{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,6]],"date-time":"2025-05-06T08:49:02Z","timestamp":1746521342900},"reference-count":41,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,2,27]],"date-time":"2014-02-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1393459200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,7]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-014-3181-0","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,2,26]],"date-time":"2014-02-26T11:13:31Z","timestamp":1393413211000},"page":"99-105","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["IUD in first-trimester abortion: immediate intrauterine contraceptive devices insertion vs delayed insertion following the next menstruation bleeding"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"290","author":[{"given":"Panagiotis","family":"Tsikouras","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Nikolaos","family":"Vrachnis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Anastasia","family":"Grapsa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Nikolaos","family":"Tsagias","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Petros","family":"Pinidis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Anastasios","family":"Liberis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Alexandros","family":"Ammari","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Xenofon","family":"Grapsas","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Georgios","family":"Galazios","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Vasileios","family":"Liberis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2014,2,27]]},"reference":[{"issue":"3","key":"3181_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"275.e15","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jadohealth.2006.10.003","volume":"40","author":"RE Sieving","year":"2007","unstructured":"Sieving RE, Bearinger LH, Resnick MD, Pettingell S, Skay C (2007) Adolescent dual method use: relevant attitudes, normative beliefs and self-efficacy. J Adolesc Health 40(3):275.e15\u2013275.e22 Epub 24 Jan 2007","journal-title":"J Adolesc Health"},{"issue":"6","key":"3181_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"294","DOI":"10.2307\/3097748","volume":"34","author":"RK Jones","year":"2002","unstructured":"Jones RK, Darroch JE, Henshaw SK (2002) Contraceptive use among US women having abortions in 2000\u20132001. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 34(6):294\u2013303","journal-title":"Perspect Sex Reprod Health"},{"key":"3181_CR3","first-page":"CD004860","volume":"4","author":"DA Grimes","year":"2004","unstructured":"Grimes DA, Gallo MF, Grigorieva V, Nanda K, Schulz KF (2004) Fertility awareness-based methods for contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD004860","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"3181_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Grimes D, Schulz K, Stanwood N (2004) Immediate postabortal insertion of intrauterine devices. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4):CD001777. (Review) Update in: (2010) Cochrane Database Syst Rev (6):CD001777","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD001777.pub2"},{"issue":"6","key":"3181_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"437","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2004.01.009","volume":"69","author":"D Hubacher","year":"2004","unstructured":"Hubacher D, Cheng D (2004) Intrauterine devices and reproductive health: American women in feast and famine. Contraception 69(6):437\u2013446 Review","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"3181_CR6","unstructured":"World Health Organization scientific group Mechanism of action, safety and efficacy of Intrauterine Devices WHO Technical Report Series 753 WHO Geneva 1987"},{"issue":"6","key":"3181_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"315","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-7824(01)00206-2","volume":"63","author":"A Moussa","year":"2001","unstructured":"Moussa A (2001) Evaluation of postabortion IUD insertion in Egyptian women. Contraception 63(6):315\u2013317","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"2","key":"3181_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"136","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2008.03.008","volume":"78","author":"S Goodman","year":"2008","unstructured":"Goodman S, Hendlish SK, Benedict C, Reeves MF, Pera-Floyd M, Foster-Rosales A (2008) Increasing intrauterine contraception use by reducing barriers to post-abortal and interval insertion. Contraception 78(2):136\u2013142. doi: 10.1016\/j.contraception.2008.03.008","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"2","key":"3181_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2008.03.013","volume":"78","author":"O Heikinheimo","year":"2008","unstructured":"Heikinheimo O, Gissler M, Suhonen S (2008) Age, parity, history of abortion and contraceptive choices affect the risk of repeat abortion. Contraception 78(2):149\u2013154. doi: 10.1016\/j.contraception.2008.03.013","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"3","key":"3181_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"191","DOI":"10.1016\/0010-7824(72)90060-1","volume":"6","author":"K Hagenfeldt","year":"1972","unstructured":"Hagenfeldt K (1972) Intrauterine contraception with the copper-T device. 2. Influence on endometrial acid and alkaline phosphatase, beta-glucuronidase and lactic dehydrogenase activities. Contraception 6(3):191\u2013206","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"10","key":"3181_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"263","DOI":"10.2307\/1965507","volume":"10","author":"I Sivin","year":"1979","unstructured":"Sivin I, Stern J (1979) Long-acting, more effective copper T IUDs: a summary of US experience, 1970\u201375. Stud Fam Plann 10(10):263\u2013281","journal-title":"Stud Fam Plann"},{"issue":"8","key":"3181_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"885","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(83)90240-5","volume":"147","author":"T Luukkainen","year":"1983","unstructured":"Luukkainen T, Allonen H, Nielsen NC, Nygren KG, Py\u00f6r\u00e4l\u00e4 T (1983) Five years\u2019 experience of intrauterine contraception with the Nova-T and the Copper-T-200. Am J Obstet Gynecol 147(8):885\u2013892","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"3181_CR13","first-page":"275","volume":"2","author":"WA Os","year":"1981","unstructured":"Os WA, Thiery M, Van Der Pas H, Rhemrev PE, De Nooyer CC, Kleinhout J (1981) Comparison of four different models of the Multiload copper IUD. Contracept Deliv Syst 2(4):275\u2013280","journal-title":"Contracept Deliv Syst"},{"key":"3181_CR14","unstructured":"Filshie M, Guillebaud J (1989) Contraception: science and practice, chapter 9, pp 144\u2013171"},{"issue":"1","key":"3181_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"66","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(71)90928-8","volume":"111","author":"DL Moyer","year":"1971","unstructured":"Moyer DL, Mishell DR Jr (1971) Reactions of human endometrium to the intrauterine foreign body II. Long term effects on the endometrial histology and cytology. Am J Obstet Gynecol 111(1):66\u201380","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"8","key":"3181_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1209","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(70)90094-3","volume":"108","author":"A Sedlis","year":"1970","unstructured":"Sedlis A, Reyniak JV (1970) Endometrial leukocytes in patients using intrauterine contraceptive devices. Am J Obstet Gynecol 108(8):1209\u20131212","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"3181_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.04.010","volume":"82","author":"ML Kavanaugh","year":"2010","unstructured":"Kavanaugh ML, Jones RK, Finer LB (2010) How commonly do US abortion clinics offer contraceptive services? Contraception 82(4):331\u2013336. doi: 10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.04.010","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"5","key":"3181_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1105","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31821188ad","volume":"117","author":"JF Peipert","year":"2011","unstructured":"Peipert JF, Zhao Q, Allsworth JE, Petrosky E, Madden T, Eisenberg D, Secura G (2011) Continuation and satisfaction of reversible contraception. Obstet Gynecol 117(5):1105\u20131113. doi: 10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31821188ad","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"3181_CR19","first-page":"CD005347","volume":"4","author":"R Kulier","year":"2007","unstructured":"Kulier R, O\u2019Brien PA, Helmerhorst FM, Usher-Patel M, D\u2019Arcangues C (2007) Copper containing, framed intra-uterine devices for contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD005347 Review","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"5","key":"3181_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"407","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2003.11.008","volume":"69","author":"S Suhonen","year":"2004","unstructured":"Suhonen S, Haukkamaa M, Jakobsson T, Rauramo I (2004) Clinical performance of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and oral contraceptives in young nulliparous women: a comparative study. Contraception 69(5):407\u2013412","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"3181_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tatum HJ, Connell EB (1989) Contraception science and practice, chapter 9, Itrauterine contraceptive devices pp 144\u2013171","DOI":"10.1016\/B978-0-407-01720-7.50013-8"},{"issue":"6","key":"3181_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"829","DOI":"10.1097\/00001703-199312000-00019","volume":"5","author":"R Rivera","year":"1993","unstructured":"Rivera R, Chi IC, Farr G (1993) The intrauterine device in the present and future. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 5(6):829\u2013832 Review","journal-title":"Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"8796","key":"3181_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"785","DOI":"10.1016\/0140-6736(92)91904-M","volume":"339","author":"TM Farley","year":"1992","unstructured":"Farley TM, Rosenberg MJ, Rowe PJ, Chen JH, Meirik O (1992) Intrauterine devices and pelvic inflammatory disease: an international perspective. Lancet 339(8796):785\u2013788","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"3181_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"367","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.01.010","volume":"81","author":"Society for Family Planning","year":"2010","unstructured":"Society for Family Planning (2010) Clinical guidelines use of the Mirena LNG-IUS and Paragard CuT380A intrauterine devices in nulliparous women. Contraception 81:367\u2013371","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"2","key":"3181_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"323","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deq348","volume":"26","author":"K Dijkhuizen","year":"2011","unstructured":"Dijkhuizen K, Dekkers OM, Holleboom CA, de Groot CJ, Hellebrekers BW, van Roosmalen GJ, Janssen CA, Helmerhorst FM (2011) Vaginal misoprostol prior to insertion of an intrauterine device: an RCT. Hum Reprod 26(2):323\u2013329. doi: 10.1093\/humrep\/deq348","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"9","key":"3181_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"500","DOI":"10.1097\/SMJ.0b013e3182a5ef0a","volume":"106","author":"J Tang","year":"2013","unstructured":"Tang J, Maurer R, Bartz D (2013) Intrauterine device knowledge and practices: a national survey of obstetrics and gynecology residents. South Med J 106(9):500\u2013505. doi: 10.1097\/SMJ.0b013e3182a5ef0a","journal-title":"South Med J"},{"issue":"2","key":"3181_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"275","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(01)01726-4","volume":"99","author":"NL Stanwood","year":"2002","unstructured":"Stanwood NL, Garrett JM, Konrad TR (2002) Obstetrician-gynecologists and the intrauterine device: a survey of attitudes and practice. Obstet Gynecol 99(2):275\u2013280","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"3181_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1359","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318173fd83","volume":"111","author":"CC Harper","year":"2008","unstructured":"Harper CC, Blum M, de Bocanegra HT, Darney PD, Speidel JJ, Policar M, Drey EA (2008) Challenges in translating evidence to practice: the provision of intrauterine contraception. Obstet Gynecol 111(6):1359\u20131369. doi: 10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318173fd83","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"3181_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"762","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31824aca39","volume":"119","author":"CP Tyler","year":"2012","unstructured":"Tyler CP, Whiteman MK, Zapata LB, Curtis KM, Hillis SD, Marchbanks PA (2012) Health care provider attitudes and practices related to intrauterine devices for nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 119(4):762\u2013771. doi: 10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31824aca39","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"3181_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1434","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181c6f965","volume":"114","author":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Gynecologic Practice; Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Working Group","year":"2009","unstructured":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Gynecologic Practice; Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Working Group (2009) ACOG Committee Opinion no. 450: Increasing use of contraceptive implants and intrauterine devices to reduce unintended pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 114(6):1434\u20131438. doi: 10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181c6f965","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"3181_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"206","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181cb50b5","volume":"115","author":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists","year":"2010","unstructured":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2010) ACOG practice bulletin no. 110: noncontraceptive uses of hormonal contraceptives. Obstet Gynecol 115(1):206\u2013218. doi: 10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181cb50b5","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"3181_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"184","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318227f05e","volume":"118","author":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists","year":"2011","unstructured":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2011) ACOG practice bulletin no. 121: long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol 118(1):184\u2013196. doi: 10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318227f05e","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"3181_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.06.018","volume":"83","author":"MC Fox","year":"2011","unstructured":"Fox MC, Oat-Judge J, Severson K, Jamshidi RM, Singh RH, McDonald-Mosley R, Burke AE (2011) Immediate placement of intrauterine devices after first and second trimester pregnancy termination. Contraception 83(1):34\u201340. doi: 10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.06.018 Epub 11 Aug 2010","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"5","key":"3181_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"397","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2008.11.019","volume":"79","author":"EA Drey","year":"2009","unstructured":"Drey EA, Reeves MF, Ogawa DD, Sokoloff A, Darney PD, Steinauer JE (2009) Insertion of intrauterine contraceptives immediately following first- and second-trimester abortions. Contraception 79(5):397\u2013402. doi: 10.1016\/j.contraception.2008.11.019","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"6","key":"3181_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"522","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.10.005","volume":"83","author":"M Cremer","year":"2011","unstructured":"Cremer M, Bullard KA, Mosley RM, Weiselberg C, Molaei M, Lerner V, Alonzo TA (2011) Immediate vs. delayed post-abortal copper T 380A IUD insertion in cases over 12\u00a0weeks of gestation. Contraception 83(6):522\u2013527. doi: 10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.10.005","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"3","key":"3181_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"240","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.08.002","volume":"85","author":"HL Hohmann","year":"2012","unstructured":"Hohmann HL, Reeves MF, Chen BA, Perriera LK, Hayes JL, Creinin MD (2012) Immediate versus delayed insertion of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device following dilation and evacuation: a randomized controlled trial. Contraception 85(3):240\u2013245. doi: 10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.08.002","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"3181_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Reeves MF, Smith KJ, Creinin MD (2007) Contraceptive effectiveness of immediate compared with delayed insertion of intrauterine devices after abortion: a decision analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 109(6):1286\u20131294. Erratum in: Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Oct; 110(4):936","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000265336.14160.cc"},{"issue":"23","key":"3181_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2208","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1011600","volume":"364","author":"PH Bednarek","year":"2011","unstructured":"Bednarek PH, Creinin MD, Reeves MF, Cwiak C, Espey E, Jensen JT, Post-Aspiration IUD (2011) Randomization (PAIR) Study Trial Group. Immediate versus delayed IUD insertion after uterine aspiration. N Engl J Med 364(23):2208\u20132217. doi: 10.1056\/NEJMoa1011600","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"3181_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e365","DOI":"10.1016\/j.whi.2012.04.008","volume":"22","author":"C McNicholas","year":"2012","unstructured":"McNicholas C, Hotchkiss T, Madden T, Zhao Q, Allsworth J, Peipert JF (2012) Immediate postabortion intrauterine device insertion: continuation and satisfaction. Womens Health Issues 22(4):e365\u2013e369. doi: 10.1016\/j.whi.2012.04.008","journal-title":"Womens Health Issues"},{"issue":"5","key":"3181_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"447","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.03.007","volume":"84","author":"MW Steenland","year":"2011","unstructured":"Steenland MW, Tepper NK, Curtis KM, Kapp N (2011) Intrauterine contraceptive insertion postabortion: a systematic review. Contraception 84(5):447\u2013464. doi: 10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.03.007 Epub 4 May 2011. Review","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"3","key":"3181_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"259","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.08.029","volume":"87","author":"JE Darroch","year":"2013","unstructured":"Darroch JE (2013) Trends in contraceptive use. Contraception 87(3):259\u2013263. doi: 10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.08.029 Epub 4 Oct 2012","journal-title":"Contraception"}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-014-3181-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-014-3181-0\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-014-3181-0","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,8,8]],"date-time":"2019-08-08T00:16:19Z","timestamp":1565223379000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-014-3181-0"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,2,27]]},"references-count":41,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,7]]}},"alternative-id":["3181"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-014-3181-0","relation":{},"ISSN":["0932-0067","1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0932-0067","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-0711","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,2,27]]}}}