{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]],"date-time":"2025-02-21T03:38:27Z","timestamp":1740109107157,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":31,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,1]],"date-time":"2020-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1596240000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,1]],"date-time":"2020-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1596240000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,11]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n<jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>To compare the techniques for cone measurement with ultrasound to determine the size of the resected tissue and to evaluate parameters which may be relevant for stratifying women at risk who need surveillance when pregnant.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n<jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>The present study included women with a pathological cervical biopsy. Cervical length and volume were determined by transvaginal ultrasound prior to conization. The pathologist measured the volume of the removed tissue by the fluid displacement technique and using a ruler. A repeat transvaginal ultrasound was performed during a follow-up visit. Factors affecting cone volume as well as the correlation between measurement techniques were analyzed.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n<jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>A total of 28 patients underwent cervical excision treatment. The mean cervical volumes measured sonographically before and after the operation were 17.72\u2009\u00b1\u20097.34 and 13.21\u2009\u00b1\u20095.43 cm<jats:sup>3<\/jats:sup>, respectively. The proportion of volume excised was 25.50\u2009\u00b1\u200917.43%. A significant correlation was found between the cone depth and the cone volume measured by the fluid displacement technique, and histopathologically and sonographically measured difference in cervical volume. The interobserver reliability coefficient was\u2009&gt;\u20090.9. Analyzing influential parameters, only age affected the extent of cone volume and the correlation between the three measurement techniques.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n<jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Commonly applied techniques of cervical and cone measurement are equivalent and interchangeable. Our ultrasound data show variety in the volume and length of the cervix, and in the proportion of the volume excised at conization. Ultrasound measurements may help the surgeon to estimate not only the dimension of the remaining cervix but also its function.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-020-05718-9","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,1]],"date-time":"2020-08-01T13:02:42Z","timestamp":1596286962000},"page":"1189-1196","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["3D ultrasound as a surgical quality control of conization in patients with severe dysplasia: a prospective study"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"302","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4116-0046","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Anna M.","family":"D\u00fcckelmann","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Julia","family":"Wordell","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Rolf","family":"Richter","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jalid","family":"Sehouli","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,1]]},"reference":[{"issue":"3","key":"5718_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"394","DOI":"10.1016\/S1470-2045(18)30836-2","volume":"20","author":"KT Simms","year":"2019","unstructured":"Simms KT, Steinberg J, Caruana M et al (2019) Impact of scaled up human papillomavirus vaccination and cervical screening and the potential for global elimination of cervical cancer in 181 countries, 2020\u201399: a modelling study. Lancet Oncol 20(3):394\u2013407","journal-title":"Lancet Oncol"},{"key":"5718_CR2","unstructured":"WHO. Accelerating cervical cancer elimination. https:\/\/apps.who.int\/gb\/ebwha\/pdf_files\/EB144\/B144_28-en.pdf [17\/01\/2020]"},{"issue":"1","key":"5718_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2303.2008.00636.x","volume":"20","author":"J Jordan","year":"2009","unstructured":"Jordan J, Martin-Hirsch P, Arbyn M et al (2009) European guidelines for clinical management of abnormal cervical cytology, part 2. Cytopathology 20(1):5\u201316","journal-title":"Cytopathology"},{"key":"5718_CR4","first-page":"CD001318","volume":"12","author":"PP Martin-Hirsch","year":"2013","unstructured":"Martin-Hirsch PP, Paraskevaidis E, Bryant A et al (2013) Surgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12:CD001318","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"5718_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"i3633","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.i3633","volume":"354","author":"M Kyrgiou","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kyrgiou M, Athanasiou A, Paraskevaidi M et al (2016) Adverse obstetric outcomes after local treatment for cervical preinvasive and early invasive disease according to cone depth: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 354:i3633","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"5718_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"489","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(06)68181-6","volume":"367","author":"M Kyrgiou","year":"2006","unstructured":"Kyrgiou M, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P et al (2006) Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 367:489\u2013498","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"5718_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"a1284","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.a1284","volume":"337","author":"M Arbyn","year":"2008","unstructured":"Arbyn M, Kyrgiou M, Simoens C et al (2008) Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: meta-analysis. BMJ 337:a1284","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"5718_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1031","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2011.02944.x","volume":"118","author":"F Bruinsma","year":"2011","unstructured":"Bruinsma F, Quinn M (2011) The risk of preterm birth following treatment for precancerous changes in the cervix: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 118:1031\u20131041","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"3","key":"5718_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"242.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.03.004","volume":"211","author":"ES Miller","year":"2014","unstructured":"Miller ES, Grobman WA (2014) The association between cervical excisional procedures, midtrimester cervical length, and preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 211(3):242.e1\u20134","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"5718_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"523.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.02.002","volume":"214","author":"LA Temming","year":"2016","unstructured":"Temming LA, Durst JK, Tuuli MG et al (2016) Universal cervical length screening: implementation and outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 214(4):523.e1\u2013523.e8","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5718_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2014.07.038","volume":"128","author":"M Kyrgiou","year":"2015","unstructured":"Kyrgiou M, Valasoulis G, Stasinou S-M et al (2015) Proportion of cervical excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as a predictor of pregnancy outcomes. Int J Gynecol Obstet 128:141\u2013147","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"5718_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"685","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2011.03252.x","volume":"119","author":"S Khalid","year":"2012","unstructured":"Khalid S, Dimitriou E, Conroy R et al (2012) The thickness and volume of LLETZ specimens can predict the relative risk of pregnancy-related morbidity. BJOG 119:685\u2013691","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"3","key":"5718_CR13","first-page":"310","volume":"36","author":"M Ueki","year":"1992","unstructured":"Ueki M, Ueda M, Kurokawa A et al (1992) Cytologic study of the tissue repair cells of the uterine cervix. With special reference to their origin. Acta Cytol 36(3):310\u2013318","journal-title":"Acta Cytol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5718_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"88","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(01)00574-7","volume":"102","author":"E Paraskevaidis","year":"2002","unstructured":"Paraskevaidis E, Bilirakis E, Koliopoulos G et al (2002) Cervical regeneration after diathermy excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as assessed by transvaginal sonography. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 102(1):88\u201391","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"5718_CR15","first-page":"1042","volume":"54","author":"H Griesser","year":"2013","unstructured":"Griesser H, Marquardt K, Jordan B et al (2013) M\u00fcnchner nomenklatur III. Frauenarzt 54:1042\u20131048","journal-title":"Frauenarzt"},{"key":"5718_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"678","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2012.03275.x","volume":"119","author":"D Papoutsis","year":"2012","unstructured":"Papoutsis D, Rodolakis A, Mesogitis S et al (2012) Regeneration of uterine cervix at 6 months after large loop excision of the transformation zone for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. BJOG 119:678\u2013684","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"5718_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"472","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12105","volume":"120","author":"X Carcopino","year":"2013","unstructured":"Carcopino X, Maycock J, Mancini J et al (2013) Image assessment of cervical dimensions after LLETZ: a prospective observational study. BJOG 120:472\u2013478","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"5718_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1301","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-013-3134-z","volume":"289","author":"GF Vercellino","year":"2014","unstructured":"Vercellino GF, Erdemoglu E, Chiantera V et al (2014) A multicentric randomized study comparing two techniques of magnification assisted loop excision of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: video exoscopy and colposcopy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 289:1301\u20131307","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"6","key":"5718_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"322","DOI":"10.1002\/jcu.20833","volume":"39","author":"D Papoutsis","year":"2011","unstructured":"Papoutsis D, Daskalakis G, Antonakou A et al (2011) Sonographic measurement of cervical volume in nonpregnant women using the geometric formula for a cylinder versus the three-dimensional automated Virtual Organ Computer-Aided Analysis (VOCAL). J Clin Ultrasound 39(6):322\u2013328","journal-title":"J Clin Ultrasound"},{"key":"5718_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2209","DOI":"10.1002\/jum.14253","volume":"36","author":"AI Ahmed","year":"2017","unstructured":"Ahmed AI, Aldhaheri SR, Rodriguez-Kovacs J et al (2017) Sonographic measurement of cervical volume in pregnant women at high risk of preterm birth using a geometric formula for a frustum versus 3-dimensional automated virtual organ computer-aided analysis. J Ultrasound Med 36:2209\u20132217","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"5718_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.39","volume":"21","author":"KD Kalache","year":"2003","unstructured":"Kalache KD, Espinoza J, Chaiworapongsa T et al (2003) Three-dimensional ultrasound fetal lung volume measurement: a systematic study comparing the multiplanar method with the rotational (VOCAL) technique. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 21(2):111\u2013118","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"5718_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"283","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.61","volume":"21","author":"NJ Raine-Fenning","year":"2003","unstructured":"Raine-Fenning NJ, Clewes JS, Kendall NR et al (2003) The interobserver reliability and validity of volume calculation from three-dimensional ultrasound datasets in the in vitro setting. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 21(3):283\u2013291","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"5718_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.1016\/S1532-0464(02)00500-2","volume":"35","author":"G Hripcsak","year":"2002","unstructured":"Hripcsak G, Heitjan DF (2002) Measuring agreement in medical informatics reliability studies. J Biomed Inform 35(2):99\u2013110","journal-title":"J Biomed Inform"},{"issue":"6","key":"5718_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"353","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tem.2010.01.011","volume":"21","author":"B Timmons","year":"2010","unstructured":"Timmons B, Akins M, Mahendroo M (2010) Cervical remodeling during pregnancy and parturition. Trends Endocrinol Metab 21(6):353\u2013361","journal-title":"Trends Endocrinol Metab"},{"issue":"2","key":"5718_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"327","DOI":"10.1530\/REP-07-0032","volume":"134","author":"CP Read","year":"2007","unstructured":"Read CP, Word RA, Ruscheinsky MA et al (2007) Cervical remodeling during pregnancy and parturition: molecular characterization of the softening phase in mice. Reproduction 134(2):327\u2013340","journal-title":"Reproduction"},{"issue":"349","key":"5718_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"g6223","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.g6223","volume":"5","author":"A Castanon","year":"2014","unstructured":"Castanon A, Landy R, Brocklehurst P et al (2014) PaCT study group. risk of preterm delivery with increasing depth of excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in England: nested case-control study. BMJ 5(349):g6223","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"3","key":"5718_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e020675","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2017-020675","volume":"8","author":"A Ciavattini","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ciavattini A, Delli Carpini G, Moriconi L et al (2018) Effect of age and cone dimensions on cervical regeneration: an Italian multicentric prospective observational study. BMJ Open 8(3):e020675","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"issue":"6","key":"5718_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1232","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181bf1ef2","volume":"114","author":"B Noehr","year":"2009","unstructured":"Noehr B, Jensen A, Frederiksen K et al (2009) Depth of cervical cone removed by loop electrosurgical excision procedure and subsequent risk of spontaneous preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 114(6):1232\u20131238","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5718_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1585","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2011.03085.x","volume":"118","author":"S Phadnis","year":"2011","unstructured":"Phadnis S, Atilade A, Bowring J et al (2011) Regeneration of cervix after excisional treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a study of collagen distribution. BJOG 118:1585\u20131591","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"5718_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1468","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02709.x","volume":"117","author":"C Founta","year":"2010","unstructured":"Founta C, Arbyn M, Valasoulis G et al (2010) Proportion of excision and cervical healing after large loop excision of the transformation zone for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. BJOG 117:1468\u20131474","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"5718_CR31","first-page":"3799","volume":"34","author":"F Nicolas","year":"2014","unstructured":"Nicolas F, Robert A-L, Lavou V et al (2014) Ultrasound evaluation of cervical regeneration after LLETZ for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a prospective observational study. Anticancer Res 34:3799\u20133806","journal-title":"Anticancer Res"}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-020-05718-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-020-05718-9\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-020-05718-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,31]],"date-time":"2021-07-31T23:52:50Z","timestamp":1627775570000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-020-05718-9"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,1]]},"references-count":31,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,11]]}},"alternative-id":["5718"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-020-05718-9","relation":{},"ISSN":["0932-0067","1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0932-0067"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1432-0711"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"6 June 2020","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"27 July 2020","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"1 August 2020","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"value":"Authors have no interests to declare.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflicts of interest"}},{"value":"The approval of the ethics committee responsible was obtained in advance of the planned study.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval"}},{"value":"Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to participate"}},{"value":"All authors gave consent.","order":5,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}}]}}