{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,27]],"date-time":"2026-10-27T19:48:04Z","timestamp":1793130484509,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":47,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,22]],"date-time":"2021-05-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1621641600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,22]],"date-time":"2021-05-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1621641600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (MHH)"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,9]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy presents the standard treatment for early cervical cancer. Recently, studies have shown a superior oncological outcome for open versus minimal invasive surgery, however, the reasons remain to be speculated. This meta-analysis evaluates the outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to open hysterectomy. Risk groups including the use of uterine manipulators or colpotomy were created.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Ovid-Medline and Embase databases were systematically searched in June 2020. No limitation in date of publication or country was made. Subgroup analyses were performed regarding the surgical approach and the endpoints OS and DFS.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>30 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Five prospective, randomized-control trials were included. Patients were analyzed concerning the surgical approach [open surgery (AH), laparoscopic surgery (LH), robotic surgery (RH)]. Additionally, three subgroups were created from the LH group: the LH high-risk group (manipulator), intermediate-risk group (no manipulator, intracorporal colpotomy) and LH low-risk group (no manipulator, vaginal colpotomy). Regarding OS, the meta-analysis showed inferiority of LH in total over AH (0.97 [0.96; 0.98]). The OS was significantly higher in LH low risk (0.96 [0.94; 0.98) compared to LH intermediate risk (0.93 [0.91; 0.94]). OS rates were comparable in AH and LH Low-risk group. DFS was higher in the AH group compared to the LH group in general (0.92 [95%-CI 0.88; 0.95] vs. 0.87 [0.82; 0.91]), whereas the application of protective measures (no uterine manipulator in combination with vaginal colpotomy) was associated with increased DFS in laparoscopy (0.91 [0.91; 0.95]).<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>DFS and OS in laparoscopy appear to be depending on surgical technique. Protective operating techniques in laparoscopy result in improved minimal invasive survival.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-021-06082-y","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,22]],"date-time":"2021-05-22T04:21:55Z","timestamp":1621657315000},"page":"577-587","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":28,"title":["Protective operative techniques in radical hysterectomy in early cervical carcinoma and their influence on disease-free and overall survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis of risk groups"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"304","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9918-4537","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Johanna","family":"Kampers","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"E.","family":"Gerhardt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"P.","family":"Sibbertsen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"T.","family":"Flock","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"R.","family":"Klapdor","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"H.","family":"Hertel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"M.","family":"Jentschke","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"P.","family":"Hillemanns","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,22]]},"reference":[{"key":"6082_CR1","unstructured":"AWMF S3-Leitlinie Diagnostik, Therapie und Nachsorge der Patientin mit Zervixkarzinom. https:\/\/www.awmf.org\/uploads\/tx_szleitlinien\/032-0"},{"issue":"3 SPEC","key":"6082_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"377","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.12.001","volume":"19","author":"M Roy","year":"2005","unstructured":"Roy M, Plante M, Renaud M-C (2005) Laparoscopically assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 19(3 SPEC):377\u2013386","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"6082_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"903","DOI":"10.1093\/annonc\/mdr360","volume":"23","author":"J-H Nam","year":"2012","unstructured":"Nam J-H, Park J-Y, Kim D-Y, Kim J-H, Kim Y-M, Kim Y-T (2012) Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: long-term survival outcomes in a matched cohort study. Ann Oncol 23(4):903\u2013911. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/annonc\/mdr360","journal-title":"Ann Oncol"},{"issue":"5","key":"6082_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1316","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-009-0342-7","volume":"16","author":"M Malzoni","year":"2009","unstructured":"Malzoni M, Tinelli R, Cosentino F, Fusco A, Malzoni C (2009) Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: our experience. Ann Surg Oncol 16(5):1316\u20131323. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1245\/s10434-009-0342-7","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"key":"6082_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"928","DOI":"10.1186\/s12885-015-1818-4","volume":"15","author":"Y Wang","year":"2015","unstructured":"Wang Y, Deng L, Xu H et al (2015) Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage cervical cancer. BMC Cancer 15:928. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12885-015-1818-4","journal-title":"BMC Cancer"},{"key":"6082_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"990","DOI":"10.1089\/lap.2015.0390","volume":"25","author":"T Cao","year":"2015","unstructured":"Cao T, Feng Y, Huang Q et al (2015) Prognostic and safety roles in laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer: a meta-analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 25:990\u2013998. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/lap.2015.0390","journal-title":"J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech"},{"key":"6082_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1132","DOI":"10.1089\/lap.2017.0022","volume":"27","author":"Y Zhao","year":"2017","unstructured":"Zhao Y, Hang B, Xiong G-W, Zhang X-W (2017) Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 27:1132\u20131144. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/lap.2017.0022","journal-title":"J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech"},{"key":"6082_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"994","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2016.07.017","volume":"43","author":"DA Park","year":"2017","unstructured":"Park DA, Yun JE, Kim SW, Lee SH (2017) Surgical and clinical safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 43:994\u20131002. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejso.2016.07.017","journal-title":"Eur J Surg Oncol"},{"key":"6082_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1002\/rcs.1652","volume":"12","author":"J Zhou","year":"2016","unstructured":"Zhou J, Xiong BH, Ma L et al (2016) Robotic vs laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a meta-analysis. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 12:145\u2013154. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/rcs.1652","journal-title":"Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg"},{"key":"6082_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e14171","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000014171","volume":"98","author":"S Zhang","year":"2019","unstructured":"Zhang S, Ding T, Cui Z et al (2019) Efficacy of robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer compared with that of open and laparoscopic surgery. Medicine (Baltimore) 98:e14171. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MD.0000000000014171","journal-title":"Medicine (Baltimore)"},{"issue":"20","key":"6082_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1895","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1806395","volume":"379","author":"PT Ramirez","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M, Pareja R et al (2018) Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 379(20):1895\u20131904. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1056\/NEJMoa1806395","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"6082_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1019","DOI":"10.1001\/jamaoncol.2020.1694","volume":"6","author":"R Nitecki","year":"2020","unstructured":"Nitecki R, Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M et al (2020) Survival after minimally invasive vs open radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. JAMA Oncol 6:1019. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jamaoncol.2020.1694","journal-title":"JAMA Oncol"},{"key":"6082_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"289","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-020-05627-x","volume":"302","author":"P Hillemanns","year":"2020","unstructured":"Hillemanns P, Hertel H, Klapdor R (2020) Radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer: what shall we do after the LACC trial? Arch Gynecol Obstet 302:289\u2013292. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-020-05627-x","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"6082_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"264","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135","volume":"151","author":"D Moher","year":"2009","unstructured":"Moher D (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151:264. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7326\/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"6082_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"l4898","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.l4898","volume":"366","author":"JAC Sterne","year":"2019","unstructured":"Sterne JAC, Savovi\u0107 J, Page MJ et al (2019) RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 366:l4898. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.l4898","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"6082_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"619","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1097-0258(19960330)15:6<619::AID-SIM188>3.0.CO;2-A","volume":"15","author":"RJ Hardy","year":"1996","unstructured":"Hardy RJ, Thompson SG (1996) A likelihood approach to meta-analysis with random effects. Stat Med 15:619\u2013629. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/(SICI)1097-0258(19960330)15:6%3c619::AID-SIM188%3e3.0.CO;2-A","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"issue":"20","key":"6082_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1905","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1804923","volume":"379","author":"A Melamed","year":"2018","unstructured":"Melamed A, Margul DJ, Chen L et al (2018) Survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 379(20):1905\u20131914. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1056\/NEJMoa1804923","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"7","key":"6082_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"987","DOI":"10.1136\/ijgc-2020-001381","volume":"30","author":"G Bogani","year":"2020","unstructured":"Bogani G, Ghezzi F, Chiva L et al (2020) Patterns of recurrence after laparoscopic versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer: a propensity-matched analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer 30(7):987\u2013992. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/ijgc-2020-001381","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Cancer"},{"key":"6082_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"516","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318264f848","volume":"120","author":"S Uccella","year":"2012","unstructured":"Uccella S, Ceccaroni M, Cromi A et al (2012) Vaginal cuff dehiscence in a series of 12,398 hysterectomies. Obstet Gynecol 120:516\u2013523. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318264f848","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"6082_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1398","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13681","volume":"98","author":"R Klapdor","year":"2019","unstructured":"Klapdor R, Hertel H, Hillemanns P et al (2019) Peritoneal contamination with ICG-stained cervical secretion as surrogate for potential cervical cancer tumor cell dissemination: a proof-of-principle study for laparoscopic hysterectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 98:1398\u20131403. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/aogs.13681","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"5","key":"6082_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"845","DOI":"10.1136\/ijgc-2019-000388","volume":"29","author":"C K\u00f6hler","year":"2019","unstructured":"K\u00f6hler C, Hertel H, Herrmann J et al (2019) Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with transvaginal closure of vaginal cuff\u2014a multicenter analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer 29(5):845\u2013850. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/ijgc-2019-000388","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Cancer"},{"key":"6082_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3802\/jgo.2020.31.e7","author":"T-W Kong","year":"2020","unstructured":"Kong T-W, Son J-H, Paek J et al (2020) Selection criteria and colpotomic approach for safe minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer. J Gynecol Oncol. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3802\/jgo.2020.31.e7","journal-title":"J Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"6082_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1864","DOI":"10.1136\/ijgc-2020-001816","volume":"30","author":"A Nica","year":"2020","unstructured":"Nica A, Kim SR, Gien LT et al (2020) Survival after minimally invasive surgery in early cervical cancer: is the intra-uterine manipulator to blame? Int J Gynecol Cancer 30:1864\u20131870. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/ijgc-2020-001816","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Cancer"},{"issue":"1","key":"6082_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.1186\/1745-6215-14-293","volume":"14","author":"L Campos","year":"2013","unstructured":"Campos L, Francisco Limberger L, Tetelbom Stein A, Nocchi KA (2013) Postoperative pain and perioperative outcomes after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Trials 14(1):293. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1745-6215-14-293","journal-title":"Trials"},{"issue":"1","key":"6082_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"136","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2014.10.048","volume":"41","author":"G Corrado","year":"2015","unstructured":"Corrado G, Fanfani F, Ghezzi F et al (2015) Mini-laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer patients. A multi-institutional study. Eur J Surg Oncol 41(1):136\u2013141. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejso.2014.10.048","journal-title":"Eur J Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"3","key":"6082_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"402","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2016.12.005","volume":"24","author":"E Diver","year":"2017","unstructured":"Diver E, Hinchcliff E, Gockley A et al (2017) Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer is associated with reduced morbidity and similar survival outcomes compared with laparotomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 24(3):402\u2013406. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2016.12.005","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"6082_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"242","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2019.03.001","volume":"153","author":"DW Doo","year":"2019","unstructured":"Doo DW, Kirkland CT, Griswold LH et al (2019) Comparative outcomes between robotic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for IB1 cervical cancer: results from a single high volume institution. Gynecol Oncol 153(2):242\u2013247. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ygyno.2019.03.001","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"issue":"7","key":"6082_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1224","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2018.03.002","volume":"25","author":"R dos Reis","year":"2018","unstructured":"dos Reis R, Andrade CEMC, Frumovitz M, Munsell M, Ramirez PT (2018) Radical hysterectomy and age: outcomes comparison based on a minimally invasive vs an open approach. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 25(7):1224\u20131230. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2018.03.002","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"6082_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"851","DOI":"10.1016\/S1470-2045(20)30081-4","volume":"21","author":"M Frumovitz","year":"2020","unstructured":"Frumovitz M, Obermair A, Coleman RL et al (2020) Quality of life in patients with cervical cancer after open versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (LACC): a secondary outcome of a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol 21(6):851\u2013860. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S1470-2045(20)30081-4","journal-title":"Lancet Oncol"},{"issue":"1","key":"6082_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2019.07.019","volume":"155","author":"SI Kim","year":"2019","unstructured":"Kim SI, Lee M, Lee S et al (2019) Impact of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy on survival outcome in patients with FIGO stage IB cervical cancer: a matching study of two institutional hospitals in Korea. Gynecol Oncol 155(1):75\u201382. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ygyno.2019.07.019","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"issue":"2","key":"6082_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"788","DOI":"10.4143\/crt.2018.120","volume":"51","author":"JH Kim","year":"2019","unstructured":"Kim JH, Kim K, Park SJ et al (2019) Comparative effectiveness of abdominal versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer in the postdissemination era. Cancer Res Treat 51(2):788\u2013796. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4143\/crt.2018.120","journal-title":"Cancer Res Treat"},{"issue":"2","key":"6082_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"280","DOI":"10.1097\/IGC.0000000000000052","volume":"24","author":"TW Kong","year":"2014","unstructured":"Kong TW, Chang S-J, Lee J, Paek J, Ryu H-S (2014) Comparison of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for FIGO stage IB and IIA cervical cancer with tumor diameter of 3 cm or greater. Int J Gynecol Cancer 24(2):280\u2013288. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/IGC.0000000000000052","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Cancer"},{"issue":"3","key":"6082_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"547","DOI":"10.1097\/IGC.0000000000000627","volume":"26","author":"RM Laterza","year":"2016","unstructured":"Laterza RM, Uccella S, Casarin J et al (2016) Recurrence of early stage cervical cancer after laparoscopic versus open radical surgery. Int J Gynecol Cancer 26(3):547\u2013552. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/IGC.0000000000000627","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Cancer"},{"issue":"1","key":"6082_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"176","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2006.11.011","volume":"105","author":"G Li","year":"2007","unstructured":"Li G, Yan X, Shang H, Wang G, Chen L, Han Y (2007) A comparison of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy and laparotomy in the treatment of Ib-IIa cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 105(1):176\u2013180. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ygyno.2006.11.011","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"issue":"1","key":"6082_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"66","DOI":"10.1016\/j.suronc.2015.09.004","volume":"25","author":"AA Mendivil","year":"2016","unstructured":"Mendivil AA, Rettenmaier MA, Abaid LN et al (2016) Survival rate comparisons amongst cervical cancer patients treated with an open, robotic-assisted or laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: a five year experience. Surg Oncol 25(1):66\u201371. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.suronc.2015.09.004","journal-title":"Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"6","key":"6082_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"746","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02479.x","volume":"117","author":"R Naik","year":"2010","unstructured":"Naik R, Jackson K, Lopes A, Cross P, Henry J (2010) Laparoscopic assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy\u2014a randomised phase II trial: perioperative outcomes and surgicopathological measurements. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 117(6):746\u2013751. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02479.x","journal-title":"BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"7","key":"6082_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1284","DOI":"10.1111\/IGC.0b013e3181ef0a14","volume":"20","author":"EJ Nam","year":"2010","unstructured":"Nam EJ, Kim SW, Kim S et al (2010) A case\u2013control study of robotic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy using 3 robotic arms compared with abdominal radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 20(7):1284\u20131289. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/IGC.0b013e3181ef0a14","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Cancer"},{"issue":"3","key":"6082_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"249.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.036","volume":"222","author":"A Obermair","year":"2020","unstructured":"Obermair A, Asher R, Pareja R et al (2020) Incidence of adverse events in minimally invasive vs open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 222(3):249.e1-249.e10. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.036","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"6082_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"547","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2019.06.023","volume":"154","author":"ES Paik","year":"2019","unstructured":"Paik ES, Lim MC, Kim M-H et al (2019) Comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer patients without adjuvant treatment: ancillary analysis of a Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group Study (KGOG 1028). Gynecol Oncol 154(3):547\u2013553. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ygyno.2019.06.023","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"issue":"S5","key":"6082_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"825","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-016-5489-4","volume":"23","author":"J-Y Park","year":"2016","unstructured":"Park J-Y, Kim D, Suh D-S et al (2016) The role of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in early-stage adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. Ann Surg Oncol 23(S5):825\u2013833. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1245\/s10434-016-5489-4","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"3","key":"6082_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"224","DOI":"10.1002\/rcs.152","volume":"3","author":"B Sert","year":"2007","unstructured":"Sert B, Abeler V (2007) Robotic radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical carcinoma patients, comparing results with total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy cases. The future is now? Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 3(3):224\u2013228. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/rcs.152","journal-title":"Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"6082_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"513","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2015.12.014","volume":"42","author":"BM Sert","year":"2016","unstructured":"Sert BM, Boggess JF, Ahmad S et al (2016) Robot-assisted versus open radical hysterectomy: a multi-institutional experience for early-stage cervical cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 42(4):513\u2013522. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejso.2015.12.014","journal-title":"Eur J Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"9","key":"6082_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2622","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-011-1611-9","volume":"18","author":"R Tinelli","year":"2011","unstructured":"Tinelli R, Malzoni M, Cosentino F et al (2011) Robotics versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol 18(9):2622\u20132628. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1245\/s10434-011-1611-9","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"5","key":"6082_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"804","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2016.04.006","volume":"23","author":"G Vizzielli","year":"2016","unstructured":"Vizzielli G, Lucidi A, Gallotta V et al (2016) Robotic total mesometrial resection versus laparoscopic total mesometrial resection in early cervical cancer: a case\u2013control study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 23(5):804\u2013809. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2016.04.006","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"36","key":"6082_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e4787","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000004787","volume":"95","author":"M Xiao","year":"2016","unstructured":"Xiao M, Gao H, Bai H, Zhang Z (2016) Quality of life and sexuality in disease-free survivors of cervical cancer after radical hysterectomy alone. Medicine (Baltimore) 95(36):e4787. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MD.0000000000004787","journal-title":"Medicine (Baltimore)"},{"issue":"12","key":"6082_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2425","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.14116","volume":"45","author":"K Kanno","year":"2019","unstructured":"Kanno K, Andou M, Yanai S et al (2019) Long-term oncological outcomes of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: a retrospective, single-institutional study in the wake of the LACC trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 45(12):2425\u20132434. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jog.14116","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"issue":"5","key":"6082_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"863","DOI":"10.1136\/ijgc-2019-000323","volume":"29","author":"D Odetto","year":"2019","unstructured":"Odetto D, Puga MC, Saadi J, Noll F, Perrotta M (2019) Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy: an analysis of oncologic outcomes from Hospital Italiano (Argentina). Int J Gynecol Cancer 29(5):863\u2013868. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/ijgc-2019-000323","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Cancer"}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-021-06082-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-021-06082-y\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-021-06082-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,31]],"date-time":"2021-07-31T21:05:22Z","timestamp":1627765522000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-021-06082-y"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,22]]},"references-count":47,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,9]]}},"alternative-id":["6082"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-021-06082-y","relation":{},"ISSN":["0932-0067","1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0932-0067","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-0711","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,22]]},"assertion":[{"value":"5 March 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"27 April 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"22 May 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"All authors of the manuscript title: \u201cProtective operative techniques in radical hysterectomy in early cervical carcinoma and their influence on disease-free and overall survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis of risk groups\u201d state no conflict of interest\/financial disclosures.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}