{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,4]],"date-time":"2026-06-04T22:13:51Z","timestamp":1780611231998,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":28,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,3,17]],"date-time":"2020-03-17T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1584403200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,3,17]],"date-time":"2020-03-17T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1584403200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,4]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-020-05492-8","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,3,17]],"date-time":"2020-03-17T15:02:33Z","timestamp":1584457353000},"page":"995-1001","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":32,"title":["Trial of labor after cesarean delivery (TOLAC) in Japan: rates and complications"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"301","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2644-8383","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Aya","family":"Takeya","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Emi","family":"Adachi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yoshimitsu","family":"Takahashi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Eiji","family":"Kondoh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Masaki","family":"Mandai","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Takeo","family":"Nakayama","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,3,17]]},"reference":[{"key":"5492_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e260","DOI":"10.1016\/S2214-109X(15)70094-X","volume":"3","author":"JP Vogel","year":"2015","unstructured":"Vogel JP, Betr\u00e1n AP, Vindevoghel N, Souza JP, Torloni MR, Zhang J et al (2015) on behalf of the WHO Multi-Country Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health Research Network. Use of the robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys. Lancet Glob Health 3:e260\u2013e270","journal-title":"Lancet Glob Health"},{"key":"5492_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"237","DOI":"10.1111\/birt.12104","volume":"41","author":"J Ye","year":"2014","unstructured":"Ye J, Betran AP, Vela MG, Souza JP, Zhang J (2014) Searching for the optimal rate of medically necessary cesarean delivery. Birth 41:237\u2013243","journal-title":"Birth"},{"issue":"360","key":"5492_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"k55","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.k55","volume":"24","author":"AA Boatin","year":"2018","unstructured":"Boatin AA, Schlotheuber A, Betran AP, Moller AB, Barros AJD, Boerma T et al (2018) Within country inequalities in caesarean section rates: observational study of 72 low and middleincome countries. BMJ 24(360):k55","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"11","key":"5492_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0148343","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0148343","volume":"5","author":"AP Betr\u00e1n","year":"2016","unstructured":"Betr\u00e1n AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Zhang J, G\u00fclmezoglu AM, Torloni MR (2016) The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990\u20132014. PLoS ONE 5(11):e0148343","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"issue":"23","key":"5492_CR5","first-page":"149","volume":"2015","author":"World Health Organization Human Reproduction Programme","year":"2015","unstructured":"World Health Organization Human Reproduction Programme (2015) WHO statement on caesarean section rates. Reprod Health Matters 2015(23):149\u2013150","journal-title":"Reprod Health Matters"},{"key":"5492_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1184","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000017","volume":"122","author":"J Timofeev","year":"2013","unstructured":"Timofeev J, Reddy UM, Huang C-C, Driggers RW, Landy HJ, Laughon SK (2013) Obstetric complications, neonatal morbidity, and indications for cesarean delivery by maternal age. Obstet Gynecol 122:1184\u20131195","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5492_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318204521a","volume":"117","author":"D Brennan","year":"2011","unstructured":"Brennan D, Murphy M, Robson M, O'Herlihy C (2011) The singleton, cephalic, nulliparous woman after 36 weeks of gestation\u2014contribution to the overall cesarean delivery rates. Obstet Gynecol 117:273\u2013279","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5492_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e001725","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2012-001725","volume":"2","author":"C Roberts","year":"2012","unstructured":"Roberts C, Algert C, Ford J, Todd A, Morris J (2012) Pathways to a rising caesarean section rate: a population-based cohort study. BMJ Open 2:e001725","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"5492_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1267","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181df925f","volume":"115","author":"JM Guise","year":"2010","unstructured":"Guise JM et al (2010) Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 115:1267\u20131278","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5492_CR10","volume-title":"Williams Obstetrics","author":"FG Cunningham","year":"2001","unstructured":"Cunningham FG et al (2001) Williams Obstetrics, 24th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York","edition":"24"},{"key":"5492_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"351","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2010.06.002","volume":"34","author":"National Institutes of Health","year":"2010","unstructured":"National Institutes of Health (2010) National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights March 8\u201310, 2010. Semin Perinatol 34:351\u2013365","journal-title":"Semin Perinatol"},{"key":"5492_CR12","first-page":"1","volume":"64","author":"SC Curtin","year":"2015","unstructured":"Curtin SC et al (2015) Maternal morbidity for vaginal and cesarean deliveries, according to previous cesarean history: new data from the birth certificate, 2013. Natl Vital Stat Rep 64:1\u201313","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"key":"5492_CR13","unstructured":"Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare. NDB open data Japan. https:\/\/www.mhlw.go.jp\/stf\/seisakunitsuite\/bunya\/0000177182.html. Accessed 5 Apr 2019"},{"key":"5492_CR14","unstructured":"Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare. Vital statistics. https:\/\/www.mhlw.go.jp\/toukei\/list\/81-1a.html. Accessed 5 Apr 2019"},{"key":"5492_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"208","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.13518","volume":"44","author":"E Maeda","year":"2018","unstructured":"Maeda E, Ishihara O, Tomio J, Sato A, Terada Y, Kobayashi Y et al (2018) Cesarean section rates and local resources for perinatal care in Japan: a nationwide ecological study using the national database of health insurance claims. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 44:208\u2013216","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"key":"5492_CR16","volume-title":"Guideline for Obstetrical Practice in Japan 2017","author":"Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology","year":"2017","unstructured":"Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (2017) Guideline for Obstetrical Practice in Japan 2017, 4th edn. KANEHARA & CO., LTD, Tokyo","edition":"4"},{"key":"5492_CR17","first-page":"e217","volume":"130","author":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG","year":"2017","unstructured":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG (2017) Practice bulletin no. 184: Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 130:e217\u2013e233","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5492_CR18","unstructured":"Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Birth After Previous Caesarean Birth. RCOG Green-top Guideline. No. 45. https:\/\/www.rcog.org.uk\/globalassets\/documents\/guidelines\/gtg_45.pdf. Accessed 5 Apr 2019"},{"key":"5492_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"969","DOI":"10.1097\/GRF.0b013e3182708a60","volume":"55","author":"JB Hill","year":"2012","unstructured":"Hill JB, Ammons A, Chauhan SP (2012) Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: comparison of ACOG practice bulletin with other national guidelines. Clin Obstet Gynecol 55:969\u2013977","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5492_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1447","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1447-0756.2011.01565.x","volume":"37","author":"A Shiozaki","year":"2011","unstructured":"Shiozaki A, Matsuda Y, Hayashi K, Satoh S, Saito S (2011) Comparison of risk factors for major obstetric complications between Western countries and Japan: a case-cohort study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 37:1447\u20131454","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"key":"5492_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"492","DOI":"10.1016\/j.je.2016.09.013","volume":"27","author":"N Morisaki","year":"2017","unstructured":"Morisaki N, Nagata C, Jwa SC, Sago H, Saito S, Oken E, Fujiwara T (2017) Pre-pregnancy BMI-specific optimal gestational weight gain for women in Japan. J Epidemiol 27:492\u2013498","journal-title":"J Epidemiol"},{"key":"5492_CR22","unstructured":"Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (2017) Perinatal Committee Report ACTA Obstetrica et Gynaecologyca Japonica 69:1445\u20131479. https:\/\/www.mhlw.go.jp\/toukei\/saikin\/hw\/iryosd\/15\/dl\/02_01.pdf. Accessed 5 Apr 2019"},{"key":"5492_CR23","unstructured":"Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare. The guidance to perinatal medical system construction [cited 2017 July 31]. https:\/\/www.mhlw.go.jp\/stf\/seisakunitsuite\/bunya\/0000186912.html. Accessed 5 Apr 2019"},{"key":"5492_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"481","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2017.04.009","volume":"30","author":"C Nilsson","year":"2017","unstructured":"Nilsson C, Lalor J, Begley C, Carroll M, Gross MM, Grylka-Baeschlin S et al (2017) Vaginal birth after caesarean: views of women from countries with low VBAC rates. Women Birth 30:481\u2013490","journal-title":"Women Birth"},{"issue":"2","key":"5492_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"140","DOI":"10.3418\/jjam.JJAM-2017-0008","volume":"31","author":"Y Hakozaki","year":"2017","unstructured":"Hakozaki Y, Torigoe I, Sato k (2017) Investigating the relationship between maternal satisfaction with the cesarean birth experience and early postpartum depressive tendencies\u2014verifying the reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the SMMS. J Jpn Acad Midwif 31(2):140\u2013152","journal-title":"J Jpn Acad Midwif"},{"key":"5492_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000224694.32531.f3","volume":"108","author":"MB Landon","year":"2006","unstructured":"Landon MB et al (2006) Risk of uterine rupture with a trial of labor in women with multiple and single prior cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 108:12\u201320","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5492_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM200107053450101","volume":"345","author":"M Lydon-Rochelle","year":"2001","unstructured":"Lydon-Rochelle M et al (2001) Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 345(1):3\u20138","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"5","key":"5492_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1656","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.04.002","volume":"193","author":"GA Macones","year":"2005","unstructured":"Macones GA et al (2005) Maternal complications with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193(5):1656\u20131662","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-020-05492-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-020-05492-8\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-020-05492-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,17]],"date-time":"2021-03-17T00:25:39Z","timestamp":1615940739000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-020-05492-8"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,3,17]]},"references-count":28,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,4]]}},"alternative-id":["5492"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-020-05492-8","relation":{},"ISSN":["0932-0067","1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0932-0067","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-0711","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,3,17]]},"assertion":[{"value":"13 May 2019","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"5 March 2020","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"17 March 2020","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and\/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}},{"value":"Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Informed consent"}},{"value":"Although retrospective studies are conducted on already available data or biological material (for which formal consent may not be needed or is difficult to obtain) ethical approval may be required dependent on the law and the national ethical guidelines of a country. Authors should check with their institution to make sure they are complying with the specific requirements of their country.","order":5,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval retrospective studies"}}]}}