{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,23]],"date-time":"2026-07-23T01:23:19Z","timestamp":1784769799815,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":41,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,17]],"date-time":"2020-08-17T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1597622400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,17]],"date-time":"2020-08-17T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1597622400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,1]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-020-05746-5","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,17]],"date-time":"2020-08-17T19:02:32Z","timestamp":1597690952000},"page":"249-258","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":14,"title":["Transfer the best and biopsy the rest? Blastocyst euploidy rates differ by morphology and day of biopsy"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"303","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6371-9966","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Katherine E.","family":"McDaniel","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8910-7434","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Michael S.","family":"Awadalla","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7910-9655","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Lynda K.","family":"McGinnis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6290-9450","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ali","family":"Ahmady","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,17]]},"reference":[{"key":"5746_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2245","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dew183","volume":"31","author":"MG Minasi","year":"2016","unstructured":"Minasi MG, Colasante A, Riccio T et al (2016) Correlation between aneuploidy, standard morphology evaluation and morphokinetic development in 1730 biopsied blastocysts: a consecutive case series study. Hum Reprod 31:2245\u20132254. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/dew183","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"5746_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"656","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.11.004","volume":"101","author":"JM Franasiak","year":"2014","unstructured":"Franasiak JM, Forman EJ, Hong KH et al (2014) The nature of aneuploidy with increasing age of the female partner: a review of 15,169 consecutive trophectoderm biopsies evaluated with comprehensive chromosomal screening. Fertil Steril 101:656\u2013663. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.11.004","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"5746_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2761","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2011.02.008","volume":"95","author":"M Vernon","year":"2011","unstructured":"Vernon M, Stern JE, Ball GD et al (2011) Utility of the national embryo morphology data collection by the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technologies (SART): correlation between day-3 morphology grade and live-birth outcome. Fertil Steril 95:2761\u20132763. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2011.02.008","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"5746_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1338","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2014.07.1242","volume":"102","author":"B Luke","year":"2014","unstructured":"Luke B, Brown MB, Stern JE et al (2014) Using the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome System morphological measures to predict live birth after assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril 102:1338\u20131344. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2014.07.1242","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"5746_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1985","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2011.02.009","volume":"95","author":"C Racowsky","year":"2011","unstructured":"Racowsky C, Stern JE, Gibbons WE et al (2011) National collection of embryo morphology data into Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System: associations among day 3 cell number, fragmentation and blastomere asymmetry, and live birth rate. Fertil Steril 95:1985\u20131989. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2011.02.009","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"5746_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1155","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(00)00518-5","volume":"73","author":"DK Gardner","year":"2000","unstructured":"Gardner DK, Phil D, Lane M et al (2000) Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril 73:1155\u20131158. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0015-0282(00)00518-5","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"5746_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1577","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-013-0100-4","volume":"30","author":"SM Thompson","year":"2013","unstructured":"Thompson SM, Onwubalili N, Brown K et al (2013) Blastocyst expansion score and trophectoderm morphology strongly predict successful clinical pregnancy and live birth following elective single embryo blastocyst transfer (eSET): a national study. J Assist Reprod Genet 30:1577\u20131581. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10815-013-0100-4","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"5746_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1199","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/det054","volume":"28","author":"A Ahlstrom","year":"2013","unstructured":"Ahlstrom A, Westin C, Wikland M, Hardarson T (2013) Prediction of live birth in frozen\u2013thawed single blastocyst transfer cycles by pre-freeze and post-thaw morphology. Hum Reprod 28:1199\u20131209. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/det054","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"5746_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"353","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2013.07.006","volume":"27","author":"E Van Den Abbeel","year":"2013","unstructured":"Van Den Abbeel E, Balaban B, Ziebe S et al (2013) Association between blastocyst morphology and outcome of single-blastocyst transfer. Reprod Biomed Online 27:353\u2013361. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.rbmo.2013.07.006","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"5746_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"999","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-015-0492-4","volume":"32","author":"G Haddad","year":"2015","unstructured":"Haddad G, Deng M, Wang CT et al (2015) Assessment of aneuploidy formation in human blastocysts resulting from donated eggs and the necessity of the embryos for aneuploidy screening. J Assist Reprod Genet 32:999\u20131006. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10815-015-0492-4","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"5746_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1661","DOI":"10.1177\/1933719118820474","volume":"26","author":"AK Masbou","year":"2019","unstructured":"Masbou AK, Friedenthal JB, McCulloh DH et al (2019) A comparison of pregnancy outcomes in patients undergoing donor egg single embryo transfers with and without preimplantation genetic testing. Reprod Sci 26:1661\u20131665. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1933719118820474","journal-title":"Reprod Sci"},{"key":"5746_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1173","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deu033","volume":"29","author":"A Capalbo","year":"2014","unstructured":"Capalbo A, Rienzi L, Cimadomo D et al (2014) Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts. Hum Reprod 29:1173\u20131181. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/deu033","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"5746_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.4103\/0974-1208.204013","volume":"10","author":"G Majumdar","year":"2017","unstructured":"Majumdar G, Majumdar A, Verma I, Upadhyaya K (2017) Relationship between morphology, euploidy and implantation potential of cleavage and blastocyst stage embryos. J Hum Reprod Sci 10:49\u201357. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/0974-1208.204013","journal-title":"J Hum Reprod Sci"},{"key":"5746_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1632","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dez138","volume":"34","author":"AW Tiegs","year":"2019","unstructured":"Tiegs AW, Sun L, Patounakis G, Scott RT (2019) Worth the wait? Day 7 blastocysts have lower euploidy rates but similar sustained implantation rates as day 5 and day 6 blastocysts. Hum Reprod 34:1632\u20131639. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/dez138","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"5746_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"664","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.11.012","volume":"107","author":"M Irani","year":"2017","unstructured":"Irani M, Reichman D, Robles A et al (2017) Morphologic grading of euploid blastocysts influences implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril 107:664\u2013670. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.11.012","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"5746_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1261","DOI":"10.4103\/0366-6999.232808","volume":"131","author":"YY Zhao","year":"2018","unstructured":"Zhao YY, Yu Y, Zhang XW (2018) Overall blastocyst quality, trophectoderm grade, and inner cell mass grade predict pregnancy outcome in euploid blastocyst transfer cycles. Chin Med J (Engl) 131:1261\u20131267. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/0366-6999.232808","journal-title":"Chin Med J (Engl)"},{"key":"5746_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-020-01739-0","author":"A Reig","year":"2020","unstructured":"Reig A, Franasiak J, Scott RT, Seli E (2020) The impact of age beyond ploidy: outcome data from 8175 euploid single embryo transfers. J Assist Reprod Genet. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10815-020-01739-0","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"5746_CR18","unstructured":"Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB (1999) In vitro culture of human blastocysts. In: Jansen R, Mortimer D (eds) Towards reproductive certainty: fertility and genetics beyond 1999: the plenary Proceedings of the 11th World Congress. p 378\u201388"},{"key":"5746_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1270","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/der037","volume":"26","author":"B Balaban","year":"2011","unstructured":"Balaban B, Brison D, Calder\u00f3n G et al (2011) The Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting. Hum Reprod 26:1270\u20131283. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/der037","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"5746_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"437","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-010-9443-2","volume":"27","author":"C Racowsky","year":"2010","unstructured":"Racowsky C, Vernon M, Mayer J et al (2010) Standardization of grading embryo morphology. J Assist Reprod Genet 27:437\u2013439. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10815-010-9443-2","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"5746_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"948","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2010.06.067","volume":"95","author":"S Goto","year":"2011","unstructured":"Goto S, Kadowaki T, Tanaka S et al (2011) Prediction of pregnancy rate by blastocyst morphological score and age, based on 1,488 single frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer cycles. Fertil Steril 95:948\u2013952. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2010.06.067","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"5746_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"197","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2017.04.009","volume":"35","author":"C Bouillon","year":"2017","unstructured":"Bouillon C, Celton N, Kassem S et al (2017) Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of singletons after single blastocyst transfer: is there any difference according to blastocyst morphology? Reprod Biomed Online 35:197\u2013207. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.rbmo.2017.04.009","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"5746_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1565","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-018-1262-x","volume":"35","author":"A Wang","year":"2018","unstructured":"Wang A, Kort J, Behr B, Westphal LM (2018) Euploidy in relation to blastocyst sex and morphology. J Assist Reprod Genet 35:1565\u20131572. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10815-018-1262-x","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"5746_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1186\/s12958-016-0157-x","volume":"14","author":"Y Su","year":"2016","unstructured":"Su Y, Li JJ, Wang C et al (2016) Aneuploidy analysis in day 7 human blastocysts produced by in vitro fertilization. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 14:20. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12958-016-0157-x","journal-title":"Reprod Biol Endocrinol"},{"key":"5746_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"429","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2018.01.002","volume":"109","author":"A Penzias","year":"2018","unstructured":"Penzias A, Bendikson K, Butts S et al (2018) The use of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A): a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 109:429\u2013436. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2018.01.002","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"5746_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"454","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmr003","volume":"17","author":"S Mastenbroek","year":"2011","unstructured":"Mastenbroek S, Twisk M, van der Veen F, Repping S (2011) Preimplantation genetic screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs. Hum Reprod Update 17:454\u2013466. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humupd\/dmr003","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"5746_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.1186\/1755-8166-5-24","volume":"5","author":"Z Yang","year":"2012","unstructured":"Yang Z, Liu J, Collins GS et al (2012) Selection of single blastocysts for fresh transfer via standard morphology assessment alone and with array CGH for good prognosis IVF patients: results from a randomized pilot study. Mol Cytogenet 5:24. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1755-8166-5-24","journal-title":"Mol Cytogenet"},{"key":"5746_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"100","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.02.056","volume":"100","author":"EJ Forman","year":"2013","unstructured":"Forman EJ, Hong KH, Ferry KM et al (2013) In vitro fertilization with single euploid blastocyst transfer: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril 100:100\u2013107.e1. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.02.056","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"5746_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"597","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.04.027","volume":"106","author":"HJ Kang","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kang HJ, Melnick AP, Stewart JD et al (2016) Preimplantation genetic screening: who benefits? Fertil Steril 106:597\u2013602. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.04.027","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"5746_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1122","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2017.03.011","volume":"107","author":"C Rubio","year":"2017","unstructured":"Rubio C, Bellver J, Rodrigo L et al (2017) In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidies in advanced maternal age: a randomized, controlled study. Fertil Steril 107:1122\u20131129. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2017.03.011","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"5746_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1668","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dew135","volume":"31","author":"G Murugappan","year":"2016","unstructured":"Murugappan G, Shahine LK, Perfetto CO et al (2016) Intent to treat analysis of in vitro fertilization and preimplantation genetic screening versus expectant management in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss. Hum Reprod 31:1668\u20131674. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/dew135","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"5746_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1215","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.02.012","volume":"103","author":"G Murugappan","year":"2015","unstructured":"Murugappan G, Ohno MS, Lathi RB (2015) Cost-effectiveness analysis of preimplantation genetic screening and in vitro fertilization versus expectant management in patients with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss. Fertil Steril 103:1215\u20131220. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.02.012","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"5746_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1071","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2019.07.1346","volume":"112","author":"S Munn\u00e9","year":"2019","unstructured":"Munn\u00e9 S, Kaplan B, Frattarelli JL et al (2019) Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy versus morphology as selection criteria for single frozen\u2013thawed embryo transfer in good-prognosis patients: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Fertil Steril 112:1071\u20131079. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2019.07.1346","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"5746_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"520","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2010.04.003","volume":"95","author":"S Alfarawati","year":"2011","unstructured":"Alfarawati S, Fragouli E, Colls P et al (2011) The relationship between blastocyst morphology, chromosomal abnormality, and embryo gender. Fertil Steril 95:520\u2013524. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2010.04.003","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"5746_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3289","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/der325","volume":"26","author":"A Ahlstr\u00f6m","year":"2011","unstructured":"Ahlstr\u00f6m A, Westin C, Reismer E et al (2011) Trophectoderm morphology: an important parameter for predicting live birth after single blastocyst transfer. Hum Reprod 26:3289\u20133296. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/der325","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"5746_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1283","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.12.003","volume":"99","author":"MJ Hill","year":"2013","unstructured":"Hill MJ, Richter KS, Heitmann RJ et al (2013) Trophectoderm grade predicts outcomes of single-blastocyst transfers. Fertil Steril 99:1283\u20131289. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.12.003","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"5746_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.5935\/1518-0557.20160007","volume":"20","author":"A Bos-Mikich","year":"2016","unstructured":"Bos-Mikich A, Michels MS, Dutra CG et al (2016) The impact of age on blastocyst scoring after single and double embryo transfers. JBRA Assist Reprod 20:27\u201332. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5935\/1518-0557.20160007","journal-title":"JBRA Assist Reprod"},{"key":"5746_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.05.014","volume":"98","author":"H Honnma","year":"2012","unstructured":"Honnma H, Baba T, Sasaki M et al (2012) Trophectoderm morphology significantly affects the rates of ongoing pregnancy and miscarriage in frozen\u2013thawed single-blastocyst transfer cycle in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 98:361\u2013367. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.05.014","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"5746_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"254","DOI":"10.1080\/14647273.2016.1223357","volume":"19","author":"J Subira","year":"2016","unstructured":"Subira J, Craig J, Turner K et al (2016) Grade of the inner cell mass, but not trophectoderm, predicts live birth in fresh blastocyst single transfers. Hum Fertil 19:254\u2013261. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/14647273.2016.1223357","journal-title":"Hum Fertil"},{"key":"5746_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"576","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.07.023","volume":"217","author":"DH Barad","year":"2017","unstructured":"Barad DH, Darmon SK, Kushnir VA et al (2017) Impact of preimplantation genetic screening on donor oocyte-recipient cycles in the United States. Am J Obstet 217:576. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.07.023","journal-title":"Am J Obstet"},{"key":"5746_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"228","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2017.06.023","volume":"108","author":"RJ Paulson","year":"2017","unstructured":"Paulson RJ (2017) Preimplantation genetic screening: what is the clinical efficiency? Fertil Steril 108:228\u2013230. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2017.06.023","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-020-05746-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-020-05746-5\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-020-05746-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,16]],"date-time":"2021-08-16T23:39:40Z","timestamp":1629157180000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-020-05746-5"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,17]]},"references-count":41,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,1]]}},"alternative-id":["5746"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-020-05746-5","relation":{},"ISSN":["0932-0067","1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0932-0067","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-0711","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,17]]},"assertion":[{"value":"24 April 2020","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"10 August 2020","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"17 August 2020","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"value":"We have no conflicts of interest or competing interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"This study was approved by the University of Southern California IRB through exempt review.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":5,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":6,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Availability of data and material"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":7,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Code availability"}}]}}