{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,12]],"date-time":"2026-06-12T14:53:01Z","timestamp":1781275981005,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":36,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,3]],"date-time":"2021-01-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609632000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,3]],"date-time":"2021-01-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609632000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,8]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-020-05946-z","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,3]],"date-time":"2021-01-03T05:02:22Z","timestamp":1609650142000},"page":"329-336","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["Trial of labor after previous single cesarean delivery in grand-multiparous women: a retrospective cohort study"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"304","author":[{"given":"Maya","family":"Ram","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Liran","family":"Hiersch","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Eran","family":"Ashwal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yariv","family":"Yogev","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2741-3679","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Amir","family":"Aviram","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,3]]},"reference":[{"issue":"5","key":"5946_CR1","first-page":"e217","volume":"130","author":"Committee on Practice B-O","year":"2017","unstructured":"Committee on Practice B-O (2017) Practice bulletin No. 184: vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 130(5):e217\u2013e233","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"5946_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e58577","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0058577","volume":"8","author":"CG Fawsitt","year":"2013","unstructured":"Fawsitt CG, Bourke J, Greene RA, Everard CM, Murphy A, Lutomski JE (2013) At what price? A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing trial of labour after previous caesarean versus elective repeat caesarean delivery. PLoS ONE 8(3):e58577","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"issue":"5","key":"5946_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"281","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2016.03.003","volume":"40","author":"MB Landon","year":"2016","unstructured":"Landon MB, Grobman WA, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child H, Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units N (2016) What we have learned about trial of labor after cesarean delivery from the maternal-fetal medicine units cesarean registry. Semin Perinatol 40(5):281\u2013286","journal-title":"Semin Perinatol"},{"issue":"25","key":"5946_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2581","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa040405","volume":"351","author":"MB Landon","year":"2004","unstructured":"Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Leindecker S, Varner MW, Moawad AH, Caritis SN, Harper M, Wapner RJ, Sorokin Y, Miodovnik M, Carpenter M, Peaceman AM, O\u2019Sullivan MJ, Sibai B, Langer O, Thorp JM, Ramin SM, Mercer BM, Gabbe SG, National Institute of Child H, Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units N (2004) Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 351(25):2581\u20132589","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"5946_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"249","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2010.03.004","volume":"34","author":"MT Lydon-Rochelle","year":"2010","unstructured":"Lydon-Rochelle MT, Cahill AG, Spong CY (2010) Birth after previous cesarean delivery: short-term maternal outcomes. Semin Perinatol 34(4):249\u2013257","journal-title":"Semin Perinatol"},{"issue":"4","key":"5946_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"272","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2010.03.007","volume":"34","author":"RM Patel","year":"2010","unstructured":"Patel RM, Jain L (2010) Delivery after previous cesarean: short-term perinatal outcomes. Semin Perinatol 34(4):272\u2013280","journal-title":"Semin Perinatol"},{"key":"5946_CR7","unstructured":"Gynaecologists. RCoOa (2015) Birth after previous caesarean birth. Green-top guideline No. 45. https:\/\/www.rcog.org.uk\/globalassets\/documents\/guidelines\/gtg_45.pdf. Accessed October 1, 2015"},{"issue":"2","key":"5946_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"164","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)30188-8","volume":"27","author":"MJ Martel","year":"2005","unstructured":"Martel MJ, MacKinnon CJ, Clinical Practice Obstetrics Committee SoO, Gynaecologists of C (2005) Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous caesarean birth. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 27(2):164\u2013188","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"issue":"1","key":"5946_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0730-7659.2005.00344.x","volume":"32","author":"MH Aliyu","year":"2005","unstructured":"Aliyu MH, Jolly PE, Ehiri JE, Salihu HM (2005) High parity and adverse birth outcomes: exploring the maze. Birth 32(1):45\u201359","journal-title":"Birth"},{"issue":"2","key":"5946_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"274","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.119639","volume":"186","author":"J Bai","year":"2002","unstructured":"Bai J, Wong FW, Bauman A, Mohsin M (2002) Parity and pregnancy outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 186(2):274\u2013278","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"5946_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1294","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000127426.95464.85","volume":"103","author":"H Roman","year":"2004","unstructured":"Roman H, Robillard PY, Verspyck E, Hulsey TC, Marpeau L, Barau G (2004) Obstetric and neonatal outcomes in grand multiparity. Obstet Gynecol 103(6):1294\u20131299","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"5946_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"669","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70511-9","volume":"181","author":"A Babinszki","year":"1999","unstructured":"Babinszki A, Kerenyi T, Torok O, Grazi V, Lapinski RH, Berkowitz RL (1999) Perinatal outcome in grand and great-grand multiparity: effects of parity on obstetric risk factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181(3):669\u2013674","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"5946_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"389","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(88)90161-5","volume":"158","author":"AI Eidelman","year":"1988","unstructured":"Eidelman AI, Kamar R, Schimmel MS, Bar-On E (1988) The grandmultipara: is she still a risk? Am J Obstet Gynecol 158(2):389\u2013392","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"10","key":"5946_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1295","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2007.01435.x","volume":"114","author":"EI Opara","year":"2007","unstructured":"Opara EI, Zaidi J (2007) The interpretation and clinical application of the word \u2018parity\u2019: a survey. BJOG 114(10):1295\u20131297","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"8","key":"5946_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1015","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1447-0756.2010.01476.x","volume":"37","author":"S Agrawal","year":"2011","unstructured":"Agrawal S, Agarwal A, Das V (2011) Impact of grandmultiparity on obstetric outcome in low resource setting. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 37(8):1015\u20131019","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"issue":"4","key":"5946_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/0020-7292(85)90027-X","volume":"23","author":"K Fuchs","year":"1985","unstructured":"Fuchs K, Peretz BA, Marcovici R, Paldi E, Timor-Tritsh I (1985) The \u201cgrand multipara\u201d\u2014is it a problem? A review of 5785 cases. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 23(4):321\u2013326","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"2","key":"5946_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"425","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.01.026","volume":"191","author":"K Ofir","year":"2004","unstructured":"Ofir K, Sheiner E, Levy A, Katz M, Mazor M (2004) Uterine rupture: differences between a scarred and an unscarred uterus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191(2):425\u2013429","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2 Pt 1","key":"5946_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"304","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000082","volume":"123","author":"H Hochler","year":"2014","unstructured":"Hochler H, Yaffe H, Schwed P, Mankuta D (2014) Safety of trial of labor after cesarean delivery in grandmultiparous women. Obstet Gynecol 123(2 Pt 1):304\u2013308","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"5946_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"339","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-007-0490-6","volume":"277","author":"E Kugler","year":"2008","unstructured":"Kugler E, Shoham-Vardi I, Burstien E, Mazor M, Hershkovitz R (2008) The safety of a trial of labor after cesarean section in a grandmultiparous population. Arch Gynecol Obstet 277(4):339\u2013344","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"1","key":"5946_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-002-0472-7","volume":"270","author":"TY Yamani Zamzami","year":"2004","unstructured":"Yamani Zamzami TY (2004) Vaginal birth after cesarean section in grand multiparous women. Arch Gynecol Obstet 270(1):21\u201324","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"3","key":"5946_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1341-8076.2002.00025.x","volume":"28","author":"AM Ali","year":"2002","unstructured":"Ali AM, Abu-Heija AT (2002) Obstetric and perinatal outcome of women para > or = 5 including one lower segment cesarean section. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 28(3):163\u2013165","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"issue":"2","key":"5946_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"219","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1447-0756.1997.tb00835.x","volume":"23","author":"C Dyack","year":"1997","unstructured":"Dyack C, Hughes PF, Simbakalia JB (1997) Vaginal delivery in the grand multipara following previous lower segment cesarian section. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 23(2):219\u2013222","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"5946_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e17","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002159","volume":"130","author":"Committee on Practice B-O","year":"2017","unstructured":"Committee on Practice B-O (2017) Practice bulletin No. 180: gestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol 130(1):e17\u2013e37","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"5946_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1122","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000437382.03963.88","volume":"122","author":"American College of O, Gynecologists, Task Force on Hypertension in P","year":"2013","unstructured":"American College of O, Gynecologists, Task Force on Hypertension in P (2013) Hypertension in pregnancy. report of the American college of obstetricians and gynecologists\u2019 task force on hypertension in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 122(5):1122\u20131131","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"5946_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"165 e161","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.10.017","volume":"216","author":"I Al-Zirqi","year":"2017","unstructured":"Al-Zirqi I, Daltveit AK, Forsen L, Stray-Pedersen B, Vangen S (2017) Risk factors for complete uterine rupture. Am J Obstet Gynecol 216(2):165 e161-165 e168","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"5946_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"68","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.07.021","volume":"126","author":"TS Kiran","year":"2006","unstructured":"Kiran TS, Chui YK, Bethel J, Bhal PS (2006) Is gestational age an independent variable affecting uterine scar rupture rates? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 126(1):68\u201371","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"3","key":"5946_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"202","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050410001668329","volume":"15","author":"A Hammoud","year":"2004","unstructured":"Hammoud A, Hendler I, Gauthier RJ, Berman S, Sansregret A, Bujold E (2004) The effect of gestational age on trial of labor after cesarean section. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 15(3):202\u2013206","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"3 Pt 2","key":"5946_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1016","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.05.066","volume":"193","author":"MB Landon","year":"2005","unstructured":"Landon MB, Leindecker S, Spong CY, Hauth JC, Bloom S, Varner MW, Moawad AH, Caritis SN, Harper M, Wapner RJ, Sorokin Y, Miodovnik M, Carpenter M, Peaceman AM, O\u2019Sullivan MJ, Sibai BM, Langer O, Thorp JM, Ramin SM, Mercer BM, Gabbe SG, National Institute of Child H, Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units N (2005) The MFMU cesarean registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193(3 Pt 2):1016\u20131023","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"5946_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"339","DOI":"10.1080\/01443615.2017.1355896","volume":"38","author":"A Kalok","year":"2018","unstructured":"Kalok A, Zabil SA, Jamil MA, Lim PS, Shafiee MN, Kampan N, Shah SA, Mohamed Ismail NA (2018) Antenatal scoring system in predicting the success of planned vaginal birth following one previous caesarean section. J Obstet Gynaecol 38(3):339\u201343","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"5946_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"571","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31829f8ced","volume":"122","author":"TD Metz","year":"2013","unstructured":"Metz TD, Stoddard GJ, Henry E, Jackson M, Holmgren C, Esplin S (2013) Simple, validated vaginal birth after cesarean delivery prediction model for use at the time of admission. Obstet Gynecol 122(3):571\u2013578","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"5946_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"806","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000259312.36053.02","volume":"109","author":"WA Grobman","year":"2007","unstructured":"Grobman WA, Lai Y, Landon MB, Spong CY, Leveno KJ, Rouse DJ, Varner MW, Moawad AH, Caritis SN, Harper M, Wapner RJ, Sorokin Y, Miodovnik M, Carpenter M, Sullivan MJ, Sibai BM, Langer O, Thorp JM, Ramin SM, Mercer BM (2007) Development of a nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 109(4):806","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2 Pt 1","key":"5946_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31816102b9","volume":"111","author":"BM Mercer","year":"2008","unstructured":"Mercer BM, Gilbert S, Landon MB, Spong CY, Leveno KJ, Rouse DJ, Varner MW, Moawad AH, Simhan HN, Harper M, Wapner RJ, Sorokin Y, Miodovnik M, Carpenter M, Peaceman A, O\u2019Sullivan MJ, Sibai BM, Langer O, Thorp JM, Ramin SM, National Institute of Child H, Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units N (2008) Labor outcomes with increasing number of prior vaginal births after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 111(2 Pt 1):285\u2013291","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"5946_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000134784.09455.21","volume":"104","author":"I Hendler","year":"2004","unstructured":"Hendler I, Bujold E (2004) Effect of prior vaginal delivery or prior vaginal birth after cesarean delivery on obstetric outcomes in women undergoing trial of labor. Obstet Gynecol 104(2):273\u2013277","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"5946_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"237","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2010.03.002","volume":"34","author":"KD Gregory","year":"2010","unstructured":"Gregory KD, Fridman M, Korst L (2010) Trends and patterns of vaginal birth after cesarean availability in the United States. Semin Perinatol 34(4):237\u2013243","journal-title":"Semin Perinatol"},{"issue":"4","key":"5946_CR35","first-page":"1","volume":"64","author":"SC Curtin","year":"2015","unstructured":"Curtin SC, Gregory KD, Korst LM, Uddin SF (2015) Maternal morbidity for vaginal and cesarean deliveries, according to previous cesarean history: new data from the birth certificate 2013. Natl Vital Stat Rep 64(4):1\u201313 ((back cover))","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"issue":"4","key":"5946_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"800","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000259313.46842.71","volume":"109","author":"SK Srinivas","year":"2007","unstructured":"Srinivas SK, Stamilio DM, Stevens EJ, Odibo AO, Peipert JF, Macones GA (2007) Predicting failure of a vaginal birth attempt after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 109(4):800\u2013805","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-020-05946-z.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-020-05946-z\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-020-05946-z.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,14]],"date-time":"2021-07-14T00:05:47Z","timestamp":1626221147000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-020-05946-z"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,3]]},"references-count":36,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,8]]}},"alternative-id":["5946"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-020-05946-z","relation":{},"ISSN":["0932-0067","1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0932-0067","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-0711","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"19 May 2020","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"17 December 2020","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"3 January 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"value":"All authors report no conflict of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"IRB approval number RMC-0419-14.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}},{"value":"Due to the retrospective nature of the research and the extraction of anonymized data from a computerized database, individual informed consent was waived.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to participate"}}]}}