{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,21]],"date-time":"2026-10-21T13:14:49Z","timestamp":1792588489798,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":36,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,30]],"date-time":"2022-01-30T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1643500800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,30]],"date-time":"2022-01-30T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1643500800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of three endometrial preparation methods prior to frozen embryo transfer (FET): Natural cycle (NC), modified natural cycle (mNC), and programmed\/artificial cycle (AC) protocols. Primary outcomes investigated were clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and live birth rate (LBR).<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>A retrospective study on 2080 FET cycles including patients \u2264 35\u00a0years with a BMI\u2009\u2264\u200930 who underwent FET with a single autologous blastocyst stage embryo at Aarhus University Hospital or Horsens Regional Hospital in the period 2013\u20132019. Only blastocysts frozen by vitrification were included. No luteal phase support (LPS) was used in natural cycles.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>In NC, mNC and AC, CPRs were 34.9%, 40.6% and 32.0%, while LBRs were 32.3%, 36.3% and 26.6%, respectively. There were no significant differences in main outcomes when comparing AC with NC [LBR: OR\u2009=\u20090.9 (0.6; 1.2), <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.4]. Compared to NC, mNC-FET displayed significantly higher positive hCG, implantation rate, CPR and LBR [LBR: OR\u2009=\u20091.4 (1.0; 1.9), <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.03]. An analysis with mNC as reference group demonstrated significantly better outcomes in the mNC group compared to AC [LBR: OR 0.6 (0.5; 0.8), <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u2009\u2009&lt;\u20090.01].<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>The present study overall demonstrated better outcomes including LBR with mNC protocol as compared to NC and AC protocol, while comparison of AC and NC showed both protocols to be equally effective. A programmed cycle may be necessary for women with anovulatory cycles; however, normo-ovulating women may be offered a natural cycle protocol.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Trial registration number<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>3-3013-3047\/1 and 31-1522-44. Date of registration: June 24, 2019 and April 23, 2020.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-021-06371-6","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,30]],"date-time":"2022-01-30T00:03:06Z","timestamp":1643500986000},"page":"1381-1388","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":28,"title":["Endometrial preparation methods prior to frozen embryo transfer: A retrospective cohort study comparing true natural cycle, modified natural cycle and artificial cycle"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"306","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4705-8061","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Lena","family":"Mensing","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Emilie S.","family":"Dahlberg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Bj\u00f8rn","family":"Bay","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anette","family":"Gabrielsen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ulla B.","family":"Knudsen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,30]]},"reference":[{"issue":"5936","key":"6371_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"707","DOI":"10.1038\/305707a0","volume":"305","author":"A Trounson","year":"1983","unstructured":"Trounson A, Mohr L (1983) Human pregnancy following cryopreservation, thawing and transfer of an eight-cell embryo. Nature 305(5936):707\u2013709","journal-title":"Nature"},{"issue":"6","key":"6371_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"808","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmu027","volume":"20","author":"J Evans","year":"2014","unstructured":"Evans J et al (2014) Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer: backing clinical decisions with scientific and clinical evidence. Hum Reprod Update 20(6):808\u2013821","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"issue":"5","key":"6371_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"458","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmt030","volume":"19","author":"ER Groenewoud","year":"2013","unstructured":"Groenewoud ER et al (2013) What is the optimal means of preparing the endometrium in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 19(5):458\u2013470","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"issue":"8","key":"6371_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1567","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dez079","volume":"34","author":"K Saito","year":"2019","unstructured":"Saito K et al (2019) Endometrial preparation methods for frozen-thawed embryo transfer are associated with altered risks of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, placenta accreta, and gestational diabetes mellitus. Hum Reprod 34(8):1567\u20131575","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"6371_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"104","DOI":"10.3389\/fmed.2020.00104","volume":"7","author":"Z Wang","year":"2020","unstructured":"Wang Z et al (2020) Increased risk of pre-eclampsia after frozen-thawed embryo transfer in programming cycles. Front Med 7:104\u2013104","journal-title":"Front Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"6371_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"640","DOI":"10.1161\/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.12043","volume":"73","author":"F von Versen-H\u00f6ynck","year":"2019","unstructured":"von Versen-H\u00f6ynck F et al (2019) Increased preeclampsia risk and reduced aortic compliance with in vitro fertilization cycles in the absence of a corpus luteum. Hypertension 73(3):640\u2013649","journal-title":"Hypertension"},{"issue":"10","key":"6371_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1325","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-017-0983-6","volume":"34","author":"AP Melnick","year":"2017","unstructured":"Melnick AP et al (2017) Replacing single frozen-thawed euploid embryos in a natural cycle in ovulatory women may increase live birth rates compared to medicated cycles in anovulatory women. J Assist Reprod Genet 34(10):1325\u20131331","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"issue":"5","key":"6371_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"925","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-019-01420-1","volume":"36","author":"S Jing","year":"2019","unstructured":"Jing S et al (2019) Increased pregnancy complications following frozen-thawed embryo transfer during an artificial cycle. J Assist Reprod Genet 36(5):925\u2013933","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"issue":"5","key":"6371_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"335","DOI":"10.1080\/19396368.2016.1199064","volume":"62","author":"Y Guan","year":"2016","unstructured":"Guan Y et al (2016) A modified natural cycle results in higher live birth rate in vitrified-thawed embryo transfer for women with regular menstruation. Syst Biol Reprod Med 62(5):335\u2013342","journal-title":"Syst Biol Reprod Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"6371_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"811","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2019.11.023","volume":"113","author":"X Liu","year":"2020","unstructured":"Liu X, Shi W, Shi J (2020) Natural cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfer in young women with regular menstrual cycles increases the live-birth rates compared with hormone replacement treatment: a retrospective cohort study. Fertil Steril 113(4):811\u2013817","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"7","key":"6371_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1483","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dew120","volume":"31","author":"ER Groenewoud","year":"2016","unstructured":"Groenewoud ER et al (2016) A randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial of modified natural versus artificial cycle for cryo-thawed embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 31(7):1483\u20131492","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"7","key":"6371_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1057","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-015-0499-x","volume":"32","author":"RB Lathi","year":"2015","unstructured":"Lathi RB et al (2015) Frozen blastocyst embryo transfer using a supplemented natural cycle protocol has a similar live birth rate compared to a programmed cycle protocol. J Assist Reprod Genet 32(7):1057\u20131062","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"issue":"4","key":"6371_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"680","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2018.05.013","volume":"110","author":"S Alur-Gupta","year":"2018","unstructured":"Alur-Gupta S et al (2018) Impact of method of endometrial preparation for frozen blastocyst transfer on pregnancy outcome: a retrospective cohort study. Fertil Steril 110(4):680\u2013686","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"3","key":"6371_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"603","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2005.09.015","volume":"85","author":"TA Gelbaya","year":"2006","unstructured":"Gelbaya TA et al (2006) Cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfer in natural or down-regulated hormonally controlled cycles: a retrospective study. Fertil Steril 85(3):603\u2013609","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"5","key":"6371_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"403","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-012-9724-z","volume":"29","author":"K Hancke","year":"2012","unstructured":"Hancke K et al (2012) Patients undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer have similar live birth rates in spontaneous and artificial cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet 29(5):403\u2013407","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"issue":"3","key":"6371_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"380","DOI":"10.1016\/S1472-6483(10)60172-1","volume":"19","author":"CR Givens","year":"2009","unstructured":"Givens CR et al (2009) Outcomes of natural cycles versus programmed cycles for 1677 frozen-thawed embryo transfers. Reprod Biomed Online 19(3):380\u2013384","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"issue":"4","key":"6371_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"915","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.07.1131","volume":"104","author":"G Mounce","year":"2015","unstructured":"Mounce G et al (2015) Randomized, controlled pilot trial of natural versus hormone replacement therapy cycles in frozen embryo replacement in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 104(4):915-920.e1","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"1","key":"6371_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.4274\/tjod.47855","volume":"15","author":"M Agha-Hosseini","year":"2018","unstructured":"Agha-Hosseini M et al (2018) Natural cycle versus artificial cycle in frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a randomized prospective trial. Turk J Obstet Gynecol 15(1):12\u201317","journal-title":"Turk J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"6371_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S146","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.07.1546","volume":"100","author":"T Child","year":"2013","unstructured":"Child T et al (2013) A randomized controlled trial of natural versus GnRH-agonist\/HRT regimes for frozen embryo replacement. Fertil Steril 100(3):S146","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"5","key":"6371_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1165","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.07.1058","volume":"98","author":"C Tom\u00e1s","year":"2012","unstructured":"Tom\u00e1s C et al (2012) Pregnancy loss after frozen-embryo transfer\u2013a comparison of three protocols. Fertil Steril 98(5):1165\u20131169","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"1","key":"6371_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1447-0578.2007.00165.x","volume":"6","author":"T Kawamura","year":"2007","unstructured":"Kawamura T et al (2007) Clinical outcomes of two different endometrial preparation methods for cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfer in patients with a normal menstrual cycle. Reprod Med Biol 6(1):53\u201357","journal-title":"Reprod Med Biol"},{"issue":"2","key":"6371_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"416","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2008.11.027","volume":"93","author":"MJ Hill","year":"2010","unstructured":"Hill MJ, Miller KA, Frattarelli JL (2010) A GnRH agonist and exogenous hormone stimulation protocol has a higher live-birth rate than a natural endogenous hormone protocol for frozen-thawed blastocyst-stage embryo transfer cycles: an analysis of 1391 cycles. Fertil Steril 93(2):416\u2013422","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"1","key":"6371_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"70","DOI":"10.3109\/09513590.2014.958988","volume":"31","author":"Y Zheng","year":"2015","unstructured":"Zheng Y et al (2015) The artificial cycle method improves the pregnancy outcome in frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study. Gynecol Endocrinol 31(1):70\u201374","journal-title":"Gynecol Endocrinol"},{"key":"6371_CR24","unstructured":"Gardner D, Schoolcraft W (1999) In vitro culture of human blastocysts. Towards reproductive certainty, Sydney, Australia, pp 378\u2013388"},{"issue":"4","key":"6371_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"783","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1447-0756.2010.01243.x","volume":"36","author":"YJ Kim","year":"2010","unstructured":"Kim YJ et al (2010) Does a vitrified blastocyst stage embryo transfer program need hormonal priming for endometrial preparation? J Obstet Gynaecol Res 36(4):783\u2013788","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"key":"6371_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.13213","author":"C Pakes","year":"2020","unstructured":"Pakes C et al (2020) Comparing pregnancy outcomes between natural cycles and artificial cycles following frozen-thaw embryo transfers. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/ajo.13213","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"6371_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"369","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-010-9530-4","volume":"28","author":"EM Chang","year":"2011","unstructured":"Chang EM et al (2011) Use of the natural cycle and vitrification thawed blastocyst transfer results in better in-vitro fertilization outcomes\u202f: cycle regimens of vitrification thawed blastocyst transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet 28(4):369\u2013374","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"issue":"7","key":"6371_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"873","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-016-0736-y","volume":"33","author":"E Greco","year":"2016","unstructured":"Greco E et al (2016) The endometrial preparation for frozen-thawed euploid blastocyst transfer: a prospective randomized trial comparing clinical results from natural modified cycle and exogenous hormone stimulation with GnRH agonist. J Assist Reprod Genet 33(7):873\u2013884","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"6371_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3389\/fendo.2021.688237","author":"S Mumusoglu","year":"2021","unstructured":"Mumusoglu S et al (2021) Preparation of the endometrium for frozen embryo transfer: a systematic review. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fendo.2021.688237","journal-title":"Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)"},{"issue":"5","key":"6371_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1073","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deaa026","volume":"35","author":"S Mackens","year":"2020","unstructured":"Mackens S et al (2020) To trigger or not to trigger ovulation in a natural cycle for frozen embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 35(5):1073\u20131081","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"10","key":"6371_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1287","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-016-0787-0","volume":"33","author":"H Yarali","year":"2016","unstructured":"Yarali H et al (2016) Preparation of endometrium for frozen embryo replacement cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet 33(10):1287\u20131304","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"issue":"6","key":"6371_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2054","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.11.036","volume":"94","author":"HM Fatemi","year":"2010","unstructured":"Fatemi HM et al (2010) Cryopreserved-thawed human embryo transfer: spontaneous natural cycle is superior to human chorionic gonadotropin\u2013induced natural cycle. Fertil Steril 94(6):2054\u20132058","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"11","key":"6371_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2552","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dev224","volume":"30","author":"K Peeraer","year":"2015","unstructured":"Peeraer K et al (2015) Frozen-thawed embryo transfer in a natural or mildly hormonally stimulated cycle in women with regular ovulatory cycles: a RCT. Hum Reprod 30(11):2552\u20132562","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"3","key":"6371_CR34","first-page":"221","volume":"22","author":"O Sheikhi","year":"2018","unstructured":"Sheikhi O et al (2018) Reproductive outcomes of vitrified blastocyst transfer in modified natural cycle versus mild hormonally stimulated and artificial protocols: a randomized control trial. JBRA Assist Reprod 22(3):221\u2013227","journal-title":"JBRA Assist Reprod"},{"issue":"4","key":"6371_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"294","DOI":"10.1080\/09513590.2020.1867976","volume":"37","author":"MF Zeng","year":"2021","unstructured":"Zeng MF, Zhou X, Duan JL (2021) Stimulated cycle versus artificial cycle for frozen embryo transfer in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: a meta-analysis. Gynecol Endocrinol 37(4):294\u2013299","journal-title":"Gynecol Endocrinol"},{"issue":"2","key":"6371_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"371","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2019.04.014","volume":"112","author":"J Zhang","year":"2019","unstructured":"Zhang J et al (2019) Letrozole use during frozen embryo transfer cycles in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 112(2):371\u2013377","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-021-06371-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-021-06371-6\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-021-06371-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,13]],"date-time":"2022-09-13T09:08:06Z","timestamp":1663060086000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-021-06371-6"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,30]]},"references-count":36,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,10]]}},"alternative-id":["6371"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-021-06371-6","relation":{},"ISSN":["1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1432-0711","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,30]]},"assertion":[{"value":"18 May 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"15 December 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"30 January 2022","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors have no financial or non-financial interests to disclose.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"Approval from the Danish Patient Safety Authority was granted in view of the retrospective nature of the study and all the procedures being performed were part of routine care.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}}]}}