{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,29]],"date-time":"2026-10-29T00:04:44Z","timestamp":1793232284806,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":50,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,5,22]],"date-time":"2020-05-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1590105600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,5,22]],"date-time":"2020-05-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1590105600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000024","name":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["Grant MFM-146444"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["Grant MFM-146444"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000024","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,7]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The use of assisted reproductive technology (ART) has increased in the last 2 decades and continuous surveillance is needed. This systematic review aims to assess the risk of adverse neonatal outcomes (preterm birth [PTB], low birth weight [LBW], small-for-gestationalage [SGA] and large for gestational-age [LGA]), in singleton pregnancies conceived by fresh or frozen embryo transfer (FET) compared to spontaneous conceptions.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Cohort studies were identified from MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library (January 2019), and manual search. Meta-analyses were performed to estimate odds ratios (OR) using random effects models in RevMan 5.3 and\n                      <jats:italic>I<\/jats:italic>\n                      -squared (\n                      <jats:italic>I<\/jats:italic>\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      ) test\u2009&gt;\u200950% was considered as high heterogeneity.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      After 3142 titles and abstracts were screened, 1180 full-text articles were assessed, and 14 were eligible. For fresh embryo transfer, the pooled ORs were PTB 1.64 (95% CI 1.46, 1.84);\n                      <jats:italic>I<\/jats:italic>\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      \u2009=\u200997%; LBW 1.67 (95% CI 1.52, 1.85);\n                      <jats:italic>I<\/jats:italic>\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      \u2009=\u200994%; SGA 1.46 [95% CI 1.11, 1.92];\n                      <jats:italic>I<\/jats:italic>\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      \u2009=\u200999%, LGA 0.88 (95% CI 0.80, 0.87);\n                      <jats:italic>I<\/jats:italic>\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      \u2009=\u200980%). For frozen, the pooled ORs were PTB 1.39 (95% CI 1.34, 1.44);\n                      <jats:italic>I<\/jats:italic>\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      \u2009=\u20090%; LBW 1.38 (95% CI 0.91, 2.09);\n                      <jats:italic>I<\/jats:italic>\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      \u2009=\u200998%; SGA 0.83 (95% CI 0.57, 1.19);\n                      <jats:italic>I<\/jats:italic>\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      \u2009=\u20090%, LGA 1.57 (95% CI 1.48, 1.68);\n                      <jats:italic>I<\/jats:italic>\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      \u2009=\u200922%).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>When compared with spontaneous pregnancies, fresh, but not frozen was associated with LBW and SGA. Both fresh and frozen were associated with PTB. Frozen was uniquely associated with LGA. Despite improvements in ART protocols in relation to pregnancy rates, attention is needed towards monitoring adverse neonatal outcomes in these pregnancies.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-020-05593-4","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,5,22]],"date-time":"2020-05-22T10:02:54Z","timestamp":1590141774000},"page":"31-45","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":60,"title":["Neonatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies conceived by fresh or frozen embryo transfer compared to spontaneous conceptions: a systematic review and meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"302","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7142-6266","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Flavia T. S.","family":"Elias","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Danielle","family":"Weber-Adrian","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jessica","family":"Pudwell","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jillian","family":"Carter","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mark","family":"Walker","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Laura","family":"Gaudet","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Graeme","family":"Smith","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4834-8279","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Maria P.","family":"Velez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,5,22]]},"reference":[{"issue":"6","key":"5593_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1313","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deu067","volume":"29","author":"MP Velez","year":"2014","unstructured":"Velez MP, Connolly MP, Kadoch IJ, Phillips S, Bissonnette F (2014) Universal coverage of IVF pays off. Hum Reprod 29(6):1313\u20131319","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"2","key":"5593_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.15437","volume":"126","author":"A Pinborg","year":"2019","unstructured":"Pinborg A (2019) Short- and long-term outcomes in children born after assisted reproductive technology. BJOG 126(2):145\u2013148","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"5593_CR3","volume-title":"National public health action plan for the detection, prevention, and management of infertility","author":"CDC","year":"2014","unstructured":"CDC (2014) National public health action plan for the detection, prevention, and management of infertility. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta"},{"issue":"10","key":"5593_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1957","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dex264","volume":"32","author":"C Calhaz-Jorge","year":"2017","unstructured":"European IVFmC, European Society of Human R, Embryology, Calhaz-Jorge C, De Geyter C, Kupka MS et al (2017) Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2013: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 32(10):1957\u20131973","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"3","key":"5593_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"287","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2017.05.021","volume":"35","author":"F Zegers-Hochschild","year":"2017","unstructured":"Zegers-Hochschild F, Schwarze JE, Crosby J, Musri C, Urbina MT, Latin American Network of Assisted R (2017) Assisted reproduction techniques in Latin America: the Latin American Registry, 2014. Reprod Biomed Online 35(3):287\u2013295","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"issue":"9","key":"5593_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1786","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dex234","volume":"32","author":"F Zegers-Hochschild","year":"2017","unstructured":"Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, Dyer S, Racowsky C, de Mouzon J, Sokol R et al (2017) The international glossary on infertility and fertility care, 2017. Hum Reprod 32(9):1786\u20131801","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"2","key":"5593_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"138","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2009.05.035","volume":"146","author":"SD McDonald","year":"2009","unstructured":"McDonald SD, Han Z, Mulla S, Murphy KE, Beyene J, Ohlsson A et al (2009) Preterm birth and low birth weight among in vitro fertilization singletons: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 146(2):138\u2013148","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"3","key":"5593_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1002\/bdra.20645","volume":"88","author":"B Kallen","year":"2010","unstructured":"Kallen B, Finnstrom O, Lindam A, Nilsson E, Nygren KG, Otterblad PO (2010) Congenital malformations in infants born after in vitro fertilization in Sweden. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 88(3):137\u2013143","journal-title":"Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol"},{"issue":"3","key":"5593_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"136","DOI":"10.1002\/bdrb.21178","volume":"107","author":"S Chaabane","year":"2016","unstructured":"Chaabane S, Sheehy O, Monnier P, Bissonnette F, Trasler JM, Fraser W et al (2016) Ovarian stimulators, intrauterine insemination, and assisted reproductive technologies use and the risk of major congenital malformations\u2014the AtRISK study. Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol 107(3):136\u2013147","journal-title":"Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol"},{"issue":"4","key":"5593_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"443","DOI":"10.1017\/S2040174417000526","volume":"8","author":"MJ Davies","year":"2017","unstructured":"Davies MJ, Rumbold AR, Moore VM (2017) Assisted reproductive technologies: a hierarchy of risks for conception, pregnancy outcomes and treatment decisions. J Dev Orig Health Dis 8(4):443\u2013447","journal-title":"J Dev Orig Health Dis"},{"issue":"4","key":"5593_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"330","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmt006","volume":"19","author":"M Hansen","year":"2013","unstructured":"Hansen M, Kurinczuk JJ, Milne E, de Klerk N, Bower C (2013) Assisted reproductive technology and birth defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 19(4):330\u2013353","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"issue":"1","key":"5593_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-017-1235-6","volume":"17","author":"AY Wang","year":"2017","unstructured":"Wang AY, Chughtai AA, Lui K, Sullivan EA (2017) Morbidity and mortality among very preterm singletons following fertility treatment in Australia and New Zealand, a population cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 17(1):50","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"1","key":"5593_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmy033","volume":"25","author":"M Roque","year":"2019","unstructured":"Roque M, Haahr T, Geber S, Esteves SC, Humaidan P (2019) Fresh versus elective frozen embryo transfer in IVF\/ICSI cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis of reproductive outcomes. Hum Reprod Update 25(1):2\u201314","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"issue":"4","key":"5593_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"561","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14257","volume":"124","author":"M Storgaard","year":"2017","unstructured":"Storgaard M, Loft A, Bergh C, Wennerholm UB, Soderstrom-Anttila V, Romundstad LB et al (2017) Obstetric and neonatal complications in pregnancies conceived after oocyte donation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 124(4):561\u2013572","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"3","key":"5593_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"551","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000114989.84822.51","volume":"103","author":"RA Jackson","year":"2004","unstructured":"Jackson RA, Gibson KA, Wu YW, Croughan MS (2004) Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 103(3):551\u2013563","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5593_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"43","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.18930","volume":"51","author":"P Cavoretto","year":"2018","unstructured":"Cavoretto P, Candiani M, Giorgione V, Inversetti A, Abu-Saba MM, Tiberio F et al (2018) Risk of spontaneous preterm birth in singleton pregnancies conceived after IVF\/ICSI treatment: meta-analysis of cohort studies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 51(1):43\u201353","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"5593_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"618","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/det440","volume":"29","author":"A Pinborg","year":"2014","unstructured":"Pinborg A, Henningsen AA, Loft A, Malchau SS, Forman J, Andersen AN (2014) Large baby syndrome in singletons born after frozen embryo transfer (FET): is it due to maternal factors or the cryotechnique? Hum Reprod 29(3):618\u2013627","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"4","key":"5593_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"433 e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.223","volume":"218","author":"JF Litzky","year":"2018","unstructured":"Litzky JF, Boulet SL, Esfandiari N, Zhang Y, Kissin DM, Theiler RN et al (2018) Effect of frozen\/thawed embryo transfer on birthweight, macrosomia, and low birthweight rates in US singleton infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 218(4):433 e1\u2013433 e10","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol."},{"issue":"2","key":"5593_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"303","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/der414","volume":"27","author":"J Harper","year":"2012","unstructured":"Harper J, Magli MC, Lundin K, Barratt CL, Brison D (2012) When and how should new technology be introduced into the IVF laboratory? Hum Reprod 27(2):303\u2013313","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"1","key":"5593_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmx031","volume":"24","author":"A Maheshwari","year":"2018","unstructured":"Maheshwari A, Pandey S, Amalraj Raja E, Shetty A, Hamilton M, Bhattacharya S (2018) Is frozen embryo transfer better for mothers and babies? Can cumulative meta-analysis provide a definitive answer? Hum Reprod Update 24(1):35\u201358","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"issue":"3","key":"5593_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"234","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmr052","volume":"18","author":"JC Harper","year":"2012","unstructured":"Harper JC, Wilton L, Traeger-Synodinos J, Goossens V, Moutou C, SenGupta SB et al (2012) The ESHRE PGD Consortium: 10 years of data collection. Hum Reprod Update 18(3):234\u2013247","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"5593_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"603","DOI":"10.1007\/s10654-010-9491-z","volume":"9","author":"A Stang","year":"2010","unstructured":"Stang A (2010) Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandom studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 9:603\u2013605","journal-title":"Eur J Epidemiol"},{"issue":"11","key":"5593_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1539","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.1186","volume":"21","author":"JP Higgins","year":"2002","unstructured":"Higgins JP, Thompson SG (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 21(11):1539\u20131558","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"issue":"6","key":"5593_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1022","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002031","volume":"129","author":"S Crawford","year":"2017","unstructured":"Crawford S, Joshi N, Boulet SL, Bailey MA, Hood ME, Manning SE et al (2017) Maternal racial and ethnic disparities in neonatal birth outcomes with and without assisted reproduction. Obstet Gynecol 129(6):1022\u20131030","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5593_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"121","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-018-1333-z","volume":"36","author":"B Luke","year":"2018","unstructured":"Luke B, Brown MB, Wantman E, Seifer DB, Sparks AT, Lin PC et al (2018) Risk of prematurity and infant morbidity and mortality by maternal fertility status and plurality. J Assist Reprod Genet 36(1):121\u2013138","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"issue":"4","key":"5593_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1320","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.05.091","volume":"94","author":"A Pinborg","year":"2010","unstructured":"Pinborg A, Loft A, Aaris Henningsen AK, Rasmussen S, Andersen AN (2010) Infant outcome of 957 singletons born after frozen embryo replacement: the Danish National Cohort Study 1995\u20132006. Fertil Steril 94(4):1320\u20131327","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"9","key":"5593_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2545","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/det272","volume":"28","author":"UB Wennerholm","year":"2013","unstructured":"Wennerholm UB, Henningsen AK, Romundstad LB, Bergh C, Pinborg A, Skjaerven R et al (2013) Perinatal outcomes of children born after frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a Nordic cohort study from the CoNARTaS group. Hum Reprod 28(9):2545\u20132553","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"19","key":"5593_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1008095","volume":"366","author":"MJ Davies","year":"2012","unstructured":"Davies MJ, Moore VM, Willson KJ, Van Essen P, Priest K, Scott H, Haan EA, Chan A (2012) Reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects. N Engl J Med 366(19):10","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"5","key":"5593_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1343","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/des036","volume":"27","author":"A Sazonova","year":"2012","unstructured":"Sazonova A, Kallen K, Thurin-Kjellberg A, Wennerholm UB, Bergh C (2012) Obstetric outcome in singletons after in vitro fertilization with cryopreserved\/thawed embryos. Hum Reprod 27(5):1343\u20131350","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"3","key":"5593_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"378 e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.040","volume":"214","author":"GE Ernstad","year":"2016","unstructured":"Ernstad GE, Bergh C, Khatibi A, Kallen KB, Westlander G, Nilsson S et al (2016) Neonatal and maternal outcome after blastocyst transfer: a population-based registry study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 214(3):378 e1\u2013378 e10","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"5593_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1604","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2003.10.053","volume":"81","author":"A Katalinic","year":"2004","unstructured":"Katalinic A, Rosch C, Ludwig M, German IF-USG (2004) Pregnancy course and outcome after intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a controlled, prospective cohort study. Fertil Steril 81(6):1604\u20131616","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"4","key":"5593_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"06","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000284627.38540.80","volume":"110","author":"WN Buckett","year":"2007","unstructured":"Buckett WN, Chian RC, Holzer H, Dean N, Usher R, Tan SL (2007) Obstetric outcomes and congenital abnormalities after in vitro maturation, in vitro fertilization, and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Obstet Gynecol 110(4):06","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"5593_CR33","first-page":"06","volume":"40","author":"JRN Stojnic","year":"2013","unstructured":"Stojnic JRN, Jeremic K, Kotlica BK, Mitrovic M (2013) Tulic Perinatal outcome of singleton pregnancies following in vitro fertilization. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 40(2):06","journal-title":"Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5593_CR34","first-page":"258 e8","volume":"101","author":"RS Legro","year":"2014","unstructured":"Legro RS, Brzyski RG, Diamond MP, Coutifaris C, Schlaff WD, Alvero R et al (2014) The pregnancy in polycystic ovary syndrome II study: baseline characteristics and effects of obesity from a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Fertil Steril 101(1):258 e8\u2013269 e8","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"5","key":"5593_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1100","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2011.08.038","volume":"96","author":"AR Cooper","year":"2011","unstructured":"Cooper AR, O'Neill KE, Allsworth JE, Jungheim ES, Odibo AO, Gray DL et al (2011) Smaller fetal size in singletons after infertility therapies: the influence of technology and the underlying infertility. Fertil Steril 96(5):1100\u20131106","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"8","key":"5593_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"06","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/15.8.1819","volume":"15","author":"JBD Koudstaal","year":"2000","unstructured":"Koudstaal JBD, Bruinse HW, Naaktgeboren N, Vermeiden JP, Visser GH (2000) Obstetric outcome of singleton pregnancies after IVF: a matched control study in four Dutch university hospitals. Hum Reprod 15(8):06","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"4","key":"5593_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"914","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dep477","volume":"25","author":"S Pelkonen","year":"2010","unstructured":"Pelkonen S, Koivunen R, Gissler M, Nuojua-Huttunen S, Suikkari AM, Hyden-Granskog C et al (2010) Perinatal outcome of children born after frozen and fresh embryo transfer: the Finnish cohort study 1995\u20132006. Hum Reprod 25(4):914\u2013923","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"6","key":"5593_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"538","DOI":"10.1159\/000468935","volume":"82","author":"S Spijkers","year":"2017","unstructured":"Spijkers S, Lens JW, Schats R, Lambalk CB (2017) Fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer compared to natural conception: differences in perinatal outcome. Gynecol Obstet Investig 82(6):538\u2013546","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Investig"},{"issue":"7434","key":"5593_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.37957.560278.EE","volume":"328","author":"FM Helmerhorst","year":"2004","unstructured":"Helmerhorst FM, Perquin DA, Donker D, Keirse MJ (2004) Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception: a systematic review of controlled studies. BMJ 328(7434):261","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"6","key":"5593_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1514","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2004.06.038","volume":"82","author":"PG McGovern","year":"2004","unstructured":"McGovern PG, Llorens AJ, Skurnick JH, Weiss G, Goldsmith LT (2004) Increased risk of preterm birth in singleton pregnancies resulting from in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer or gamete intrafallopian transfer: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 82(6):1514\u20131520","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"5","key":"5593_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"485","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dms018","volume":"18","author":"S Pandey","year":"2012","unstructured":"Pandey S, Shetty A, Hamilton M, Bhattacharya S, Maheshwari A (2012) Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from IVF\/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 18(5):485\u2013503","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"issue":"2","key":"5593_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-016-4250-3","volume":"295","author":"JB Qin","year":"2017","unstructured":"Qin JB, Sheng XQ, Wu D, Gao SY, You YP, Yang TB et al (2017) Worldwide prevalence of adverse pregnancy outcomes among singleton pregnancies after in vitro fertilization\/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 295(2):285\u2013301","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"2","key":"5593_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dms044","volume":"19","author":"A Pinborg","year":"2013","unstructured":"Pinborg A, Wennerholm UB, Romundstad LB, Loft A, Aittomaki K, Soderstrom-Anttila V et al (2013) Why do singletons conceived after assisted reproduction technology have adverse perinatal outcome? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 19(2):87\u2013104","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"issue":"1","key":"5593_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"121","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-018-1333-z","volume":"36","author":"B Luke","year":"2019","unstructured":"Luke B, Brown MB, Wantman E, Seifer DB, Sparks AT, Lin PC et al (2019) Risk of prematurity and infant morbidity and mortality by maternal fertility status and plurality. J Assist Reprod Genet 36(1):121\u2013138","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"5593_CR45","unstructured":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (2018) 2016 assisted reproductive technology national summary report. US Dept of Health and Human Services, Atlanta (GA)"},{"issue":"1","key":"5593_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2014.05.024","volume":"102","author":"KT Barnhart","year":"2014","unstructured":"Barnhart KT (2014) Introduction: are we ready to eliminate the transfer of fresh embryos in in vitro fertilization? Fertil Steril 102(1):1\u20132","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"2","key":"5593_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"196","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dex361","volume":"33","author":"A De Vos","year":"2018","unstructured":"De Vos A, Santos-Ribeiro S, Van Landuyt L, Van de Velde H, Tournaye H, Verheyen G (2018) Birthweight of singletons born after cleavage-stage or blastocyst transfer in fresh and warming cycles. Hum Reprod 33(2):196\u2013201","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"1","key":"5593_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2018.10.006","volume":"111","author":"J Zhang","year":"2019","unstructured":"Zhang J, Wang Y, Liu H, Mao X, Chen Q, Fan Y et al (2019) Effect of in vitro culture period on birth weight after vitrified-warmed transfer cycles: analysis of 4,201 singleton newborns. Fertil Steril 111(1):97\u2013104","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"5","key":"5593_CR49","first-page":"399","volume":"38","author":"XJ Zhang","year":"2017","unstructured":"Zhang XJ, Lv Q, Min LH, Cao XH, Li XJ (2017) Effect of developmental stage of embryos at freezing on live birth outcomes after frozen embryo transfer. Cryo Letters 38(5):399\u2013406","journal-title":"Cryo Letters"},{"issue":"3","key":"5593_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"283","DOI":"10.1002\/rmb2.12038","volume":"16","author":"Y Tsuji","year":"2017","unstructured":"Tsuji Y, Otsuki J, Iwasaki T, Furuhashi K, Matsumoto Y, Kokeguchi S et al (2017) Retrospective comparative study of the factors affecting birthweights in frozen-thawed embryo transfer, compared to fresh embryo transfer. Reprod Med Biol 16(3):283\u2013289","journal-title":"Reprod Med Biol"}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-020-05593-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-020-05593-4\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-020-05593-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,6]],"date-time":"2024-08-06T02:31:17Z","timestamp":1722911477000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-020-05593-4"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,5,22]]},"references-count":50,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,7]]}},"alternative-id":["5593"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-020-05593-4","relation":{},"ISSN":["0932-0067","1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0932-0067","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-0711","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,5,22]]},"assertion":[{"value":"28 January 2020","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"6 May 2020","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"22 May 2020","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests that might have influenced the work described in this manuscript.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"The present study was approved by the Queen\u2019s University Health Sciences & Affiliated Teaching Hospitals Research Ethics Board.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}}]}}