{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,6]],"date-time":"2025-11-06T19:57:35Z","timestamp":1762459055295},"reference-count":25,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2013,2,21]],"date-time":"2013-02-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1361404800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,8]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-013-2764-5","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2013,2,20]],"date-time":"2013-02-20T03:59:08Z","timestamp":1361332748000},"page":"279-285","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":9,"title":["Elevated umbilical artery systolic\/diastolic ratio in the absence of fetal growth restriction"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"288","author":[{"given":"Gilad","family":"Filmar","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Georgia","family":"Panagopoulos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Victoria","family":"Minior","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Yoni","family":"Barnhard","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Michael Y.","family":"Divon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2013,2,21]]},"reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"2764_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"148","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.11.003","volume":"132","author":"A Gadelha-Costa","year":"2007","unstructured":"Gadelha-Costa A, Spara-Gadelha P, Filho FM, Gadelha EB (2007) Hemodynamic changes in the fetal arteries during the second half of pregnancy assessed by Doppler velocimetry. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 132(2):148\u2013153 (Epub 2006 Dec 27, Review)","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"4","key":"2764_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"224","DOI":"10.1002\/1520-6661(200007\/08)9:4<224::AID-MFM7>3.0.CO;2-W","volume":"9","author":"JW Goldkrand","year":"2000","unstructured":"Goldkrand JW, Moore DH, Lentz SU, Clements SP, Turner AD, Bryant JL (2000) Volumetric flow in the umbilical artery: normative data. J Matern Fetal Med 9(4):224\u2013228","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"2764_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1053\/sper.2001.22892","volume":"25","author":"MY Divon","year":"2001","unstructured":"Divon MY, Ferber A (2001) Umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry\u2014an update. Semin Perinatol 25(1):44\u201347 Review","journal-title":"Semin Perinatol"},{"issue":"3","key":"2764_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"424","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.02057.x","volume":"116","author":"GS Ghosh","year":"2009","unstructured":"Ghosh GS, Gudmundsson S (2009) Uterine and umbilical artery Doppler are comparable in predicting perinatal outcome of growth-restricted fetuses. BJOG 116(3):424\u2013430","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"1","key":"2764_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-999326","volume":"8","author":"S Gudmundsson","year":"1991","unstructured":"Gudmundsson S, Mars\u00e1l K (1991) Blood velocity waveforms in the fetal aorta and umbilical artery as predictors of fetal outcome: a comparison. Am J Perinatol 8(1):1\u20136","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"issue":"4","key":"2764_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1007","DOI":"10.1067\/S0002-9378(03)00836-6","volume":"189","author":"P Vergani","year":"2003","unstructured":"Vergani P, Andreotti C, Roncaglia N, Zani G, Pozzi E, Pezzullo JC, Ghidini A (2003) Doppler predictors of adverse neonatal outcome in the growth restricted fetus at 34\u00a0weeks\u2019 gestation or beyond. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189(4):1007\u20131011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1 Pt 1","key":"2764_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"154","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(00)70505-9","volume":"182","author":"AA Baschat","year":"2000","unstructured":"Baschat AA, Weiner CP (2000) Umbilical artery doppler screening for detection of the small fetus in need of antepartum surveillance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182(1 Pt 1):154\u2013158","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"2764_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1079","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(97)70018-8","volume":"177","author":"PS Bernstein","year":"1997","unstructured":"Bernstein PS, Minior VK, Divon MY (1997) Neonatal nucleated red blood cell counts in small-for-gestational age fetuses with abnormal umbilical artery Doppler studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 177(5):1079\u20131084","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1 Pt 1","key":"2764_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70365-4","volume":"174","author":"MY Divon","year":"1996","unstructured":"Divon MY (1996) Umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry: clinical utility in high-risk pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 174(1 Pt 1):10\u201314 Review","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"2764_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"247","DOI":"10.1159\/000263835","volume":"8","author":"W Giles","year":"1993","unstructured":"Giles W, Bisits A (1993) Clinical use of Doppler ultrasound in pregnancy: information from six randomised trials. Fetal Diagn Ther 8(4):247\u2013255","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"issue":"4","key":"2764_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"425","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1997.tb11493.x","volume":"104","author":"F Goffinet","year":"1997","unstructured":"Goffinet F, Paris-Llado J, Nisand I, Br\u00e9art G (1997) Umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry in unselected and low risk pregnancies: a review of randomised controlled trials. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104(4):425\u2013430","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"2764_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.181.1.1887021","volume":"181","author":"FP Hadlock","year":"1991","unstructured":"Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Martinez-Poyer J (1991) In utero analysis of fetal growth: a sonographic weight standard. Radiology 181(1):129\u2013133","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"2764_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(95)00386-X","volume":"87","author":"GR Alexander","year":"1996","unstructured":"Alexander GR, Himes JJ, Kaufman RB, Mor J, Kogan M (1996) A United States national reference for fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol 87:163","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"2764_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"94","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-994679","volume":"9","author":"AD Kofinas","year":"1992","unstructured":"Kofinas AD, Espeland MA, Penry M, Swain M, Hatjis CG (1992) Uteroplacental Doppler flow velocity waveform indices in normal pregnancy: a statistical exercise and the development of appropriate reference values. Am J Perinatol 9(2):94\u2013101","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"2764_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bolz N, Kalache KD, Fotopoulou C, Proquitte H, Slowinski T, Hartung JP, Henrich W, Bamberg C (2012) Value of Doppler sonography near term: can umbilical and uterine artery indices in low-risk pregnancies predict perinatal outcome? J Perinat Med pii:\/j\/jpme.ahead-of-print\/jpm-2012-0042\/jpm-2012-0042.xml. (Epub ahead of print)","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm-2012-0042"},{"issue":"4","key":"2764_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"378","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1991.tb13428.x","volume":"98","author":"BJ Trudinger","year":"1991","unstructured":"Trudinger BJ, Cook CM, Giles WB, Ng S, Fong E, Connelly A, Wilcox W (1991) Fetal umbilical artery velocity waveforms and subsequent neonatal outcome. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 98(4):378\u2013384","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"2764_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"160","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.5386","volume":"32","author":"OM Turan","year":"2008","unstructured":"Turan OM, Turan S, Gungor S, Berg C, Moyano D, Gembruch U, Nicolaides KH, Harman CR, Baschat AA (2008) Progression of Doppler abnormalities in intrauterine growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 32(2):160\u2013167","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"2764_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"172","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2008.02.006","volume":"32","author":"JA Arroyo","year":"2008","unstructured":"Arroyo JA, Winn VD (2008) Vasculogenesis and angiogenesis in the IUGR placenta. Semin Perinatol 32(3):172\u2013177 Review","journal-title":"Semin Perinatol"},{"issue":"1","key":"2764_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1985.tb01045.x","volume":"92","author":"WB Giles","year":"1985","unstructured":"Giles WB, Trudinger BJ, Baird PJ (1985) Fetal umbilical artery flow velocity waveforms and placental resistance: pathological correlation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 92(1):31\u201338","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"2764_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"830","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00473-0","volume":"90","author":"CM Salafia","year":"1997","unstructured":"Salafia CM, Pezzullo JC, Minior VK, Divon MY (1997) Placental pathology of absent and reversed end-diastolic flow in growth-restricted fetuses. Obstet Gynecol 90(5):830\u2013836","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"2764_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1087","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-010-1781-x","volume":"284","author":"N Vedmedovska","year":"2011","unstructured":"Vedmedovska N, Rezeberga D, Teibe U, Melderis I, Donders GG (2011) Microscopic lesions of placenta and Doppler velocimetry related to fetal growth restriction. Arch Gynecol Obstet 284(5):1087\u20131093 (Epub 2010 Dec 14)","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"3","key":"2764_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"751","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(90)91062-H","volume":"163","author":"JA Copel","year":"1990","unstructured":"Copel JA, Schlafer D, Wentworth R, Belanger K, Kreitzer L, Hobbins JC, Nathanielsz PW (1990) Does the umbilical artery systolic\/diastolic ratio reflect flow or acidosis? An umbilical artery Doppler study of fetal sheep. Am J Obstet Gynecol 163(3):751\u2013756","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"7","key":"2764_CR23","first-page":"562","volume":"45","author":"BC Carroll","year":"2000","unstructured":"Carroll BC, Bruner JP (2000) Umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry in pregnancies complicated by oligohydramnios. J Reprod Med 45(7):562\u2013566","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"issue":"6","key":"2764_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"466","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2001.00415.x","volume":"17","author":"HB Westergaard","year":"2001","unstructured":"Westergaard HB, Langhoff-Roos J, Lingman G, Mars\u00e1l K, Kreiner S (2001) A critical appraisal of the use of umbilical artery Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies: use of meta-analyses in evidence-based obstetrics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 17(6):466\u2013476","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2764_CR25","first-page":"CD001450","volume":"8","author":"Z Alfirevic","year":"2010","unstructured":"Alfirevic Z, Stampalija T, Gyte GM (2010) Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in normal pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8:CD001450 Review","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-013-2764-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-013-2764-5\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-013-2764-5","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,2,9]],"date-time":"2022-02-09T01:40:09Z","timestamp":1644370809000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-013-2764-5"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2013,2,21]]},"references-count":25,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,8]]}},"alternative-id":["2764"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-013-2764-5","relation":{},"ISSN":["0932-0067","1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0932-0067","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-0711","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2013,2,21]]}}}