{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,20]],"date-time":"2025-12-20T22:14:12Z","timestamp":1766268852310,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":39,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,16]],"date-time":"2019-07-16T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1563235200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,16]],"date-time":"2019-07-16T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1563235200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,10]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-019-05244-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,16]],"date-time":"2019-07-16T16:02:37Z","timestamp":1563292957000},"page":"875-880","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Late preterm versus term external cephalic version: an audit of a single obstetrician experience"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"300","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1282-5379","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Gabriel","family":"Levin","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Amihai","family":"Rottenstreich","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Yishay","family":"Weill","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Raphael N.","family":"Pollack","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,16]]},"reference":[{"issue":"3","key":"5244_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"851","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(92)91347-D","volume":"166","author":"DE Hickok","year":"1992","unstructured":"Hickok DE, Gordon DC, Milberg JA, Williams MA, Daling JR (1992) The frequency of breech presentation by gestational age at birth: a large population-based study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 166(3):851\u2013852","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"5244_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1002","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.10.817","volume":"194","author":"F Goffinet","year":"2006","unstructured":"Goffinet F, Carayol M, Foidart JM, Alexander S, Uzan S, Subtil D et al (2006) Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium. Am J Obstet Gynecol 194(4):1002\u20131011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"5244_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00317.x","volume":"112","author":"CC Rietberg","year":"2005","unstructured":"Rietberg CC, Elferink-Stinkens PM, Visser GH (2005) The effect of the Term Breech Trial on medical intervention behaviour and neonatal outcome in The Netherlands: an analysis of 35,453 term breech infants. BJOG 112(2):205\u2013209","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"1","key":"5244_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"59.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.11.059","volume":"199","author":"HC Lee","year":"2008","unstructured":"Lee HC, El-Sayed YY, Gould JB (2008) Population trends in cesarean delivery for breech presentation in the United States, 1997\u20132003. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199(1):59.e1\u20138","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5244_CR5","first-page":"CD000184","volume":"2","author":"GJ Hofmeyr","year":"2000","unstructured":"Hofmeyr GJ (2000) External cephalic version facilitation for breech presentation at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD000184","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"2","key":"5244_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-3016.2006.00702.x","volume":"20","author":"N Nassar","year":"2006","unstructured":"Nassar N, Roberts CL, Barratt A, Bell JC, Olive EC, Peat B (2006) Systematic review of adverse outcomes of external cephalic version and persisting breech presentation at term. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 20(2):163\u2013171","journal-title":"Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5244_CR7","first-page":"63","volume":"67","author":"DC Dyson","year":"1986","unstructured":"Dyson DC, Ferguson JE, Hensleigh P (1986) Antepartum external cephalic version under tocolysis. Obstet Gynecol 67(1):63\u201368","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5244_CR8","first-page":"CD000083","volume":"4","author":"GJ Hofmeyr","year":"2015","unstructured":"Hofmeyr GJ, Kulier R, West HM (2015) External cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD000083","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"10","key":"5244_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"804","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)30473-X","volume":"24","author":"EK Hutton","year":"2002","unstructured":"Hutton EK, Hannah ME, Barrett J (2002) Use of external cephalic version for breech pregnancy and mode of delivery for breech and twin pregnancy: a survey of Canadian practitioners. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 24(10):804\u2013810","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can."},{"issue":"7568","key":"5244_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"578","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.38919.681563.4F","volume":"333","author":"N Nassar","year":"2006","unstructured":"Nassar N, Roberts CL, Cameron CA, Olive EC (2006) Diagnostic accuracy of clinical examination for detection of non-cephalic presentation in late pregnancy: cross sectional analytic study. BMJ 333(7568):578\u2013580","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"7294","key":"5244_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1089","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.322.7294.1089","volume":"322","author":"M. Waterstone","year":"2001","unstructured":"Waterstone M, Bewley S, Wolfe C (2001) Incidence and predictors of severe obstetric morbidity: case-control study. BMJ 322(7294):1089\u20131093 (discussion 93\u20134)","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"5244_CR12","first-page":"CD000083","volume":"10","author":"GJ Hofmeyr","year":"2012","unstructured":"Hofmeyr GJ, Kulier R (2012) External cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10:CD000083","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"5244_CR13","first-page":"CD000184","volume":"1","author":"C Cluver","year":"2012","unstructured":"Cluver C, Hofmeyr GJ, Gyte GM, Sinclair M (2012) Interventions for helping to turn term breech babies to head first presentation when using external cephalic version. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD000184","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"5244_CR14","first-page":"CD000184","volume":"1","author":"GJ Hofmeyr","year":"2004","unstructured":"Hofmeyr GJ (2004) Interventions to help external cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD000184","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"5244_CR15","first-page":"CD000184","volume":"4","author":"GJ Hofmeyr","year":"2001","unstructured":"Hofmeyr GJ (2001) External cephalic version facilitation for breech presentation at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 4:CD000184","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev."},{"issue":"4","key":"5244_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"493","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.15475","volume":"126","author":"P Melo","year":"2019","unstructured":"Melo P, Georgiou EX, Hedditch A, Ellaway P, Impey L (2019) External cephalic version at term: a cohort study of 18 years' experience. BJOG 126(4):493\u2013499","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"7","key":"5244_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e178","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14466","volume":"124","author":"LWM Impey","year":"2017","unstructured":"Impey LWM, Murphy DJ, Griffiths M, Bray E, Penna LK, Aggarwal A, Akaba G, Barrett JFR, Bogner G, Danielian PJ, De Hundt M (2017) External cephalic version and reducing the incidence of term breech presentation: green-top guideline no. 20a. BJOG 124(7):e178\u2013e192","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"5244_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hutton EK, Hofmeyr GJ, Dowswell T (2015) External cephalic version for breech presentation before term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7:CD000084","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD000084.pub3"},{"issue":"9","key":"5244_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1073","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1997.tb12070.x","volume":"104","author":"M Healey","year":"1997","unstructured":"Healey M, Porter R, Galimberti A (1997) Introducing external cephalic version at 36 weeks or more in a district general hospital: a review and an audit. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104(9):1073\u20131079","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"5244_CR20","first-page":"454","volume":"57","author":"K Devendra","year":"2002","unstructured":"Devendra K (2002) Introducing routine external cephalic version for the management of the malpresenting fetus near term. Med J Malaysia 57(4):454\u2013459","journal-title":"Med J Malaysia"},{"key":"5244_CR21","first-page":"CD000084","volume":"2","author":"GJ Hofmeyr","year":"2000","unstructured":"Hofmeyr GJ (2000) External cephalic version for breech presentation before term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD000084","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"6","key":"5244_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1734","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(95)91405-6","volume":"172","author":"Moyne Treat Kornman","year":"1995","unstructured":"Kornman MT, Kimball KT, Reeves KO (1995) Preterm external cephalic version in an outpatient environment. Am J Obstet Gynecol 172(6):1734\u20131738 (discussion 8\u201341)","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"issue":"4","key":"5244_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"417","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(81)90604-9","volume":"141","author":"JP Van Dorsten","year":"1981","unstructured":"Van Dorsten JP, Schifrin BS, Wallace RL (1981) Randomized control trial of external cephalic version with tocolysis in late pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 141(4):417\u2013424","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5244_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"116","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.12774","volume":"145","author":"A Lavie","year":"2019","unstructured":"Lavie A, Reicher L, Avraham S, Ram M, Maslovitz S (2019) Success rates of early versus late initiation of external cephalic version. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 145(1):116\u2013121","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"2","key":"5244_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"323","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(88)80076-0","volume":"159","author":"B Gonik","year":"1988","unstructured":"Gonik B, Benedetti T, Creasy RK, Lee AF (1988) Intramuscular versus intravenous ritodrine hydrochloride for preterm labor management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 159(2):323\u2013328","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5244_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Levin G, Rottenstreich A, Weill Y, Pollack RN (2019) External cephalic version at term: a 6-year single-operator experience. Birth","DOI":"10.1111\/birt.12429"},{"key":"5244_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.10.003","volume":"230","author":"G Levin","year":"2018","unstructured":"Levin G, Rottenstreich A, Weill Y, Pollack RN (2018) The role of bladder volume in the success of external cephalic version. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 230:178\u2013181","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"5244_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.06.019","volume":"228","author":"J Velzel","year":"2018","unstructured":"Velzel J, Schuit E, Vlemmix F, Molkenboer JFM, Van der Post JAM, Mol BW et al (2018) Development and internal validation of a clinical prediction model for external cephalic version. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 228:137\u2013142","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"8","key":"5244_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1012","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13161","volume":"96","author":"EK Hutton","year":"2017","unstructured":"Hutton EK, Simioni JC, Thabane L (2017) Predictors of success of external cephalic version and cephalic presentation at birth among 1253 women with non-cephalic presentation using logistic regression and classification tree analyses. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 96(8):1012\u20131020","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"5","key":"5244_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"686","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogn.2017.07.007","volume":"46","author":"VF Zobbi","year":"2017","unstructured":"Zobbi VF, Nespoli A, Spreafico E, Recalcati R, Loi F, Scian A et al (2017) Effect of oral hydration on external cephalic version at term. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 46(5):686\u2013695","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs"},{"issue":"4","key":"5244_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"749","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-015-3902-z","volume":"293","author":"F Ebner","year":"2016","unstructured":"Ebner F, Friedl TW, Leinert E, Schramm A, Reister F, Lato K et al (2016) Predictors for a successful external cephalic version: a single centre experience. Arch Gynecol Obstet 293(4):749\u2013755","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"1","key":"5244_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2014.900749","volume":"28","author":"L Salzer","year":"2015","unstructured":"Salzer L, Nagar R, Melamed N, Wiznitzer A, Peled Y, Yogev Y (2015) Predictors of successful external cephalic version and assessment of success for vaginal delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 28(1):49\u201354","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"6","key":"5244_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"665.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.06.031","volume":"211","author":"J Burgos","year":"2014","unstructured":"Burgos J, Quintana E, Cobos P, Osuna C, Centeno MEM, Melchor JC (2014) Effect of maternal intravenous fluid therapy on external cephalic version at term: a prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 211(6):665.e1\u2013665.e17","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5244_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.12152","volume":"54","author":"A Mowat","year":"2014","unstructured":"Mowat A, Gardener G (2014) Predictors of successful external cephalic version in an Australian maternity hospital. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 54(1):59\u201363","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5244_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2011.01386.x","volume":"52","author":"J Burgos","year":"2012","unstructured":"Burgos J, Cobos P, Rodriguez L, Pijo\u00e1n JI, Fern\u00e1ndez-Llebrez L, Mart\u00ednez-Astorquiza T et al (2012) Clinical score for the outcome of external cephalic version: a two-phase prospective study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 52(1):59\u201361","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5244_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2003.442","volume":"189","author":"EK Hutton","year":"2003","unstructured":"Hutton EK, Kaufman K, Hodnett E, Amankwah K, Hewson SA, McKay D et al (2003) External cephalic version beginning at 34 weeks' gestation versus 37 weeks' gestation: a randomized multicenter trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189(1):245\u2013254","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"8","key":"5244_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"998","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13153","volume":"96","author":"KL Poole","year":"2017","unstructured":"Poole KL, McDonald SD, Griffith LE, Hutton EK (2017) Association of external cephalic version before term with late preterm birth. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 96(8):998\u20131005","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"1","key":"5244_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2004.02.005","volume":"116","author":"LY Chan","year":"2004","unstructured":"Chan LY, Leung TY, Fok WY, Chan LW, Lau TK (2004) Prediction of successful vaginal delivery in women undergoing external cephalic version at term for breech presentation. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 116(1):39\u201342","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"5244_CR39","unstructured":"Bulletins-Obstetrics ACoOaGCoP (2016) American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists committee on practice bulletins-obstetrics. Practice Bulletin No. 161: External Cephalic Version. Obstet Gynecol 127(2):e54\u2013e61"}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-019-05244-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-019-05244-3\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-019-05244-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,14]],"date-time":"2020-07-14T23:23:39Z","timestamp":1594769019000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-019-05244-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,16]]},"references-count":39,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,10]]}},"alternative-id":["5244"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-019-05244-3","relation":{},"ISSN":["0932-0067","1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0932-0067"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1432-0711"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,16]]},"assertion":[{"value":"14 May 2019","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"10 July 2019","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"16 July 2019","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"For this type of study formal consent is not required and was waived by the institutional review board approval. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and\/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}}]}}