{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,19]],"date-time":"2026-09-19T14:15:47Z","timestamp":1789827347862,"version":"4.0.1"},"reference-count":28,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,3,8]],"date-time":"2019-03-08T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1552003200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,5]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-019-05106-y","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,3,8]],"date-time":"2019-03-08T14:15:55Z","timestamp":1552054555000},"page":"1321-1330","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":14,"title":["Analysis of the reproductive outcomes and the size of the unicornuate uterus measured by magnetic resonance imaging and their relationship"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"299","author":[{"given":"Xiao-qing","family":"Li","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hui-jun","family":"Qian","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Xu-yin","family":"Zhang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yuan","family":"He","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Shao-Fen","family":"Zhang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ke-Qin","family":"Hua","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jing-Xin","family":"Ding","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,3,8]]},"reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"5106_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1016\/S1526-9523(99)00025-2","volume":"45","author":"S White-Walker","year":"2000","unstructured":"White-Walker S (2000) Before we are born: essentials of embroyology and birth defects. J Midwifery Women's Health 45(2):192. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S1526-9523(99)00025-2","journal-title":"J Midwifery Women's Health"},{"key":"5106_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.13622","author":"M Sawada","year":"2018","unstructured":"Sawada M, Kakigano A, Matsuzaki S, Takiuchi T, Mimura K, Kumasawa K, Endo M, Ueda Y, Yoshino K, Kimura T (2018) Obstetric outcome in patients with a unicornuate uterus after laparoscopic resection of a rudimentary horn. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jog.13622","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"issue":"6","key":"5106_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"761","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmr028","volume":"17","author":"YY Chan","year":"2011","unstructured":"Chan YY, Jayaprakasan K, Zamora J, Thornton JG, Raine-Fenning N, Coomarasamy A (2011) The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 17(6):761\u2013771. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humupd\/dmr028","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"5106_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, mullerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions (1988). Fertil Steril 49 (6):944-955. doi:10.1016\/s0015-0282(16)59942-7","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)59942-7"},{"issue":"8","key":"5106_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2032","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/det098","volume":"28","author":"GF Grimbizis","year":"2013","unstructured":"Grimbizis GF, Gordts S, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Brucker S, De Angelis C, Gergolet M, Li TC, Tanos V, Brolmann H, Gianaroli L, Campo R (2013) The ESHRE\/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies. Hum Reprod 28(8):2032\u20132044. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/det098","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"5","key":"5106_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"873","DOI":"10.17219\/acem\/23171","volume":"24","author":"MM Zyla","year":"2015","unstructured":"Zyla MM, Wilczynski J, Nowakowska-Glab A, Maniecka-Bryla I, Nowakowska D (2015) Pregnancy and delivery in women with uterine malformations. Adv Clin Exp Med 24(5):873\u2013879. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.17219\/acem\/23171","journal-title":"Adv Clin Exp Med"},{"issue":"6","key":"5106_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"665","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2014.09.006","volume":"29","author":"CA Venetis","year":"2014","unstructured":"Venetis CA, Papadopoulos SP, Campo R, Gordts S, Tarlatzis BC, Grimbizis GF (2014) Clinical implications of congenital uterine anomalies: a meta-analysis of comparative studies. Reprod Biomed Online 29(6):665\u2013683. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.rbmo.2014.09.006","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"issue":"5","key":"5106_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1886","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2008.02.163","volume":"91","author":"D Reichman","year":"2009","unstructured":"Reichman D, Laufer MR, Robinson BK (2009) Pregnancy outcomes in unicornuate uteri: a review. Fertil Steril 91(5):1886\u20131894. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2008.02.163","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"2","key":"5106_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2009.09.006","volume":"24","author":"DE Reichman","year":"2010","unstructured":"Reichman DE, Laufer MR (2010) Congenital uterine anomalies affecting reproduction. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 24(2):193\u2013208. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2009.09.006","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"10","key":"5106_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2277","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/12.10.2277","volume":"12","author":"CB Francisco Raga","year":"1997","unstructured":"Francisco Raga CB, Remohi Jose, Bonilla-Musoles F, Simo \u0301n C, Pellicer A (1997) Reproductive impact of congenital Mu \u0308llerian anomalies. Hum Reprod 12(10):2277\u20132281","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"9","key":"5106_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1943","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/15.9.1943","volume":"15","author":"PE Egbase","year":"2000","unstructured":"Egbase PE, Al-Sharhan M, Grudzinskas JG (2000) Influence of position and length of uterus on implantation and clinical pregnancy rates in IVF and embryo transfer treatment cycles. Hum Reprod 15(9):1943\u20131946","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"11","key":"5106_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3000","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/det344","volume":"28","author":"LK Hawkins","year":"2013","unstructured":"Hawkins LK, Correia KF, Srouji SS, Hornstein MD, Missmer SA (2013) Uterine length and fertility outcomes: a cohort study in the IVF population. Hum Reprod 28(11):3000\u20133006. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/det344","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"5106_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"46","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.09.023","volume":"172","author":"PO Cenksoy","year":"2014","unstructured":"Cenksoy PO, Ficicioglu C, Yesiladali M, Akcin OA, Kaspar C (2014) The importance of the length of uterine cavity, the position of the tip of the inner catheter and the distance between the fundal endometrial surface and the air bubbles as determinants of the pregnancy rate in IVF cycles. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 172:46\u201350. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.09.023","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"2","key":"5106_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"663","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.08.067","volume":"93","author":"SS Chun","year":"2010","unstructured":"Chun SS, Chung MJ, Chong GO, Park KS, Lee TH (2010) Relationship between the length of the uterine cavity and clinical pregnancy rates after in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril 93(2):663\u2013665. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.08.067","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"1","key":"5106_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dev264","volume":"31","author":"GF Grimbizis","year":"2016","unstructured":"Grimbizis GF, Di Spiezio SA, Saravelos SH, Gordts S, Exacoustos C, Van Schoubroeck D, Bermejo C, Amso NN, Nargund G, Timmerman D, Athanasiadis A, Brucker S, De Angelis C, Gergolet M, Li TC, Tanos V, Tarlatzis B, Farquharson R, Gianaroli L, Campo R (2016) The Thessaloniki ESHRE\/ESGE consensus on diagnosis of female genital anomalies. Hum Reprod 31(1):2\u20137. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/dev264","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"1","key":"5106_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"185","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.13189","volume":"43","author":"SS Sheth","year":"2017","unstructured":"Sheth SS, Hajari AR, Lulla CP, Kshirsagar D (2017) Sonographic evaluation of uterine volume and its clinical importance. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 43(1):185\u2013189. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jog.13189","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"issue":"4","key":"5106_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"919","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-018-4663-2","volume":"297","author":"SA Mastrolia","year":"2018","unstructured":"Mastrolia SA, Baumfeld Y, Hershkovitz R, Yohay D, Trojano G, Weintraub AY (2018) Independent association between uterine malformations and cervical insufficiency: a retrospective population-based cohort study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 297(4):919\u2013926. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-018-4663-2","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"4","key":"5106_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"318","DOI":"10.22074\/ijfs.2018.5022","volume":"11","author":"M Kaveh","year":"2018","unstructured":"Kaveh M, Mehdizadeh Kashi A, Sadegi K, Forghani F (2018) Pregnancy in non-communicating rudimentary horn of a unicornuate uterus. Int J Fertil Steril 11(4):318\u2013320. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.22074\/ijfs.2018.5022","journal-title":"Int J Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"2","key":"5106_CR19","first-page":"59","volume":"39","author":"Y Kanno","year":"2014","unstructured":"Kanno Y, Suzuki T, Nakamura E, Goya K, Nishijima Y, Shinoda M, Hayashi M, Izumi S (2014) Successful term delivery after laparoscopic resection of a non-communicating rudimentary horn in a patient with a unicornuate uterus: a case report. Tokai J Exp Clin Med 39(2):59\u201363","journal-title":"Tokai J Exp Clin Med"},{"issue":"5","key":"5106_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"899","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(02)03368-X","volume":"78","author":"PC Lin","year":"2002","unstructured":"Lin PC, Bhatnagar KP, Nettleton GS, Nakajima ST (2002) Female genital anomalies affecting reproduction. Fertil Steril 78(5):899\u2013915","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"6","key":"5106_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1456","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000161321.94364.56","volume":"105","author":"Y Jayasinghe","year":"2005","unstructured":"Jayasinghe Y, Rane A, Stalewski H, Grover S (2005) The presentation and early diagnosis of the rudimentary uterine horn. Obstet Gynecol 105(6):1456\u20131467. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.AOG.0000161321.94364.56","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5106_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.08.023","volume":"182","author":"G Pados","year":"2014","unstructured":"Pados G, Tsolakidis D, Athanatos D, Almaloglou K, Nikolaidis N, Tarlatzis B (2014) Reproductive and obstetric outcome after laparoscopic excision of functional, non-communicating broadly attached rudimentary horn: a case series. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 182:33\u201337. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.08.023","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"9","key":"5106_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"949","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2013.847082","volume":"27","author":"NS Fox","year":"2014","unstructured":"Fox NS, Roman AS, Stern EM, Gerber RS, Saltzman DH, Rebarber A (2014) Type of congenital uterine anomaly and adverse pregnancy outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 27(9):949\u2013953. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/14767058.2013.847082","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"8","key":"5106_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1020","DOI":"10.1080\/01443615.2017.1318266","volume":"37","author":"J Liu","year":"2017","unstructured":"Liu J, Wu Y, Xu S, Su D, Han Y, Wu X (2017) Retrospective evaluation of pregnancy outcomes and clinical implications of 34 Han Chinese women with unicornuate uterus who received IVF-ET or ICSI-ET treatment. J Obstet Gynaecol 37(8):1020\u20131024. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/01443615.2017.1318266","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"5106_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"583","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2017.07.015","volume":"35","author":"X Li","year":"2017","unstructured":"Li X, Ouyang Y, Yi Y, Lin G, Lu G, Gong F (2017) Pregnancy outcomes of women with a congenital unicornuate uterus after IVF-embryo transfer. Reprod Biomed Online 35(5):583\u2013591. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.rbmo.2017.07.015","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"issue":"2","key":"5106_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"148","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2005.00346.x","volume":"45","author":"ME Akar","year":"2005","unstructured":"Akar ME, Bayar D, Yildiz S, Ozel M, Yilmaz Z (2005) Reproductive outcome of women with unicornuate uterus. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 45(2):148\u2013150. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2005.00346.x","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"10","key":"5106_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"989","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2013.853732","volume":"27","author":"LK Hawkins","year":"2014","unstructured":"Hawkins LK, Missmer SA, Correia KF, Hornstein MD (2014) Assessment of pregnancy-associated, within-woman change in uterine length. J Matern-Fetal Neo M 27(10):989\u2013993. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/14767058.2013.853732","journal-title":"J Matern-Fetal Neo M"},{"issue":"2","key":"5106_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1016\/0028-2243(92)90043-X","volume":"47","author":"PF Donderwinkel","year":"1992","unstructured":"Donderwinkel PF, Dorr JP, Willemsen WN (1992) The unicornuate uterus: clinical implications. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 47(2):135\u2013139. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0028-2243(92)90043-X","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-019-05106-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-019-05106-y\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-019-05106-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,3,7]],"date-time":"2020-03-07T00:12:39Z","timestamp":1583539959000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-019-05106-y"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,3,8]]},"references-count":28,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,5]]}},"alternative-id":["5106"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-019-05106-y","relation":{},"ISSN":["0932-0067","1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0932-0067","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-0711","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,3,8]]},"assertion":[{"value":"15 December 2018","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"22 February 2019","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"8 March 2019","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"value":"All the authors declare that they have no competing interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and\/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Department of Gynecology, the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University [2018\u201318] and informed consent was obtained from each individual.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}},{"value":"Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Informed consent"}}]}}