{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,20]],"date-time":"2026-02-20T01:24:52Z","timestamp":1771550692572,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":31,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,12,25]],"date-time":"2011-12-25T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1324771200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,6]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-011-2178-1","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,12,24]],"date-time":"2011-12-24T07:52:02Z","timestamp":1324713122000},"page":"1523-1528","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":12,"title":["Sonographic cervical length as a predictor of type of delivery after induced labor"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"285","author":[{"given":"Ana Mar\u00eda","family":"G\u00f3mez-Laencina","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Cristina Pages","family":"Garc\u00eda","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Laura Villanueva","family":"Asensio","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jose Andr\u00e9s Guijarro","family":"Ponce","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Monserrat Solera","family":"Mart\u00ednez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Vicente","family":"Mart\u00ednez-Vizca\u00edno","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2011,12,25]]},"reference":[{"key":"2178_CR1","unstructured":"RCOG (2001) Induction of labour. In Evidence-based Clinical Guideline Number 9. RCOG Clinical Support Unit, London"},{"key":"2178_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"628","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70265-6","volume":"180","author":"JD Yeast","year":"1999","unstructured":"Yeast JD, Jones A, Poskin M (1999) Induction of labour and the relationship to caesarean delivery: a review of 7001 consecutive inductions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180:628\u2013633","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2178_CR3","volume-title":"Interventions for preventing or improving the outcome of delivery at or beyond term (Cochrane Review). In The Cochrane Lybrary, issue 3","author":"P Crowley","year":"2001","unstructured":"Crowley P (2001) Interventions for preventing or improving the outcome of delivery at or beyond term (Cochrane Review). In The Cochrane Lybrary, issue 3. Update Software, Oxford"},{"key":"2178_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"942","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(95)90371-2","volume":"173","author":"JY Phelps","year":"1995","unstructured":"Phelps JY, Higby K, Smyth MH, Ward JA, Arredondo F, Mayer AR (1995) Accuracy and intraobserver variability of simulated cervical dilatation measurements. Am J Obstet Gynecol 173:942","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2178_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"309","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.1987.tb01015.x","volume":"27","author":"K Dhall","year":"1987","unstructured":"Dhall K, Mittal SC, Kumar A (1987) Evaluation of preinduction scoring systems. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 27:309\u2013311","journal-title":"Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"2178_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"214","DOI":"10.3109\/01443619209013646","volume":"79","author":"GM Jackson","year":"1992","unstructured":"Jackson GM, Ludmir J, Bader TJ (1992) The accuracy of digital examination and ultrasound in the evaluation of cervical length. Obstet Gynecol 79:214\u2013218","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2178_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1081","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(94)90040-X","volume":"171","author":"F Boozarjomehri","year":"1994","unstructured":"Boozarjomehri F, Timor-Tritsch I, Chao CR, Fox HE (1994) Transvaginal ultrasonographic evaluation of the cervix before labour: presence of cervical wedging is associated with shorter duration of induced labour. Am J Obstet Gynecol 171:1081\u20131087","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2178_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"990","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(96)00321-3","volume":"88","author":"WJ Watson","year":"1996","unstructured":"Watson WJ, Stevens D, Welter S, Day D (1996) Factors predicting successful labour induction. Obstet Gynecol 88:990\u2013992","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2178_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1016\/S0929-8266(98)00042-1","volume":"7","author":"R Gonen","year":"1998","unstructured":"Gonen R, Degani S, Ron A (1998) Prediction of successful induction of labour: comparison of transvaginal ultrasonography and the Bishop score. Eur J Ultrasound 7:183\u2013187","journal-title":"Eur J Ultrasound"},{"key":"2178_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1030","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.105399","volume":"182","author":"V Ware","year":"2000","unstructured":"Ware V, Raynor D (2000) Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement as a predictor of successful labour induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182:1030\u20131032","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2178_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"254","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2002.00643.x","volume":"19","author":"R Gabriel","year":"2002","unstructured":"Gabriel R, Darnaud T, Chalot F, Gonzalez N, Leymarie F, Quereux C (2002) Transvaginal sonography of the uterine cervix prior to labour induction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 19:254\u2013257","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2178_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"623","DOI":"10.1046\/j.0960-7692.2001.00580.x","volume":"18","author":"GK Pandis","year":"2001","unstructured":"Pandis GK, Papageorghiou AT, Ramanathan VG, Thompson MO, Nicolaides KH (2001) Preinduction sonographic measurement of cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labour. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 18:623\u2013628","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2178_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hatfield Ann S, Sanchez Ramos Luis, Kaunitz Andrew M (2007) Sonographic cervical assessment to predict the success of labour induction: a systematic review with metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 197(2):186\u2013192","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.04.050"},{"key":"2178_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1159\/000089045","volume":"21","author":"G Daskalakis","year":"2006","unstructured":"Daskalakis G, Thomakos N, Hatziioannou L, Mesogitis S, Papantoniu N, Antsaklis A (2006) Sonographic cervical length measurement before labour induction in term nulliparous women. Fetal Diagn Ther 21:34\u201338","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"key":"2178_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"722","DOI":"10.3346\/jkms.2007.22.4.722","volume":"22","author":"KH Park","year":"2007","unstructured":"Park KH (2007) Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement in predicting failed labour induction and caesarean delivery for failure to progress in nulliparous women. J Korean Med Sci 22:722\u2013727","journal-title":"J Korean Med Sci"},{"key":"2178_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"568","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.4018","volume":"29","author":"PC Tan","year":"2007","unstructured":"Tan PC, Vallikkannu N, Suguna S, Quek KF, Hassan J (2007) Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length vs. Bishop score in labour induction at term: tolerability and prediction of caesarean delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 29:568\u2013573","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2178_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"248","DOI":"10.1097\/00007611-199803000-00006","volume":"91","author":"NW Hendrix","year":"1998","unstructured":"Hendrix NW, Chauan SP, Morrison JC, Magna EF, Martin JN, Devoe LD (1998) Bishop score: a poor diagnostic test to predict failed induction versus vaginal delivery. South Med J 91:248\u2013252","journal-title":"South Med J"},{"issue":"7","key":"2178_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"799","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340701409858","volume":"86","author":"AM G\u00f3mez Laencina","year":"2007","unstructured":"G\u00f3mez Laencina AM, S\u00e1nchez FG, Gim\u00e9nez JH, Mart\u00ednez MS, Valverde Mart\u00ednez JA, Vizca\u00edno VM (2007) Comparison of ultrasonographic cervical length and the Bishop score in predicting successful labour induction. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 86(7):799\u2013804","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"3","key":"2178_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"573","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-200609000-00017","volume":"49","author":"JM Crane","year":"2006","unstructured":"Crane JM (2006) Factors predicting labor induction success: a critical analysis. Clin Obstet Gynecol 49(3):573\u2013584","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"2178_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"227","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2011.30.2.227","volume":"30","author":"PC Tan","year":"2011","unstructured":"Tan PC, Khine PP, Sabdin NH, Vallikkannu N, Sulaiman S (2011) Effect of membrane sweeping on cervical length by transvaginal ultrasonography and impact of cervical shortening on caesarean delivery. J Ultrasound Med 30(2):227\u2013233","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"2178_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"598","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.913","volume":"22","author":"G Ramanathan","year":"2003","unstructured":"Ramanathan G, Yu C, Osei E, Nicolaides KH (2003) Ultrasound examination at 37\u00a0weeks\u2019 gestation in the prediction of pregnancy outcome: the value of cervical assessment. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 22:598\u2013603","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2178_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"328","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.5254","volume":"31","author":"P Vankayalapati","year":"2008","unstructured":"Vankayalapati P, Sethna F, Roberts N, Ngeh N, Thilaganathan B, Bhide A (2008) Ultrasound assessment of cervical length in prolonged pregnancy: prediction of spontaneous onset of labour and successful vaginal delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 31:328\u2013331","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"2178_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6219","volume":"33","author":"M Meijer-Hoogeveen","year":"2009","unstructured":"Meijer-Hoogeveen M, Roos C, Arabin B, Stoutenbeek P, Visser GH (2009) Transvaginal ultrasound measurement of cervical length in the supine and upright positions versus Bishop score in predicting successful induction of labour at term. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 33(2):213\u2013220","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"2178_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"325","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340902730417","volume":"88","author":"TM Eggeb\u00f8","year":"2009","unstructured":"Eggeb\u00f8 TM, \u00d8kland I, Heien C, Gjessing LK, Romundstad P, Salvesen KA (2009) Can ultrasound measurements replace digitally assessed elements of the Bishop score? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 88(3):325\u2013331","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"2","key":"2178_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"301","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1447-0756.2008.00929.x","volume":"35","author":"KH Park","year":"2009","unstructured":"Park KH, Hong J-S, Shin DM, Kang WS (2009) Prediction of failed labour induction in parous women at term: role of previous obstetric history, digital examination and sonographic measurement of cervical length. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 35(2):301\u2013306","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"issue":"5","key":"2178_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"519","DOI":"10.1515\/JPM.2009.099","volume":"37","author":"KH Park","year":"2009","unstructured":"Park KH, Hong JS, Kang WS, Shin DM, Kim SN (2009) Body mass index, Bishop score, and sonographic measurement of the cervical length as predictors of successful labour induction in twin gestations. J Perinat Med 37(5):519\u2013523","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"2178_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"316","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.7315","volume":"34","author":"CJ Verhoeven","year":"2009","unstructured":"Verhoeven CJ, Oudenaarden A, Hermus MA, Porath MM, Oei SG, Mol BW (2009) Validation of models that predict Caesarean section after induction of labour. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 34(3):316\u2013321","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2178_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"227","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000196508.11431.c0","volume":"107","author":"E Peregrine","year":"2006","unstructured":"Peregrine E, O\u2032Brien P, Omar R, Jauniaux E (2006) Clinical and ultrasound parameters to predict the risk of caesarean delivery after induction of labour. Obstet Gynecol 107:227\u2013233","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2178_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"315","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050500127690","volume":"17","author":"SM Rane","year":"2005","unstructured":"Rane SM, Guirguis RR, Higgins B, Nicolaides KH (2005) Models for the prediction of successful induction of labour based on pre-induction sonographic measurement of cervical length. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 17:315\u2013322","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"12","key":"2178_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1406","DOI":"10.3109\/14767051003678135","volume":"23","author":"CW Cheung","year":"2010","unstructured":"Cheung CW, Leung TY, Sahota DS, Chan OK, Chan LW, Fung TY, Lau TK (2010) Outcome of induction of labour using maternal characteristics, ultrasound assessment and biochemical state of the cervix. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 23(12):1406\u20131412","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"2178_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"357","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-008-0915-x","volume":"280","author":"Y Uyar","year":"2009","unstructured":"Uyar Y, Erbay G, Demir BC, Baytur Y (2009) Comparison of the Bishop score, body mass index and transvaginal cervical length in predicting the success of labor induction. Arch Gynecol Obstet 280:357\u2013362","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-011-2178-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-011-2178-1\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-011-2178-1","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,21]],"date-time":"2019-06-21T10:07:08Z","timestamp":1561111628000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-011-2178-1"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2011,12,25]]},"references-count":31,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,6]]}},"alternative-id":["2178"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-011-2178-1","relation":{},"ISSN":["0932-0067","1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0932-0067","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-0711","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2011,12,25]]}}}