{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,15]],"date-time":"2026-10-15T04:55:17Z","timestamp":1792040117335,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":40,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,7]],"date-time":"2020-09-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1599436800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,7]],"date-time":"2020-09-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1599436800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,2]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-020-05765-2","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,7]],"date-time":"2020-09-07T17:02:55Z","timestamp":1599498175000},"page":"443-454","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Influence of the external cephalic version attempt on the Cesarean section rate: experience of a type 3 maternity hospital in France"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"303","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9472-9334","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Benjamin","family":"Birene","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"U.","family":"Ishaque","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"J.","family":"Chrusciel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"S.","family":"Bonneau","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"R.","family":"Gabriel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"O.","family":"Graesslin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,7]]},"reference":[{"key":"5765_CR1","first-page":"665","volume":"91","author":"JE Hall","year":"1965","unstructured":"Hall JE, Kohl SG, Obrien F, Ginsberg M (1965) Breech presentation and perinatal mortality; a study of 6,044 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 91:665\u2013683","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5765_CR2","first-page":"262","volume":"187","author":"HS Morgan","year":"1964","unstructured":"Morgan HS, Kane SH (1964) An analysis of 16,327 breech births. JAMA 187:262\u2013264","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"5765_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.3109\/00016346709158629","volume":"46","author":"W Fischer-Rasmussen","year":"1967","unstructured":"Fischer-Rasmussen W, Trolle D (1967) Abdominal versus vaginal delivery in breech presentation. A retrospective study comparing 420 breech presentations and 9,291 cephalic presentations for infants weighing more than 2,5000 g at birth. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 46:69\u201376","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"5765_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"497","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(73)90398-0","volume":"115","author":"JJ Rovinsky","year":"1973","unstructured":"Rovinsky JJ, Miller JA, Kaplan S (1973) Management of breech presentation at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 115:497\u2013513","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5765_CR5","unstructured":"Pinard A (1878) Trait\u00e9 du palper abdominal au point de vue obst\u00e9trical et de la version par manoeuvres externes. Paris, H. Lauwereyns"},{"key":"5765_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"366","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2017.04.018","volume":"56","author":"MJ Cuerva","year":"2017","unstructured":"Cuerva MJ, Pi\u00f1el CS, Caceres J, Espinosa JA (2017) Labor induction just after external cephalic version with epidural analgesia at term. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 56:366\u2013367","journal-title":"Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5765_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1016\/j.midw.2016.02.014","volume":"39","author":"AN Rosman","year":"2016","unstructured":"Rosman AN et al (2016) Mode of childbirth and neonatal outcome after external cephalic version: a prospective cohort study. Midwifery 39:44\u201348","journal-title":"Midwifery"},{"key":"5765_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"859","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2016.03.007","volume":"45","author":"C Coppola","year":"2016","unstructured":"Coppola C et al (2016) Impact de la version par man\u0153uvre externe sur le pronostic obst\u00e9trical dans une \u00e9quipe \u00e0 fort taux de r\u00e9ussite de l\u2019accouchement vaginal du si\u00e8ge. J Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique Biol Reprod 45:859\u2013865","journal-title":"J Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique Biol Reprod"},{"key":"5765_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1916","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(95)91432-3","volume":"172","author":"RK Laros","year":"1995","unstructured":"Laros RK, Flanagan TA, Kilpatrick SJ (1995) Management of term breech presentation: a protocol of external cephalic version and selective trial of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 172:1916\u20131923 (discussion 1923\u20131925)","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5765_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"744","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610600955784","volume":"26","author":"M Higgins","year":"2006","unstructured":"Higgins M, Turner MJ (2006) How useful is external cephalic version in clinical practice? J Obstet Gynaecol 26:744\u2013745","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"5765_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1443","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2011.01221.x","volume":"90","author":"T Gottvall","year":"2011","unstructured":"Gottvall T, Ginstman C (2011) External cephalic version of non-cephalic presentation; is it worthwhile: external cephalic version. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 90:1443\u20131445","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"5765_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"134","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2011.09.027","volume":"116","author":"G Bogner","year":"2012","unstructured":"Bogner G, Xu F, Simbrunner C, Bacherer A, Reisenberger K (2012) Single-institute experience, management, success rate, and outcome after external cephalic version at term. Int J Gynecol Obstet 116:134\u2013137","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"5765_CR13","first-page":"11","volume":"18","author":"LY Cho","year":"2012","unstructured":"Cho LY, Lau WL, Lo TK, Tang HHT, Leung WC (2012) Predictors of successful outcomes after external cephalic version in singleton term breech pregnancies: a nine-year historical cohort study. Hong Kong Med J Xianggang Yi Xue Za Zhi 18:11\u201319","journal-title":"Hong Kong Med J Xianggang Yi Xue Za Zhi"},{"key":"5765_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2014.900749","volume":"28","author":"L Salzer","year":"2015","unstructured":"Salzer L et al (2015) Predictors of successful external cephalic version and assessment of success for vaginal delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 28:49\u201354","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"5765_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"298","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2014.07.019","volume":"127","author":"GB Theron","year":"2014","unstructured":"Theron GB, Kader R (2014) Obstetric outcome after successful external cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Int J Gynecol Obstet 127:298\u2013299","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"5765_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2015.04.050","volume":"131","author":"J Burgos","year":"2015","unstructured":"Burgos J et al (2015) Probability of cesarean delivery after successful external cephalic version. Int J Gynecol Obstet 131:192\u2013195","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"5765_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2005","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2015.1072160","volume":"29","author":"M de Hundt","year":"2016","unstructured":"de Hundt M et al (2016) Risk factors for cesarean section and instrumental vaginal delivery after successful external cephalic version. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 29:2005\u20132007","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"5765_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"439","DOI":"10.1038\/jp.2015.220","volume":"36","author":"A Basu","year":"2016","unstructured":"Basu A, Flatley C, Kumar S (2016) Intrapartum intervention rates and perinatal outcomes following successful external cephalic version. J Perinatol 36:439\u2013442","journal-title":"J Perinatol"},{"key":"5765_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"415","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13234","volume":"123","author":"A Beuckens","year":"2016","unstructured":"Beuckens A et al (2016) An observational study of the success and complications of 2546 external cephalic versions in low-risk pregnant women performed by trained midwives. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 123:415\u2013423","journal-title":"BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"5765_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"244","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-017-1430-5","volume":"17","author":"YS Bin","year":"2017","unstructured":"Bin YS, Roberts CL, Nicholl MC, Ford JB (2017) Uptake of external cephalic version for term breech presentation: an Australian population study, 2002\u20132012. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 17:244","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"5765_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"737","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2017.09.001","volume":"46","author":"J Boujenah","year":"2017","unstructured":"Boujenah J et al (2017) Successful external cephalic version is an independent factor for Cesarean section during trial of labor\u2014a matched controlled study. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 46:737\u2013742","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod"},{"key":"5765_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"218","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(97)80040-3","volume":"176","author":"TK Lau","year":"1997","unstructured":"Lau TK, Lo KW, Rogers M (1997) Pregnancy outcome after successful external cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 176:218\u2013223","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5765_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"627","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2002.01514.x","volume":"109","author":"LY-S Chan","year":"2002","unstructured":"Chan LY-S, Leung TY, Fok WY, Chan LW, Lau TK (2002) High incidence of obstetric interventions after successful external cephalic version. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 109:627\u2013631","journal-title":"BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"5765_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"763","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2003.09.056","volume":"190","author":"Y V\u00e9zina","year":"2004","unstructured":"V\u00e9zina Y, Bujold E, Varin J, Marquette GP, Boucher M (2004) Cesarean delivery after successful external cephalic version of breech presentation at term: a comparative study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190:763\u2013768","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5765_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.3109\/01443610903383341","volume":"30","author":"S Jain","year":"2010","unstructured":"Jain S, Mulligama C, Tagwira V, Guyer C, Cheong Y (2010) Labour outcome of women with successful external cephalic version: a prospective study. J Obstet Gynaecol 30:13\u201316","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"5765_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"883","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(15)30809-4","volume":"35","author":"SMI Kuppens","year":"2013","unstructured":"Kuppens SMI et al (2013) Mode of delivery following successful external cephalic version: comparison with spontaneous cephalic presentations at delivery. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 35:883\u2013888","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"5765_CR27","first-page":"85","volume":"5","author":"H Zandstra","year":"2013","unstructured":"Zandstra H, Mertens HJMM (2013) Improving external cephalic version for foetal breech presentation. Facts Views Vis ObGyn 5:85\u201390","journal-title":"Facts Views Vis ObGyn"},{"key":"5765_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-015-3643-z","volume":"292","author":"Y Hants","year":"2015","unstructured":"Hants Y et al (2015) Induction of labor at term following external cephalic version in nulliparous women is associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery. Arch Gynecol Obstet 292:313\u2013319","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"5765_CR29","first-page":"771","volume":"83","author":"T Egge","year":"1994","unstructured":"Egge T, Schauberger C, Schaper A (1994) Dysfunctional labor after external cephalic version. Obstet Gynecol 83:771\u2013773","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5765_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1092","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70087-6","volume":"181","author":"D Siddiqui","year":"1999","unstructured":"Siddiqui D, Stiller RJ, Collins J, Laifer SA (1999) Pregnancy outcome after successful external cephalic version. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181:1092\u20131095","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5765_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2000-9421","volume":"17","author":"JR Wax","year":"2000","unstructured":"Wax JR, Sutula K, Lerer T, Steinfeld JD, Ingardia CJ (2000) Labor and delivery following successful external cephalic version. Am J Perinatol 17:183\u2013186","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"5765_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"355","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2002-35609","volume":"19","author":"A Ben-Haroush","year":"2002","unstructured":"Ben-Haroush A et al (2002) Mode of delivery following successful external cephalic version. Am J Perinatol 19:355\u2013360","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"5765_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"248","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2006.03.015","volume":"93","author":"S Matsuzaki","year":"2006","unstructured":"Matsuzaki S, Shimoya K, Murata Y (2006) Cesarean delivery after successful external cephalic version of breech presentation at term. Int J Gynecol Obstet 93:248\u2013249","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"5765_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"96","DOI":"10.1038\/jp.2008.227","volume":"29","author":"C Clock","year":"2009","unstructured":"Clock C, Kurtzman J, White J, Chung JH (2009) Cesarean risk after successful external cephalic version: a matched, retrospective analysis. J Perinatol 29:96\u2013100","journal-title":"J Perinatol"},{"key":"5765_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"522","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12343","volume":"93","author":"EA McCarthy","year":"2014","unstructured":"McCarthy EA et al (2014) Successful external cephalic version does not confer a measurable increased risk of intrapartum cesarean section in modern obstetric practice. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 93:522\u2013523","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"5765_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"272","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2014.03.029","volume":"126","author":"C Policiano","year":"2014","unstructured":"Policiano C, Costa A, Valentim-Louren\u00e7o A, Clode N, Gra\u00e7a LM (2014) Route of delivery following successful external cephalic version. Int J Gynecol Obstet 126:272\u2013274","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"5765_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1985.tb01043.x","volume":"92","author":"M Westgren","year":"1985","unstructured":"Westgren M, Edvall H, Nordstr\u00f6m L, Svalenius E, Ranstam J (1985) Spontaneous cephalic version of breech presentation in the last trimester. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 92:19\u201322","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"5765_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"346","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2011.02.001","volume":"39","author":"M Roux-Chevalier","year":"2011","unstructured":"Roux-Chevalier M, Gaucherand P, Cluze CL (2011) version par man\u0153uvre externe: audit sur un an dans une maternit\u00e9 de niveau 3. Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique Fertil 39:346\u2013350","journal-title":"Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique Fertil"},{"key":"5765_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1012","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13161","volume":"96","author":"EK Hutton","year":"2017","unstructured":"Hutton EK, Simioni JC, Thabane L, for the Early ECV2 Trial Collaborative Group (2017) Predictors of success of external cephalic version and cephalic presentation at birth among 1253 women with non-cephalic presentation using logistic regression and classification tree analyses. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 96:1012\u20131020","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"5765_CR40","first-page":"323","volume":"38","author":"TG Teoh","year":"1997","unstructured":"Teoh TG (1997) Effect of learning curve on the outcome of external cephalic version. Singap Med J 38:323\u2013325","journal-title":"Singap Med J"}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-020-05765-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-020-05765-2\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-020-05765-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,6]],"date-time":"2021-09-06T23:30:23Z","timestamp":1630971023000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-020-05765-2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,7]]},"references-count":40,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,2]]}},"alternative-id":["5765"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-020-05765-2","relation":{},"ISSN":["0932-0067","1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0932-0067","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-0711","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,7]]},"assertion":[{"value":"14 March 2020","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"24 August 2020","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"7 September 2020","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"This research study was conducted retrospectively from data obtained for clinical purposes. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}}]}}