{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,3]],"date-time":"2026-08-03T16:41:05Z","timestamp":1785775265229,"version":"3.56.0"},"reference-count":22,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2010,11,16]],"date-time":"2010-11-16T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1289865600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,10]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-010-1745-1","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2010,11,15]],"date-time":"2010-11-15T01:35:16Z","timestamp":1289784916000},"page":"855-859","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Transvaginal ultrasound of cervical length and its correlation to digital cervical examination, time to spontaneous labor and mode of delivery"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"284","author":[{"given":"Chad A.","family":"Grotegut","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mordechai","family":"Dulitzki","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"John P.","family":"Gaughan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Reuven","family":"Achiron","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Eyal","family":"Schiff","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ossie","family":"Geifman-Holtzman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2010,11,16]]},"reference":[{"key":"1745_CR1","first-page":"266","volume":"24","author":"EH Bishop","year":"1964","unstructured":"Bishop EH (1964) Pelvic scoring for elective induction. Obstet Gynecol 24:266\u2013268","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"1745_CR2","first-page":"495","volume":"28","author":"EA Friedman","year":"1966","unstructured":"Friedman EA, Niswander KR, Bayonet-Rivera NP, Sachtleben MR (1966) Relation of prelabor evaluation to inducibility and the course of labor. Obstet Gynecol 28(4):495\u2013501","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"1745_CR3","first-page":"635","volume":"48","author":"MJ Hughey","year":"1976","unstructured":"Hughey MJ, McElin TW, Bird CC (1976) An evaluation of preinduction scoring systems. Obstet Gynecol 48(6):635\u2013641","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"1745_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"309","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.1987.tb01015.x","volume":"27","author":"K Dhall","year":"1987","unstructured":"Dhall K, Mittal SC, Kumar A (1987) Evaluation of preinduction scoring systems. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 27(4):309\u2013311","journal-title":"Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"9","key":"1745_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"567","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199602293340904","volume":"334","author":"JD Iams","year":"1996","unstructured":"Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, Mercer BM, Moawad A, Das A et al (1996) The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network. N Engl J Med 334(9):567\u2013572","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"5","key":"1745_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1361","DOI":"10.1067\/S0002-9378(03)00725-7","volume":"189","author":"FM Reis","year":"2003","unstructured":"Reis FM, Gervasi MT, Florio P, Bracalente G, Fadalti M, Severi FM et al (2003) Prediction of successful induction of labor at term: role of clinical history, digital examination, ultrasound assessment of the cervix, and fetal fibronectin assay. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189(5):1361\u20131367","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"1745_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(01)01386-2","volume":"98","author":"S Chandra","year":"2001","unstructured":"Chandra S, Crane JM, Hutchens D, Young DC (2001) Transvaginal ultrasound and digital examination in predicting successful labor induction. Obstet Gynecol 98(1):2\u20136","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"1745_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1081","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(94)90040-X","volume":"171","author":"F Boozarjomehri","year":"1994","unstructured":"Boozarjomehri F, Timor-Tritsch I, Chao CR, Fox HE (1994) Transvaginal ultrasonographic evaluation of the cervix before labor: presence of cervical wedging is associated with shorter duration of induced labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 171(4):1081\u20131087","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"1745_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"990","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(96)00321-3","volume":"88","author":"WJ Watson","year":"1996","unstructured":"Watson WJ, Stevens D, Welter S, Day D (1996) Factors predicting successful labor induction. Obstet Gynecol 88(6):990\u2013992","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"1745_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"623","DOI":"10.1046\/j.0960-7692.2001.00580.x","volume":"18","author":"GK Pandis","year":"2001","unstructured":"Pandis GK, Papageorghiou AT, Ramanathan VG, Thompson MO, Nicolaides KH (2001) Preinduction sonographic measurement of cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 18(6):623\u2013628","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"1745_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1030","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.105399","volume":"182","author":"V Ware","year":"2000","unstructured":"Ware V, Raynor BD (2000) Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement as a predictor of successful labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182(5):1030\u20131032","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1 Pt 1","key":"1745_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"108","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(00)70498-4","volume":"182","author":"P Rozenberg","year":"2000","unstructured":"Rozenberg P, Goffinet F, Hessabi M (2000) Comparison of the Bishop score, ultrasonographically measured cervical length, and fetal fibronectin assay in predicting time until delivery and type of delivery at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182(1 Pt 1):108\u2013113","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"1745_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"328","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.5254","volume":"31","author":"P Vankayalapati","year":"2008","unstructured":"Vankayalapati P, Sethna F, Roberts N, Ngeh N, Thilaganathan B, Bhide A (2008) Ultrasound assessment of cervical length in prolonged pregnancy: prediction of spontaneous onset of labor and successful vaginal delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 31(3):328\u2013331","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"1745_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"598","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.913","volume":"22","author":"G Ramanathan","year":"2003","unstructured":"Ramanathan G, Yu C, Osei E, Nicolaides KH (2003) Ultrasound examination at 37\u00a0weeks\u2019 gestation in the prediction of pregnancy outcome: the value of cervical assessment. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 22(6):598\u2013603","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"1745_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"748","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02849968","volume":"24","author":"A Yanik","year":"2007","unstructured":"Yanik A, Gulumser C, Tosun M (2007) Ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length in predicting mode of delivery after oxytocin induction. Adv Ther 24(4):748\u2013756","journal-title":"Adv Ther"},{"issue":"6","key":"1745_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"521","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610600797459","volume":"26","author":"MR Elghorori","year":"2006","unstructured":"Elghorori MR, Hassan I, Dartey W, Abdel-Aziz E, Bradley M (2006) Comparison between subjective and objective assessments of the cervix before induction of labour. J Obstet Gynaecol 26(6):521\u2013526","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"1745_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"214","DOI":"10.3109\/01443619209013646","volume":"79","author":"GM Jackson","year":"1992","unstructured":"Jackson GM, Ludmir J, Bader TJ (1992) The accuracy of digital examination and ultrasound in the evaluation of cervical length. Obstet Gynecol 79(2):214\u2013218","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"1745_CR18","first-page":"43","volume":"78","author":"WL Holcomb Jr","year":"1991","unstructured":"Holcomb WL Jr, Smeltzer JS (1991) Cervical effacement: variation in belief among clinicians. Obstet Gynecol 78(1):43\u201345","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"1745_CR19","first-page":"172","volume":"76","author":"JD Sonek","year":"1990","unstructured":"Sonek JD, Iams JD, Blumenfeld M, Johnson F, Landon M, Gabbe S (1990) Measurement of cervical length in pregnancy: comparison between vaginal ultrasonography and digital examination. Obstet Gynecol 76(2):172\u2013175","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"1745_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1002\/jcu.1870190204","volume":"19","author":"HF Andersen","year":"1991","unstructured":"Andersen HF (1991) Transvaginal and transabdominal ultrasonography of the uterine cervix during pregnancy. J Clin Ultrasound 19(2):77\u201383","journal-title":"J Clin Ultrasound"},{"issue":"1","key":"1745_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1159\/000089045","volume":"21","author":"G Daskalakis","year":"2006","unstructured":"Daskalakis G, Thomakos N, Hatziioannou L, Mesogitis S, Papantoniou N, Antsaklis A (2006) Sonographic cervical length measurement before labor induction in term nulliparous women. Fetal Diagn Ther 21(1):34\u201338","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"issue":"3","key":"1745_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"254","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2002.00643.x","volume":"19","author":"R Gabriel","year":"2002","unstructured":"Gabriel R, Darnaud T, Chalot F, Gonzalez N, Leymarie F, Quereux C (2002) Transvaginal sonography of the uterine cervix prior to labor induction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 19(3):254\u2013257","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-010-1745-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-010-1745-1\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-010-1745-1","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,28]],"date-time":"2019-05-28T13:54:10Z","timestamp":1559051650000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-010-1745-1"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2010,11,16]]},"references-count":22,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,10]]}},"alternative-id":["1745"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-010-1745-1","relation":{},"ISSN":["0932-0067","1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0932-0067","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-0711","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2010,11,16]]}}}