{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,2]],"date-time":"2026-11-02T07:52:43Z","timestamp":1793605963254,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":37,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,15]],"date-time":"2022-04-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1649980800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,15]],"date-time":"2022-04-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1649980800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"academic and technical leader\u2019s foundation of sichuan province","award":["No.2017-919-25"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["No.2017-919-25"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To investigate the perinatal outcomes of singleton pregnant women with M\u00fcllerian anomalies (MuAs).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A retrospective cohort study was conducted on singleton pregnant women with MuAs who delivered at the West China Second University Hospital between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2020.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Four hundred fifty-seven cases of MuAs were identified, with an incidence of 0.40%. The most common anomaly was a septate uterus (38.7%). Compared to the control group, the MuAs group had significantly higher incidences of perinatal complications, including preterm deliveries (PTDs) (27.4 vs. 9.8%,\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u20090.001), preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) (29.1 vs. 22.5%,\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.001), malpresentation (34.4 vs. 5.6%,\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u20090.001), abruptio placentae (4.6 vs. 1.2%,\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u20090.001), placental accreta\/increta (19.7 vs. 11.8%,\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u20090.001), and uterine rupture (2.8 vs. 1.6%,\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.035). The rates of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF\u2013ET), foetal growth restriction (FGR), and low birth weight were also significantly higher in the MuAs group (8.3 vs. 4.5%,\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u20090.001; 2.6 vs. 0.9%,\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.001; 3.1 vs. 1.7%,\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.033, respectively). In the MuAs group, the incidence of PPROM was high in cases with unicornuate uterus (31.5%), and malpresentation was as high as 42.4 and 37.0% in cases with septate and didelphys uteri, respectively.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The data suggest that pregnancy with MuAs may increase adverse perinatal outcomes, which calls for intensive supervision during pregnancy and delivery to reduce maternal and foetal complications. Individualized considerations should be emphasized according to the different categories of MuAs in pregnancies.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-022-06557-6","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,15]],"date-time":"2022-04-15T11:03:11Z","timestamp":1650020591000},"page":"1209-1216","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":29,"title":["Perinatal outcomes of women with M\u00fcllerian anomalies"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"307","author":[{"given":"Si","family":"Wang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kana","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Qing","family":"Hu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hua","family":"Liao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Xiaodong","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1656-4906","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Haiyan","family":"Yu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,15]]},"reference":[{"key":"6557_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1097\/grf.0000000000000258","volume":"60","author":"ME Christiansen","year":"2017","unstructured":"Christiansen ME, Detti L (2017) Clinically relevant female genital tract anomalies. Clin Obstet Gynecol 60:18\u201326. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/grf.0000000000000258","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"6557_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2020.01.003","volume":"59","author":"I Passos","year":"2020","unstructured":"Passos I, Britto RL (2020) Diagnosis and treatment of M\u00fcllerian malformations. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 59:183\u2013188. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.tjog.2020.01.003","journal-title":"Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"6557_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"74","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2018.12.003","volume":"43","author":"JM Turocy","year":"2019","unstructured":"Turocy JM, Rackow BW (2019) Uterine factor in recurrent pregnancy loss. Semin Perinatol 43:74\u201379. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1053\/j.semperi.2018.12.003","journal-title":"Semin Perinatol"},{"key":"6557_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2011.02.008","volume":"23","author":"GS Letterie","year":"2011","unstructured":"Letterie GS (2011) Management of congenital uterine abnormalities. Reprod Biomed Online 23:40\u201352. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.rbmo.2011.02.008","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"6557_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"110","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.18935","volume":"51","author":"M Prior","year":"2018","unstructured":"Prior M, Richardson A, Asif S, Polanski L, Parris-Larkin M, Chandler J, Fogg L, Jassal P, Thornton JG, Raine-Fenning NJ (2018) Outcome of assisted reproduction in women with congenital uterine anomalies: a prospective observational study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 51:110\u2013117. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.18935","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"6557_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"431","DOI":"10.1097\/ogx.0000000000000807","volume":"75","author":"S Garzon","year":"2020","unstructured":"Garzon S, Lagan\u00e0 AS, Di Spiezio SA et al (2020) Hysteroscopic metroplasty for T-shaped uterus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of reproductive outcomes. Obstet Gynecol Surv 75:431\u2013444. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/ogx.0000000000000807","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Surv"},{"key":"6557_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"366","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.23108","volume":"57","author":"MA Coelho Neto","year":"2021","unstructured":"Coelho Neto MA, Ludwin A, Petraglia F, Martins WP (2021) Definition, prevalence, clinical relevance and treatment of T-shaped uterus: systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 57:366\u2013377. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.23108","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"6557_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"949","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2013.847082","volume":"27","author":"NS Fox","year":"2014","unstructured":"Fox NS, Roman AS, Stern EM, Gerber RS, Saltzman DH, Rebarber A (2014) Type of congenital uterine anomaly and adverse pregnancy outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 27:949\u2013953. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/14767058.2013.847082","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"6557_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2573","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2015.1098613","volume":"29","author":"L Hiersch","year":"2016","unstructured":"Hiersch L, Yeoshoua E, Miremberg H, Krissi H, Aviram A, Yogev Y, Ashwal E (2016) The association between Mullerian anomalies and short-term pregnancy outcome. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 29:2573\u20132578. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/14767058.2015.1098613","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"6557_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"691","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12400","volume":"93","author":"M Takami","year":"2014","unstructured":"Takami M, Aoki S, Kurasawa K, Okuda M, Takahashi T, Hirahara F (2014) A classification of congenital uterine anomalies predicting pregnancy outcomes. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 93:691\u2013697. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/aogs.12400","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"6557_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2017.1370703","volume":"32","author":"A Cahen-Peretz","year":"2019","unstructured":"Cahen-Peretz A, Sheiner E, Friger M, Walfisch A (2019) The association between M\u00fcllerian anomalies and perinatal outcome. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 32:51\u201357. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/14767058.2017.1370703","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"6557_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"371","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.10056","volume":"38","author":"YY Chan","year":"2011","unstructured":"Chan YY, Jayaprakasan K, Tan A, Thornton JG, Coomarasamy A, Raine-Fenning NJ (2011) Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 38:371\u2013382. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.10056","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"6557_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2021.1949446","volume":"8","author":"A Naeh","year":"2021","unstructured":"Naeh A, Sigal E, Barda S, Hallak M, Gabbay-Benziv R (2021) The association between congenital uterine anomalies and perinatal outcomes - does type of defect matters? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 8:1\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/14767058.2021.1949446","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"6557_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dev264","volume":"31","author":"GF Grimbizis","year":"2016","unstructured":"Grimbizis GF, Di Spiezio SA, Saravelos SH et al (2016) The Thessaloniki ESHRE\/ESGE consensus on diagnosis of female genital anomalies. Hum Reprod 31:2\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/dev264","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"6557_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"729","DOI":"10.3760\/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2015.10.002","volume":"50","author":"L Zhu","year":"2015","unstructured":"Zhu L, Wang S, Lang JH (2015) Obstetrics and gynecology branch of Chinese medical association consensus of Chinese experts on diagnosis and treatment of female genital malformation. Chin J Obstet Gynecol 50:729\u2013733. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3760\/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2015.10.002","journal-title":"Chin J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"6557_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"600","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dey043","volume":"33","author":"J Knez","year":"2018","unstructured":"Knez J, Saridogan E, Van Den Bosch T, Mavrelos D, Ambler G, Jurkovic D (2018) ESHRE\/ESGE female genital tract anomalies classification system-the potential impact of discarding arcuate uterus on clinical practice. Hum Reprod 33:600\u2013606. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/dey043","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"6557_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1473","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-018-4749-x","volume":"297","author":"D Sch\u00f6ller","year":"2018","unstructured":"Sch\u00f6ller D, H\u00f6lting M, Stefanescu D, Burow H, Sch\u00f6nfisch B, Rall K, Taran FA, Grimbizis GF, Di Spiezio SA, Brucker SY (2018) Female genital tract congenital malformations and the applicability of the ESHRE\/ESGE classification: a systematic retrospective analysis of 920 patients. Arch Gynecol Obstet 297:1473\u20131481. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-018-4749-x","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"6557_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.514","volume":"206","author":"H Zhou","year":"2016","unstructured":"Zhou H, Liu Y, Liu L, Zhang M, Chen X, Qi Y (2016) Maternal pre-pregnancy risk factors for miscarriage from a prevention perspective: a cohort study in China. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 206:57\u201363. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.514","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"6557_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1904","DOI":"10.2105\/ajph.2017.304042","volume":"107","author":"RK Jones","year":"2017","unstructured":"Jones RK, Jerman J (2017) Population group abortion rates and lifetime incidence of abortion: United States, 2008\u20132014. Am J Public Health 107:1904\u20131909. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2105\/ajph.2017.304042","journal-title":"Am J Public Health"},{"key":"6557_CR20","first-page":"162","volume-title":"Before we are born: essential of embryology and birth defects","author":"KL Moore","year":"2008","unstructured":"Moore KL, Persaud TVN, Torchia MG (2008) The urogenital system. Before we are born: essential of embryology and birth defects. Saunders\/Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 162\u2013189"},{"key":"6557_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.02.010","volume":"212","author":"A Cahen-Peretz","year":"2017","unstructured":"Cahen-Peretz A, Walfisch A, Friger M, Sheiner E (2017) Maternal M\u00fcllerian anomalies and future health of the offspring. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 212:20\u201324. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.02.010","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"6557_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"563","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mric.2017.03.008","volume":"25","author":"JD Olpin","year":"2017","unstructured":"Olpin JD, Moeni A, Willmore RJ, Heilbrun ME (2017) MR imaging of M\u00fcllerian fusion anomalies. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 25:563\u2013575. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.mric.2017.03.008","journal-title":"Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am"},{"key":"6557_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/s10397-015-0909-1","volume":"13","author":"GF Grimbizis","year":"2016","unstructured":"Grimbizis GF, Di Spiezio SA, Saravelos SH et al (2016) The Thessaloniki ESHRE\/ESGE consensus on diagnosis of female genital anomalies. Gynecol Surg 13:1\u201316. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10397-015-0909-1","journal-title":"Gynecol Surg"},{"key":"6557_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1213","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-021-06147-y","volume":"304","author":"L Alonso Pacheco","year":"2021","unstructured":"Alonso Pacheco L, Bermejo L\u00f3pez C, Carugno J, Azumendi G\u00f3mez P, Martinez-Ten P, Lagan\u00e0 AS, Garzon S (2021) The rule of 10: a simple 3D ultrasonographic method for the diagnosis of T-shaped uterus. Arch Gynecol Obstet 304:1213\u20131220. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-021-06147-y","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"6557_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"708","DOI":"10.3760\/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2017.10.013","volume":"52","author":"S Wang","year":"2017","unstructured":"Wang S, Deng S, Zhu L et al (2017) Using 3D printing technology to diagnose female reproductive tract malformation before surgery. Chin J Obstet Gynecol 52:708\u2013710. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3760\/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2017.10.013","journal-title":"Chin J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"6557_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.07.007","volume":"228","author":"HX Pan","year":"2018","unstructured":"Pan HX, Liu P, Duan H, Li PF, Chen RL, Tang L, Luo GN, Chen CL (2018) Using 3D MRI can potentially enhance the ability of trained surgeons to more precisely diagnose Mullerian duct anomalies compared to MR alone. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 228:313\u2013318. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.07.007","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"6557_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.2147\/ijwh.s100817","volume":"9","author":"H El Hachem","year":"2017","unstructured":"El Hachem H, Crepaux V, May-Panloup P, Descamps P, Legendre G, Bouet PE (2017) Recurrent pregnancy loss: current perspectives. Int J Womens Health 9:331\u2013345. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2147\/ijwh.s100817","journal-title":"Int J Womens Health"},{"key":"6557_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"416","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2009.11.021","volume":"20","author":"SH Saravelos","year":"2010","unstructured":"Saravelos SH, Cocksedge KA, Li TC (2010) The pattern of pregnancy loss in women with congenital uterine anomalies and recurrent miscarriage. Reprod Biomed Online 20:416\u2013422. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.rbmo.2009.11.021","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"6557_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"144","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpurol.2018.01.011","volume":"14","author":"MA Friedman","year":"2018","unstructured":"Friedman MA, Aguilar L, Heyward Q, Wheeler C, Caldamone A (2018) Screening for Mullerian anomalies in patients with unilateral renal agenesis: leveraging early detection to prevent complications. J Pediatr Urol 14:144\u2013149. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jpurol.2018.01.011","journal-title":"J Pediatr Urol"},{"key":"6557_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0035-1570029","volume":"34","author":"L Kroener","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kroener L, Wang ET, Pisarska MD (2016) Predisposing factors to abnormal first trimester placentation and the impact on fetal outcomes. Semin Reprod Med 34:27\u201335. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/s-0035-1570029","journal-title":"Semin Reprod Med"},{"key":"6557_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"665","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2014.09.006","volume":"29","author":"CA Venetis","year":"2014","unstructured":"Venetis CA, Papadopoulos SP, Campo R, Gordts S, Tarlatzis BC, Grimbizis GF (2014) Clinical implications of congenital uterine anomalies: a meta-analysis of comparative studies. Reprod Biomed Online 29:665\u2013683. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.rbmo.2014.09.006","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"6557_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2408","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2018.1432588","volume":"32","author":"M Karami","year":"2019","unstructured":"Karami M, Jenabi E (2019) The association between Mullerian anomalies and IUGR: a meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 32:2408\u20132411. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/14767058.2018.1432588","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"6557_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"512","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2017.1379072","volume":"32","author":"S Khazaei","year":"2019","unstructured":"Khazaei S, Jenabi E, Veisani Y (2019) The association of Mullerian anomalies and placenta abruption: a meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 32:512\u2013516. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/14767058.2017.1379072","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"6557_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"146","DOI":"10.1017\/thg.2016.4","volume":"19","author":"S Shim","year":"2016","unstructured":"Shim S, Hur YM, Kim DH, Seong SJ, Kim ML, Shin JS (2016) Evidence for no significant impact of M\u00fcllerian anomalies on reproductive outcomes of twin pregnancy in Korean women. Twin Res Hum Genet 19:146\u2013153. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/thg.2016.4","journal-title":"Twin Res Hum Genet"},{"key":"6557_CR35","first-page":"175","volume":"68","author":"SA Di Spiezio","year":"2016","unstructured":"Di Spiezio SA, Spinelli M, Da Cunha VM, Zizolfi B, Nappi C, Bifulco G (2016) Hysteroscopic treatment of M\u00fcllerian duct anomalies. Minerva Ginecol 68:175\u2013185","journal-title":"Minerva Ginecol"},{"key":"6557_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.07.017","volume":"25","author":"A Budden","year":"2018","unstructured":"Budden A, Abbott JA (2018) The diagnosis and surgical approach of uterine septa. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 25:209\u2013217. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.07.017","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"6557_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"408","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2019.07.005","volume":"112","author":"A Ludwin","year":"2019","unstructured":"Ludwin A, Pfeifer SM (2019) Reproductive surgery for m\u00fcllerian anomalies: a review of progress in the last decade. Fertil Steril 112:408\u2013416. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2019.07.005","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-022-06557-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-022-06557-6\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-022-06557-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,3,17]],"date-time":"2023-03-17T04:05:09Z","timestamp":1679025909000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-022-06557-6"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,15]]},"references-count":37,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,4]]}},"alternative-id":["6557"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-022-06557-6","relation":{},"ISSN":["1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1432-0711","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,15]]},"assertion":[{"value":"31 July 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"30 March 2022","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"15 April 2022","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"The study was approved by the ethics committee of West China Second University Hospital (No. 2021140).","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}},{"value":"Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Informed consent"}},{"value":"For this type of study, formal consent is not required. This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.","order":5,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Research involving human participants and\/or animals"}}]}}