{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,15]],"date-time":"2026-01-15T06:39:38Z","timestamp":1768459178086,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":32,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,9]],"date-time":"2022-01-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1641686400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,9]],"date-time":"2022-01-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1641686400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"funder":[{"name":"department of obstetrics and gynecology, university of malaya","award":["UMSCOG\/RF00142018\/01"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["UMSCOG\/RF00142018\/01"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-021-06383-2","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,9]],"date-time":"2022-01-09T06:02:37Z","timestamp":1641708157000},"page":"1027-1036","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Foley catheter and controlled release dinoprostone versus foley catheter labor induction in nulliparas: a randomized trial"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"306","author":[{"given":"Narayanan","family":"Vallikkannu","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Naumi","family":"Laboh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Peng Chiong","family":"Tan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jesrine Gek Shan","family":"Hong","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mukhri","family":"Hamdan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3878-9997","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Boon Kiong","family":"Lim","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,9]]},"reference":[{"key":"6383_CR1","unstructured":"NHS D (2017) NHS Maternity Statistics, England 2016\u20132017. NHS Digital 2017"},{"issue":"6","key":"6383_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"513","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1800566","volume":"379","author":"WA Grobman","year":"2018","unstructured":"Grobman WA et al (2018) Labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women. N Engl J Med 379(6):513\u2013523","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"6383_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"267","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-199506000-00009","volume":"38","author":"PC Leppert","year":"1995","unstructured":"Leppert PC (1995) Anatomy and physiology of cervical ripening. Clin Obstet Gynecol 38(2):267\u2013279","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"6383_CR4","unstructured":"Evbuomwan O, Chowdhury YS (2021) Physiology, cervical dilation, in StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL)"},{"key":"6383_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"de Vaan MD et al (2019) Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10:CD001233","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD001233.pub3"},{"issue":"6","key":"6383_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"441","DOI":"10.1097\/GCO.0000000000000027","volume":"25","author":"CE Lim","year":"2013","unstructured":"Lim CE, Ng RW, Xu K (2013) Non-hormonal methods for induction of labour. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 25(6):441\u2013447","journal-title":"Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"6383_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"346","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13456","volume":"123","author":"W Chen","year":"2016","unstructured":"Chen W et al (2016) A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the use of Foley catheters, misoprostol, and dinoprostone for cervical ripening in the induction of labour. BJOG 123(3):346\u2013354","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"6383_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Laughon SK et al (2012) Induction of labor in a contemporary obstetric cohort. Am J Obstet Gynecol 206(6):486 e1\u20139","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.03.014"},{"key":"6383_CR9","unstructured":"WHO (2011) in WHO Recommendations for Induction of Labour. Geneva"},{"issue":"5","key":"6383_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"796","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14147","volume":"124","author":"O Rugarn","year":"2017","unstructured":"Rugarn O et al (2017) Induction of labour with retrievable prostaglandin vaginal inserts: outcomes following retrieval due to an intrapartum adverse event. BJOG 124(5):796\u2013803","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"2","key":"6383_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"225","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.13109","volume":"149","author":"R Wickramasinghe","year":"2020","unstructured":"Wickramasinghe R, Senanayake H, De Silva C (2020) Intrauterine Foley catheter for 48 versus 24 hours for cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 149(2):225\u2013230","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"6383_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gu N et al (2015) Foley catheter for induction of labor at term: an open-label, randomized controlled trial. PLoS One 10(8):e0136856","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0136856"},{"issue":"6","key":"6383_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"479","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0030-1271208","volume":"28","author":"MC Brennan","year":"2011","unstructured":"Brennan MC et al (2011) Retention of dinoprostone vaginal insert beyond 12 hours for induction of labor. Am J Perinatol 28(6):479\u2013484","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"6383_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Win S. et al (2019) Vaginal assessment and expedited amniotomy in oral misoprostol labor induction in nulliparas: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 220(4):387 e1\u2013387 e12.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.01.004"},{"issue":"1","key":"6383_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"330","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-020-03029-0","volume":"20","author":"HM Chia","year":"2020","unstructured":"Chia HM et al (2020) Speculum versus digital insertion of Foley catheter for induction of labor in Nulliparas with unripe cervix: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 20(1):330","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"6383_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dupont WD, Plummer WD, Jr. (1990) Power and sample size calculations. A review and computer program. Control Clin Trials 11(2):116\u2013128","DOI":"10.1016\/0197-2456(90)90005-M"},{"issue":"4","key":"6383_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"725","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-016-4026-9","volume":"294","author":"Y Mizrachi","year":"2016","unstructured":"Mizrachi Y et al (2016) Induction of labor in nulliparous women with unfavorable cervix: a comparison of Foley catheter and vaginal prostaglandin E2. Arch Gynecol Obstet 294(4):725\u2013730","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"4","key":"6383_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e52","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001108","volume":"126","author":"Committee Opinion No","year":"2015","unstructured":"Committee Opinion No (2015) 644: The Apgar Score. Obstet Gynecol 126(4):e52\u2013e55","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"7","key":"6383_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"824","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2007.01384.x","volume":"114","author":"PC Tan","year":"2007","unstructured":"Tan PC et al (2007) Concurrent oxytocin with dinoprostone pessary versus dinoprostone pessary in labour induction of nulliparas with an unfavourable cervix: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. BJOG 114(7):824\u2013832","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"9","key":"6383_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1086","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.15047","volume":"125","author":"M Diederen","year":"2018","unstructured":"Diederen M et al (2018) Safety of the balloon catheter for cervical ripening in outpatient care: complications during the period from insertion to expulsion of a balloon catheter in the process of labour induction: a systematic review. BJOG 125(9):1086\u20131095","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"2","key":"6383_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1016\/0028-2243(95)80009-H","volume":"58","author":"AA Orhue","year":"1995","unstructured":"Orhue AA (1995) Induction of labour at term in primigravidae with low Bishop\u2019s score: a comparison of three methods. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 58(2):119\u2013125","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"6383_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Orr L et al (2020) Combination of Foley and prostaglandins versus Foley and oxytocin for cervical ripening: a network meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 223(5):743 e1\u2013743 e17","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.05.007"},{"issue":"6","key":"6383_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1124","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.123821","volume":"186","author":"PS Barrilleaux","year":"2002","unstructured":"Barrilleaux PS et al (2002) Cervical ripening and induction of labor with misoprostol, dinoprostone gel, and a Foley catheter: a randomized trial of 3 techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol 186(6):1124\u20131129","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"6383_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"461","DOI":"10.1080\/01443615.2018.1534090","volume":"39","author":"A Chowdhary","year":"2019","unstructured":"Chowdhary A et al (2019) Comparison of intracervical Foley catheter used alone or combined with a single dose of dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening: a randomised study. J Obstet Gynaecol 39(4):461\u2013467","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"6383_CR25","first-page":"11","volume":"46","author":"M Greybush","year":"2001","unstructured":"Greybush M et al (2001) Preinduction cervical ripening techniques compared. J Reprod Med 46(1):11\u201317","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"6383_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zhu L et al (2018) Intracervical Foley catheter balloon versus dinoprostone insert for induction cervical ripening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore) 97(48):e13251","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000013251"},{"issue":"3","key":"6383_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.5582\/ddt.2015.01033","volume":"9","author":"X Zeng","year":"2015","unstructured":"Zeng X et al (2015) Efficiency of dinoprostone insert for cervical ripening and induction of labor in women of full-term pregnancy compared with dinoprostone gel: a meta-analysis. Drug Discov Ther 9(3):165\u2013172","journal-title":"Drug Discov Ther"},{"issue":"3","key":"6383_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2015.01.005","volume":"129","author":"W Chen","year":"2015","unstructured":"Chen W et al (2015) Meta-analysis of Foley catheter plus misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for cervical ripening. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 129(3):193\u2013198","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"1","key":"6383_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002403","volume":"131","author":"Z Al-Ibraheemi","year":"2018","unstructured":"Al-Ibraheemi Z et al (2018) Misoprostol with foley bulb compared with misoprostol alone for cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 131(1):23\u201329","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"6383_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1357","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001778","volume":"128","author":"LD Levine","year":"2016","unstructured":"Levine LD et al (2016) Mechanical and pharmacologic methods of labor induction: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 128(6):1357\u20131364","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"6383_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"578","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.12489","volume":"56","author":"OP Aduloju","year":"2016","unstructured":"Aduloju OP et al (2016) Combined Foley\u2019s catheter with vaginal misoprostol for pre-induction cervical ripening: a randomised controlled trial. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 56(6):578\u2013584","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"6383_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Edwards RK et al (2021) Controlled release dinoprostone insert and foley compared to foley alone: a randomized pilot trial. Am J Perinatol 38(S 01):e57\u2013e63","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0040-1705113"}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-021-06383-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-021-06383-2\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-021-06383-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,13]],"date-time":"2022-09-13T09:08:55Z","timestamp":1663060135000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-021-06383-2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,9]]},"references-count":32,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,10]]}},"alternative-id":["6383"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-021-06383-2","relation":{},"ISSN":["1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1432-0711","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"12 June 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"27 December 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"9 January 2022","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"All authors have no conflict of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this manuscript.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interests"}},{"value":"This randomized controlled trial was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of University Malaya Medical Centre (date of approval November 15, 2018; reference number 201882\u20136564) and registered in ISRCTN registry on December 3, 2018 (registration number ISRCTN2282883 (). The trial was conducted in University Malaya Medical Centre with the first participant recruited on December 12, 2018 and the last on May 8, 2019. This trial was registered in the Malaysian National Medical Research Register NMRR: 18\u20133139-44981.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval"}},{"value":"Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to participate"}}]}}