{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,17]],"date-time":"2026-08-17T15:21:47Z","timestamp":1786980107627,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":31,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,30]],"date-time":"2022-01-30T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1643500800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,30]],"date-time":"2022-01-30T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1643500800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,6]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-021-06368-1","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,29]],"date-time":"2022-01-29T19:03:06Z","timestamp":1643482986000},"page":"1633-1639","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":10,"title":["Uterine rupture risk in a trial of labor after cesarean section with and without previous vaginal births"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"305","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2098-4433","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Avraham","family":"Nahum-Yerushalmy","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Asnat","family":"Walfisch","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Michal","family":"Lipschuetz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Joshua I.","family":"Rosenbloom","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Doron","family":"Kabiri","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hila","family":"Hochler","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,30]]},"reference":[{"issue":"6","key":"6368_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e005671","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjgh-2021-005671","volume":"6","author":"AP Betran","year":"2021","unstructured":"Betran AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Souza JP, Zhang J (2021) Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates. BMJ Glob Health 6(6):e005671. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjgh-2021-005671","journal-title":"BMJ Glob Health"},{"issue":"4","key":"6368_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"249","DOI":"10.1016\/s1526-9523(03)00088-6","volume":"48","author":"O'brien-Abel N.","year":"2003","unstructured":"O\u2019brien-Abel N. (2003) Uterine rupture during VBAC trial of labor: risk factors and fetal response. J Midwifery Womens Health 48(4):249\u2013257. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s1526-9523(03)00088-6","journal-title":"J Midwifery Womens Health"},{"key":"6368_CR3","first-page":"1","volume":"191","author":"JM Guise","year":"2010","unstructured":"Guise JM, Eden K, Emeis C, Denman MA, Marshall N, Fu RR, Janik R, Nygren P, Walker M, McDonagh M (2010) Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. Evid Rep Technol Assess 191:1\u2013397","journal-title":"Evid Rep Technol Assess"},{"issue":"7","key":"6368_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1309","DOI":"10.1007\/s10995-012-1132-6","volume":"17","author":"SF Uddin","year":"2013","unstructured":"Uddin SF, Simon AE (2013) Rates and success rates of trial of labor after cesarean delivery in the United States, 1990\u20132009. Matern Child Health J 17(7):1309\u20131314. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10995-012-1132-6","journal-title":"Matern Child Health J"},{"issue":"1","key":"6368_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM200107053450101","volume":"345","author":"M Lydon-Rochelle","year":"2001","unstructured":"Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR, Martin DP (2001) Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 345(1):3\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1056\/NEJM200107053450101","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"6368_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"317","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-011-1977-8","volume":"285","author":"D Ronel","year":"2012","unstructured":"Ronel D, Wiznitzer A, Sergienko R, Zlotnik A, Sheiner E (2012) Trends, risk factors and pregnancy outcome in women with uterine rupture. Arch Gynecol Obstet 285(2):317\u2013321. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-011-1977-8","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"4","key":"6368_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"799","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-015-3715-0","volume":"292","author":"T Eshkoli","year":"2015","unstructured":"Eshkoli T, Weintraub AY, Baron J, Sheiner E (2015) The significance of a uterine rupture in subsequent births. Arch Gynecol Obstet 292(4):799\u2013803. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-015-3715-0","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"2","key":"6368_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e110","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003078","volume":"133","author":"The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists\u2019 Committee on Practice Bulletins\u2014Obstetrics in collaboration with William Grobman, MD","year":"2019","unstructured":"The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists\u2019 Committee on Practice Bulletins\u2014Obstetrics in collaboration with William Grobman, MD (2019) ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 205: vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 133(2):e110\u2013e127. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003078","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"6368_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(96)90009-0","volume":"52","author":"Committee on Practice Patterns, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists","year":"1996","unstructured":"Committee on Practice Patterns, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (1996) Vaginal delivery after previous cesarean birth. Number 1\u2014August 1995. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 52(1):90\u201398","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"18","key":"6368_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E556","DOI":"10.1503\/cmaj.170371","volume":"190","author":"CB Young","year":"2018","unstructured":"Young CB, Liu S, Muraca GM, Sabr Y, Pressey T, Liston RM, Joseph KS, Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System (2018) Mode of delivery after a previous cesarean birth, and associated maternal and neonatal morbidity. CMAJ Can Med Assoc J 190(18):E556\u2013E564. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1503\/cmaj.170371","journal-title":"CMAJ Can Med Assoc J"},{"issue":"6","key":"6368_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1267","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181df925f","volume":"115","author":"JM Guise","year":"2010","unstructured":"Guise JM, Denman MA, Emeis C, Marshall N, Walker M, Fu R, Janik R, Nygren P, Eden KB, McDonagh M (2010) Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 115(6):1267\u20131278. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181df925f\u3039","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"6368_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000922","volume":"126","author":"JR Lappen","year":"2015","unstructured":"Lappen JR, Hackney DN, Bailit JL (2015) Outcomes of term induction in trial of labor after cesarean delivery: analysis of a modern obstetric cohort. Obstet Gynecol 126(1):115\u2013123. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000922","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"6368_CR13","unstructured":"Curtin SC, Gregory KD, Korst LM, Uddin SF (2015) Maternal morbidity for vaginal and cesarean deliveries, according to previous cesarean history: new data from the birth certificate, 2013. Natl Vital Stat Rep Cent Dis Control Prev Natl Cent Health Stat Natl Vital Stat Syst 64(4):1\u201313"},{"issue":"1","key":"6368_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"100081","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2019.100081","volume":"2","author":"H Hochler","year":"2020","unstructured":"Hochler H, Wainstock T, Lipschuetz M, Sheiner E, Ezra Y, Yagel S, Walfisch A (2020) Induction of labor in women with a scarred uterus: does grand multiparity affect the risk of uterine rupture? Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2(1):100081. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2019.100081","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM"},{"issue":"3","key":"6368_CR15","first-page":"1","volume":"27","author":"FG Cunningham","year":"2010","unstructured":"Cunningham FG, Bangdiwala SI, Brown SS, Dean TM, Frederiksen M, Rowland Hogue CJ, King T, Spencer Lukacz E, McCullough LB, Nicholson W, Petit NF, Probstfield JL, Viguera AC, Wong CA, Zimmet SC (2010) NIH consensus development conference draft statement on vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. NIH Consens State Sci Statements 27(3):1\u201342","journal-title":"NIH Consens State Sci Statements"},{"issue":"5","key":"6368_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1184","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.109048","volume":"183","author":"CM Zelop","year":"2000","unstructured":"Zelop CM, Shipp TD, Repke JT, Cohen A, Lieberman E (2000) Effect of previous vaginal delivery on the risk of uterine rupture during a subsequent trial of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183(5):1184\u20131186. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1067\/mob.2000.109048","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"7","key":"6368_CR17","first-page":"526","volume":"2","author":"S Shimonovitz","year":"2000","unstructured":"Shimonovitz S, Botosneano A, Hochner-Celnikier D (2000) Successful first vaginal birth after cesarean section: a predictor of reduced risk for uterine rupture in subsequent deliveries. Isr Med Assoc J IMAJ 2(7):526\u2013528","journal-title":"Isr Med Assoc J IMAJ"},{"issue":"2 Pt 1","key":"6368_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"262","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000254169.49346.e9","volume":"109","author":"WA Grobman","year":"2007","unstructured":"Grobman WA, Gilbert S, Landon JR et al (2007) Outcomes of induction of labor after one prior cesarean. Obstet Gynecol 109(2 Pt 1):262\u2013269. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.AOG.0000254169.49346.e9","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"6368_CR19","unstructured":"Israeli Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS) https:\/\/www.cbs.gov.il\/en\/settlements\/Pages\/default.aspx. 10 Sept 2021"},{"issue":"2","key":"6368_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1111\/birt.12319","volume":"45","author":"C O'Donovan","year":"2018","unstructured":"O\u2019Donovan C, O\u2019Donovan J (2018) Why do women request an elective cesarean delivery for non-medical reasons? A systematic review of the qualitative literature. Birth (Berkeley, California) 45(2):109\u2013119. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/birt.12319","journal-title":"Birth (Berkeley, California)"},{"issue":"1","key":"6368_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e008881","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2015-008881","volume":"6","author":"M Black","year":"2016","unstructured":"Black M, Entwistle VA, Bhattacharya S, Gillies K (2016) Vaginal birth after caesarean section: why is uptake so low? Insights from a meta-ethnographic synthesis of women\u2019s accounts of their birth choices. BMJ Open 6(1):e008881. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2015-008881","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"6368_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"CD004224","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD004224.pub2","volume":"4","author":"JM Dodd","year":"2004","unstructured":"Dodd JM, Crowther CA, Huertas E, Guise JM, Horey D (2004) Planned elective repeat caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for women with a previous caesarean birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD004224. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD004224.pub2","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"25","key":"6368_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2581","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa040405","volume":"351","author":"MB Landon","year":"2004","unstructured":"Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno K, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network et al (2004) Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 351(25):2581\u20132589. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1056\/NEJMoa040405","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"3 Pt 2","key":"6368_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1016","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.05.066","volume":"193","author":"MB Landon","year":"2005","unstructured":"Landon MB, Leindecker S, Spong MW, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network et al (2005) The MFMU Cesarean Registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193(3 Pt 2):1016\u20131023. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.05.066","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"8","key":"6368_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"593","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0031-1275386","volume":"28","author":"JG Ouzounian","year":"2011","unstructured":"Ouzounian JG, Miller DA, Hiebert CJ, Battista LR, Lee RH (2011) Vaginal birth after cesarean section: risk of uterine rupture with labor induction. Am J Perinatol 28(8):593\u2013596. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/s-0031-1275386","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"issue":"2","key":"6368_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000134784.09455.21","volume":"104","author":"I Hendler","year":"2004","unstructured":"Hendler I, Bujold E (2004) Effect of prior vaginal delivery or prior vaginal birth after cesarean delivery on obstetric outcomes in women undergoing trial of labor. Obstet Gynecol 104(2):273\u2013277. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.AOG.0000134784.09455.21","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"6368_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.009","volume":"256","author":"O Atia","year":"2021","unstructured":"Atia O, Rotem R, Reichman O, Jaffe A, Grisaru-Granovsky S, Sela HY, Rottenstreich M (2021) Number of prior vaginal deliveries and trial of labor after cesarean success. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 256:189\u2013193. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.009","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"1","key":"6368_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"360","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-019-2517-y","volume":"19","author":"Y Wu","year":"2019","unstructured":"Wu Y, Kataria Y, Wang Z, Ming WK, Ellervik C (2019) Factors associated with successful vaginal birth after a cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 19(1):360. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12884-019-2517-y","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"3","key":"6368_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"202","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050410001668329","volume":"15","author":"A Hammoud","year":"2004","unstructured":"Hammoud A, Hendler I, Gauthier RJ, Berman S, Sansregret A, Bujold E (2004) The effect of gestational age on trial of labor after cesarean section. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 15(3):202\u2013206. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/14767050410001668329","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"6368_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"264","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610701195041","volume":"27","author":"A Omole-Ohonsi","year":"2007","unstructured":"Omole-Ohonsi A, Muhammad Z, Iliyasu Z (2007) Value of partogram in vaginal birth after caesarean section. J Obstet Gynaecol 27(3):264\u2013266. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/01443610701195041","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"6368_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"210.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.06.028","volume":"207","author":"LM Harper","year":"2012","unstructured":"Harper LM, Cahill AG, Roehl KA, Odibo AO, Stamilio DM, Macones GA (2012) The pattern of labor preceding uterine rupture. Am J Obstet Gynecol 207(3):210.e1-210.e2106. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.06.028","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-021-06368-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-021-06368-1\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-021-06368-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,3]],"date-time":"2022-06-03T00:17:09Z","timestamp":1654215429000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-021-06368-1"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,30]]},"references-count":31,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,6]]}},"alternative-id":["6368"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-021-06368-1","relation":{"has-preprint":[{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.21203\/rs.3.rs-928177\/v1","asserted-by":"object"}]},"ISSN":["1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1432-0711","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,30]]},"assertion":[{"value":"23 September 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"13 December 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"30 January 2022","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors report no conflict of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}