{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T08:17:26Z","timestamp":1759565846580},"reference-count":36,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,3,23]],"date-time":"2011-03-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1300838400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,12]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-011-1888-8","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,3,22]],"date-time":"2011-03-22T02:31:35Z","timestamp":1300761095000},"page":"1345-1349","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Role of fetal abdominal circumference as a prognostic parameter of perinatal complications"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"284","author":[{"given":"Sven","family":"Kehl","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Joachim","family":"Brade","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ulrike","family":"Schmidt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sebastian","family":"Berlit","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Michael K.","family":"Bohlmann","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Marc","family":"S\u00fctterlin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"J\u00f6rn","family":"Siemer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Amadeus","family":"Hornemann","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2011,3,23]]},"reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"1888_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1515\/JPM.2004.028","volume":"32","author":"J Kurmanavicius","year":"2004","unstructured":"Kurmanavicius J, Burkhardt T, Wisser J, Huch R (2004) Ultrasonographic fetal weight estimation: accuracy of formulas and accuracy of examiners by birth weight from 500 to 5000\u00a0g. J Perinat Med 32(2):155\u2013161","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"1888_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"241","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-009-1216-8","volume":"282","author":"MK Bohlmann","year":"2010","unstructured":"Bohlmann MK, Luedders DW, Beyer D, Kavallaris A, Baumann K, Diedrich K, Hornemann A (2010) Nulliparous patients with small stature delivering at term have an increased risk of secondary cesarean section. Arch Gynecol Obstet 282(3):241\u2013244. doi: 10.1007\/s00404-009-1216-8","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"4","key":"1888_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"247","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-994465","volume":"12","author":"HM Schrader","year":"1995","unstructured":"Schrader HM, Jovanovic-Peterson L, Bevier WC, Peterson CM (1995) Fasting plasma glucose and glycosylated plasma protein at 24 to 28\u00a0weeks of gestation predict macrosomia in the general obstetric population. Am J Perinatol 12(4):247\u2013251. doi: 10.1055\/s-2007-994465","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"issue":"4","key":"1888_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"558","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(95)00005-C","volume":"85","author":"KR Lipscomb","year":"1995","unstructured":"Lipscomb KR, Gregory K, Shaw K (1995) The outcome of macrosomic infants weighing at least 4500 grams: Los Angeles County\u00a0+\u00a0University of Southern California experience. Obstet Gynecol 85(4):558\u2013564. doi: 10.1016\/0029-7844(95)00005-C","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"1888_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1372","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2003.302","volume":"188","author":"SL Boulet","year":"2003","unstructured":"Boulet SL, Alexander GR, Salihu HM, Pass M (2003) Macrosomic births in the United States: determinants, outcomes, and proposed grades of risk. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188(5):1372\u20131378 (pii:S0002937803001327)","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"1888_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1215","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(95)91356-4","volume":"173","author":"JW Weeks","year":"1995","unstructured":"Weeks JW, Pitman T, Spinnato JA (1995) Fetal macrosomia: does antenatal prediction affect delivery route and birth outcome? Am J Obstet Gynecol 173(4):1215\u20131219 (pii:0002-9378(95)91356-4)","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"1888_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"332","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.12.020","volume":"193","author":"SP Chauhan","year":"2005","unstructured":"Chauhan SP, Grobman WA, Gherman RA, Chauhan VB, Chang G, Magann EF, Hendrix NW (2005) Suspicion and treatment of the macrosomic fetus: a review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193(2):332\u2013346. doi: 10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.12.020","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"1888_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1296","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.107382","volume":"183","author":"R Gonen","year":"2000","unstructured":"Gonen R, Bader D, Ajami M (2000) Effects of a policy of elective cesarean delivery in cases of suspected fetal macrosomia on the incidence of brachial plexus injury and the rate of cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183(5):1296\u20131300. doi: 10.1067\/mob.2000.107382","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"1888_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1007\/s004040050262","volume":"263","author":"K Wollschlaeger","year":"1999","unstructured":"Wollschlaeger K, Nieder J, K\u00f6ppe I, H\u00e4rtlein K (1999) A study of fetal macrosomia. Arch Gynecol Obstet 263(1\u20132):51\u201355","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"6","key":"1888_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"547","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-008-0630-7","volume":"278","author":"W Siggelkow","year":"2008","unstructured":"Siggelkow W, Boehm D, Skala C, Grosslercher M, Schmidt M, Koelbl H (2008) The influence of macrosomia on the duration of labor, the mode of delivery and intrapartum complications. Arch Gynecol Obstet 278(6):547\u2013553. doi: 10.1007\/s00404-008-0630-7","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"3","key":"1888_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"225","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-008-0566-y","volume":"278","author":"D Sadeh-Mestechkin","year":"2008","unstructured":"Sadeh-Mestechkin D, Walfisch A, Shachar R, Shoham-Vardi I, Vardi H, Hallak M (2008) Suspected macrosomia? Better not tell. Arch Gynecol Obstet 278(3):225\u2013230. doi: 10.1007\/s00404-008-0566-y","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"2","key":"1888_CR12","first-page":"302","volume":"63","author":"MA Zamorski","year":"2001","unstructured":"Zamorski MA, Biggs WS (2001) Management of suspected fetal macrosomia. Am Fam Physician 63(2):302\u2013306","journal-title":"Am Fam Physician"},{"issue":"1","key":"1888_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"42","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.7493","volume":"35","author":"NC Hart","year":"2010","unstructured":"Hart NC, Hilbert A, Meurer B, Schrauder M, Schmid M, Siemer J, Voigt M, Schild RL (2010) Macrosomia: a new formula for optimized fetal weight estimation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 35(1):42\u201347. doi: 10.1002\/uog.7493","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"1888_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kehl S, K\u00f6rber C, Hart N, Goecke T, Schild R, Siemer J (2010) New sonographic method for fetuses with large abdominal circumference improves fetal weight estimation. Ultraschall in Med. doi: 10.1055\/s-0029-1245834 [Epub ahead of print]","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0029-1245834"},{"issue":"2","key":"1888_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-963165","volume":"29","author":"J Siemer","year":"2008","unstructured":"Siemer J, Egger N, Hart N, Meurer B, Muller A, Dathe O, Goecke T, Schild RL (2008) Fetal weight estimation by ultrasound: comparison of 11 different formulae and examiners with differing skill levels. Ultraschall in Med 29(2):159\u2013164. doi: 10.1055\/s-2007-963165","journal-title":"Ultraschall in Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"1888_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"190","DOI":"10.1046\/j.0960-7692.2001.00549.x","volume":"19","author":"NJ Dudley","year":"2002","unstructured":"Dudley NJ, Chapman E (2002) The importance of quality management in fetal measurement. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 19(2):190\u2013196. doi: 10.1046\/j.0960-7692.2001.00549.x","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"11","key":"1888_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1461","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2005.00702.x","volume":"112","author":"A Coomarasamy","year":"2005","unstructured":"Coomarasamy A, Connock M, Thornton J, Khan KS (2005) Accuracy of ultrasound biometry in the prediction of macrosomia: a systematic quantitative review. BJOG 112(11):1461\u20131466. doi: 10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2005.00702.x","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"Suppl 4","key":"1888_CR18","first-page":"S60","volume":"89","author":"R Loetworawanit","year":"2006","unstructured":"Loetworawanit R, Chittacharoen A, Sututvoravut S (2006) Intrapartum fetal abdominal circumference by ultrasonography for predicting fetal macrosomia. J Med Assoc Thai 89(Suppl 4):S60\u2013S64","journal-title":"J Med Assoc Thai"},{"issue":"5","key":"1888_CR19","first-page":"339","volume":"48","author":"C Henrichs","year":"2003","unstructured":"Henrichs C, Magann EF, Brantley KL, Crews JH, Sanderson M, Chauhan SP (2003) Detecting fetal macrosomia with abdominal circumference alone. J Reprod Med 48(5):339\u2013342","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"1888_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"486","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.7734","volume":"36","author":"SN Kim","year":"2010","unstructured":"Kim SN, Park KH, Jung HJ, Hong JS, Shin DM, Kang WS (2010) Clinical and sonographic parameters at 37\u00a0weeks\u2019 gestation for predicting the risk of primary Cesarean delivery in nulliparous women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 36(4):486\u2013492. doi: 10.1002\/uog.7734","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"1888_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Abramowicz JS, Rana S, Abramowicz S (2005) Fetal cheek-to-cheek diameter in the prediction of mode of delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192 (4):1205\u20131211. doi: 10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.01.008 (discussion 1211\u20131203)","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.01.008"},{"issue":"4","key":"1888_CR22","first-page":"163","volume":"195","author":"A Rempen","year":"1991","unstructured":"Rempen A (1991) Vaginal ultrasonography in the first trimester. II. Quantitative parameters. Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol 195(4):163\u2013171","journal-title":"Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol"},{"issue":"2","key":"1888_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"185","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2006-926622","volume":"27","author":"KH Eichhorn","year":"2006","unstructured":"Eichhorn KH, Schramm T, Bald R, Hansmann M, Gembruch U (2006) DEGUM grade I quality standards in obstetric ultrasound diagnosis during the 19th\u201322nd week of pregnancy. Ultraschall in Med 27(2):185\u2013187","journal-title":"Ultraschall in Med"},{"key":"1888_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kehl S, Zaiss I, Freiburg F, Speierer A, Sutterlin M, Siemer J (2010) Comparison of different sonographic methods to determine fetal abdominal circumference. Fetal Diagn Ther. doi: 10.1159\/000320100 [Epub]","DOI":"10.1159\/000320100"},{"issue":"2","key":"1888_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"126","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08212.x","volume":"106","author":"J Kurmanavicius","year":"1999","unstructured":"Kurmanavicius J, Wright EM, Royston P, Wisser J, Huch R, Huch A, Zimmermann R (1999) Fetal ultrasound biometry: 1. Head reference values. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 106(2):126\u2013135","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"1888_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"136","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08213.x","volume":"106","author":"J Kurmanavicius","year":"1999","unstructured":"Kurmanavicius J, Wright EM, Royston P, Zimmermann R, Huch R, Huch A, Wisser J (1999) Fetal ultrasound biometry: 2. Abdomen and femur length reference values. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 106(2):136\u2013143","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"1888_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Melamed N, Yogev Y, Meizner I, Mashiach R, Pardo J, Ben-Haroush (2011) A sonographic prediction of fetal macrosomia: the effect of sonographic fetal weight estimation model and threshold used. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. doi: 10.1002\/uog.8930 [Epub ahead of print]","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.8930"},{"issue":"5 Pt 1","key":"1888_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"997","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(02)02321-9","volume":"100","author":"L Sanchez-Ramos","year":"2002","unstructured":"Sanchez-Ramos L, Bernstein S, Kaunitz AM (2002) Expectant management versus labor induction for suspected fetal macrosomia: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 100(5 Pt 1):997\u20131002 (pii:S0029784402023219)","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"1888_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"913","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00149-X","volume":"89","author":"O Gonen","year":"1997","unstructured":"Gonen O, Rosen DJ, Dolfin Z, Tepper R, Markov S, Fejgin MD (1997) Induction of labor versus expectant management in macrosomia: a randomized study. Obstet Gynecol 89(6):913\u2013917 (pii:S002978449700149X)","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"1888_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"121","DOI":"10.1159\/000078942","volume":"58","author":"N Simhayoff","year":"2004","unstructured":"Simhayoff N, Sheiner E, Levy A, Hammel RD, Mazor M, Hallak M (2004) To induce or not to induce labor: a macrosomic dilemma. Gynecol Obstet Investig 58(3):121\u2013125. doi: 10.1159\/000078942","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Investig"},{"issue":"4","key":"1888_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"370","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610220141281","volume":"22","author":"JH Lim","year":"2002","unstructured":"Lim JH, Tan BC, Jammal AE, Symonds EM (2002) Delivery of macrosomic babies: management and outcomes of 330 cases. J Obstet Gynaecol 22(4):370\u2013374. doi: 10.1080\/01443610220141281","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"1888_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"332","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70557-0","volume":"181","author":"DJ Rouse","year":"1999","unstructured":"Rouse DJ, Owen J (1999) Prophylactic cesarean delivery for fetal macrosomia diagnosed by means of ultrasonography\u2014a Faustian bargain? Am J Obstet Gynecol 181(2):332\u2013338 (pii:S0002937899004627)","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"1888_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"185","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0412.2002.810301.x","volume":"81","author":"K Haram","year":"2002","unstructured":"Haram K, Pirhonen J, Bergsj\u00f8 P (2002) Suspected big baby: a difficult clinical problem in obstetrics. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 81(3):185\u2013194","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"2","key":"1888_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"438","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.105899","volume":"183","author":"L Impey","year":"2000","unstructured":"Impey L, Hobson J, O\u2019Herlihy C (2000) Graphic analysis of actively managed labor: prospective computation of labor progress in 500 consecutive nulliparous women in spontaneous labor at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183(2):438\u2013443. doi: 10.1067\/mob.2000.105899","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"1888_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"267","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610701195074","volume":"27","author":"OB Navti","year":"2007","unstructured":"Navti OB, Ndumbe FM, Konje JC (2007) The peri-partum management of pregnancies with macrosomic babies weighing > or =4,500\u00a0g at a tertiary University Hospital. J Obstet Gynaecol 27(3):267\u2013270. doi: 10.1080\/01443610701195074","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"1888_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1378","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(98)70165-6","volume":"179","author":"RB Gherman","year":"1998","unstructured":"Gherman RB (1998) Increased cesarean delivery rate: no effect on brachial plexus palsy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 179(5):1378\u20131379 (pii:a93953)","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-011-1888-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-011-1888-8\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-011-1888-8","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,9]],"date-time":"2019-06-09T06:56:58Z","timestamp":1560063418000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-011-1888-8"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2011,3,23]]},"references-count":36,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,12]]}},"alternative-id":["1888"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-011-1888-8","relation":{},"ISSN":["0932-0067","1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0932-0067","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-0711","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2011,3,23]]}}}