{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,11]],"date-time":"2026-03-11T11:19:13Z","timestamp":1773227953316,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":28,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,17]],"date-time":"2019-06-17T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1560729600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,17]],"date-time":"2019-06-17T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1560729600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,9]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-019-05216-7","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,18]],"date-time":"2019-06-18T11:02:32Z","timestamp":1560855752000},"page":"575-581","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["Correlation of short-term variation and Doppler parameters with adverse perinatal outcome in small-for-gestational age fetuses at term"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"300","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1865-5369","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Florian M.","family":"Stumpfe","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Florian","family":"Faschingbauer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sven","family":"Kehl","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jutta","family":"Pretscher","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Patrick","family":"Stelzl","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Andreas","family":"Mayr","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ralf L.","family":"Schild","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Matthias","family":"Schmid","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Matthias W.","family":"Beckmann","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Michael O.","family":"Schneider","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,17]]},"reference":[{"issue":"5","key":"5216_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1122","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000429658.85846.f9","volume":"121","author":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists","year":"2013","unstructured":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2013) ACOG practice bulletin no. 134: fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol 121(5):1122\u20131133","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"5216_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"303","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.13319","volume":"43","author":"J Morales-Rosello","year":"2014","unstructured":"Morales-Rosello J et al (2014) Changes in fetal Doppler indices as a marker of failure to reach growth potential at term. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 43(3):303\u2013310","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"5216_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15884","volume":"48","author":"SJ Gordijn","year":"2016","unstructured":"Gordijn SJ et al (2016) Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 48(3):333\u2013339","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5216_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"353","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-018-4966-3","volume":"299","author":"O Graupner","year":"2018","unstructured":"Graupner O et al (2018) Performance of computerized cardiotocography-based short-term variation in late-onset small-for-gestational-age fetuses and reference ranges for the late third trimester. Arch Gynecol Obstet 299:353\u2013360","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"1","key":"5216_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"57 e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.10.013","volume":"213","author":"AA Khalil","year":"2015","unstructured":"Khalil AA et al (2015) The association between fetal Doppler and admission to neonatal unit at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 213(1):57 e1\u201357.e7","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5216_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"54 e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.10.024","volume":"213","author":"AA Khalil","year":"2015","unstructured":"Khalil AA et al (2015) Is fetal cerebroplacental ratio an independent predictor of intrapartum fetal compromise and neonatal unit admission? Am J Obstet Gynecol 213(1):54 e1\u201354 e10","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"5216_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"156","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14647","volume":"45","author":"J Morales-Rosello","year":"2015","unstructured":"Morales-Rosello J et al (2015) Poor neonatal acid-base status in term fetuses with low cerebroplacental ratio. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 45(2):156\u2013161","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"5216_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"124 e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.11.016","volume":"208","author":"T Prior","year":"2013","unstructured":"Prior T et al (2013) Prediction of intrapartum fetal compromise using the cerebroumbilical ratio: a prospective observational study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 208(2):124 e1\u2013124 e6","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"5216_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"460","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14758","volume":"46","author":"T Prior","year":"2015","unstructured":"Prior T et al (2015) Are fetuses that fail to achieve their growth potential at increased risk of intrapartum compromise? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 46(4):460\u2013464","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"5216_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"564","DOI":"10.1046\/j.0960-7692.2001.00590.x","volume":"18","author":"K Hecher","year":"2001","unstructured":"Hecher K et al (2001) Monitoring of fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction: a longitudinal study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 18(6):564\u2013570","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"5216_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"229","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-009-1119-8","volume":"281","author":"G Galazios","year":"2010","unstructured":"Galazios G et al (2010) Fetal distress evaluation using and analyzing the variables of antepartum computerized cardiotocography. Arch Gynecol Obstet 281(2):229\u2013233","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"3","key":"5216_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"231","DOI":"10.1515\/JPM.2003.031","volume":"31","author":"MM Anceschi","year":"2003","unstructured":"Anceschi MM et al (2003) Validity of short term variation (STV) in detection of fetal acidemia. J Perinat Med 31(3):231\u2013236","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"5216_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"515","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(91)90277-X","volume":"165","author":"P Street","year":"1991","unstructured":"Street P et al (1991) Short-term variation in abnormal antenatal fetal heart rate records. Am J Obstet Gynecol 165(3):515\u2013523","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"9983","key":"5216_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2162","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(14)62049-3","volume":"385","author":"CC Lees","year":"2015","unstructured":"Lees CC et al (2015) 2 year neurodevelopmental and intermediate perinatal outcomes in infants with very preterm fetal growth restriction (TRUFFLE): a randomised trial. Lancet 385(9983):2162\u20132172","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"5216_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"521 e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.01.001","volume":"216","author":"T Stampalija","year":"2017","unstructured":"Stampalija T et al (2017) Is middle cerebral artery Doppler related to neonatal and 2-year infant outcome in early fetal growth restriction? Am J Obstet Gynecol 216:521 e1\u2013521 e13","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"5216_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"411","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-018-4978-z","volume":"299","author":"FM Stumpfe","year":"2019","unstructured":"Stumpfe FM et al (2019) Correlation of short-term variation and Doppler parameters with adverse perinatal outcome in low-risk fetuses at term. Arch Gynecol Obstet 299(2):411\u2013420","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"5216_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"752","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2006-924385","volume":"66","author":"S Schiermeier","year":"2006","unstructured":"Schiermeier S, Westhof G, Daumer M, Scholz M, Hatzmann W (2006) Short-time variations of fetal heart rate and the FIGO-CTG-Score\u2014first experience with a combination of these two parameters. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 66:752\u2013755","journal-title":"Geburtsh Frauenheilk"},{"issue":"6","key":"5216_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"490","DOI":"10.1515\/JPM.2002.077","volume":"30","author":"F Bahlmann","year":"2002","unstructured":"Bahlmann F et al (2002) Blood flow velocity waveforms of the fetal middle cerebral artery in a normal population: reference values from 18 weeks to 42 weeks of gestation. J Perinat Med 30(6):490\u2013501","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"5216_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"124","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20","volume":"21","author":"AA Baschat","year":"2003","unstructured":"Baschat AA, Gembruch U (2003) The cerebroplacental Doppler ratio revisited. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 21(2):124\u2013127","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"9946","key":"5216_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"857","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(14)60932-6","volume":"384","author":"J Villar","year":"2014","unstructured":"Villar J et al (2014) International standards for newborn weight, length, and head circumference by gestational age and sex: the newborn cross-sectional study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project. Lancet 384(9946):857\u2013868","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"5216_CR21","unstructured":"National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health (2017)\u00a0Intrapartum care: care of healthy women and their babies during childbirth (NICE Guideline 190). RCOG Press"},{"issue":"7","key":"5216_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"771","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0043-112863","volume":"77","author":"N Genuttis","year":"2017","unstructured":"Genuttis N, Bolz M, Briese V (2017) Can the rate of C-sections performed in a level I perinatal center be reduced?\u2014an analysis of the University Gynecology Clinic Rostock, 2008\u20132014. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 77(7):771\u2013779","journal-title":"Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd"},{"issue":"3","key":"5216_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"618","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31820b0884","volume":"117","author":"R Cruz-Martinez","year":"2011","unstructured":"Cruz-Martinez R et al (2011) Fetal brain Doppler to predict cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal status in term small-for-gestational-age fetuses. Obstet Gynecol 117(3):618\u2013626","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"5216_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"279","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14714","volume":"45","author":"F Figueras","year":"2015","unstructured":"Figueras F et al (2015) An integrated model with classification criteria to predict small-for-gestational-age fetuses at risk of adverse perinatal outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 45(3):279\u2013285","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"5216_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"713","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14807","volume":"46","author":"R Garcia-Simon","year":"2015","unstructured":"Garcia-Simon R et al (2015) Cervical condition and fetal cerebral Doppler as determinants of adverse perinatal outcome after labor induction for late-onset small-for-gestational-age fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 46(6):713\u2013717","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"5216_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"381","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17458","volume":"51","author":"A Sirico","year":"2018","unstructured":"Sirico A et al (2018) Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome by cerebroplacental ratio adjusted for estimated fetal weight. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 51(3):381\u2013386","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5216_CR27","first-page":"1","volume":"32","author":"C Flatley","year":"2018","unstructured":"Flatley C, Kumar S (2018) Is the fetal cerebroplacental ratio better that the estimated fetal weight in predicting adverse perinatal outcomes in a low risk cohort? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 32:1\u20137","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"5216_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"476","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.13235","volume":"43","author":"C Amorim-Costa","year":"2017","unstructured":"Amorim-Costa C, Campos DA, Bernardes J (2017) Cardiotocographic parameters in small-for-gestational-age fetuses: how do they vary from normal at different gestational ages? A study of 11687 fetuses from 25 to 40 weeks of pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 43(3):476\u2013485","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-019-05216-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-019-05216-7\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-019-05216-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,15]],"date-time":"2020-06-15T23:05:26Z","timestamp":1592262326000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-019-05216-7"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,17]]},"references-count":28,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,9]]}},"alternative-id":["5216"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-019-05216-7","relation":{},"ISSN":["0932-0067","1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0932-0067","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-0711","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,17]]},"assertion":[{"value":"24 January 2019","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"7 June 2019","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"17 June 2019","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"value":"Author FMS declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author FF declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author SK declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author JP declares that she has no conflict of interest. Author PS declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author AM declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author RLS declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author MS declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author MWB declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author MOS declares that he has no conflict of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee (Klinisches Ethikkomitee des Universit\u00e4tsklinikums Erlangen) and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}}]}}