{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,22]],"date-time":"2026-06-22T13:40:23Z","timestamp":1782135623505,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":45,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,4]],"date-time":"2019-07-04T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1562198400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,4]],"date-time":"2019-07-04T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1562198400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"funder":[{"name":"Basic Research Program of Shenzhen","award":["JCYJ20160427113153295"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["JCYJ20160427113153295"]}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100012151","name":"Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","award":["SZSM201502035"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["SZSM201502035"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100012151","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100010909","name":"Young Scientists Fund","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["21807072"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["21807072"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100010909","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,9]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-019-05236-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,4]],"date-time":"2019-07-04T14:21:54Z","timestamp":1562250114000},"page":"751-761","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":18,"title":["Clinical outcomes after transfer of blastocysts derived from frozen\u2013thawed cleavage embryos: a retrospective propensity-matched cohort study"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"300","author":[{"given":"Feng","family":"Xiong","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Guangui","family":"Li","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Qing","family":"Sun","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sisi","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Caiyun","family":"Wan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Peilin","family":"Chen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Zhihong","family":"Yao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Huixian","family":"Zhong","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1385-3518","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Yong","family":"Zeng","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,4]]},"reference":[{"issue":"3","key":"5236_CR1","first-page":"2751","volume":"10","author":"M Choudhary","year":"2017","unstructured":"Choudhary M, Soni R, Swarankar M, Garg S (2017) Comparison of vitrification and slow freezing for cryopreservation of cleavage stage embryos (day 3) and its impact on clinical outcome. Int J Res Med Sci 10(3):2751\u20132756","journal-title":"Int J Res Med Sci"},{"issue":"7","key":"5236_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1588","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dew082","volume":"31","author":"S Dyer","year":"2016","unstructured":"Dyer S, Chambers GM, de Mouzon J, Nygren KG, Zegers-Hochschild F, Mansour R, Ishihara O, Banker M, Adamson GD (2016) International committee for monitoring assisted reproductive technologies world report: assisted reproductive technology 2008, 2009 and 2010. Hum Reprod 31(7):1588\u20131609. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/dew082","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"2","key":"5236_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"257","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.06.028","volume":"106","author":"N Pereira","year":"2016","unstructured":"Pereira N, Rosenwaks Z (2016) A fresh(er) perspective on frozen embryo transfers. Fertil Steril 106(2):257\u2013258. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.06.028","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"2","key":"5236_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"216","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(99)00254-X","volume":"72","author":"DR Meldrum","year":"1999","unstructured":"Meldrum DR (1999) Blastocyst transfer\u2014a natural evolution. Fertil Steril 72(2):216\u2013217","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"3","key":"5236_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"201","DOI":"10.4103\/jhrs.JHRS_130_16","volume":"10","author":"UM Sundhararaj","year":"2017","unstructured":"Sundhararaj UM, Madne MV, Biliangady R, Gurunath S, Swamy AG, Gopal IST (2017) Single blastocyst transfer: the key to reduce multiple pregnancy rates without compromising the live birth rate. J Hum Reprod Sci 10(3):201\u2013207. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/jhrs.JHRS_130_16","journal-title":"J Hum Reprod Sci"},{"issue":"3","key":"5236_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"667","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.01.087","volume":"99","author":"Practice Committees of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology","year":"2013","unstructured":"Practice Committees of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (2013) Blastocyst culture and transfer in clinical-assisted reproduction: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 99(3):667\u2013672. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.01.087","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"5236_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Glujovsky D, Farquhar C, Quinteiro Retamar AM, Alvarez Sedo CR, Blake D (2016) Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 6:CD002118. doi:10.1002\/14651858.CD002118.pub5.","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD002118.pub5"},{"issue":"6","key":"5236_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1155","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(00)00518-5","volume":"73","author":"DK Gardner","year":"2000","unstructured":"Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J, Schlenker T, Schoolcraft WB (2000) Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril 73(6):1155\u20131158","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"5","key":"5236_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"582","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2014.01.006","volume":"28","author":"CY Wan","year":"2014","unstructured":"Wan CY, Song C, Diao LH, Li GG, Bao ZJ, Hu XD, Zhang HZ, Zeng Y (2014) Laser-assisted hatching improves clinical outcomes of vitrified-warmed blastocysts developed from low-grade cleavage-stage embryos: a prospective randomized study. Reprod Biomed Online 28(5):582\u2013589. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.rbmo.2014.01.006","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"issue":"4","key":"5236_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1006","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2014.06.019","volume":"102","author":"A Cobo","year":"2014","unstructured":"Cobo A, Serra V, Garrido N, Olmo I, Pellicer A, Remohi J (2014) Obstetric and perinatal outcome of babies born from vitrified oocytes. Fertil Steril 102(4):1006\u20131015 e1004. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2014.06.019","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"2","key":"5236_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1111\/aji.12185","volume":"71","author":"C Bartmann","year":"2014","unstructured":"Bartmann C, Segerer SE, Rieger L, Kapp M, Sutterlin M, Kammerer U (2014) Quantification of the predominant immune cell populations in decidua throughout human pregnancy. Am J Reprod Immunol 71(2):109\u2013119. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/aji.12185","journal-title":"Am J Reprod Immunol"},{"key":"5236_CR12","unstructured":"Thoemmes F (2012) Propensity score matching in SPSS. \n                    arXiv:1201.6385"},{"key":"5236_CR13","unstructured":"Thoemmes F, Liao W (2013) Propensity score matching (with multi level data) using SPSS and R. In: Modern modeling methods conference, Storrs, Connecticut, USA"},{"issue":"2","key":"5236_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"241","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-013-0145-4","volume":"31","author":"G Fasano","year":"2014","unstructured":"Fasano G, Fontenelle N, Vannin AS, Biramane J, Devreker F, Englert Y, Delbaere A (2014) A randomized controlled trial comparing two vitrification methods versus slow-freezing for cryopreservation of human cleavage stage embryos. J Assist Reprod Genet 31(2):241\u2013247. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10815-013-0145-4","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"issue":"3","key":"5236_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"469","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)53342-1","volume":"53","author":"S Gordts","year":"1990","unstructured":"Gordts S, Roziers P, Campo R, Noto V (1990) Survival and pregnancy outcome after ultrarapid freezing of human embryos. Fertil Steril 53(3):469\u2013472","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"1","key":"5236_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"186","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2007.06.010","volume":"90","author":"KE Loutradi","year":"2008","unstructured":"Loutradi KE, Kolibianakis EM, Venetis CA, Papanikolaou EG, Pados G, Bontis I, Tarlatzis BC (2008) Cryopreservation of human embryos by vitrification or slow freezing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 90(1):186\u2013193. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2007.06.010","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"7","key":"5236_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1703","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.08.047","volume":"106","author":"A Maheshwari","year":"2016","unstructured":"Maheshwari A, Raja EA, Bhattacharya S (2016) Obstetric and perinatal outcomes after either fresh or thawed frozen embryo transfer: an analysis of 112,432 singleton pregnancies recorded in the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority anonymized dataset. Fertil Steril 106(7):1703\u20131708. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.08.047","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"2","key":"5236_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"126","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1705334","volume":"378","author":"Y Shi","year":"2018","unstructured":"Shi Y, Sun Y, Hao C, Zhang H, Wei D, Zhang Y, Zhu Y, Deng X, Qi X, Li H, Ma X, Ren H, Wang Y, Zhang D, Wang B, Liu F, Wu Q, Wang Z, Bai H, Li Y, Zhou Y, Sun M, Liu H, Li J, Zhang L, Chen X, Zhang S, Sun X, Legro RS, Chen ZJ (2018) Transfer of fresh versus frozen embryos in ovulatory women. N Engl J Med 378(2):126\u2013136. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1056\/NEJMoa1705334","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"5236_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"CD011184","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD011184.pub2","volume":"3","author":"KM Wong","year":"2017","unstructured":"Wong KM, van Wely M, Mol F, Repping S, Mastenbroek S (2017) Fresh versus frozen embryo transfers in assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD011184. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD011184.pub2","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"3","key":"5236_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"927","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.03.105","volume":"94","author":"P Fauque","year":"2010","unstructured":"Fauque P, Jouannet P, Davy C, Guibert J, Viallon V, Epelboin S, Kunstmann JM, Patrat C (2010) Cumulative results including obstetrical and neonatal outcome of fresh and frozen-thawed cycles in elective single versus double fresh embryo transfers. Fertil Steril 94(3):927\u2013935. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.03.105","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"3","key":"5236_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"368","DOI":"10.1016\/S1472-6483(10)61441-1","volume":"13","author":"D Le Lannou","year":"2006","unstructured":"Le Lannou D, Griveau JF, Laurent MC, Gueho A, Veron E, Morcel K (2006) Contribution of embryo cryopreservation to elective single embryo transfer in IVF-ICSI. Reprod Biomed Online 13(3):368\u2013375","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"issue":"1","key":"5236_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"76","DOI":"10.1016\/S1472-6483(10)60695-5","volume":"15","author":"K Lundin","year":"2007","unstructured":"Lundin K, Bergh C (2007) Cumulative impact of adding frozen-thawed cycles to single versus double fresh embryo transfers. Reprod Biomed Online 15(1):76\u201382","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"issue":"11","key":"5236_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"579","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1013138703680","volume":"18","author":"K Pantos","year":"2001","unstructured":"Pantos K, Stefanidis K, Pappas K, Kokkinopoulos P, Petroutsou K, Kokkali G, Stavrou D, Tzigounis V (2001) Cryopreservation of embryos, blastocysts, and pregnancy rates of blastocysts derived from frozen-thawed embryos and frozen-thawed blastocysts. J Assist Reprod Genet 18(11):579\u2013582","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"issue":"1","key":"5236_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1016\/S1001-7844(09)60002-X","volume":"20","author":"H-b Wang","year":"2009","unstructured":"Wang H-b, Li Y-h (2009) Extended culture of early stage embryos in frozen-thawed cycles. Journal of Reproduction and Contraception 20(1):11\u201318","journal-title":"Journal of Reproduction and Contraception"},{"issue":"2","key":"5236_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1080\/1464727012000199391","volume":"4","author":"S Butterworth","year":"2001","unstructured":"Butterworth S (2001) Blastocyst culture: myth or magic? Hum Fertil (Camb) 4(2):109\u2013116","journal-title":"Hum Fertil (Camb)"},{"issue":"6","key":"5236_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"777","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2011.07.023","volume":"23","author":"YA Wang","year":"2011","unstructured":"Wang YA, Costello M, Chapman M, Black D, Sullivan EA (2011) Transfers of fresh blastocysts and blastocysts cultured from thawed cleavage embryos are associated with fewer miscarriages. Reprod Biomed Online 23(6):777\u2013788. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.rbmo.2011.07.023","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"issue":"12","key":"5236_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1553","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-016-0818-x","volume":"33","author":"J Haas","year":"2016","unstructured":"Haas J, Meriano J, Laskin C, Bentov Y, Barzilay E, Casper RF, Cadesky K (2016) Clinical pregnancy rate following frozen embryo transfer is higher with blastocysts vitrified on day 5 than on day 6. J Assist Reprod Genet 33(12):1553\u20131557. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10815-016-0818-x","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"issue":"8","key":"5236_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1685","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dew127","volume":"31","author":"B Wirleitner","year":"2016","unstructured":"Wirleitner B, Schuff M, Stecher A, Murtinger M, Vanderzwalmen P (2016) Pregnancy and birth outcomes following fresh or vitrified embryo transfer according to blastocyst morphology and expansion stage, and culturing strategy for delayed development. Hum Reprod 31(8):1685\u20131695. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/dew127","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"6","key":"5236_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1173","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deu033","volume":"29","author":"A Capalbo","year":"2014","unstructured":"Capalbo A, Rienzi L, Cimadomo D, Maggiulli R, Elliott T, Wright G, Nagy ZP, Ubaldi FM (2014) Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts. Hum Reprod 29(6):1173\u20131181. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/deu033","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"5","key":"5236_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"871","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-018-1147-z","volume":"35","author":"AM Klimczak","year":"2018","unstructured":"Klimczak AM, Pacheco LE, Lewis KE, Massahi N, Richards JP, Kearns WG, Saad AF, Crochet JR (2018) Embryonal mitochondrial DNA: relationship to embryo quality and transfer outcomes. J Assist Reprod Genet 35(5):871\u2013877. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10815-018-1147-z","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"issue":"4","key":"5236_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"940","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2017.01.021","volume":"107","author":"M Vidal","year":"2017","unstructured":"Vidal M, Vellve K, Gonzalez-Comadran M, Robles A, Prat M, Torne M, Carreras R, Checa MA (2017) Perinatal outcomes in children born after fresh or frozen embryo transfer: a Catalan cohort study based on 14,262 newborns. Fertil Steril 107(4):940\u2013947. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2017.01.021","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"2","key":"5236_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"368","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.05.019","volume":"98","author":"A Maheshwari","year":"2012","unstructured":"Maheshwari A, Pandey S, Shetty A, Hamilton M, Bhattacharya S (2012) Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from the transfer of frozen thawed versus fresh embryos generated through in vitro fertilization treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 98(2):368\u2013377. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.05.019","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"3","key":"5236_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.29252\/ijrm.14.3.167","volume":"14","author":"A Aflatoonian","year":"2016","unstructured":"Aflatoonian A, Karimzadeh Maybodi MA, Aflatoonian N, Tabibnejad N, Amir-Arjmand MH, Soleimani M, Aflatoonian B, Aflatoonian A (2016) Perinatal outcome in fresh versus frozen embryo transfer in ART cycles. Int J Reprod Biomed (Yazd) 14(3):167\u2013172","journal-title":"Int J Reprod Biomed (Yazd)"},{"issue":"2","key":"5236_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"317","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.03.049","volume":"106","author":"BS Shapiro","year":"2016","unstructured":"Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Bedient CE, Garner FC (2016) Comparison of birth weights in patients randomly assigned to fresh or frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 106(2):317\u2013321. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.03.049","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"1","key":"5236_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1186\/s13048-018-0432-x","volume":"11","author":"J Zhang","year":"2018","unstructured":"Zhang J, Du M, Li Z, Wang L, Hu J, Zhao B, Feng Y, Chen X, Sun L (2018) Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer for full-term singleton birth: a retrospective cohort study. J Ovarian Res 11(1):59. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13048-018-0432-x","journal-title":"J Ovarian Res"},{"issue":"7","key":"5236_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1644","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/den150","volume":"23","author":"W Shih","year":"2008","unstructured":"Shih W, Rushford DD, Bourne H, Garrett C, McBain JC, Healy DL, Baker HW (2008) Factors affecting low birthweight after assisted reproduction technology: difference between transfer of fresh and cryopreserved embryos suggests an adverse effect of oocyte collection. Hum Reprod 23(7):1644\u20131653. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/den150","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"6","key":"5236_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1411","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.08.013","volume":"104","author":"D Galliano","year":"2015","unstructured":"Galliano D, Garrido N, Serra-Serra V, Pellicer A (2015) Difference in birth weight of consecutive sibling singletons is not found in oocyte donation when comparing fresh versus frozen embryo replacements. Fertil Steril 104(6):1411\u20131418. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.08.013","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"4","key":"5236_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"863","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31822be65f","volume":"118","author":"SK Kalra","year":"2011","unstructured":"Kalra SK, Ratcliffe SJ, Coutifaris C, Molinaro T, Barnhart KT (2011) Ovarian stimulation and low birth weight in newborns conceived through in vitro fertilization. Obstet Gynecol 118(4):863\u2013871. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31822be65f","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"5236_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"705","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dei378","volume":"21","author":"C De Geyter","year":"2006","unstructured":"De Geyter C, De Geyter M, Steimann S, Zhang H, Holzgreve W (2006) Comparative birth weights of singletons born after assisted reproduction and natural conception in previously infertile women. Hum Reprod 21(3):705\u2013712. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/dei378","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"2","key":"5236_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"511","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-012-2303-9","volume":"286","author":"M Eftekhar","year":"2012","unstructured":"Eftekhar M, Aflatoonian A, Mohammadian F, Tabibnejad N (2012) Transfer of blastocysts derived from frozen-thawed cleavage stage embryos improved ongoing pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 286(2):511\u2013516. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-012-2303-9","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"5236_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"60","DOI":"10.1186\/1477-7827-9-60","volume":"9","author":"D Stoop","year":"2011","unstructured":"Stoop D, Van Landuyt L, Van den Abbeel E, Camus M, Verheyen G, Devroey P (2011) Should a single blastocyst transfer policy be a clinical decision or should it depend on the embryological evaluation on day 3? Reprod Biol Endocrinol 9:60. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1477-7827-9-60","journal-title":"Reprod Biol Endocrinol"},{"issue":"11","key":"5236_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3198","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dei217","volume":"20","author":"EG Papanikolaou","year":"2005","unstructured":"Papanikolaou EG, D'Haeseleer E, Verheyen G, Van de Velde H, Camus M, Van Steirteghem A, Devroey P, Tournaye H (2005) Live birth rate is significantly higher after blastocyst transfer than after cleavage-stage embryo transfer when at least four embryos are available on day 3 of embryo culture. A randomized prospective study. Hum Reprod 20(11):3198\u20133203. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/dei217","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"1","key":"5236_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dem339","volume":"23","author":"EG Papanikolaou","year":"2008","unstructured":"Papanikolaou EG, Kolibianakis EM, Tournaye H, Venetis CA, Fatemi H, Tarlatzis B, Devroey P (2008) Live birth rates after transfer of equal number of blastocysts or cleavage-stage embryos in IVF. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 23(1):91\u201399. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/dem339","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"5","key":"5236_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"583","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17327","volume":"49","author":"WP Martins","year":"2017","unstructured":"Martins WP, Nastri CO, Rienzi L, van der Poel SZ, Gracia C, Racowsky C (2017) Blastocyst vs cleavage-stage embryo transfer: systematic review and meta-analysis of reproductive outcomes. Ultrasound Obstetr Gynecol 49(5):583\u2013591. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.17327","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstetr Gynecol"},{"issue":"11","key":"5236_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2442","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dew219","volume":"31","author":"A De Vos","year":"2016","unstructured":"De Vos A, Van Landuyt L, Santos-Ribeiro S, Camus M, Van de Velde H, Tournaye H, Verheyen G (2016) Cumulative live birth rates after fresh and vitrified cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in the first treatment cycle. Hum Reprod 31(11):2442\u20132449. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/dew219","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-019-05236-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-019-05236-3\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-019-05236-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,2]],"date-time":"2020-07-02T23:12:12Z","timestamp":1593731532000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-019-05236-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,4]]},"references-count":45,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,9]]}},"alternative-id":["5236"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-019-05236-3","relation":{},"ISSN":["0932-0067","1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0932-0067","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-0711","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,4]]},"assertion":[{"value":"23 February 2019","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"27 June 2019","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"4 July 2019","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"value":"We declared that we have no conflict of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}