{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,27]],"date-time":"2026-09-27T07:21:58Z","timestamp":1790493718225,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":52,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,14]],"date-time":"2020-08-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1597363200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,14]],"date-time":"2020-08-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1597363200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,2]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-020-05747-4","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,14]],"date-time":"2020-08-14T17:03:10Z","timestamp":1597424590000},"page":"381-390","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":19,"title":["Identification of the optimal growth chart and threshold for the prediction of antepartum stillbirth"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"303","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4443-388X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Liran","family":"Hiersch","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hayley","family":"Lipworth","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"John\u200f","family":"Kingdom","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jon","family":"Barrett","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nir","family":"Melamed","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,14]]},"reference":[{"key":"5747_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"303","DOI":"10.1093\/aje\/kwj237","volume":"164","author":"O Basso","year":"2006","unstructured":"Basso O, Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR (2006) Birth weight and mortality: causality or confounding? Am J Epidemiol 164:303\u2013311","journal-title":"Am J Epidemiol"},{"key":"5747_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1331","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(10)62233-7","volume":"377","author":"V Flenady","year":"2011","unstructured":"Flenady V, Koopmans L, Middleton P et al (2011) Major risk factors for stillbirth in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 377:1331\u20131340","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"5747_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"f108","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.f108","volume":"346","author":"J Gardosi","year":"2013","unstructured":"Gardosi J, Madurasinghe V, Williams M, Malik A, Francis A (2013) Maternal and fetal risk factors for stillbirth: population based study. BMJ 346:f108","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"5747_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S700","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.014","volume":"218","author":"L Hiersch","year":"2018","unstructured":"Hiersch L, Melamed N (2018) Fetal growth velocity and body proportion in the assessment of growth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 218:S700\u2013S11 el","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5747_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"515","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12517","volume":"121","author":"GL Malin","year":"2014","unstructured":"Malin GL, Morris RK, Riley R, Teune MJ, Khan KS (2014) When is birthweight at term abnormally low? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the association and predictive ability of current birthweight standards for neonatal outcomes. BJOG 121:515\u2013526","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"5747_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1095","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-018-4901-7","volume":"298","author":"Z Gur","year":"2018","unstructured":"Gur Z, Tsumi E, Wainstock T, Walter E, Sheiner E (2018) Association between delivery of small-for-gestational age neonate and long-term pediatric ophthalmic morbidity. Arch Gynecol Obstet 298:1095\u20131099","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"5747_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e92074","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0092074","volume":"9","author":"J Katz","year":"2014","unstructured":"Katz J, Wu LA, Mullany LC et al (2014) Prevalence of small-for-gestational-age and its mortality risk varies by choice of birth-weight-for-gestation reference population. PLoS ONE 9:e92074","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"5747_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"559","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1901","volume":"25","author":"LJ Salomon","year":"2005","unstructured":"Salomon LJ, Bernard JP, Duyme M, Buvat I, Ville Y (2005) The impact of choice of reference charts and equations on the assessment of fetal biometry. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 25:559\u2013565","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5747_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(95)00386-X","volume":"87","author":"GR Alexander","year":"1996","unstructured":"Alexander GR, Himes JH, Kaufman RB, Mor J, Kogan M (1996) A United States national reference for fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol 87:163\u2013168","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5747_CR10","first-page":"624","volume":"59","author":"RL Williams","year":"1982","unstructured":"Williams RL, Creasy RK, Cunningham GC, Hawes WE, Norris FD, Tashiro M (1982) Fetal growth and perinatal viability in California. Obstet Gynecol 59:624\u2013632","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5747_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.181.1.1887021","volume":"181","author":"FP Hadlock","year":"1991","unstructured":"Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Martinez-Poyer J (1991) In utero analysis of fetal growth: a sonographic weight standard. Radiology 181:129\u2013133","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"5747_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1002220","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1002220","volume":"14","author":"T Kiserud","year":"2017","unstructured":"Kiserud T, Piaggio G, Carroli G et al (2017) The world health organization fetal growth charts: a multinational longitudinal study of ultrasound biometric measurements and estimated fetal weight. PLoS Med 14:e1002220","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"5747_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Buck Louis GM, Grewal J, Albert PS, et al (2015) Racial\/ethnic standards for fetal growth: the NICHD Fetal Growth Studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 213:449 e1\u2013449 e41.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.08.032"},{"key":"5747_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"478","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17347","volume":"49","author":"J Stirnemann","year":"2017","unstructured":"Stirnemann J, Villar J, Salomon LJ et al (2017) International estimated fetal weight standards of the INTERGROWTH-21(st) Project. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 49:478\u2013486","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5747_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1002923","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1002923","volume":"16","author":"NL Pritchard","year":"2019","unstructured":"Pritchard NL, Hiscock RJ, Lockie E et al (2019) Identification of the optimal growth charts for use in a preterm population: an Australian state-wide retrospective cohort study. PLoS Med 16:e1002923","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"5747_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Anderson NH, Sadler LC, McKinlay CJD, McCowan LME (2016) INTERGROWTH-21st vs customized birthweight standards for identification of perinatal mortality and morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 214:509 e1\u201309 e7.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.931"},{"key":"5747_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S692","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.013","volume":"218","author":"A Francis","year":"2018","unstructured":"Francis A, Hugh O, Gardosi J (2018) Customized vs INTERGROWTH-21(st) standards for the assessment of birthweight and stillbirth risk at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 218:S692\u2013S699","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5747_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"961","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2018.1511696","volume":"33","author":"N Pritchard","year":"2020","unstructured":"Pritchard N, Lindquist A, Siqueira IDA, Walker SP, Permezel M (2020) INTERGROWTH-21st compared with GROW customized centiles in the detection of adverse perinatal outcomes at term. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 33:961\u2013966","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"5747_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"602","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17287","volume":"48","author":"LC Poon","year":"2016","unstructured":"Poon LC, Tan MY, Yerlikaya G, Syngelaki A, Nicolaides KH (2016) Birth weight in live births and stillbirths. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 48:602\u2013606","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5747_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1002228","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1002228","volume":"14","author":"S Iliodromiti","year":"2017","unstructured":"Iliodromiti S, Mackay DF, Smith GC et al (2017) Customised and noncustomised birth weight centiles and prediction of stillbirth and infant mortality and morbidity: a cohort study of 979,912 term singleton pregnancies in Scotland. PLoS Med 14:e1002228","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"5747_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"609","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.19196","volume":"53","author":"A Khalil","year":"2019","unstructured":"Khalil A, Gordijn SJ, Beune IM et al (2019) Essential variables for reporting research studies on fetal growth restriction: a Delphi consensus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 53:609\u2013614","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5747_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"399","DOI":"10.1016\/j.puhe.2014.03.010","volume":"128","author":"MJ Platt","year":"2014","unstructured":"Platt MJ (2014) Outcomes in preterm infants. Public Health 128:399\u2013403","journal-title":"Public Health"},{"key":"5747_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"574","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.16018","volume":"48","author":"J Man","year":"2016","unstructured":"Man J, Hutchinson JC, Ashworth M, Heazell AE, Levine S, Sebire NJ (2016) Effects of intrauterine retention and postmortem interval on body weight following intrauterine death: implications for assessment of fetal growth restriction at autopsy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 48:574\u2013578","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5747_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E35","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.108.2.e35","volume":"108","author":"MS Kramer","year":"2001","unstructured":"Kramer MS, Platt RW, Wen SW et al (2001) A new and improved population-based Canadian reference for birth weight for gestational age. Pediatrics 108:E35","journal-title":"Pediatrics"},{"key":"5747_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"365","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13499","volume":"98","author":"A Aviram","year":"2019","unstructured":"Aviram A, Sherman C, Kingdom J, Zaltz A, Barrett J, Melamed N (2019) Defining early vs late fetal growth restriction by placental pathology. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 98:365\u2013373","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"5747_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.1016\/j.placenta.2017.10.002","volume":"60","author":"M Kibel","year":"2017","unstructured":"Kibel M, Kahn M, Sherman C et al (2017) Placental abnormalities differ between small for gestational age fetuses in dichorionic twin and singleton pregnancies. Placenta 60:28\u201335","journal-title":"Placenta"},{"key":"5747_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"American College of O, Gynecologists, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine in collaboration w, et al (2020) Obstetric care consensus #10: management of stillbirth: (replaces practice bulletin number 102, March 2009). Am J Obstet Gynecol 222:B2\u2013B20.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.01.017"},{"key":"5747_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"212","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14971","volume":"125","author":"HE Reinebrant","year":"2018","unstructured":"Reinebrant HE, Leisher SH, Coory M et al (2018) Making stillbirths visible: a systematic review of globally reported causes of stillbirth. BJOG 125:212\u2013224","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"5747_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"182","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-13-182","volume":"13","author":"A Ego","year":"2013","unstructured":"Ego A, Zeitlin J, Batailler P et al (2013) Stillbirth classification in population-based data and role of fetal growth restriction: the example of RECODE. BMC Preg Childbirth 13:182","journal-title":"BMC Preg Childbirth"},{"key":"5747_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"256","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318242ad81","volume":"119","author":"T Singh","year":"2012","unstructured":"Singh T, Leslie K, Bhide A, D'Antonio F, Thilaganathan B (2012) Role of second-trimester uterine artery Doppler in assessing stillbirth risk. Obstet Gynecol 119:256\u2013261","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5747_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Smith GC, Yu CK, Papageorghiou AT, Cacho AM, Nicolaides KH, Fetal medicine foundation second trimester screening G (2007) Maternal uterine artery doppler flow velocimetry and the risk of stillbirth. Obstet Gynecol 109:144\u201351.","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000248536.94919.e3"},{"key":"5747_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"104","DOI":"10.1159\/000500453","volume":"47","author":"R Saviron-Cornudella","year":"2020","unstructured":"Saviron-Cornudella R, Esteban LM, Tajada-Duaso M et al (2020) Detection of adverse perinatal outcomes at term delivery using ultrasound estimated percentile weight at 35 weeks of gestation: comparison of five fetal growth standards. Fetal Diagn Ther 47:104\u2013114","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"key":"5747_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"569","DOI":"10.1016\/S2352-4642(18)30129-9","volume":"2","author":"F Gaccioli","year":"2018","unstructured":"Gaccioli F, Sovio U, Cook E, Hund M, Charnock-Jones DS, Smith GCS (2018) Screening for fetal growth restriction using ultrasound and the sFLT1\/PlGF ratio in nulliparous women: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Child Adolesc Health 2:569\u2013581","journal-title":"Lancet Child Adolesc Health"},{"key":"5747_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"348","DOI":"10.1038\/s41591-020-0804-9","volume":"26","author":"U Sovio","year":"2020","unstructured":"Sovio U, Goulding N, McBride N et al (2020) A maternal serum metabolite ratio predicts fetal growth restriction at term. Nat Med 26:348\u2013353","journal-title":"Nat Med"},{"key":"5747_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2089","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(15)00131-2","volume":"386","author":"U Sovio","year":"2015","unstructured":"Sovio U, White IR, Dacey A, Pasupathy D, Smith GCS (2015) Screening for fetal growth restriction with universal third trimester ultrasonography in nulliparous women in the pregnancy outcome prediction (POP) study: a prospective cohort study. Lancet 386:2089\u20132097","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"5747_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"793","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20406","volume":"55","author":"G Rizzo","year":"2020","unstructured":"Rizzo G, Mappa I, Bitsadze V et al (2020) Role of doppler ultrasound in predicting perinatal outcome in pregnancies complicated by late-onset fetal growth restriction at the time of diagnosis: a prospective cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 55:793\u2013798","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5747_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.05.024","volume":"213","author":"GR DeVore","year":"2015","unstructured":"DeVore GR (2015) The importance of the cerebroplacental ratio in the evaluation of fetal well-being in SGA and AGA fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 213:5\u201315","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5747_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"575","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.21940","volume":"55","author":"RJ Martinez-Portilla","year":"2020","unstructured":"Martinez-Portilla RJ, Caradeux J, Meler E, Lip-Sosa DL, Sotiriadis A, Figueras F (2020) Third-trimester uterine-artery Doppler for prediction of adverse outcome in late small-for-gestational-age fetuses: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 55:575\u2013585","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5747_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0182874","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0182874","volume":"12","author":"R Bukowski","year":"2017","unstructured":"Bukowski R, Hansen NI, Pinar H et al (2017) Altered fetal growth, placental abnormalities, and stillbirth. PLoS ONE 12:e0182874","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"5747_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"274","DOI":"10.1111\/ppe.12563","volume":"33","author":"AA Freedman","year":"2019","unstructured":"Freedman AA, Silver RM, Gibbins KJ et al (2019) The association of stillbirth with placental abnormalities in growth-restricted and normally grown fetuses. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 33:274\u2013383","journal-title":"Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol"},{"key":"5747_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"365","DOI":"10.1097\/GCO.0000000000000576","volume":"31","author":"R Halimeh","year":"2019","unstructured":"Halimeh R, Melchiorre K, Thilaganathan B (2019) Preventing term stillbirth: benefits and limitations of using fetal growth reference charts. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 31:365\u2013374","journal-title":"Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5747_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1710","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(93)90681-8","volume":"168","author":"WJ Ott","year":"1993","unstructured":"Ott WJ (1993) Intrauterine growth retardation and preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 168:1710\u20131715 (discussion 15\u20137)","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5747_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"723","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.2007-2564","volume":"123","author":"C Ferdynus","year":"2009","unstructured":"Ferdynus C, Quantin C, Abrahamowicz M et al (2009) Can birth weight standards based on healthy populations improve the identification of small-for-gestational-age newborns at risk of adverse neonatal outcomes? Pediatrics 123:723\u2013730","journal-title":"Pediatrics"},{"key":"5747_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1273","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.111.6.1273","volume":"111","author":"W Zaw","year":"2003","unstructured":"Zaw W, Gagnon R, da Silva O (2003) The risks of adverse neonatal outcome among preterm small for gestational age infants according to neonatal versus fetal growth standards. Pediatrics 111:1273\u20131277","journal-title":"Pediatrics"},{"key":"5747_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"F189","DOI":"10.1136\/adc.2005.089698","volume":"92","author":"RW Cooke","year":"2007","unstructured":"Cooke RW (2007) Conventional birth weight standards obscure fetal growth restriction in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 92:F189\u2013F192","journal-title":"Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed"},{"key":"5747_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"F161","DOI":"10.1136\/adc.2006.109439","volume":"92","author":"RA Ehrenkranz","year":"2007","unstructured":"Ehrenkranz RA (2007) Estimated fetal weights versus birth weights: should the reference intrauterine growth curves based on birth weights be retired? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 92:F161\u2013F162","journal-title":"Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed"},{"key":"5747_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1456","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12282","volume":"120","author":"C Ferdynus","year":"2013","unstructured":"Ferdynus C, Quantin C, Abrahamowicz M, Burguet A, Sagot P, Gouyon JB (2013) Comparison of the ability of alternative birthweight and fetal weight standards to identify preterm newborns at increased risk of perinatal death. BJOG 120:1456\u20131464","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"5747_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hoftiezer L, Hof MHP, Dijs-Elsinga J, Hogeveen M, Hukkelhoven C, van Lingen RA (2019) From population reference to national standard: new and improved birthweight charts. Am J Obstet Gynecol 220:383 e1\u201383 e17","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.12.023"},{"key":"5747_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"156","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17381","volume":"50","author":"G Chiossi","year":"2017","unstructured":"Chiossi G, Pedroza C, Costantine MM, Truong VTT, Gargano G, Saade GR (2017) Customized vs population-based growth charts to identify neonates at risk of adverse outcome: systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis of observational studies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 50:156\u2013166","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5747_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Grantz KL, Hediger ML, Liu D, Buck Louis GM (2018) Fetal growth standards: the NICHD fetal growth study approach in context with INTERGROWTH-21st and the World Health Organization Multicentre Growth Reference Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 218:S641\u2013S55 e28.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.11.593"},{"key":"5747_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Blue NR, Beddow ME, Savabi M, Katukuri VR, Chao CR (2018) Comparing the hadlock fetal growth standard to the eunice kennedy shriver national institute of child health and human development racial\/ethnic standard for the prediction of neonatal morbidity and small for gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 219:474 e1\u201374 e12.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.011"},{"issue":"318","key":"5747_CR52","first-page":"e1","volume":"207","author":"RA Pilliod","year":"2012","unstructured":"Pilliod RA, Cheng YW, Snowden JM, Doss AE, Caughey AB (2012) The risk of intrauterine fetal death in the small-for-gestational-age fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 207(318):e1\u20136","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-020-05747-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-020-05747-4\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-020-05747-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,17]],"date-time":"2022-04-17T21:07:44Z","timestamp":1650229664000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-020-05747-4"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,14]]},"references-count":52,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,2]]}},"alternative-id":["5747"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-020-05747-4","relation":{},"ISSN":["0932-0067","1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0932-0067","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-0711","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,14]]},"assertion":[{"value":"19 July 2020","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"10 August 2020","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"14 August 2020","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"value":"All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}}]}}