{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,4]],"date-time":"2026-08-04T21:29:27Z","timestamp":1785878967139,"version":"3.56.0"},"reference-count":16,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,4,12]],"date-time":"2014-04-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1397260800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,9]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-014-3229-1","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,4,11]],"date-time":"2014-04-11T16:14:05Z","timestamp":1397232845000},"page":"465-469","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":16,"title":["Transperineal versus transvaginal ultrasound cervical length measurement and preterm labor"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"290","author":[{"given":"T.","family":"Gauthier","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"B.","family":"Marin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"A.","family":"Garuchet-Bigot","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"D.","family":"Kanoun","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"C.","family":"Catalan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"H.","family":"Caly","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"J.-L.","family":"Eyraud","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Y.","family":"Aubard","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2014,4,12]]},"reference":[{"key":"3229_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"567","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199602293340904","volume":"334","author":"JD Iams","year":"1996","unstructured":"Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, Mercer BM, Moawad A, Das A, Thom E, McNellis D, Copper RL, Johnson F, Roberts JM (1996) The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network. N Engl J Med 334:567\u2013572","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"3229_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"755","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050600852601","volume":"19","author":"M Meijer-Hoogeveen","year":"2006","unstructured":"Meijer-Hoogeveen M, Stoutenbeek P, Visser GH (2006) Methods of sonographic cervical length measurement in pregnancy: a review of the literature. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 19:755\u2013762","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"3229_CR3","first-page":"CD007235","volume":"1","author":"V Berghella","year":"2013","unstructured":"Berghella V, Baxter JK, Hendrix NW (2013) Cervical assessment by ultrasound for preventing preterm delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD007235","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"3229_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"312","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1998.12050312.x","volume":"12","author":"VC Heath","year":"1998","unstructured":"Heath VC, Southall TR, Souka AP, Elisseou A, Nicolaides KH (1998) Cervical length at 23\u00a0weeks of gestation: prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 12:312\u2013317","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"3229_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"657","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.4093","volume":"32","author":"M Meijer-Hoogeveen","year":"2008","unstructured":"Meijer-Hoogeveen M, Stoutenbeek P, Visser GH (2008) Transperineal versus transvaginal sonographic cervical length measurement in second- and third-trimester pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 32:657\u2013662","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"3229_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"335","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2001.00345.x","volume":"17","author":"S Cicero","year":"2001","unstructured":"Cicero S, Skentou C, Souka A, To MS, Nicolaides KH (2001) Cervical length at 22\u201324\u00a0weeks of gestation: comparison of transvaginal and transperineal-translabial ultrasonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 17:335\u2013340","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"3229_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"225","DOI":"10.1002\/jcu.20027","volume":"32","author":"G Yazici","year":"2004","unstructured":"Yazici G, Yildiz A, Tiras MB, Arslan M, Kanik A, Oz U (2004) Comparison of transperineal and transvaginal sonography in predicting preterm delivery. J Clin Ultrasound 32:225\u2013230","journal-title":"J Clin Ultrasound"},{"key":"3229_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"387","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.2744","volume":"27","author":"TM Eggebo","year":"2006","unstructured":"Eggebo TM, Gjessing LK, Heien C, Smedvig E, Okland I, Romundstad P, Salvesen KA (2006) Prediction of labor and delivery by transperineal ultrasound in pregnancies with prelabor rupture of membranes at term. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 27:387\u2013391","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"3229_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"554","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(00)00973-X","volume":"96","author":"DB Carr","year":"2000","unstructured":"Carr DB, Smith K, Parsons L, Chansky K, Shields LE (2000) Ultrasonography for cervical length measurement: agreement between transvaginal and translabial techniques. Obstet Gynecol 96:554\u2013558","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"3229_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"852","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(98)70177-2","volume":"179","author":"JT Kurtzman","year":"1998","unstructured":"Kurtzman JT, Goldsmith LJ, Gall SA, Spinnato JA (1998) Transvaginal versus transperineal ultrasonography: a blinded comparison in the assessment of cervical length at midgestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 179:852\u2013857","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"3229_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"780","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70300-5","volume":"181","author":"J Owen","year":"1999","unstructured":"Owen J, Neely C, Northen A (1999) Transperineal versus endovaginal ultrasonographic examination of the cervix in the midtrimester: a blinded comparison. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181:780\u2013783","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"3229_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"191","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2005.00378.x","volume":"45","author":"I Ozdemir","year":"2005","unstructured":"Ozdemir I, Demirci F, Yucel O (2005) Transperineal versus transvaginal ultrasonographic evaluation of the cervix at each trimester in normal pregnant women. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 45:191\u2013194","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"3229_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1331","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.1108","volume":"21","author":"DG Bonett","year":"2002","unstructured":"Bonett DG (2002) Sample size requirements for estimating intraclass correlations with desired precision. Stat Med 21:1331\u20131335","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"key":"3229_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"420","DOI":"10.1037\/0033-2909.86.2.420","volume":"86","author":"PE Shrout","year":"1979","unstructured":"Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86:420\u2013428","journal-title":"Psychol Bull"},{"key":"3229_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"307","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(86)90837-8","volume":"1","author":"JM Bland","year":"1986","unstructured":"Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307\u2013310","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"3229_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1071","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2001.20.10.1071","volume":"20","author":"BS Hertzberg","year":"2001","unstructured":"Hertzberg BS, Livingston E, DeLong DM, McNally PJ, Fazekas CK, Kliewer MA (2001) Ultrasonographic evaluation of the cervix: transperineal versus endovaginal imaging. J Ultrasound Med 20:1071\u20131078","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-014-3229-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-014-3229-1\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-014-3229-1","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,8,9]],"date-time":"2019-08-09T08:22:27Z","timestamp":1565338947000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-014-3229-1"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,4,12]]},"references-count":16,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,9]]}},"alternative-id":["3229"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-014-3229-1","relation":{},"ISSN":["0932-0067","1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0932-0067","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-0711","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,4,12]]}}}