{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,12]],"date-time":"2026-03-12T07:03:21Z","timestamp":1773299001294,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,5,24]],"date-time":"2018-05-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1527120000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,8]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-018-4801-x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,5,24]],"date-time":"2018-05-24T10:39:40Z","timestamp":1527158380000},"page":"273-277","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Complicated primary cesarean delivery increases the risk for uterine rupture at subsequent trial of labor after cesarean"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"298","author":[{"given":"Lina","family":"Salman","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Liran","family":"Hiersch","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Anat","family":"Shmueli","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Eyal","family":"Krispin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Arnon","family":"Wiznitzer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6887-6314","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Rinat","family":"Gabbay-Benziv","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,5,24]]},"reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"4801_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0148343","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0148343","volume":"11","author":"AP Betr\u00e1n","year":"2016","unstructured":"Betr\u00e1n AP, Ye J, Moller A-B, Zhang J, G\u00fclmezoglu AM, Torloni MR (2016) The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990\u20132014. PLoS One 11(2):e0148343","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"issue":"1","key":"4801_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"197","DOI":"10.2353\/ajpath.2010.091209","volume":"177","author":"CS Buhimschi","year":"2010","unstructured":"Buhimschi CS, Zhao G, Sora N, Madri JA, Buhimschi IA (2010) Myometrial wound healing post-cesarean delivery in the MRL\/MpJ mouse model of uterine scarring. Am J Pathol 177(1):197\u2013207","journal-title":"Am J Pathol"},{"key":"4801_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1016","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.05.066","volume":"193","author":"MB Landon","year":"2005","unstructured":"Landon MB, Leindecker S, Spong CY et al (2005) The MFMU cesarean registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193:1016\u20131023","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"4801_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2009.02351.x","volume":"117","author":"S Tahseen","year":"2010","unstructured":"Tahseen S, Griffiths M (2010) Vaginal birth after two caesarean sections (VBAC-2)\u2014a systematic review with meta-analysis of success rate and adverse outcomes of VBAC-2 versus VBAC-1 and repeat (third) caesarean sections. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 117(1):5\u201319","journal-title":"BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"4801_CR5","first-page":"175","volume":"97","author":"TD Shipp","year":"2001","unstructured":"Shipp TD, Zelop CM, Repke JT, Cohen A, Lieberman E (2001) Interdelivery interval and risk of symptomatic uterine rupture. Obstet Gynecol 97(2):175\u2013177","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"4801_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM200107053450101","volume":"345","author":"M Lydon-Rochelle","year":"2001","unstructured":"Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR, Martin DP (2001) Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 345(1):3\u20138","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"5","key":"4801_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"780","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13394","volume":"123","author":"I Al-Zirqi","year":"2016","unstructured":"Al-Zirqi I, Stray-Pedersen B, Fors\u00e9n L, Daltveit AK, Vangen S (2016) Uterine rupture: trends over 40 years. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 123(5):780\u2013787","journal-title":"BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"4801_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"869","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-017-4508-4","volume":"296","author":"G Vilchez","year":"2017","unstructured":"Vilchez G, Nazeer S, Kumar K, Warren M, Dai J, Sokol RJ (2017) Contemporary epidemiology and novel predictors of uterine rupture: a nationwide population-based study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 296(5):869\u2013875","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"25","key":"4801_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2581","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa040405","volume":"351","author":"MB Landon","year":"2004","unstructured":"Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ et al (2004) Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 351(25):2581\u20132589","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"4801_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"882","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70319-4","volume":"181","author":"CM Zelop","year":"1999","unstructured":"Zelop CM, Shipp TD, Repke JT, Cohen A, Caughey AB, Lieberman E (1999) Uterine rupture during induced or augmented labor in gravid women with one prior cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181:882\u2013886","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"4801_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1132","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.06.009","volume":"195","author":"JL Bailit","year":"2006","unstructured":"Bailit JL, Landon MB, Thom E et al (2006) The MFMU cesarean registry: impact of time of day on cesarean complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195(4):1132\u20131137","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"4801_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-017-4569-4","volume":"297","author":"Y Mizrachi","year":"2018","unstructured":"Mizrachi Y, Barber E, Kovo M, Bar J, Lurie S (2018) Prediction of vaginal birth after one ceasarean delivery for non-progressive labor. Arch Gynecol Obstet 297(1):85\u201391","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"4","key":"4801_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"806","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000259312.36053.02","volume":"109","author":"WA Grobman","year":"2007","unstructured":"Grobman WA, Lai Y, Landon MB et al (2007) Development of a nomogram for prediction of vaginal birt after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 109(4):806\u2013812","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"4801_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"648","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318163cd3e","volume":"111","author":"AC Sciscione","year":"2008","unstructured":"Sciscione AC, Landon MB, Leveno KJ et al (2008) Previous preterm cesarean delivery and risk of subsequent uterine rupture. Obstet Gynecol 111(3):648\u2013653","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"4801_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1095","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000832","volume":"125","author":"SMR Lannon","year":"2015","unstructured":"Lannon SMR, Guthrie KA, Vanderhoeven JP, Gammill HS (2015) Uterine rupture risk after periviable cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 125(5):1095\u20131100","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"4801_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"355","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-017-4417-6","volume":"296","author":"Y Chen","year":"2017","unstructured":"Chen Y, Han P, Wang YJ, Li YX (2017) Risk factors for incomplete healing of the uterine incision after cesarean section. Arch Gynecol Obstet 296(2):355\u2013361","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"4","key":"4801_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"755","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-014-3455-6","volume":"291","author":"BL Brahmalakshmy","year":"2015","unstructured":"Brahmalakshmy BL, Kushtagi P (2015) Variables influencing the integrity of lower uterine segment in post-cesarean pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 291(4):755\u2013762","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"1","key":"4801_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"160","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-017-1349-x","volume":"17","author":"AEA Refaeey El","year":"2017","unstructured":"El Refaeey AEA, Abdelfattah H, Mosbah A et al (2017) Is early intervention using Mansoura-VV uterine compression sutures an effective procedure in the management of primary atonic postpartum hemorrhage? : a prospective study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 17(1):160","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"4801_CR19","first-page":"1","volume":"27","author":"E Krispin","year":"2017","unstructured":"Krispin E, Hiersch L, Wilk Goldsher Y, Wiznitzer A, Yogev Y, Ashwal E (2017) Association between prior vaginal birth after cesarean and subsequent labor outcome. J Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Med 27:1\u20137","journal-title":"J Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"22","key":"4801_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3741","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2016.1142968","volume":"29","author":"R Vigorito","year":"2016","unstructured":"Vigorito R, Montemango R, Sconne G, De Stefano R (2016) Obstetric outcome associated with trial of labor in women with three perior cesarean delivery and at least one prior vaginal birth in an area with a particulary high rate of cesarean delivery. J Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Med 29(22):3741\u20133743","journal-title":"J Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Med"}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-018-4801-x\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-018-4801-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-018-4801-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,23]],"date-time":"2019-05-23T19:13:44Z","timestamp":1558638824000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-018-4801-x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,5,24]]},"references-count":20,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,8]]}},"alternative-id":["4801"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-018-4801-x","relation":{},"ISSN":["0932-0067","1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0932-0067","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-0711","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,5,24]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2 January 2018","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"16 May 2018","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"24 May 2018","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"value":"The authors report no conflicts of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and\/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study formal consent is not required.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Informed consent"}}]}}