{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,7]],"date-time":"2026-10-07T01:02:32Z","timestamp":1791334952822,"version":"4.3.1"},"reference-count":28,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,11]],"date-time":"2022-01-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1641859200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,11]],"date-time":"2022-01-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1641859200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100008977","name":"Universit\u00e4t Ulm","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100008977","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title><jats:p>A short fetal femur in prenatal diagnosis might be an indicator for intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR), a genetically determined small child (SGA) with or without associated fetal malformations and\/or an adverse fetal outcome.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>1373 singleton pregnancies with a femoral length\u2009&lt;\u20095th percentile detected between 1999 and 2015 during second-trimester screening in a tertiary prenatal diagnostic center were subjected to a descriptive retrospective analysis with regard to fetal characteristics as well as pregnancy outcome.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>685 (49.9%) fetuses presented an isolated short femur, while 688 (50.1%) showed additional abnormalities. 293 (42.6%) of those were SGA babies without any malformation, while 395 (57.4%) had one or more severe anomaly of the following organ systems: 157 (11.5%) cardiovascular, 101 (7.4%) musculoskeletal, 82 (6.0%) urogenital, 72 (5.2%) cerebrocephalic, 50 (3.6%) gastrointestinal, and 5 (0.4%) thoracic. 75 (5.5%) of the fetuses showed chromosomal aberrations of which Trisomy 13, 18 and 21 were found in 2, 13 and 27 of the cases, respectively. Fetuses with associated malformations had a significantly lower live birth rate than those without (64.2% vs. 98.1%,<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.001); in addition, a higher rate of preterm births 36.6% vs. 11.3%,<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.001) and SGA babies (51.4% vs. 30.4%,<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.001) were observed in the first collective.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>Diagnosis of a short fetal femur should lead to an extended organ screening; in the case of associated abnormalities, additional genetic testing has to be offered, as well as intensified pregnancy monitoring in pregnancies at risk for IUGR and\/or preterm birth.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-021-06394-z","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,11]],"date-time":"2022-01-11T15:02:40Z","timestamp":1641913360000},"page":"1037-1044","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["The femur too short? 1373 fetuses with short femur during second-trimester screening"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"306","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1882-9741","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ulrike","family":"Friebe-Hoffmann","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Larissa","family":"Dobravsky","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Thomas W. P.","family":"Friedl","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Wolfgang","family":"Janni","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alexander J.","family":"Knippel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hans J.","family":"Siegmann","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Peter","family":"Kozlowski","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,11]]},"reference":[{"issue":"3","key":"6394_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(85)90298-4","volume":"151","author":"FP Hadlock","year":"1985","unstructured":"Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Sharman RS, Deter RL, Park SK (1985) Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements\u2014a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 151(3):333\u2013337","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"6394_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1994.04010034.x","volume":"4","author":"RJ Snijders","year":"1994","unstructured":"Snijders RJ, Nicolaides KH (1994) Fetal biometry at 14\u201340 weeks\u2019 gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 4(1):34\u201348","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"6394_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(82)90390-8","volume":"144","author":"GD O'Brien","year":"1982","unstructured":"O\u2019Brien GD, Queenan JT (1982) Ultrasound fetal femur length in relation to intrauterine growth retardation. Part II Am J Obstet Gynecol 144(1):35\u201339","journal-title":"Part II Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"6394_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"507","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.5265","volume":"31","author":"AT Papageorghiou","year":"2008","unstructured":"Papageorghiou AT, Fratelli N, Leslie K, Bhide A, Thilaganathan B (2008) Outcome of fetuses with antenatally diagnosed short femur. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 31(5):507\u2013511","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"6394_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1471-0528.2003.00015.x","volume":"111","author":"T Todros","year":"2004","unstructured":"Todros T, Massarenti I, Gaglioti P, Biolcati M, Botta G, De Felice C (2004) Fetal short femur length in the second trimester and the outcome of pregnancy. BJOG 111(1):83\u201385","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"2","key":"6394_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"377","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.173.2.2529580","volume":"173","author":"BR Benacerraf","year":"1989","unstructured":"Benacerraf BR, Cnann A, Gelman R, Laboda LA, Frigoletto JRFD (1989) Can sonographers reliably identify anatomic features associated with Down syndrome in fetuses? Radiology 173(2):377\u2013380","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"6394_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bromley B, Lieberman E, Shipp TD, Benacerraf BR (2002) The genetic sonogram: a method of risk assessment for Down syndrome in the second trimester. J Ultrasound Med 21(10):1087\u201396 (quiz 1097\u20138)","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2002.21.10.1087"},{"issue":"4","key":"6394_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"803","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(87)80059-5","volume":"157","author":"C Lockwood","year":"1987","unstructured":"Lockwood C, Benacerraf B, Krinsky A, Blakemore K, Belanger K, Mahoney M, Hobbins J (1987) A sonographic screening method for Down syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 157(4):803\u2013808","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"6394_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"534","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(93)90487-4","volume":"168","author":"DA Nyberg","year":"1993","unstructured":"Nyberg DA, Resta RG, Luthy DA, Hickok DE, Williams MA (1993) Humerus and femur length shortening in the detection of Down\u2019s syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 168(2):534\u2013538","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"10","key":"6394_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1053","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2001.20.10.1053","volume":"20","author":"DA Nyberg","year":"2001","unstructured":"Nyberg DA, Souter VL, El-Bastawissi A, Young S, Luthhardt F, Luthy DA (2001) Isolated sonographic markers for detection of fetal Down syndrome in the second trimester of pregnancy. J Ultrasound Med 20(10):1053\u20131063","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"6394_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"142","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2000.00198.x","volume":"16","author":"RJ Snijders","year":"2000","unstructured":"Snijders RJ, Platt LD, Greene N, Carlson D, Krakow D, Gregory K, Bradley K (2000) Femur length and trisomy 21: impact of gestational age on screening efficiency. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 16(2):142\u2013145","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"6394_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"197","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.177.1.2399317","volume":"177","author":"AB Kurtz","year":"1990","unstructured":"Kurtz AB, Needleman L, Wapner RJ, Hilpert P, Kuhlman K, Burns PN, Feld RI, Mitchell DG, Segal S, Blum L (1990) Usefulness of a short femur in the in utero detection of skeletal dysplasias. Radiology 177(1):197\u2013200","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"2","key":"6394_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2001.20.2.141","volume":"20","author":"TD Shipp","year":"2001","unstructured":"Shipp TD, Bromley B, Mascola M, Benacerraf B (2001) Variation in fetal femur length with respect to maternal race. J Ultrasound Med 20(2):141\u2013144","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"6394_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kovac CM, Brown JA, Apodaca CC, Napolitano PG, Pierce B, Patience T, Hume JR RF, Calhoun BC (2002) Maternal ethnicity and variation of fetal femur length calculations when screening for Down syndrome. J Ultrasound Med 21(7):719\u201322 (quiz 724\u20135)","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2002.21.7.719"},{"issue":"4","key":"6394_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"388","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.5225","volume":"31","author":"BO Verburg","year":"2008","unstructured":"Verburg BO, Steegers EAP, De Ridder M, Snijders RJM, Smith E, Hofman A, Moll HA, Jaddoe VWV, Witteman JCM (2008) New charts for ultrasound dating of pregnancy and assessment of fetal growth: longitudinal data from a population-based cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 31(4):388\u2013396","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"6394_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1159\/000375446","volume":"38","author":"A Aviram","year":"2015","unstructured":"Aviram A, Bardin R, Wiznitzer A, Yogev Y, Hadar E (2015) Midtrimester isolated short femur length as a predictor of adverse pregnancy outcome. Fetal Diagn Ther 38(3):205\u2013211","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"issue":"2","key":"6394_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"160","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.13286","volume":"44","author":"JM Mathiesen","year":"2014","unstructured":"Mathiesen JM, Aksglaede L, Skibsted L, Petersen OB, Tabor A (2014) Outcome of fetuses with short femur length detected at second-trimester anomaly scan: a national survey. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 44(2):160\u2013165","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"6394_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"727","DOI":"10.1080\/01443615.2018.1444408","volume":"38","author":"M Smith","year":"2018","unstructured":"Smith M, Nicoll A (2018) Perinatal outcomes following mid trimester detection of isolated short foetal femur length. J Obstet Gynecol 38(5):727","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"6394_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"365","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.4068","volume":"33","author":"N Vermeer","year":"2013","unstructured":"Vermeer N, Bekker MN (2013) Association of isolated short fetal femur with intrauterine growth restriction. Prenat Diagn 33(4):365\u2013370","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"issue":"11","key":"6394_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e978","DOI":"10.1002\/mgg3.978","volume":"7","author":"J Liu","year":"2019","unstructured":"Liu J, Huang L, He Z, Lin S, Wang Y, Luo Y (2019) Clinical value of genetic analysis in prenatal diagnosis of short femur. Mol Genet Genomic Med 7(11):e978","journal-title":"Mol Genet Genomic Med"},{"issue":"6","key":"6394_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"449","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.1970130605","volume":"13","author":"B Bromley","year":"1993","unstructured":"Bromley B, Brown DL, Benacerraf BR (1993) Short femur length associated with severe intrauterine growth retardation. Prenat Diagn 13(6):449\u2013452","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"issue":"2","key":"6394_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"130","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.4020","volume":"33","author":"AA de Carvalho","year":"2013","unstructured":"de Carvalho AA, Carvalho JA, Figueiredo JRI, Velarde LGC, Marchiori E (2013) Association of midtrimester short femur and short humerus with fetal growth restriction. Prenat Diagn 33(2):130\u2013133","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"issue":"5","key":"6394_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"512","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.5349","volume":"31","author":"B Weisz","year":"2008","unstructured":"Weisz B, David AL, Chitty L, Peebles D, Pandya P, Patel P, Rodeck CH (2008) Association of isolated short femur in the mid-trimester fetus with perinatal outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 31(5):512\u2013516","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"6394_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1002\/jcu.20889","volume":"40","author":"W Ventura","year":"2012","unstructured":"Ventura W, Huaman J, Nazario CE, Ingar J, Huertas E, Antonio LO (2012) Perinatal outcomes after sonographic detection of isolated short femur in the second trimester. J Clin Ultrasound 40(2):63\u201367","journal-title":"J Clin Ultrasound"},{"issue":"12","key":"6394_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1935","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2012.31.12.1935","volume":"31","author":"KR Goetzinger","year":"2012","unstructured":"Goetzinger KR, Cahill AG, Macones GA (2012) Odibo AO Isolated short femur length on second-trimester sonography: a marker for fetal growth restriction and other adverse perinatal outcomes. J Ultrasound Med 31(12):1935\u20131941","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"issue":"6","key":"6394_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0128820","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0128820","volume":"10","author":"M Mailath-Pokorny","year":"2015","unstructured":"Mailath-Pokorny M, Polterauer S, Worda K, Springer S, Bettelheim D (2015) Isolated short fetal femur length in the second trimester and the association with adverse perinatal outcome: experiences from a tertiary referral center. PLoS ONE 10(6):e0128820","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"issue":"1","key":"6394_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13470","volume":"98","author":"V D'Ambrosio","year":"2019","unstructured":"D\u2019Ambrosio V, Vena F, Marchetti C, Di Mascio D, Perrone S, Boccherini C, Pizzuti A, Benedetti Panici P, Giancotti A (2019) Midtrimester isolated short femur and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 98(1):11\u201317","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"11","key":"6394_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1063","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.4197","volume":"33","author":"T \u00d6zl\u00fc","year":"2013","unstructured":"\u00d6zl\u00fc T, Ozcan T (2013) Fetal isolated short femur in the second trimester and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Prenat Diagn 33(11):1063\u20131069","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-021-06394-z.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-021-06394-z\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-021-06394-z.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,15]],"date-time":"2023-11-15T17:42:59Z","timestamp":1700070179000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-021-06394-z"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,11]]},"references-count":28,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,10]]}},"alternative-id":["6394"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-021-06394-z","relation":{},"ISSN":["1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1432-0711","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,11]]},"assertion":[{"value":"12 September 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"30 December 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"11 January 2022","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"There are no conflicts of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}