1671_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1511","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.07.001","volume":"191","author":"DA Luthy","year":"2004","unstructured":"Luthy DA, Malmgren JA, Zingheim RW (2004) Caesarean delivery after elective induction in nulliparous women: the physician effect. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191(5):1511\u20131515","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"1671_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"690","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000152338.76759.38","volume":"105","author":"FP Vrouenraets","year":"2005","unstructured":"Vrouenraets FP, Roumen FJ, Dehing CJ, van den Akker ES, Aarts MJ, Scheve EJ (2005) Bishop score and risk of caesarean delivery after induction of labour in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 105(4):690\u2013697","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"1671_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"698","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000157436.68847.3b","volume":"105","author":"A Vahratian","year":"2005","unstructured":"Vahratian A, Zhang J, Troendle JF, Sciscione AC, Hoffman MK (2005) Labour progression and risk of caesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas. Obstet Gynecol 105(4):698\u2013704","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3 Pt 1","key":"1671_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"628","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70265-6","volume":"180","author":"JD Yeast","year":"1999","unstructured":"Yeast JD, Jones A, Poskin M (1999) Induction of labour and the relationship to caesarean delivery: a review of 7001 consecutive inductions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180(3 Pt 1):628\u2013633","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"1671_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(98)00115-X","volume":"92","author":"M Prysak","year":"1998","unstructured":"Prysak M, Castronova FC (1998) Elective induction versus spontaneous labour: a case control analysis of safety and efficacy. Obstet Gynecol 92(1):47\u201352","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"1671_CR10","first-page":"CD004945","volume":"18","author":"AM G\u00fclmezoglu","year":"2006","unstructured":"G\u00fclmezoglu AM (2006) Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 18(4):CD004945","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"4","key":"1671_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"252","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00007","volume":"151","author":"AB Caughey","year":"2009","unstructured":"Caughey AB, Sundaram V, Kaimal AJ, Gienger A, Cheng YW, McDonald KM, Shaffer BL, Owens DK, Bravata DM (2009) Systematic review: elective induction of labor versus expectant management of pregnancy. Ann Intern Med 151(4):252\u2013263 W53\u2013W63 (review)","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"issue":"6","key":"1671_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1312","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(03)00342-9","volume":"101","author":"L Sanchez-Ramos","year":"2003","unstructured":"Sanchez-Ramos L, Olivier F, Delke I, Kaunitz AM (2003) Labor induction versus expectant management for postterm pregnancies: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 101(6):1312\u20131318","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"24","key":"1671_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1587","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199206113262402","volume":"326","author":"ME Hannah","year":"1992","unstructured":"Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hellmann J, Hewson S, Milner R, Willan A (1992) Induction of labor as compared with serial antenatal monitoring in post-term pregnancy. A randomized controlled trial. The Canadian Multicenter Post-term Pregnancy Trial Group. N Engl J Med 326(24):1587\u20131592 (Erratum in: N Engl J Med 30;327)","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"7\u20138","key":"1671_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"287","DOI":"10.1007\/s00508-005-0330-2","volume":"117","author":"B Bodner-Adler","year":"2005","unstructured":"Bodner-Adler B, Bodner K, Pateisky N, Kimberger O, Chalubinski K, Mayerhofer K, Husslein P (2005) Influence of labor induction on obstetric outcomes in patients with prolonged pregnancy: a comparison between elective labor induction and spontaneous onset of labor beyond term. Wien Klin Wochenschr 117(7\u20138):287\u2013292","journal-title":"Wien Klin Wochenschr"},{"issue":"4","key":"1671_CR15","first-page":"235","volume":"50","author":"JC Glantz","year":"2005","unstructured":"Glantz JC (2005) Elective induction vs. spontaneous labor associations and outcomes. J Reprod Med 50(4):235\u2013240","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"1671_CR16","first-page":"173","volume":"52","author":"L Beebe","year":"2007","unstructured":"Beebe L, Beaty C, Rayburn W (2007) Immediate neonatal outcomes after elective induction of labor. J Reprod Med 52(3):173\u2013175","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"issue":"6 Pt 1","key":"1671_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"917","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(00)00794-8","volume":"95","author":"AS Maslow","year":"2000","unstructured":"Maslow AS, Sweeny AL (2000) Elective induction of labor as a risk factor for cesarean delivery among low-risk women at term. Obstet Gynecol 95(6 Pt 1):917\u2013922","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"1671_CR18","unstructured":"National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2008) Clinical guideline D: induction of labor. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, London"},{"key":"1671_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lin MG, Rouse DJ (2006) Clinical obstetrics and gynaecology 49(3):585\u2013593","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-200609000-00018"},{"issue":"6","key":"1671_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"813","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-008-0818-x","volume":"276","author":"D Selo-Ojeme","year":"2009","unstructured":"Selo-Ojeme D, Pisal P, Lawal O, Rogers C, Shah A, Sinha S (2009) A randomised controlled trial of amniotomy and immediate oxytocin infusion versus amniotomy and delayed oxytocin infusion for induction of labor at term. Arch Gynaecol Obstet 276(6):813\u2013820","journal-title":"Arch Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"3","key":"1671_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"794","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(90)91070-S","volume":"63","author":"CH Egarter","year":"1990","unstructured":"Egarter CH, Husslein PW, Rayburn WF (1990) Uterine hyperstimulation after low dose prostaglandin E2 therapy: tocolytic treatment in 181 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 63(3):794\u2013796","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"1671_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"133","DOI":"10.1159\/000073771","volume":"56","author":"N Gemund van","year":"2003","unstructured":"van Gemund N, Hardeman A, Scherjon SA, Kanhai HH (2003) Intervention rates after elective induction of labor compared to labor with a spontaneous onset. A matched cohort study. Gynecol Obstet Invest 56(3):133\u2013138","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Invest"},{"issue":"1","key":"1671_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2702.2005.01481.x","volume":"16","author":"K Sv\u00e4rdby","year":"2007","unstructured":"Sv\u00e4rdby K, Nordstr\u00f6m L, Sellstr\u00f6m E (2007) Primiparas with or without oxytocin augmentation: a prospective descriptive study. J Clin Nurs 16(1):179\u2013184","journal-title":"J Clin Nurs"},{"key":"1671_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"281","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00012","volume":"151","author":"GA Macones","year":"2009","unstructured":"Macones GA (2009) Elective induction of labour: waking a sleeping dogma? Ann Intern Med 151:281\u2013282","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-010-1671-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-010-1671-2\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-010-1671-2","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,4]],"date-time":"2019-06-04T17:29:10Z","timestamp":1559669350000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-010-1671-2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2010,9,14]]},"references-count":24,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,8]]}},"alternative-id":["1671"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-010-1671-2","relation":{},"ISSN":["0932-0067","1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0932-0067","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-0711","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2010,9,14]]}}}