{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,4]],"date-time":"2026-08-04T03:17:20Z","timestamp":1785813440761,"version":"3.56.0"},"reference-count":41,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,5,15]],"date-time":"2020-05-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1589500800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,5,15]],"date-time":"2020-05-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1589500800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,7]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-020-05591-6","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,5,15]],"date-time":"2020-05-15T11:05:30Z","timestamp":1589540730000},"page":"101-108","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["The use of absorbable adhesion barriers to reduce the incidence of intraperitoneal adhesions at repeat cesarean delivery"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"302","author":[{"given":"Misgav","family":"Rottenstreich","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4063-5911","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Reut","family":"Rotem","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ayala","family":"Hirsch","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rivka","family":"Farkash","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Amihai","family":"Rottenstreich","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hen Y.","family":"Sela","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Arnon","family":"Samueloff","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sorina","family":"Grisaru-Granovsky","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,5,15]]},"reference":[{"key":"5591_CR1","first-page":"1","volume":"29","author":"MJ Hall","year":"2010","unstructured":"Hall MJ, DeFrances CJ, Williams SN, Golosinskiy A, Schwartzman A (2010) National Hospital Discharge Survey: 2007 summary. Natl Health Stat Rep 29:1\u201320 (24)","journal-title":"Natl Health Stat Rep"},{"key":"5591_CR2","first-page":"46","volume":"67","author":"JA Martin","year":"2018","unstructured":"Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK, Driscoll AK, Drake P (2018) National vital statistics reports: births: final data for 2016. Natl Vital Stat Rep 67:46\u201348","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"issue":"2","key":"5591_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0148343","volume":"11","author":"AP Betr\u00e1n","year":"2016","unstructured":"Betr\u00e1n AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Zhang J, G\u00fclmezoglu AM, Torloni MR (2016) The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990\u20132014. PLoS ONE 11(2):1\u201312","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"issue":"2","key":"5591_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.007","volume":"38","author":"M MacDorman","year":"2011","unstructured":"MacDorman M, Declercq E, Menacker F (2011) Recent trends and patterns in cesarean and vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) deliveries in the United States. Clin Perinatol 38(2):179\u2013192","journal-title":"Clin Perinatol"},{"issue":"6","key":"5591_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1226","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000219750.79480.84","volume":"107","author":"RM Silver","year":"2006","unstructured":"Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Thom EA et al (2006) Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obs Gynecol 107(6):1226\u20131232","journal-title":"Obs Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5591_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"56.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.04.039","volume":"201","author":"T Tulandi","year":"2009","unstructured":"Tulandi T, Agdi M, Zarei A, Miner L, Sikirica V (2009) Adhesion development and morbidity after repeat cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 201(1):56.e1\u20136","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"5591_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"461.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.12.017","volume":"196","author":"KJ Morales","year":"2007","unstructured":"Morales KJ, Gordon MC, Bates GWJ (2007) Postcesarean delivery adhesions associated with delayed delivery of infant. Am J Obstet Gynecol 196(5):461.e1\u20136","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"5591_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.06.035","volume":"205","author":"NE Marshall","year":"2011","unstructured":"Marshall NE, Fu R, Guise J (2011) Impact of multiple cesarean deliveries on maternal morbidity: a systematic review. Am J Obs Gynecol 205(3):e1\u20138 [262(September)]","journal-title":"Am J Obs Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5591_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12010","volume":"120","author":"JR Cook","year":"2012","unstructured":"Cook JR, Jarvis S, Knight M (2012) Multiple repeat caesarean section in the UK: incidence and consequences to mother and child. A national, prospective, cohort study. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 120(1):85\u201391","journal-title":"BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol."},{"key":"5591_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"855","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11083.x","volume":"107","author":"AM Lower","year":"2000","unstructured":"Lower AM, Gynaecology C, Consultant JSH, Ellis H, Surgery E, Brien FO et al (2000) The impact of adhesions on hospital readmissions over ten years after 8849 open gynaecological operations: an assessment from the Surgical and Clinical Adhesions Research Study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 107:855\u2013862","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"5591_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1396","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(94)70170-9","volume":"170","author":"BJ Monk","year":"1994","unstructured":"Monk BJ, Berman ML, Montz FJ (1994) Adhesions after extensive gynecologic surgery: Clinical significance, etiology, and prevention. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170(5):1396\u20131403","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5591_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"82","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2012.11.008","volume":"121","author":"JN Rossouw","year":"2013","unstructured":"Rossouw JN, Hall D, Harvey J (2013) Time between skin incision and delivery during cesarean. Int J Gynecol Obstet 121(1):82\u201385","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"1","key":"5591_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000222380.11069.11","volume":"108","author":"V Nisenblat","year":"2006","unstructured":"Nisenblat V, Barak S, Griness OB, Degani S, Ohel G, Gonen R (2006) Maternal complications associated with multiple cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 108(1):21\u201326","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5591_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"719","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2012.01395.x","volume":"91","author":"V Sikirica","year":"2012","unstructured":"Sikirica V, Broder MS, Chang E, Hinoul P, Robinson D, Wilson M (2012) Clinical and economic impact of adhesiolysis during repeat cesarean delivery. Acta Obs Gynecol Scand 91:719\u2013725","journal-title":"Acta Obs Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"3","key":"5591_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"227","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2004.08.016","volume":"87","author":"FW Makoha","year":"2004","unstructured":"Makoha FW, Felimban HM, Fathuddien MA, Roomi F, Ghabra T (2004) Multiple cesarean section morbidity. Int J Gynaecol Obs 87(3):227\u2013232","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obs"},{"issue":"10","key":"5591_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1235","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1447-0756.2011.01777.x","volume":"38","author":"A Ghahiry","year":"2012","unstructured":"Ghahiry A, Rezaei F, Khouzani RK, Ashrafinia M (2012) Comparative analysis of long-term outcomes of Misgav Ladach technique cesarean section and traditional cesarean section. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 38(10):1235\u20131239","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"issue":"6","key":"5591_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"598","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)34530-3","volume":"32","author":"D Robertson","year":"2010","unstructured":"Robertson D, Lefebvre G, Leyland N, Wolfman W, Allaire C, Awadalla A et al (2010) Adhesion prevention in gynaecological surgery. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 32(6):598\u2013602","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"issue":"6","key":"5591_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"849","DOI":"10.1001\/archsurg.1974.01350300081019","volume":"108","author":"SK Nair","year":"1974","unstructured":"Nair SK, Bhat IK, Aurora AL (1974) Role of proteolytic enzyme in the prevention of postoperative intraperitoneal adhesions. Arch Surg 108(6):849\u2013853","journal-title":"Arch Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"5591_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1643","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.12429","volume":"40","author":"I Kahyaoglu","year":"2014","unstructured":"Kahyaoglu I, Kayikcioglu F, Kinay T, Mollamahmutoglu L (2014) Abdominal scar characteristics: do they predict intra-abdominal adhesions with repeat cesarean deliveries? J Obstet Gynaecol Res 40(6):1643\u20131648","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"issue":"4 SUPPL.","key":"5591_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1223","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2006.04.021","volume":"86","author":"LA Gago","year":"2006","unstructured":"Gago LA, Saed G, Elhammady E, Diamond MP (2006) Effect of oxidized regenerated cellulose (Interceed\u00ae) on the expression of tissue plasminogen activator and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 in human peritoneal fibroblasts and mesothelial cells. Fertil Steril 86(4 SUPPL.):1223\u20131227","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"6","key":"5591_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1315","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(97)70070-X","volume":"177","author":"S Reddy","year":"1997","unstructured":"Reddy S, Santanam N, Reddy PP, Rock JA, Murphy AA, Parthasarathy S et al (1997) Interaction of interceed oxidized regenerated cellulose with macrophages: a potential mechanism by which interceed may prevent adhesions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 177(6):1315\u20131321","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5591_CR22","unstructured":"Gynecare Interceed\u2014Instructions for use [Internet]. https:\/\/www.jnjmedicaldevices.com\/en-US\/product\/gynecare-interceed-absorbable-adhesion-barrier. Accessed 19 Apr 2020"},{"issue":"6","key":"5591_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"567","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/7.6.567","volume":"7","author":"MP Diamond","year":"2001","unstructured":"Diamond MP, Freeman ML (2001) Clinical implications of postsurgical adhesions. Hum Reprod Update 7(6):567\u2013576","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"issue":"4","key":"5591_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"467","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2168.2000.01394.x","volume":"87","author":"AA van der Krabben","year":"2000","unstructured":"van der Krabben AA, Dijkstra FR, Nieuwenhuijzen M, Reijnen MM, Schaapveld M, Van Goor H (2000) Morbidity and mortality of inadvertent enterotomy during adhesiotomy. Br J Surg 87(4):467","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"issue":"11","key":"5591_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1503","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.7657","volume":"98","author":"BWJ Hellebrekers","year":"2011","unstructured":"Hellebrekers BWJ, Kooistra T (2011) Pathogenesis of postoperative adhesion formation. Br J Surg 98(11):1503\u20131516","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"issue":"39","key":"5591_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6","DOI":"10.1038\/srep37600","volume":"69","author":"H Nakagawa","year":"2013","unstructured":"Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, Nakagawa H, Matsumoto YY et al (2013) The use of adhesion prevention agents in obstetrics and gynaecology. Biomaterials 69(39):6. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/srep37600","journal-title":"Biomaterials"},{"issue":"6 SUPPL.","key":"5591_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S19","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.09.030","volume":"205","author":"GW Bates","year":"2011","unstructured":"Bates GW, Shomento S (2011) Adhesion prevention in patients with multiple cesarean deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 205(6 SUPPL.):S19\u201324","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"5591_CR28","first-page":"325","volume":"44","author":"DM Wiseman","year":"1999","unstructured":"Wiseman DM, Trout JR, Franklin RR, Diamond MP (1999) Metaanalysis of the safety and efficacy of an adhesion barrier (Interceed TC7) in laparotomy. J Reprod Med 44(4):325\u2013331","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"5591_CR29","first-page":"1","volume":"4","author":"C Farquhar","year":"2007","unstructured":"Farquhar C, Vandekerckhove P, Watson A, Vail A, Wiseman D (2007) Barrier agents for preventing adhesions after surgery for subfertility [systematic review]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:1\u201334","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"5591_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD000475.pub3","author":"G Ahmad","year":"2015","unstructured":"Ahmad G, O'Flynn H, Hindocha A, Watson A (2015) Barrier agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD000475.pub3","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"20","key":"5591_CR31","first-page":"2738","volume":"287","author":"MD Asnat Walfisch","year":"2014","unstructured":"Asnat Walfisch MD, Ron Beloosesky MD, Alon Shrim MD, Mordechai HM (2014) Adhesion prevention after cesarean delivery: evidence, and lack of it. J Am Med Assoc 287(20):2738","journal-title":"J Am Med Assoc"},{"issue":"12","key":"5591_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1166","DOI":"10.1177\/1933719111414206","volume":"18","author":"AO Awonuga","year":"2011","unstructured":"Awonuga AO, Fletcher NM, Saed GM, Diamond MP (2011) Postoperative adhesion development following cesarean and open intra-abdominal gynecological operations. Reprod Sci 18(12):1166\u20131185","journal-title":"Reprod Sci"},{"issue":"5","key":"5591_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"417","DOI":"10.3109\/00016348609157375","volume":"65","author":"H Pschera","year":"1986","unstructured":"Pschera H, Kjaeldgaard A, Larsson B (1986) Fibrinolytic activity in amniotic fluid during late pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 65(5):417\u2013420","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"3\u20134","key":"5591_CR34","first-page":"103","volume":"56","author":"HO Chapa","year":"2011","unstructured":"Chapa HO, Venegas G, Vanduyne CP, Antonetti AG, Sandate JP, Silver L (2011) Peritoneal adhesion prevention at cesarean section: an analysis of the effectiveness of an absorbable adhesion barrier. J Reprod Med 56(3\u20134):103\u2013109","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"5591_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"157","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31821d8438","volume":"118","author":"CM Albright","year":"2011","unstructured":"Albright CM, Rouse DJ (2011) Adhesion barriers at cesarean delivery: advertising compared with the evidence. Obstet Gynecol 118(1):157\u2013160","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"5591_CR36","first-page":"557","volume":"91","author":"H Fushiki","year":"2005","unstructured":"Fushiki H, Ikoma T, Kobayashi H, Yoshimoto H (2005) Efficacy of seprafilm as an adhesion prevention barrier in cesarean sections. Obs Gynecol Treat 91(5):557\u2013561","journal-title":"Obs Gynecol Treat"},{"issue":"9","key":"5591_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"795","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2016.06.007","volume":"38","author":"B Plante","year":"2016","unstructured":"Plante B, Sukalich S, Elliott JO (2016) Adhesion assessment at first repeat caesarean section with or without prior adhesion barrier use. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 38(9):795\u2013803","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"issue":"5","key":"5591_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"923","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000220","volume":"123","author":"RK Edwards","year":"2014","unstructured":"Edwards RK, Ingersoll M, Gerkin RD, Bodea-Braescu AV, Lin MG (2014) Carboxymethylcellulose adhesion barrier placement at primary cesarean delivery and outcomes at repeat cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 123(5):923\u2013928","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"5591_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"679","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000450","volume":"124","author":"M Gaspar-Oishi","year":"2014","unstructured":"Gaspar-Oishi M, Aeby T (2014) Cesarean delivery times and adhesion severity associated with prior placement of a sodium hyaluronate\u2013carboxycellulose barrier. Obstet Gynecol 124(4):679\u2013683","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"5591_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"373.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.012","volume":"214","author":"DG Kiefer","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kiefer DG, Muscat JC, Santorelli J, Chavez MR, Ananth CV, Smulian JC et al (2016) Effectiveness and short-term safety of modified sodium hyaluronic acid\u2013carboxymethylcellulose at cesarean delivery: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 214(3):373.e1\u2013373.e12","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5591_CR41","first-page":"CD000475","volume":"3","author":"G Ahmad","year":"2020","unstructured":"Ahmad G, Kim K, Thompson M, Agarwal P, O\u2019Flynn H, Hindocha A et al (2020) Barrier agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 3:CD000475","journal-title":"Cochrane database Syst Rev."}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-020-05591-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-020-05591-6\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-020-05591-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,14]],"date-time":"2021-05-14T23:22:34Z","timestamp":1621034554000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-020-05591-6"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,5,15]]},"references-count":41,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,7]]}},"alternative-id":["5591"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-020-05591-6","relation":{},"ISSN":["0932-0067","1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0932-0067","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-0711","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,5,15]]},"assertion":[{"value":"8 March 2020","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"5 May 2020","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"15 May 2020","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have nothing to disclose and that they have no financial or non-financial conflict of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and\/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study, formal consent is not required. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors. The Shaare Zedek Medical Center institutional review board approved the study (0208-19-SZMC), with waiver of informed consent due to the retrospective, observational design of the study.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}}]}}