{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,23]],"date-time":"2026-10-23T09:40:22Z","timestamp":1792748422781,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":45,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,10,5]],"date-time":"2015-10-05T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1444003200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,4]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-015-3902-z","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,10,5]],"date-time":"2015-10-05T05:54:47Z","timestamp":1444024487000},"page":"749-755","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":34,"title":["Predictors for a successful external cephalic version: a single centre experience"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"293","author":[{"given":"Florian","family":"Ebner","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Thomas W. P.","family":"Friedl","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Elena","family":"Leinert","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Amelie","family":"Schramm","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Frank","family":"Reister","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kristian","family":"Lato","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Wolfgang","family":"Janni","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nikolaus","family":"DeGregorio","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2015,10,5]]},"reference":[{"key":"3902_CR1","first-page":"CD000166","volume":"3","author":"GJ Hofmeyr","year":"2003","unstructured":"Hofmeyr GJ, Hannah ME (2003) Planned caesarean section for term breech delivery. Cochrane database Syst Rev 3:CD000166","journal-title":"Cochrane database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"10","key":"3902_CR2","first-page":"CD000051","volume":"10","author":"GJ Hofmeyr","year":"2012","unstructured":"Hofmeyr GJ, Kulier R (2012) External cephalic version for breech presentation at term (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10(10):CD000051","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"3902_CR3","unstructured":"RCOG (2006) External cephalic version (Green Top 20a). RCOG green top guidelines. RCOG, London [cited 2014 Jul 2]"},{"key":"3902_CR4","unstructured":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2014) External cephalic version. ACOG practice bulletin Number 13, Feb 2000. Reaffirmed. ( http:\/\/www.acog.org\/-\/media\/List-of-Titles\/PBListOfTitles.pdf )"},{"key":"3902_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Newman RB, Peacock BS, Van Dorsten JP, Hunt HH (1993) Predicting success of external cephalic version. Am J Obstet Gynecol 169(2 Pt 1):245\u2013249 (discussion 249\u2013250)","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(93)90071-P"},{"issue":"8","key":"3902_CR6","first-page":"601","volume":"32","author":"JP Phelan","year":"1987","unstructured":"Phelan JP, Ahn MO, Smith CV, Rutherford SE, Anderson E (1987) Amniotic fluid index measurements during pregnancy. J Reprod Med 32(8):601\u2013604","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"issue":"31","key":"3902_CR7","first-page":"353","volume":"70","author":"SE Rutherford","year":"1987","unstructured":"Rutherford SE, Phelan JP, Smith CV, Jacobs N (1987) The four-quadrant assessment of amniotic fluid volume: an adjunct to antepartum fetal heart rate testing. Obstet Gynecol 70(31):353\u2013356","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"3902_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-14-101","volume":"14","author":"E Ciliacus","year":"2014","unstructured":"Ciliacus E, van der Zalm M, Truijens SE, Hasaart TH, Pop VJ, Kuppens SM (2014) Fear for external cephalic version and depression: predictors of successful external cephalic version for breech presentation at term? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 14:101","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"3","key":"3902_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"523","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-013-3007-5","volume":"289","author":"G Bogner","year":"2014","unstructured":"Bogner G, Hammer BE, Schausberger C, Fischer T, Reisenberger K, Jacobs V (2014) Patient satisfaction with childbirth after external cephalic version. Arch Gynecol Obstet 289(3):523\u2013531","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"1","key":"3902_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2004.02.005","volume":"116","author":"LY-S Chan","year":"2004","unstructured":"Chan LY-S, Leung TY, Fok WY, Chan LW, Lau TK (2004) Prediction of successful vaginal delivery in women undergoing external cephalic version at term for breech presentation. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 116(1):39\u201342","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"1","key":"3902_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"76","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6277","volume":"33","author":"M Kok","year":"2009","unstructured":"Kok M, Cnossen J, Gravendeel L, Van Der Post JA, Mol BW (2009) Ultrasound factors to predict the outcome of external cephalic version: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 33(1):76\u201384","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"3902_CR12","first-page":"CD000184","volume":"1","author":"C Cluver","year":"2012","unstructured":"Cluver C, Hofmeyr GJ, Gyte GM, Sinclair M (2012) Interventions for helping to turn term breech babies to head first presentation when using external cephalic version. Cochrane database Syst Rev 1:CD000184","journal-title":"Cochrane database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"1","key":"3902_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1136\/acupmed-2012-010261","volume":"31","author":"J Vas","year":"2013","unstructured":"Vas J, Aranda-Regules JM, Modesto M, Ramos-Monserrat M, Bar\u00f3n M, Aguilar I et al (2013) Using moxibustion in primary healthcare to correct non-vertex presentation: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Acupunct Med 31(1):31\u201338","journal-title":"Acupunct Med"},{"key":"3902_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-13-4","volume":"13","author":"R Say","year":"2013","unstructured":"Say R, Thomson R, Robson S, Exley C (2013) A qualitative interview study exploring pregnant women\u2019s and health professionals\u2019 attitudes to external cephalic version. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 13:4","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"3","key":"3902_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1086\/JCE201324305","volume":"24","author":"H Minkoff","year":"2013","unstructured":"Minkoff H, Ecker J (2013) A reconsideration of home birth in the United States. J Clin Ethics 24(3):207\u2013214","journal-title":"J Clin Ethics"},{"issue":"5","key":"3902_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1179","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182167413","volume":"117","author":"J Ecker","year":"2011","unstructured":"Ecker J, Minkoff H (2011) Home birth: what are physicians\u2019 ethical obligations when patient choices may carry increased risk? Obstet Gynecol 117(5):1179\u20131182","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"3902_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.3109\/0167482X.2012.760540","volume":"34","author":"F Vlemmix","year":"2013","unstructured":"Vlemmix F, Kuitert M, Bais J, Opmeer B, van der Post J, Mol BW et al (2013) Patient\u2019s willingness to opt for external cephalic version. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 34(1):15\u201321","journal-title":"J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"3902_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(98)00149-3","volume":"81","author":"JB Meeus De","year":"1998","unstructured":"De Meeus JB, Ellia F, Magnin G (1998) External cephalic version after previous cesarean section: a series of 38 cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 81(1):65\u201368","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"2","key":"3902_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2008.08.012","volume":"142","author":"HY Sela","year":"2009","unstructured":"Sela HY, Fiegenberg T, Ben-Meir A, Elchalal U, Ezra Y (2009) Safety and efficacy of external cephalic version for women with a previous cesarean delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 142(2):111\u2013114","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"3902_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Burgos J, Cobos P, Rodr\u00edguez L, Osuna C, Centeno MM, Mart\u00ednez-Astorquiza T et al (2014) Is external cephalic version at term contraindicated in previous caesarean section? A prospective comparative cohort study. BJOG 121(2):230\u2013235 (discussion 235). doi: 10.1111\/1471-0528.12487","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12487"},{"issue":"3","key":"3902_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.1998.tb03081.x","volume":"38","author":"PJ Lowe","year":"1998","unstructured":"Lowe PJ, Mamers PM, Sturrock TV, Healy D (1998) A casemix cost comparison of 2 treatments for ectopic pregnancy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 38(3):333\u2013335","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"3902_CR22","first-page":"91","volume":"19","author":"N Tasnim","year":"2009","unstructured":"Tasnim N, Mahmud G, Khurshid M (2009) External cephalic version with salbutamol success rate and predictors of success. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 19(2):91\u201394","journal-title":"J Coll Physicians Surg Pak"},{"issue":"9","key":"3902_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"660","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050802244938","volume":"21","author":"A Ben-Meir","year":"2008","unstructured":"Ben-Meir A, Erez Y, Sela HY, Shveiky D, Tsafrir A, Ezra Y (2008) Prognostic parameters for successful external cephalic version. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 21(9):660\u2013662","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"3902_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"103","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0030-1262909","volume":"28","author":"M Kok","year":"2011","unstructured":"Kok M, van der Steeg JW, van der Post JAM, Mol BWJ (2011) Prediction of success of external cephalic version after 36\u00a0weeks. Am J Perinatol 28(2):103\u2013110","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"3902_CR25","first-page":"860107","volume":"2014","author":"PS Lim","year":"2014","unstructured":"Lim PS, Ng BK, Ali A, Shafiee MN, Kampan NC, Mohamed Ismail NA et al (2014) Successful external cephalic version: factors predicting vaginal birth. ScientificWorldJournal 2014:860107","journal-title":"ScientificWorldJournal"},{"issue":"1","key":"3902_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2014.900749","volume":"28","author":"L Salzer","year":"2014","unstructured":"Salzer L, Nagar R, Melamed N, Wiznitzer A, Peled Y, Yogev Y (2014) Predictors of successful external cephalic version and assessment of success for vaginal delivery. J Mater Fetal Neonatal Med 28(1):49\u201354","journal-title":"J Mater Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"3902_CR27","first-page":"85","volume":"5","author":"H Zandstra","year":"2013","unstructured":"Zandstra H, Mertens HJMM (2013) Improving external cephalic version for foetal breech presentation. Facts Views Vis ObGyn 5(2):85\u201390","journal-title":"Facts Views Vis ObGyn"},{"issue":"6","key":"3902_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"648","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.10093","volume":"39","author":"S Pri-Paz","year":"2012","unstructured":"Pri-Paz S, Khalek N, Fuchs KM, Simpson LL (2012) Maximal amniotic fluid index as a prognostic factor in pregnancies complicated by polyhydramnios. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 39(6):648\u2013653","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"3902_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2011.01386.x","volume":"52","author":"J Burgos","year":"2012","unstructured":"Burgos J, Cobos P, Rodriguez L, Pijo\u00e1n JI, Fern\u00e1ndez-Llebrez L, Mart\u00ednez-Astorquiza T et al (2012) Clinical score for the outcome of external cephalic version: a two-phase prospective study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 52(1):59\u201361","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"3902_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"80","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1751","volume":"25","author":"NJ Dudley","year":"2005","unstructured":"Dudley NJ (2005) A systematic review of the ultrasound estimation of fetal weight. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 25(1):80\u201389","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"10","key":"3902_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1101","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340903176792","volume":"88","author":"J Burgos","year":"2009","unstructured":"Burgos J, Melchor JC, Cobos P, Centeno M, Pijoan JI, Fernandez-Llebrez L et al (2009) Does fetal weight estimated by ultrasound really affect the success rate of external cephalic version? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 88(10):1101\u20131106","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"1","key":"3902_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.12152","volume":"54","author":"A Mowat","year":"2014","unstructured":"Mowat A, Gardener G (2014) Predictors of successful external cephalic version in an Australian maternity hospital. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 54(1):59\u201363","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"3902_CR33","first-page":"386","volume":"38","author":"N Obeidat","year":"2011","unstructured":"Obeidat N, Lataifeh I, Al-Khateeb M, Zayed F, Khriesat W, Amarin Z (2011) Factors associated with the success of external cephalic version (ECV) of breech presentation at term. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 38(4):386\u2013389","journal-title":"Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"9","key":"3902_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1073","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1997.tb12070.x","volume":"104","author":"M Healey","year":"1997","unstructured":"Healey M, Porter R, Galimberti A (1997) Introducing external cephalic version at 36 weeks or more in a district general hospital: a review and an audit. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104(9):1073\u20131079","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"3902_CR35","first-page":"11","volume":"18","author":"LY Cho","year":"2012","unstructured":"Cho LY, Lau WL, Lo TK, Tang HHT, Leung WC (2012) Predictors of successful outcomes after external cephalic version in singleton term breech pregnancies: a nine-year historical cohort study. Hong Kong Med J 18(1):11\u201319","journal-title":"Hong Kong Med J"},{"issue":"7","key":"3902_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"798","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1997.tb12023.x","volume":"104","author":"TK Lau","year":"1997","unstructured":"Lau TK, Lo KW, Wan D, Rogers MS (1997) Predictors of successful external cephalic version at term: a prospective study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104(7):798\u2013802","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"5 Pt 1","key":"3902_CR37","first-page":"783","volume":"94","author":"GA Aisenbrey","year":"1999","unstructured":"Aisenbrey GA, Catanzarite VA, Nelson C (1999) External cephalic version: predictors of success. Obstet Gynecol 94(5 Pt 1):783\u2013786","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"3902_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12011","volume":"92","author":"AN Rosman","year":"2013","unstructured":"Rosman AN, Guijt A, Vlemmix F, Rijnders M, Mol BWJ, Kok M (2013) Contraindications for external cephalic version in breech position at term: a systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 92(2):137\u2013142","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"3","key":"3902_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"221","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(02)00274-6","volume":"79","author":"Y Yogev","year":"2002","unstructured":"Yogev Y, Horowitz E, Ben-Haroush A, Chen R, Kaplan B (2002) Changing attitudes toward mode of delivery and external cephalic version in breech presentations. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 79(3):221\u2013224","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"4","key":"3902_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"663","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-012-2639-1","volume":"287","author":"J Reinhard","year":"2013","unstructured":"Reinhard J, S\u00e4nger N, Hanker L, Reichenbach L, Yuan J, Herrmann E et al (2013) Delivery mode and neonatal outcome after a trial of external cephalic version (ECV): a prospective trial of vaginal breech versus cephalic delivery. Arch Gynecol Obstet 287(4):663\u2013668","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"3902_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Balayla J, Dahdouh EM, Villeneuve S, Boucher M, Gauthier RJ, Audibert F et al (2015) Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes following unsuccessful external cephalic version: a stratified analysis amongst failures, successes, and controls. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 28(5):605\u2013610. doi: 10.3109\/14767058.2014.927429","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2014.927429"},{"issue":"10","key":"3902_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"883","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(15)30809-4","volume":"35","author":"SMI Kuppens","year":"2013","unstructured":"Kuppens SMI, Hutton EK, Hasaart THM, Aichi N, Wijnen HA, Pop VJM (2013) Mode of delivery following successful external cephalic version: comparison with spontaneous cephalic presentations at delivery. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 35(10):883\u2013888","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"issue":"7","key":"3902_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"355","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2002-35609","volume":"19","author":"A Ben-Haroush","year":"2002","unstructured":"Ben-Haroush A, Perri T, Bar J, Yogev Y, Bar-Hava I, Hod M et al (2002) Mode of delivery following successful external cephalic version. Am J Perinatol 19(7):355\u2013360","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"issue":"3","key":"3902_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"763","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2003.09.056","volume":"190","author":"Y V\u00e9zina","year":"2004","unstructured":"V\u00e9zina Y, Bujold E, Varin J, Marquette GP, Boucher M (2004) Cesarean delivery after successful external cephalic version of breech presentation at term: a comparative study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190(3):763\u2013768","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"3902_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-015-3643-z","volume":"92","author":"Y Hants","year":"2015","unstructured":"Hants Y, Kabiri D, Elchalal U, Arbel-Alon S, Drukker L, Ezra Y (2015) Induction of labor at term following external cephalic version in nulliparous women is associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery. Arch Gynecol Obstet 92(2):313\u2013319","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-015-3902-z.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-015-3902-z\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-015-3902-z","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,14]],"date-time":"2023-08-14T22:45:23Z","timestamp":1692053123000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-015-3902-z"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,10,5]]},"references-count":45,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,4]]}},"alternative-id":["3902"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-015-3902-z","relation":{},"ISSN":["0932-0067","1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0932-0067","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-0711","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,10,5]]}}}