{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,15]],"date-time":"2026-10-15T02:39:49Z","timestamp":1792031989466,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":19,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,2,1]],"date-time":"2020-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1580515200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,2,1]],"date-time":"2020-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1580515200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,2]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-020-05454-0","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,2,11]],"date-time":"2020-02-11T06:03:01Z","timestamp":1581400981000},"page":"509-515","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":19,"title":["Vaginal birth after caesarean section: a multicentre study on prognostic factors and feasibility"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"301","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6353-9383","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Alessandra","family":"Familiari","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Caterina","family":"Neri","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alessandro","family":"Caruso","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Chiara","family":"Airoldi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Francesco","family":"Barone-Adesi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Giovanni","family":"Zanconato","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Giulia","family":"Bolomini","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Francesca","family":"Presti","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,2,11]]},"reference":[{"issue":"9","key":"5454_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e325","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.0020325","volume":"2","author":"GCS Smith","year":"2005","unstructured":"Smith GCS, White IR, Pell JP, Dobbie R (2005) A tool to estimate the risks of repeat cesarean section. PLoS Med 2(9):e325","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"5454_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1002494","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1002494","volume":"15","author":"OE Keag","year":"2018","unstructured":"Keag OE, Jane E, Stock SJ (2018) Long-term risks and benefits associated with cesarean delivery for mother, baby, and subsequent pregnancies: Systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 15(1):e1002494 (Published online 2018 Jan 23)","journal-title":"PLoS Med."},{"key":"5454_CR3","first-page":"1","volume":"22","author":"A Iacovelli","year":"2018","unstructured":"Iacovelli A, Liberati M, Khalil A, Timor-Trisch I, Leombroni M, Buca D et al (2018) Risk factors for abnormally invasive placenta: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 22:1\u201311","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"5","key":"5454_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"507","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13258","volume":"97","author":"A Familiari","year":"2018","unstructured":"Familiari A, Liberati M, Lim P, Pagani G, Cal\u00ec G, Buca D et al (2018) Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting the severity of abnormal invasive placenta: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 97(5):507\u2013520","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand."},{"key":"5454_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.03.007","volume":"207","author":"IE Timor-Tritsch","year":"2012","unstructured":"Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A (2012) Unforeseen consequences of the increasing rate of cesarean deliveries: early placenta accreta and cesarean scar pregnancy. A review Am J Obstet Gynecol 207:14\u201329","journal-title":"A review Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5454_CR6","first-page":"1","volume":"5","author":"C Davidson","year":"2018","unstructured":"Davidson C, Bellows P, Shah U, Hawley L, Drexler K, Gandhi M et al (2018) Outcomes associated with trial of labor after cesarean in women with one vs two prior cesarean deliveries after a change in clinical practice guidelines in an academic hospital. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 5:1\u201312","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"5454_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"133","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12409","volume":"121","author":"SC Dexter","year":"2014","unstructured":"Dexter SC, Windsor S, Watkinson SJ (2014) Meeting the challenge of maternal choice in mode of delivery with vaginal birth after cesarean section: a medical, legal and ethical commentary. BJOG 121(2):133\u2013139","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"2","key":"5454_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e110","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003078","volume":"133","author":"ACOG","year":"2019","unstructured":"ACOG (2019) Practice bulletin No Feb 205: vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 133(2):e110\u2013e127","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5454_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"375","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.38160.634352.55","volume":"329","author":"GC Smith","year":"2004","unstructured":"Smith GC, Pell JP, Pasupathy D, Dobbie R (2004) Factors predisposing to perinatal death related to uterine rupture during attempted vaginal birth after cesarean section: retrospective cohort study. BMJ 329:375","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"5454_CR10","unstructured":"Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologist, RCOG. Birth After previous cesarean birth green-top guideline No. 45 October 2015"},{"key":"5454_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1003","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2013.765854","volume":"26","author":"R Kessous","year":"2013","unstructured":"Kessous R, Sheiner E (2013) Is there an association between short interval from previous cesarean section and adverse obstetric and perinatal outcome? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 26:1003\u20131006","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"32","key":"5454_CR12","first-page":"e1","volume":"199","author":"AG Cahill","year":"2008","unstructured":"Cahill AG, Waterman BM, Stamilio DM, Odibo AO, Allsworth JE, Evanoff B et al (2008) Higher maximum doses of oxytocin are associated with an unacceptably high risk for uterine rupture in patients attempting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199(32):e1\u20135","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"495","key":"5454_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.10.496","volume":"197","author":"AG Cahill","year":"2007","unstructured":"Cahill AG, Stamilio DM, Odibo AO, Peipert JF, Stevens EJ, Macones GA (2007) Does a maximum dose of oxytocin affect risk for uterine rupture in candidates for vaginal birth after cesarean delivery? Am J Obstet Gynecol 197(495):e1\u20135","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5454_CR14","unstructured":"Guise JM, Eden K, Emeis C, Denman MA, Marshall N, Fu R, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. evidence reports\/technology assessments, No. 191. Rockville, Maryland, USA: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2010."},{"key":"5454_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1358","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02688.x","volume":"117","author":"GA Dekker","year":"2010","unstructured":"Dekker GA, Chan A, Luke CG, Priest K, Riley M, Halliday J et al (2010) Risk of uterine rupture in Australian women attempting vaginal birth after one prior cesarean section: a retrospective population-based cohort study. BJOG 117:1358\u20131365","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"5454_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2581","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa040405","volume":"351","author":"MB Landon","year":"2004","unstructured":"Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Leindecker S, Varner MW et al (2004) National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 351:2581\u20132589","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"5454_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000224694.32531.f3","volume":"108","author":"MB Landon","year":"2006","unstructured":"Landon MB, Spong CY, Thom E, Hauth JC, Bloom SL, Varner MW et al (2006) Risk of uterine rupture with a trial of labor in women with multiple and single prior cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 108(1):12","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"5454_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"339","DOI":"10.1080\/01443615.2017.1355896","volume":"38","author":"A Kalok","year":"2018","unstructured":"Kalok A, Zabil SA, Jamil MA, Lim PS, Shafiee MN, Kampan N et al (2018) Antenatal scoring system in predicting the success of planned vaginal birth following one previous cesarean section. J Obstet Gynaecol 38(3):339\u2013343","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"8","key":"5454_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"447","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2004-835961","volume":"21","author":"R Gonen","year":"2004","unstructured":"Gonen R, Tamir A, Degani S, Ohel G (2004) Variables associated with successful vaginal birth after one cesarean section: a proposed vaginal birth after cesarean section score. Am J Perinatol 21(8):447\u2013453","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-020-05454-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-020-05454-0\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-020-05454-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,10]],"date-time":"2021-02-10T01:34:20Z","timestamp":1612920860000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-020-05454-0"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,2]]},"references-count":19,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,2]]}},"alternative-id":["5454"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-020-05454-0","relation":{},"ISSN":["0932-0067","1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0932-0067","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-0711","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,2]]},"assertion":[{"value":"22 September 2019","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"23 January 2020","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"11 February 2020","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"value":"The authors declare no conflict of interest for the present study.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}