{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,18]],"date-time":"2026-05-18T22:46:49Z","timestamp":1779144409411,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":22,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,11]],"date-time":"2021-05-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1620691200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,11]],"date-time":"2021-05-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1620691200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"funder":[{"name":"SingHealth Duke-NUS OBGYN Academic Clinical Program (ACP) Grant"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,1]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-021-06090-y","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,11]],"date-time":"2021-05-11T04:08:38Z","timestamp":1620706118000},"page":"11-18","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":20,"title":["Multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing the safety in the first 12\u00a0h, efficacy and maternal satisfaction of a double balloon catheter and prostaglandin pessary for induction of labour"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"305","clinical-trial-number":[{"clinical-trial-number":"nct02620215","registry":"10.18810\/clinical-trials-gov"}],"author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2686-0549","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Yang Huang","family":"Grace Ng","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Anisa Aisyah","family":"Aminuddin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Toh Lick","family":"Tan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ramesh","family":"Kuppusamy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Shephali","family":"Tagore","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"George Seow Heong","family":"Yeo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,11]]},"reference":[{"key":"6090_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Grobman WA, Rice MM, Reddy UM, Tita AT, Silver RM, Mallet G et al. (2018) Labor induction versus expectant management for low-risk nulliparous women.\u00a0New Engl J Med","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1800566"},{"key":"6090_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"De Vaan MDT, ten Eikelder MLG, Jozwiak M, Palmer KR, Davies-Tuck M, Bloemenkamp KWM, Mol BWJ Boulvain M (2019) Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10.","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD001233.pub3"},{"key":"6090_CR3","unstructured":"National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) (2015) Insertion of a double balloon catheter for induction of labour in pregnant women without previous caesarean section: Interventional procedures guidance. National Institute for Clinical Excellence, London"},{"key":"6090_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Du YM, Zhu LY, Cui LN, Jin BH, Ou JL (2016) Double-balloon catheter versus prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening and labour induction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BJOG. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1471-0528.14256. Epub 2016 Aug 17","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14256"},{"issue":"8","key":"6090_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"419","DOI":"10.11622\/smedj.2018097","volume":"59","author":"SE Lim","year":"2018","unstructured":"Lim SE, Tan TL, Ng GYH, Tagore S, Kyaw EEP, Yeo GSH (2018) Patient satisfaction with the cervical ripening balloon as a method for induction of labour: a randomised controlled trial. Singapore Med J 59(8):419\u2013424","journal-title":"Singapore Med J"},{"key":"6090_CR6","unstructured":"Tan TL,\u00a0Ng GYH, Lim S, Tagore S, Kyaw E, Yeo G (2015) Cervical ripening balloon as an alternative for induction of labour: a randomised controlled trial. BJMP 8(1):a806."},{"key":"6090_CR7","unstructured":"Ng GYH, Tan TL, SE Lim, S Tagore, Yeo GSH (2017) Learning curve in the use of cervical ripening balloon for induction of labour. Singapore J Obstet Gynaecol 48(1):15\u201319"},{"key":"6090_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"L\u00f8kkegaard E, Lundstr\u00f8m M, Kj\u00e6r MM, Christensen IJ, Pedersen HB, Nyholm H (2015) Prospective multi-centre randomised trial comparing induction of labour with a double-balloon catheter versus dinoprostone. J Obstet Gynaecol. 18:1\u20136.","DOI":"10.3109\/01443615.2015.1011101"},{"key":"6090_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wilkinson C, Bryce R, Adelson P, Turnbull D (2015) A randomised controlled trial of outpatient compared with inpatient cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 (OPRA study). BJOG 122(1):94\u2013104","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12846"},{"issue":"14","key":"6090_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"330","DOI":"10.1186\/1472-6963-14-330","volume":"30","author":"K Howard","year":"2014","unstructured":"Howard K, Gerard K, Adelson P, Bryce R, Wilkinson C, Turnbull D (2014) Women\u2019s preferences for inpatient and outpatient priming for labour induction: a discrete choice experiment. BMC Health Serv Res 30(14):330","journal-title":"BMC Health Serv Res"},{"key":"6090_CR11","first-page":"126","volume":"15","author":"C Wilkinson","year":"2015","unstructured":"Wilkinson C, Bryce R, Adelson P, Turnbull D (2015) A comparison of inpatient and outpatient balloon catheter cervical ripening pilot randomised controlled trial. BMC 15:126","journal-title":"BMC"},{"key":"6090_CR12","unstructured":"National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) (2008) Induction of labor: clinical guideline no. 70. National Institute for Clinical Excellence, London"},{"issue":"3","key":"6090_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"794","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(90)91070-S","volume":"163","author":"CH Egarter","year":"1990","unstructured":"Egarter CH, Husslein PW, Rayburn WF (1990) Uterine hyperstimulation after low-dose prostaglandin E2 therapy: tocolytic treatment in 181 cases. ACOG 163(3):794\u2013879","journal-title":"ACOG"},{"key":"6090_CR14","unstructured":"National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) (2014) Intrapartum care for healthy women and babies: clinical guideline no. 190. National Institute for Clinical Excellence, London"},{"issue":"9","key":"6090_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1086","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.15047","volume":"125","author":"M Diederen","year":"2018","unstructured":"Diederen M, Gommers J, Wilkinson C, Turnbull D, Mol B (2018) Safety of the balloon catheter for cervical ripening in outpatient care: complications during the period from insertion to expulsion of a balloon catheter in the process of labour induction: a systematic review. BJOG 125(9):1086\u20131095","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"6090_CR16","first-page":"1","volume":"11","author":"I Solt","year":"2019","unstructured":"Solt I, Wolf MF, Ben-Haroush S, Kaminskyi S, Ophir E, Bornstein J (2019) Foley catheter versus cervical double balloon for labor induction: a prospective randomized study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 11:1\u20138","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"6090_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318220e4b7","volume":"118","author":"R Salim","year":"2011","unstructured":"Salim R, Zafran N, Nachum Z, Garmi G, Kraiem N, Shalev E (2011) Single-balloon compared with double balloon catheters for induction of labor: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 118(1):79\u201386","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"6090_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"723","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2011.591459","volume":"25","author":"E Mei-Dan","year":"2012","unstructured":"Mei-Dan E, Walfisch A, Suarez-Easton S, Hallak M (2012) Comparison of two mechanical devices for cervical ripening: a prospective quasi-randomized trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 25(6):723\u2013727","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"6090_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1443","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2009.02279.x","volume":"116","author":"C Pennell","year":"2009","unstructured":"Pennell C, Henderson J, O\u2019Neill M, McCleery S, Doherty D (2009) Induction of labour in nulliparous women with an unfavourable cervix: a randomised controlled trial comparing double and single balloon catheters and PGE2 gel. BJOG 116:1443\u20131452","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"1","key":"6090_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13116","volume":"122","author":"S Kehl","year":"2015","unstructured":"Kehl S, Ziegler J, Schleussner E, Tuschy B, Berlit S, Kirscht J et al (2015) Sequential use of double-balloon catheter and oral misoprostol versus oral misoprostol alone for induction of labour at term (CRBplus trial): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial. BJOG 122(1):129\u2013136","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"6090_CR21","first-page":"125","volume":"207","author":"A Cromi","year":"2012","unstructured":"Cromi A, Ghezzi F, Uccella S, Agosti M, Serati M, Marchitelli G et al (2012) A randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: dinoprostone vaginal insert versus double-balloon catheter. ACOG 207:125\u2013127","journal-title":"ACOG"},{"key":"6090_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"223","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(95)00389-4","volume":"87","author":"J Atad","year":"1996","unstructured":"Atad J, Hallak M, Auslender R, Porat-Packer T, Zarfati D, Abramovici H (1996) A randomized comparison of prostaglandin E2, oxytocin, and the double-balloon device in inducing labor. Obstet Gynecol 87:223\u2013227","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-021-06090-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-021-06090-y\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-021-06090-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,21]],"date-time":"2022-01-21T16:06:48Z","timestamp":1642781208000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-021-06090-y"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,11]]},"references-count":22,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,1]]}},"alternative-id":["6090"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-021-06090-y","relation":{},"ISSN":["0932-0067","1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0932-0067","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-0711","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,11]]},"assertion":[{"value":"29 October 2020","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"1 May 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"11 May 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declaration"}},{"value":"No conflict of interest declared.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and\/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}}]}}