{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,25]],"date-time":"2026-10-25T00:03:31Z","timestamp":1792886611861,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":32,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,28]],"date-time":"2021-10-28T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1635379200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,28]],"date-time":"2021-10-28T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1635379200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,8]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-021-06298-y","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,28]],"date-time":"2021-10-28T03:30:40Z","timestamp":1635391840000},"page":"379-387","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":10,"title":["Balloon catheter vs oxytocin alone for induction of labor in women with one previous cesarean section and an unfavorable cervix: a multicenter, retrospective study"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"306","author":[{"given":"D\u00e9borah","family":"Secchi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Julia","family":"Alb\u00e9ric","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sophie","family":"Gobillot","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Adrien","family":"Ghenassia","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Matthieu","family":"Roustit","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"C\u00e9line","family":"Chauleur","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Pascale","family":"Hoffmann","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4408-6075","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Tiphaine","family":"Raia-Barjat","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,28]]},"reference":[{"key":"6298_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"701","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2017.09.002","volume":"46","author":"B Blondel","year":"2017","unstructured":"Blondel B, Coulm B, Bonnet C, Goffinet F, Le Ray C, National Coordination Group of the National Perinatal Surveys (2017) Trends in perinatal health in metropolitan France from 1995 to 2016: results from the French National Perinatal Surveys. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 46:701\u2013713","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod"},{"key":"6298_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.05.015","volume":"170","author":"L Sentilhes","year":"2013","unstructured":"Sentilhes L, Vayssi\u00e8re C, Beucher G, Deneux-Tharaux C, Deruelle P, Diemunsch P et al (2013) Delivery for women with a previous cesarean: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 170:25\u201332","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"6298_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"788","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030","volume":"41","author":"P Deruelle","year":"2012","unstructured":"Deruelle P, Lepage J, Depret S, Clouqueur E (2012) Induction of labor and intrapartum management for women with uterine scar. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 41:788\u2013802","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"},{"key":"6298_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"708","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028","volume":"41","author":"G Beucher","year":"2012","unstructured":"Beucher G, Dolley P, L\u00e9vy-Thissier S, Florian A, Dreyfus M (2012) Maternal benefits and risks of trial of labor versus elective repeat caesarean delivery in women with a previous caesarean delivery. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 41:708\u2013726","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"},{"key":"6298_CR5","first-page":"CD004224","volume":"12","author":"JM Dodd","year":"2013","unstructured":"Dodd JM, Crowther CA, Huertas E, Guise J-M, Horey D (2013) Planned elective repeat caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for women with a previous caesarean birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12:CD004224","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"6298_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"539","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2018.09.006","volume":"47","author":"S Gobillot","year":"2018","unstructured":"Gobillot S, Ghenassia A, Coston AL, Gillois P, Equy V, Michy T et al (2018) Obstetric outcomes associated with induction of labour after caesarean section. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 47:539\u2013543","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod"},{"key":"6298_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"735","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.032","volume":"41","author":"J-B Haumont\u00e9","year":"2012","unstructured":"Haumont\u00e9 J-B, Raylet M, Sabiani L, Frank\u00e9 O, Bretelle F, Boubli L et al (2012) Predictive factors for vaginal birth after cesarean section. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 41:735\u2013752","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"},{"key":"6298_CR8","first-page":"266","volume":"24","author":"EH Bishop","year":"1964","unstructured":"Bishop EH (1964) Pelvic scoring for elective induction. Obstet Gynecol 24:266\u2013268","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"6298_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2015.03.008","volume":"43","author":"J Cirier","year":"2015","unstructured":"Cirier J, Diguisto C, Arlicot C, Denis C, Potin J, Perrotin F (2015) Mechanical methods for cervical ripening in France: an evaluation of professional practices. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 43:361\u2013366","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Fertil"},{"key":"6298_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2017.11.006","volume":"47","author":"P Blanc-Petitjean","year":"2018","unstructured":"Blanc-Petitjean P, Salom\u00e9 M, Dupont C, Crenn-Hebert C, Gaudineau A, Perrotte F et al (2018) Labour induction practices in France: a population-based declarative survey in 94 maternity units. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 47:57\u201362","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod"},{"key":"6298_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"463","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.009","volume":"39","author":"M Gilstrop","year":"2015","unstructured":"Gilstrop M, Sciscione A (2015) Induction of labor\u2013pharmacology methods. Semin Perinatol 39:463\u2013465","journal-title":"Semin Perinatol"},{"key":"6298_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"369","DOI":"10.1097\/GRF.0000000000000023","volume":"57","author":"AC Sciscione","year":"2014","unstructured":"Sciscione AC (2014) Methods of cervical ripening and labor induction: mechanical. Clin Obstet Gynecol 57:369\u2013376","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"6298_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"496","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.06.001","volume":"45","author":"C Lamourdedieu","year":"2016","unstructured":"Lamourdedieu C, Gnisci A, Agostini A (2016) Risk of uterine rupture after cervical ripening with ballon catheter on uterus with previous cesarean section. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 45:496\u2013501","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"},{"key":"6298_CR14","first-page":"CD001233","volume":"3","author":"M Jozwiak","year":"2012","unstructured":"Jozwiak M, Bloemenkamp KWM, Kelly AJ, Mol BWJ, Irion O, Boulvain M (2012) Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD001233","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"6298_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"112","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.11.007","volume":"45","author":"G Ducarme","year":"2016","unstructured":"Ducarme G, Grange J, Vital M (2016) Expansion dilatation balloons for cervical ripening in obstetric practice. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 45:112\u2013119","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"},{"key":"6298_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505","volume":"204","author":"S Kehl","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kehl S, Weiss C, Rath W (2016) Balloon catheters for induction of labor at term after previous cesarean section: a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 204:44\u201350","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"6298_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.4103\/0972-4958.135223","volume":"28","author":"L Meetei","year":"2014","unstructured":"Meetei L, Suri V, Aggarwal N (2014) Induction of labor in patients with previous cesarean section with unfavorable cervix. J Med Soc 28:29","journal-title":"J Med Soc"},{"key":"6298_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"212","DOI":"10.4236\/ojog.2013.31A039","volume":"03","author":"ER Ferradas","year":"2013","unstructured":"Ferradas ER, Alvarado IL, Gabilondo MA, Diez-Itza I, Garc\u00eda-Adanez J (2013) Double balloon device compared to oxytocin for induction of labour after previous caesarean section. Open J Obstet Gynecol 03:212\u2013216","journal-title":"Open J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"6298_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1010","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2016.1197903","volume":"30","author":"U Shah","year":"2017","unstructured":"Shah U, Bellows P, Drexler K, Hawley L, Davidson C, Sangi-Haghpeykar H et al (2017) Comparison of induction of labor methods for unfavorable cervices in trial of labor after cesarean delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 30:1010\u20131015","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"6298_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"259","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13712","volume":"99","author":"M Sarreau","year":"2020","unstructured":"Sarreau M, Isly H, Poulain P, Fontaine B, Morel O, Villemonteix P et al (2020) Balloon catheter vs oxytocin alone for induction of labor in women with a previous cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 99:259\u2013266","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"6298_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"309","DOI":"10.1080\/01443615.2016.1239075","volume":"37","author":"NI El Khouly","year":"2017","unstructured":"El Khouly NI (2017) A prospective randomized trial comparing Foley catheter, oxytocin, and combination Foley catheter-oxytocin for labour induction with unfavourable cervix. J Obstet Gynaecol 37:309\u2013314","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"6298_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026","volume":"210","author":"AB Caughey","year":"2014","unstructured":"Caughey AB, Cahill AG, Guise J-M, Rouse DJ, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (College), Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (2014) Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 210:179\u2013193","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"6298_CR23","first-page":"CD009792","volume":"6","author":"HM West","year":"2017","unstructured":"West HM, Jozwiak M, Dodd JM (2017) Methods of term labour induction for women with a previous caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 6:CD009792","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"6298_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1176","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.109037","volume":"183","author":"DJ Ravasia","year":"2000","unstructured":"Ravasia DJ, Wood SL, Pollard JK (2000) Uterine rupture during induced trial of labor among women with previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:1176\u20131179","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"6298_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000109148.23082.C1","volume":"103","author":"E Bujold","year":"2004","unstructured":"Bujold E, Blackwell SC, Gauthier RJ (2004) Cervical ripening with transcervical foley catheter and the risk of uterine rupture. Obstet Gynecol 103:18\u201323","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"6298_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"809","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02533.x","volume":"117","author":"I Al-Zirqi","year":"2010","unstructured":"Al-Zirqi I, Stray-Pedersen B, Fors\u00e9n L, Vangen S (2010) Uterine rupture after previous caesarean section. BJOG 117:809\u2013820","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"32","key":"6298_CR27","first-page":"e1","volume":"199","author":"AG Cahill","year":"2008","unstructured":"Cahill AG, Waterman BM, Stamilio DM, Odibo AO, Allsworth JE, Evanoff B et al (2008) Higher maximum doses of oxytocin are associated with an unacceptably high risk for uterine rupture in patients attempting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199(32):e1-5","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"6298_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"262","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000254169.49346.e9","volume":"109","author":"WA Grobman","year":"2007","unstructured":"Grobman WA, Gilbert S, Landon MB, Spong CY, Leveno KJ, Rouse DJ et al (2007) Outcomes of induction of labor after one prior cesarean. Obstet Gynecol 109:262\u2013269","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"6298_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"73","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014","volume":"218","author":"JSM Gommers","year":"2017","unstructured":"Gommers JSM, Diederen M, Wilkinson C, Turnbull D, Mol BWJ (2017) Risk of maternal, fetal and neonatal complications associated with the use of the transcervical balloon catheter in induction of labour: a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 218:73\u201384","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"6298_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"840","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(15)30842-2","volume":"35","author":"D Leduc","year":"2013","unstructured":"Leduc D, Biringer A, Lee L, Dy J (2013) Clinical practice obstetrics committee, special contributors induction of labour. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 35:840\u2013857","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"6298_CR31","first-page":"56","volume":"45","author":"C Dupont","year":"2017","unstructured":"Dupont C, Carayol M, Le Ray C, Barasinski C, Beranger R, Burguet A et al (2017) Oxytocin administration during spontaneous labour: guidelines for clinical practice. Guidelines short text. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol 45:56\u201361","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol"},{"issue":"56","key":"6298_CR32","first-page":"e1","volume":"200","author":"WA Grobman","year":"2009","unstructured":"Grobman WA, Lai Y, Landon MB, Spong CY, Leveno KJ, Rouse DJ et al (2009) Can a prediction model for vaginal birth after cesarean also predict the probability of morbidity related to a trial of labor? Am J Obstet Gynecol 200(56):e1-6","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-021-06298-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-021-06298-y\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-021-06298-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,3]],"date-time":"2022-08-03T11:05:50Z","timestamp":1659524750000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-021-06298-y"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,28]]},"references-count":32,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,8]]}},"alternative-id":["6298"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-021-06298-y","relation":{},"ISSN":["1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1432-0711","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,28]]},"assertion":[{"value":"16 June 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"18 October 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"28 October 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors report no conflict of interest in this work.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"This retrospective study involving human participants was in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The Human Investigation Committee (IRB) of Saint-Etienne university hospital approved this study in May 2021 (IRBN832021\/CHUSTE).","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}},{"value":"Only patients who was not opposite were included.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not required.","order":5,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}}]}}