{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,26]],"date-time":"2026-07-26T06:12:26Z","timestamp":1785046346126,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":25,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,2,2]],"date-time":"2016-02-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1454371200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,10]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-016-4026-9","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,2,2]],"date-time":"2016-02-02T04:02:23Z","timestamp":1454385743000},"page":"725-730","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":14,"title":["Induction of labor in nulliparous women with unfavorable cervix: a comparison of Foley catheter and vaginal prostaglandin E2"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"294","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2533-6972","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Yossi","family":"Mizrachi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Michal","family":"Levy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jacob","family":"Bar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Michal","family":"Kovo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2016,2,2]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"4026_CR1","first-page":"1","volume":"64","author":"JA Martin","year":"2015","unstructured":"Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJ, Curtin SC, Matthews TJ (2015) Births: final data for 2013. Natl Vital Stat Rep 64(1):1\u201365","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"issue":"2 Pt 1","key":"4026_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"386","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181b48ef5","volume":"114","author":"ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107","year":"2009","unstructured":"ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107 (2009) Induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol 114(2 Pt 1):386\u2013397. doi: 10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181b48ef5","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"4026_CR3","first-page":"266","volume":"24","author":"EH Bishop","year":"1964","unstructured":"Bishop EH (1964) Pelvic scoring for elective induction. Obstet Gynecol 24:266\u2013268","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"4026_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"690","DOI":"10.1097\/01.aog.0000152338.76759.38","volume":"105","author":"FP Vrouenraets","year":"2005","unstructured":"Vrouenraets FP, Roumen FJ, Dehing CJ, van den Akker ES, Aarts MJ, Scheve EJ (2005) Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 105(4):690\u2013697. doi: 10.1097\/01.aog.0000152338.76759.38","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"4026_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"CD001233","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD001233.pub2","volume":"3","author":"M Jozwiak","year":"2012","unstructured":"Jozwiak M, Bloemenkamp KW, Kelly AJ, Mol BW, Irion O, Boulvain M (2012) Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD001233. doi: 10.1002\/14651858.CD001233.pub2","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"4","key":"4026_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"698","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000157436.68847.3b","volume":"105","author":"A Vahratian","year":"2005","unstructured":"Vahratian A, Zhang J, Troendle JF, Sciscione AC, Hoffman MK (2005) Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas. Obstet Gynecol 105(4):698\u2013704. doi: 10.1097\/01.AOG.0000157436.68847.3b","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6 Pt 1","key":"4026_CR7","first-page":"917","volume":"95","author":"AS Maslow","year":"2000","unstructured":"Maslow AS, Sweeny AL (2000) Elective induction of labor as a risk factor for cesarean delivery among low-risk women at term. Obstet Gynecol 95(6 Pt 1):917\u2013922","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2 Pt 1","key":"4026_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181ad9377","volume":"114","author":"L Pevzner","year":"2009","unstructured":"Pevzner L, Rayburn WF, Rumney P, Wing DA (2009) Factors predicting successful labor induction with dinoprostone and misoprostol vaginal inserts. Obstet Gynecol 114(2 Pt 1):261\u2013267. doi: 10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181ad9377","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"4026_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181e10c5c","volume":"116","author":"DB Ehrenthal","year":"2010","unstructured":"Ehrenthal DB, Jiang X, Strobino DM (2010) Labor induction and the risk of a cesarean delivery among nulliparous women at term. Obstet Gynecol 116(1):35\u201342. doi: 10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181e10c5c","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"4026_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"694e611","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.03.026","volume":"198","author":"DV Coonrod","year":"2008","unstructured":"Coonrod DV, Drachman D, Hobson P, Manriquez M (2008) Nulliparous term singleton vertex cesarean delivery rates: institutional and individual level predictors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 198(6):694e611\u2013694e691. doi: 10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.03.026 discussion 694 e611","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"4026_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"220","DOI":"10.3109\/01443615.2010.544424","volume":"31","author":"F Memon","year":"2011","unstructured":"Memon F, Wijesiriwardana A, Jonker L (2011) Maternal and prenatal factors influencing the outcome of prostaglandin E2 induced labour. J Obstet Gynaecol 31(3):220\u2013223. doi: 10.3109\/01443615.2010.544424","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"4026_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm-2013-0152","volume":"42","author":"K Suffecool","year":"2014","unstructured":"Suffecool K, Rosenn BM, Kam S, Mushi J, Foroutan J, Herrera K (2014) Labor induction in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix: double balloon catheter versus dinoprostone. J Perinat Med 42(2):213\u2013218. doi: 10.1515\/jpm-2013-0152","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"issue":"5 Pt 1","key":"4026_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1108","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70090-6","volume":"181","author":"D Abramovici","year":"1999","unstructured":"Abramovici D, Goldwasser S, Mabie BC, Mercer BM, Goldwasser R, Sibai BM (1999) A randomized comparison of oral misoprostol versus Foley catheter and oxytocin for induction of labor at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181(5 Pt 1):1108\u20131112","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"4026_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"139","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2004-823777","volume":"21","author":"J Culver","year":"2004","unstructured":"Culver J, Strauss RA, Brody S, Dorman K, Timlin S, McMahon MJ (2004) A randomized trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter with concurrent oxytocin for labor induction in nulliparous women. Am J Perinatol 21(3):139\u2013146. doi: 10.1055\/s-2004-823777","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"issue":"11","key":"4026_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1443","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2009.02279.x","volume":"116","author":"CE Pennell","year":"2009","unstructured":"Pennell CE, Henderson JJ, O\u2019Neill MJ, McChlery S, Doherty DA, Dickinson JE (2009) Induction of labour in nulliparous women with an unfavourable cervix: a randomised controlled trial comparing double and single balloon catheters and PGE2 gel. BJOG 116(11):1443\u20131452. doi: 10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2009.02279.x","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"5","key":"4026_CR16","first-page":"311","volume":"7","author":"S Dollberg","year":"2005","unstructured":"Dollberg S, Haklai Z, Mimouni FB, Gorfein I, Gordon ES (2005) Birth weight standards in the live-born population in Israel. Isr Med Assoc J: IMAJ 7(5):311\u2013314","journal-title":"Isr Med Assoc J: IMAJ"},{"issue":"1","key":"4026_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181aef106","volume":"114","author":"ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 106","year":"2009","unstructured":"ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 106 (2009) Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: nomenclature, interpretation, and general management principles. Obstet Gynecol 114(1):192\u2013202. doi: 10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181aef106","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"4026_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"592","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2013.831066","volume":"27","author":"FK Aghideh","year":"2014","unstructured":"Aghideh FK, Mullin PM, Ingles S, Ouzounian JG, Opper N, Wilson ML, Miller DA, Lee RH (2014) A comparison of obstetrical outcomes with labor induction agents used at term. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 27(6):592\u2013596. doi: 10.3109\/14767058.2013.831066","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"4026_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"56","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.03.004","volume":"123","author":"A Shetty","year":"2005","unstructured":"Shetty A, Burt R, Rice P, Templeton A (2005) Women\u2019s perceptions, expectations and satisfaction with induced labour\u2014a questionnaire-based study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 123(1):56\u201361. doi: 10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.03.004","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"8","key":"4026_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"987","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12221","volume":"120","author":"GJ Baaren van","year":"2013","unstructured":"van Baaren GJ, Jozwiak M, Opmeer BC, Oude Rengerink K, Benthem M, Dijksterhuis MG, van Huizen ME, van der Salm PC, Schuitemaker NW, Papatsonis DN, Perquin DA, Porath M, van der Post JA, Rijnders RJ, Scheepers HC, Spaanderman M, van Pampus MG, de Leeuw JW, Mol BW, Bloemenkamp KW (2013) Cost-effectiveness of induction of labour at term with a Foley catheter compared to vaginal prostaglandin E(2) gel (PROBAAT trial). BJOG 120(8):987\u2013995. doi: 10.1111\/1471-0528.12221","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"6","key":"4026_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"719","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2011.02901.x","volume":"118","author":"SE Taher","year":"2011","unstructured":"Taher SE, Inder JW, Soltan SA, Eliahoo J, Edmonds DK, Bennett PR (2011) Prostaglandin E2 vaginal gel or tablets for the induction of labour at term: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG 118(6):719\u2013725. doi: 10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2011.02901.x","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"6","key":"4026_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"647","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2011.02905.x","volume":"118","author":"NS Fox","year":"2011","unstructured":"Fox NS, Saltzman DH, Roman AS, Klauser CK, Moshier E, Rebarber A (2011) Intravaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter for labour induction: a meta-analysis. BJOG 118(6):647\u2013654. doi: 10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2011.02905.x","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"2","key":"4026_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005","volume":"199","author":"J Heinemann","year":"2008","unstructured":"Heinemann J, Gillen G, Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM (2008) Do mechanical methods of cervical ripening increase infectious morbidity? A systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199(2):177\u2013187. doi: 10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005 discussion 187\u2013178","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"4026_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"CD003101","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD003101.pub3","volume":"6","author":"J Thomas","year":"2014","unstructured":"Thomas J, Fairclough A, Kavanagh J, Kelly AJ (2014) Vaginal prostaglandin (PGE2 and PGF2a) for induction of labour at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 6:CD003101. doi: 10.1002\/14651858.CD003101.pub3","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"4026_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2014.993965","author":"I Parkes","year":"2014","unstructured":"Parkes I, Kabiri D, Hants Y, Ezra Y (2014) The indication for induction of labor impacts the risk of cesarean delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. doi: 10.3109\/14767058.2014.993965","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-016-4026-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-016-4026-9\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-016-4026-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-016-4026-9","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,28]],"date-time":"2019-05-28T14:00:42Z","timestamp":1559052042000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-016-4026-9"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,2,2]]},"references-count":25,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,10]]}},"alternative-id":["4026"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-016-4026-9","relation":{},"ISSN":["0932-0067","1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0932-0067","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-0711","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,2,2]]}}}