{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,15]],"date-time":"2026-10-15T19:36:34Z","timestamp":1792092994269,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":40,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,18]],"date-time":"2019-11-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1574035200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,18]],"date-time":"2019-11-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1574035200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"Helsinki University Hospital Research Grant"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,2]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>To determine if the common risks for breech presentation at term labor are also eligible in preterm labor.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>A Finnish cross-sectional study included 737,788 singleton births (24\u201342 gestational weeks) during 2004\u20132014. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to calculate the risks of breech presentation.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>The incidence of breech presentation at delivery decreased from 23.5% in pregnancy weeks 24\u201327 to 2.5% in term pregnancies. In gestational weeks 24\u201327, preterm premature rupture of membranes was associated with breech presentation. In 28\u201331 gestational weeks, breech presentation was associated with maternal pre-eclampsia\/hypertension, preterm premature rupture of membranes, and fetal birth weight below the tenth percentile. In gestational weeks 32\u201336, the risks were advanced maternal age, nulliparity, previous cesarean section, preterm premature rupture of membranes, oligohydramnios, birth weight below the tenth percentile, female sex, and congenital anomaly. In term pregnancies, breech presentation was associated with advanced maternal age, nulliparity, maternal hypothyroidism, pre-gestational diabetes, placenta praevia, premature rupture of membranes, oligohydramnios, congenital anomaly, female sex, and birth weight below the tenth percentile.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Breech presentation in preterm labor is associated with obstetric risk factors compared to cephalic presentation. These risks decrease linearly with the gestational age. In moderate to late preterm delivery, breech presentation is a high-risk state and some obstetric risk factors are yet visible in early preterm delivery. Breech presentation in extremely preterm deliveries has, with the exception of preterm premature rupture of membranes, similar clinical risk profiles as in cephalic presentation.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-019-05385-5","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,18]],"date-time":"2019-11-18T17:02:45Z","timestamp":1574096565000},"page":"393-403","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":45,"title":["A comparison of risk factors for breech presentation in preterm and term labor: a nationwide, population-based case\u2013control study"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"301","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4812-2766","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Anna E.","family":"Toijonen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Seppo T.","family":"Heinonen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mika V. M.","family":"Gissler","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Georg","family":"Macharey","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,18]]},"reference":[{"key":"5385_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"410","DOI":"10.1080\/j.1600-0412.1998.770409.x","volume":"77","author":"S Albrechtsen","year":"1998","unstructured":"Albrechtsen S, Rasmussen S, Dalaker K, Irgens LM (1998) The occurrence of breech presentation in Norway 1967\u20131994. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 77:410\u2013415","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"5385_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"851","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(92)91347-D","volume":"166","author":"D Hickok","year":"1992","unstructured":"Hickok D, Gordon DC, Milberg JA, Williams MA, Daling JR (1992) The frequency of breech presentation by gestational age at birth: a large population-based study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 166:851\u2013852","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"5385_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"833","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-016-4283-7","volume":"295","author":"G Macharey","year":"2017","unstructured":"Macharey G, Gissler M, Rahkonen L, Ulander VM, V\u00e4is\u00e4nen-Tommiska M, Nuutila M et al (2017) Breech presentation at term and associated obstetric risks factors\u2014a nationwide population based cohort study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 295(4):833\u2013838","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"3","key":"5385_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"347","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12834","volume":"95","author":"L Zsirai","year":"2016","unstructured":"Zsirai L, Cs\u00e1k\u00e1ny GM, Vargha P, F\u00fcl\u00f6p V, Tab\u00e1k \u00c1G (2016) Breech presentation: its predictors and consequences. An analysis of the Hungarian Tauffer Obstetric Database (1996\u20132011). Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 95(3):347\u2013354","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"5385_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"106","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.04.008","volume":"177","author":"H Cammu","year":"2014","unstructured":"Cammu H, Dony N, Martens G, Colman R (2014) Common determinants of breech presentation at birth in singletons: a population-based study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 177:106\u2013109","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"9239","key":"5385_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1375","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(00)02840-3","volume":"356","author":"ME Hannah","year":"2000","unstructured":"Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR (2000) Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 356(9239):1375\u20131383","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"5385_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70368-X","volume":"174","author":"J Rayl","year":"1996","unstructured":"Rayl J, Gibson PJ, Hickok DE (1996) A population-based case-control study of risk factors for breech presentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 174:28\u201332","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"5385_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2013.806891","volume":"27","author":"A Fruscalzo","year":"2014","unstructured":"Fruscalzo A, Londero AP, Salvador S, Bertozzi S, Biasioli A, Della Martina M et al (2014) New and old predictive factors for breech presentation: our experience in 14 433 singleton pregnancies and a literature review. J Matern Neonatal Med 27(2):167\u2013172","journal-title":"J Matern Neonatal Med"},{"key":"5385_CR9","unstructured":"Macharey G. Breech presentation and delivery in singleton term pregnancies in Finland [Internet]. Vol. 1, Medical Faculty of the University of Helsinki. 2018. 1\u2013179 p. Available from: urn:ISBN:978\u2013951\u201351\u20134023\u20134"},{"issue":"3","key":"5385_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"864","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.06.056","volume":"191","author":"H Whyte","year":"2004","unstructured":"Whyte H, Hannah ME, Saigal S, Hannah WJ, Hewson S, Amankwah K et al (2004) Outcomes of children at 2 years after planned cesarean birth versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the international randomized Term Breech Trial. Am J Obst Gynecol 191(3):864\u2013871","journal-title":"Am J Obst Gynecol"},{"key":"5385_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2016-014979","volume":"7","author":"S Bjellmo","year":"2017","unstructured":"Bjellmo S, Andersen GL, Martinussen MP, Romundstad PR, Hjelle S, Moster D et al (2017) Is vaginal breech delivery associated with higher risk for perinatal death and cerebral palsy compared with vaginal cephalic birth? Registry-based cohort study in Norway. BMJ Open 7:4","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"issue":"9","key":"5385_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"943","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08434.x","volume":"106","author":"L Krebs","year":"1999","unstructured":"Krebs L, Topp M, Langhoff-Roos J (1999) The relation of breech presentation at term to cerebral palsy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 106(9):943\u2013947","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5385_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"26","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2004.05.018","volume":"127","author":"L Krebs","year":"2006","unstructured":"Krebs L, Langhoff-Roos J (2006) The relation of breech presentation at term to epilepsy in childhood. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 127(1):26\u201328","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"6","key":"5385_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"564","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.12556","volume":"56","author":"YS Bin","year":"2016","unstructured":"Bin YS, Roberts CL, Nicholl MC, Nassar N, Ford JB (2016) Contribution of changing risk factors to the trend in breech presentation at term. Aust New Zeal J Obstet Gynaecol 56(6):564\u2013570","journal-title":"Aust New Zeal J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"10","key":"5385_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1160","DOI":"10.3109\/14767051003677996","volume":"23","author":"SR Sekuli\u0107","year":"2010","unstructured":"Sekuli\u0107 SR, Mikov A, Petrovi DS (2010) Probability of breech presentation and its significance. J Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Med 23(10):1160\u20131164","journal-title":"J Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"5","key":"5385_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"525","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.02.008","volume":"218","author":"JV Madden","year":"2018","unstructured":"Madden JV, Flatley CJ, Kumar S (2018) Term small-for-gestational-age infants from low-risk women are at significantly greater risk of adverse neonatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 218(5):525","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5385_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13524","volume":"123","author":"Y Berhan","year":"2016","unstructured":"Berhan Y, Haileamlak A (2016) The risks of planned vaginal breech delivery versus planned caesarean section for term breech birth: a meta-analysis including observational studies. BJOG 123(1):49\u201357","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"1","key":"5385_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(00)00246-3","volume":"93","author":"S Demol","year":"2000","unstructured":"Demol S, Bashiri A, Furman B, Maymon E, Shoham-Vardi I, Mazor M (2000) Breech presentation is a risk factor for intrapartum and neonatal death in preterm delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 93(1):47\u201351","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5385_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1038\/jp.2013.132","volume":"34","author":"D Mostello","year":"2014","unstructured":"Mostello D, Chang JJ, Bai F, Wang J, Guild C, Stamps K et al (2014) Breech presentation at delivery: a marker for congenital anomaly? J Perinatol 34(1):11\u201315","journal-title":"J Perinatol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5385_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(99)00116-2","volume":"67","author":"CL Roberts","year":"1999","unstructured":"Roberts CL, Algert CS, Peat B, Henderson-Smart D (1999) Small fetal size: a risk factor for breech birth at term. Int J Gynecol Obstet 67(1):1\u20138","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"3","key":"5385_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"231","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.12.012","volume":"208","author":"JR Goodman","year":"2013","unstructured":"Goodman JR, Lambert AE, Peck JD, Sutton KM, Deschamps DR (2013) Outcomes in cephalic vs noncephalic presentation in the setting of preterm premature rupture of membranes. Am J Obst Gynecol 208(3):231","journal-title":"Am J Obst Gynecol"},{"issue":"11","key":"5385_CR22","first-page":"3","volume":"8","author":"S Joy","year":"2014","unstructured":"Joy S (2014) Impact of fetal presentation on pregnancy outcome in preterm premature rupture of membranes. J Clin Diagn Res 8(11):3\u20136","journal-title":"J Clin Diagn Res"},{"issue":"5","key":"5385_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"733","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpeds.2010.05.002","volume":"157","author":"J Zeitlin","year":"2010","unstructured":"Zeitlin J, El Ayoubi M, Jarreau P-H, Draper ES, Blondel B, K\u00fcnzel W et al (2010) Impact of fetal growth restriction on mortality and morbidity in a very preterm birth cohort. J Pediatr 157(5):733\u2013739","journal-title":"J Pediatr"},{"issue":"2","key":"5385_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1515\/jpme.1998.26.2.77","volume":"26","author":"K Harrington","year":"1998","unstructured":"Harrington K, Thompson O, Jordan L, Page J, Carpenter RG, Campbell S (1998) Obstetric outcome in women who present with a reduction in fetal movements in the third trimester of pregnancy. J Perinat Med 26(2):77\u201382","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"5385_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-017-1278-8","volume":"17","author":"G Macharey","year":"2017","unstructured":"Macharey G, Gissler M, Ulander VM, Rahkonen L, V\u00e4is\u00e4nen-Tommiska M, Nuutila M et al (2017) Risk factors associated with adverse perinatal outcome in planned vaginal breech labors at term: a retrospective population-based case\u2013control study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 17(1):93","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"5385_CR26","first-page":"108","volume":"346","author":"J Gardosi","year":"2013","unstructured":"Gardosi J, Madurasinghe V, Williams M, Malik A, Francis A (2013) Maternal and fetal risk factors for stillbirth: population based study. Obst Gynecol Surv 346:108","journal-title":"Obst Gynecol Surv"},{"issue":"3","key":"5385_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"588","DOI":"10.1097\/GRF.0b013e3181eb63fc","volume":"53","author":"R Fretts","year":"2010","unstructured":"Fretts R (2010) Stillbirth epidemiology, risk factors, and opportunities for stillbirth prevention. Clin Obst Gynecol 53(3):588\u2013596","journal-title":"Clin Obst Gynecol"},{"key":"5385_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"371","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-017-1557-4","volume":"17","author":"A Newtonraj","year":"2017","unstructured":"Newtonraj A, Kaur M, Gupta M, Kumar R (2017) Level, causes, and risk factors of stillbirth: a population-based case control study from Chandigarh. India. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 17:371","journal-title":"India. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"2S","key":"5385_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S790","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.003","volume":"218","author":"F Figueras","year":"2018","unstructured":"Figueras F, Caradeux J, Crispi F, Eixarch E, Peguero A, Gratacos E (2018) Diagnosis and surveillance of late-onset fetal growth restriction. Am J Obst Gynecol 218(2S):S790\u2013S802","journal-title":"Am J Obst Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"5385_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"969","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-019-05091-2","volume":"299","author":"P Hinnenberg","year":"2019","unstructured":"Hinnenberg P, Toijonen A, Gissler M, Heinonen S, Macharey G (2019) Outcome of small for gestational age-fetuses in breech presentation at term according to mode of delivery: a nationwide, population-based record linkage study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 299(4):969\u2013974","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"5385_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ogrm.2018.03.003","volume":"28","author":"RM Ryan","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ryan RM, McCarthy FP (2018) Hypertension in pregnancy. Obst Gynaecol Reprod Med. 28:141\u2013147","journal-title":"Obst Gynaecol Reprod Med."},{"key":"5385_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"667","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2016.04.002","volume":"38","author":"H Berger","year":"2016","unstructured":"Berger H, Gagnon R, Sermer M, Basso M, Bos H, Brown RN et al (2016) Diabetes in pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Canada. 38:667\u2013679","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Canada."},{"issue":"9","key":"5385_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1619","DOI":"10.2337\/diacare.25.9.1619","volume":"25","author":"X Yang","year":"2002","unstructured":"Yang X, Hsu-Hage B, Zhang H, Zhang C, Zhang Y, Zhang C (2002) Women with impaired glucose tolerance during pregnancy have significantly poor pregnancy outcomes. Diabetes Care 25(9):1619\u20131624","journal-title":"Diabetes Care"},{"key":"5385_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-13-12","volume":"13","author":"A Gordon","year":"2013","unstructured":"Gordon A, Raynes-Greenow C, McGeechan K, Morris J, Jeffery H (2013) Risk factors for antepartum stillbirth and the influence of maternal age in New South Wales Australia: a population based study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 13:12","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"9","key":"5385_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"818","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0001-6349.2004.00603.x","volume":"83","author":"AG Olesen","year":"2004","unstructured":"Olesen AG, Svare JA (2004) Decreased fetal movements: background, assessment, and clinical management. Acta Obst Gynecol Scand 83(9):818\u2013826","journal-title":"Acta Obst Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"10","key":"5385_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0186287","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0186287","volume":"12","author":"SC Lean","year":"2017","unstructured":"Lean SC, Derricott H, Jones RL, Heazell AEP (2017) Advanced maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 12(10):e0186287","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"issue":"1","key":"5385_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"105","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.04.012","volume":"219","author":"MP Hehir","year":"2018","unstructured":"Hehir MP, Ananth CV, Siddiq Z, Flood K, Friedman AM, D\u2019Alton ME (2018) Cesarean delivery in the United States 2005 through 2014: a population-based analysis using the Robson 10-Group Classification System. Am J Obstet Gynecol 219(1):105","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5385_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Maraka S, Ospina NMS, Okeeffe DT, Espinosa de Ycaza AE, Gionfriddo MR, Erwin PJ, et al. Subclinical hypothyroidism in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thyroid. 2016; 26(4):580\u201390.","DOI":"10.1089\/thy.2015.0418"},{"issue":"1","key":"5385_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181788dd7","volume":"112","author":"J Cleary-Goldman","year":"2008","unstructured":"Cleary-Goldman J, Malone FD, Lambert-Messerlian G, Sullivan L, Canick J, Porter TF et al (2008) Maternal thyroid hypofunction and pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol 112(1):85\u201392","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"7","key":"5385_CR40","first-page":"387","volume":"13","author":"S Nazarpour","year":"2015","unstructured":"Nazarpour S, Tehrani FR, Simbar M, Azizi F (2015) Thyroid dysfunction and pregnancy outcomes. Iran J Reprod Med 13(7):387\u2013396","journal-title":"Iran J Reprod Med"}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-019-05385-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-019-05385-5\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-019-05385-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,17]],"date-time":"2020-11-17T00:19:28Z","timestamp":1605572368000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-019-05385-5"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,18]]},"references-count":40,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,2]]}},"alternative-id":["5385"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-019-05385-5","relation":{},"ISSN":["0932-0067","1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0932-0067","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-0711","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,18]]},"assertion":[{"value":"5 July 2019","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"9 November 2019","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"18 November 2019","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"value":"We declare that we have no conflict of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"For this type of study, formal consent is not required. The National Institute for Health and Welfare authorized to use the data (reference number THL\/652\/5.05.00\/2017).","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Informed consent statement"}}]}}