{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,27]],"date-time":"2026-03-27T02:26:12Z","timestamp":1774578372420,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":23,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,4,4]],"date-time":"2017-04-04T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1491264000000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,6]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-017-4359-z","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,4,5]],"date-time":"2017-04-05T09:24:28Z","timestamp":1491384268000},"page":"1393-1398","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Non-progressive labor in the second stage leading to vacuum extraction is a risk factor for recurrent non-progressive labor"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"295","author":[{"given":"Avi","family":"Harlev","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sarah K.","family":"Fatool","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ruslan","family":"Sergienko","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0454-6874","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Eyal","family":"Sheiner","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,4,4]]},"reference":[{"key":"4359_CR1","unstructured":"Stephenson P (1992) International differences in the use of obstetrical interventions. 1992, WHO (EUR\/ICP\/MCH), Copenhagen. p\u00a0112"},{"key":"4359_CR2","first-page":"198","volume-title":"Operative obstetrics and gynecology","author":"N Mahlotra","year":"2014","unstructured":"Mahlotra N, Puri R, Malhotra J (2014) Operative obstetrics and gynecology. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers Ltd, New Delhi, p\u00a0198"},{"issue":"4","key":"4359_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"402","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340902811001","volume":"88","author":"H Kjaergaard","year":"2009","unstructured":"Kjaergaard H et al (2009) Incidence and outcomes of dystocia in the active phase of labor in term nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 88(4):402\u2013407","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"1","key":"4359_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(02)00007-3","volume":"77","author":"U Feinstein","year":"2002","unstructured":"Feinstein U et al (2002) Risk factors for arrest of descent during the second stage of labor. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 77(1):7\u201314","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"2","key":"4359_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"227","DOI":"10.1097\/GRF.0000000000000113","volume":"58","author":"YW Cheng","year":"2015","unstructured":"Cheng YW, Caughey AB (2015) Second stage of labor. Clin Obstet Gynecol 58(2):227\u2013240","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"4359_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"315","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1523-536X.2006.00129.x","volume":"33","author":"MR Altman","year":"2006","unstructured":"Altman MR, Lydon-Rochelle MT (2006) Prolonged second stage of labor and risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review. Birth 33(4):315\u2013322","journal-title":"Birth"},{"issue":"3","key":"4359_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"933","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.05.044","volume":"191","author":"YW Cheng","year":"2004","unstructured":"Cheng YW, Hopkins LM, Caughey AB (2004) How long is too long: Does a prolonged second stage of labor in nulliparous women affect maternal and neonatal outcomes? Am J Obstet Gynecol 191(3):933\u2013938","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"4359_CR8","first-page":"1","volume":"8","author":"A Shmueli","year":"2016","unstructured":"Shmueli A et al (2016) Perinatal outcomes of vacuum assisted versus cesarean deliveries for prolonged second stage of delivery at term (.). J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 8:1\u20134","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"Suppl 8","key":"4359_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S244","DOI":"10.1016\/S0368-2315(08)74762-8","volume":"37","author":"G Beucher","year":"2008","unstructured":"Beucher G (2008) Maternal morbidity after operative vaginal delivery. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris), 37 Suppl 8: S244\u201359","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"},{"issue":"1","key":"4359_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.02002.x","volume":"116","author":"H Rouhe","year":"2009","unstructured":"Rouhe H et al (2009) Fear of childbirth according to parity, gestational age, and obstetric history. BJOG 116(1):67\u201373","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"7435","key":"4359_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"311","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.37942.546076.44","volume":"328","author":"R Bahl","year":"2004","unstructured":"Bahl R, Strachan B, Murphy DJ (2004) Outcome of subsequent pregnancy three years after previous operative delivery in the second stage of labour: cohort study. BMJ 328(7435):311","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"12","key":"4359_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1593","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13021","volume":"122","author":"C Elvander","year":"2015","unstructured":"Elvander C et al (2015) Mode of delivery and the probability of subsequent childbearing: a population-based register study. BJOG 122(12):1593\u20131600","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"10","key":"4359_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1175","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12215","volume":"92","author":"C Elvander","year":"2013","unstructured":"Elvander C et al (2013) Reason for the increasing use of vacuum extraction in Sweden: a population-based study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 92(10):1175\u20131182","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"12","key":"4359_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1600","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13041","volume":"122","author":"SP Chauhan","year":"2015","unstructured":"Chauhan SP (2015) Route of delivery linked with subsequent childbirth? BJOG 122(12):1600","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"13","key":"4359_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1648","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2012.03502.x","volume":"119","author":"A Sandstr\u00f6m","year":"2012","unstructured":"Sandstr\u00f6m A et al (2012) Labour dystocia\u2013risk of recurrence and instrumental delivery in following labour\u2014a population-based cohort study. BJOG 119(13):1648\u20131656","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"9","key":"4359_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1099","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2014.943178","volume":"28","author":"T Tobias","year":"2015","unstructured":"Tobias T et al (2015) Does dystocia during labor pose a risk factor for another non-progressive labor during the subsequent delivery? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 28(9):1099\u20131103","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"4359_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"362","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12824","volume":"95","author":"C Elvander","year":"2016","unstructured":"Elvander C, Cnattingius S (2016) Outcome of attempted vaginal delivery after a previous vacuum extraction: a population-based study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 95(3):362\u2013367","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"4","key":"4359_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"757","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181b6f611","volume":"114","author":"N Melamed","year":"2009","unstructured":"Melamed N et al (2009) Pregnancy outcome and mode of delivery after a previous operative vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 114(4):757\u2013763","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"4359_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"405","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2011.02.007","volume":"25","author":"PJ Williams","year":"2011","unstructured":"Williams PJ, Broughton Pipkin F (2011) The genetics of pre-eclampsia and other hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 25(4):405\u2013417","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"4359_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"283","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm-2012-0104","volume":"41","author":"S Lurie","year":"2013","unstructured":"Lurie S et al (2013) Mode of delivery in a subsequent pregnancy following previous instrumental delivery. J Perinat Med 41(3):283\u2013286","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"4359_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"243","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-008-0902-2","volume":"280","author":"N Melamed","year":"2009","unstructured":"Melamed N, Yogev Y, Stainmetz S, Ben-Haroush A (2009 Aug) What happens when vacuum extraction fails? Arch Gynecol Obstet 280(2):243\u2013248","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"6","key":"4359_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1075","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-012-2688-5","volume":"287","author":"R Kessous","year":"2013","unstructured":"Kessous R, Tirosh D, Weintraub AY, Benshalom-Tirosh N, Sergienko R, Sheiner E (2013) Second stage disorders in patients following a previous cesarean section: vacuum versus repeated cesarean section. Arch Gynecol Obstet 287(6):1075\u20131079","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"3","key":"4359_CR23","first-page":"222","volume":"81","author":"E Sheiner","year":"2002","unstructured":"Sheiner E et al (2002) Risk factors and outcome of failure to progress during the first stage of labor: a population-based study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 81(3):222\u2013226","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-017-4359-z.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-017-4359-z\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-017-4359-z.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,17]],"date-time":"2025-06-17T20:48:20Z","timestamp":1750193300000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-017-4359-z"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,4,4]]},"references-count":23,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,6]]}},"alternative-id":["4359"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-017-4359-z","relation":{},"ISSN":["0932-0067","1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0932-0067","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-0711","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,4,4]]}}}