{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,2]],"date-time":"2026-09-02T04:25:01Z","timestamp":1788323101296,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":19,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,22]],"date-time":"2022-05-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1653177600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,22]],"date-time":"2022-05-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1653177600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100012320","name":"Otto-von-Guericke-Universit\u00e4t Magdeburg","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100012320","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>As a Doppler sonographic parameter, the cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) provides information about fetal hemodynamics and the redistribution of fetal blood volume in response to a metabolic change. The present study was undertaken to determine the extent to which CPR can be used as a valid parameter in routine obstetric assessment. We investigated whether CPR can be used to assess the neonatal outcome in appropriate for gestational age (AGA) fetuses and its association with secondary cesarean section due to fetal distress.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>In this retrospective analysis 1739 pregnant women were admitted to the University Women\u2018s Clinic Magdeburg, Germany, between January 2016 and December 2017. Of them, 710 AGA fetuses were eligible for analysis. SGA fetuses with an estimated fetal weight\u2009&lt;\u200910th percentile were excluded from the study. The AGA fetuses were divided in two groups based on the CPR: 669 fetuses showed a normal CPR\u2009\u2265\u20091.08; 41 fetuses showed a decreased CPR\u2009&lt;\u20091.08.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      In our study cohort decreased CPR in AGA fetuses was associated with threefold increased rate of cesarean sections due to fetal distress (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u20090.001). Our data suggested that low CPR is a reliable predictor of an impaired neonatal outcome in AGA fetuses in terms of a lower birth weight, transfer to neonatology, longer length of hospitalization, and the presence of severe morbidity.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Decreased CPR in AGA fetuses correlated with impaired neonatal outcome and secondary cesarean section due to fetal distress. The potential role of CPR for obstetric screening should be investigated in further studies.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-022-06596-z","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,22]],"date-time":"2022-05-22T07:02:26Z","timestamp":1653202946000},"page":"311-317","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":13,"title":["The importance of the cerebroplacental ratio for the prognosis of neonatal outcome in AGA fetuses"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"307","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1041-8828","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"L.","family":"Mecke","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"A.","family":"Ignatov","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"A.","family":"Redlich","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,22]]},"reference":[{"key":"6596_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/3-540-28903-8","volume-title":"Doppler ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology: with 521 figures and 112 tables, 2nd revisted and enlarged edition","author":"D Maulik","year":"2005","unstructured":"Maulik D, Zalud I (2005) Doppler ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology: with 521 figures and 112 tables, 2nd revisted and enlarged edition. Springer, Berlin"},{"key":"6596_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.05.024","volume":"213","author":"GR DeVore","year":"2015","unstructured":"DeVore GR (2015) The importance of the cerebroplacental ratio in the evaluation of fetal well-being in SGA and AGA fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 213:5\u201315. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.05.024","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"6596_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.01.001","author":"T Stampalija","year":"2017","unstructured":"Stampalija T, Arabin B, Wolf H et al (2017) Is middle cerebral artery Doppler related to neonatal and 2-year infant outcome in early fetal growth restriction? Am J Obstet Gynecol. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.01.001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"6596_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"329","DOI":"10.1016\/0301-5629(87)90166-9","volume":"13","author":"PH Arbeille","year":"1987","unstructured":"Arbeille PH, Roncin A, Berson M et al (1987) Exploration of the fetal cerebral blood flow by duplex doppler\u2014linear array system in normal and pathological pregnancies. Ultrasound Med Biol 13:329\u2013337. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0301-5629(87)90166-9","journal-title":"Ultrasound Med Biol"},{"key":"6596_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"750","DOI":"10.1016\/s0002-9378(99)70283-8","volume":"180","author":"RO Bahado-Singh","year":"1999","unstructured":"Bahado-Singh RO, Kovanci E, Jeffres A et al (1999) The Doppler cerebroplacental ratio and perinatal outcome in intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180:750\u2013756. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0002-9378(99)70283-8","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"6596_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"124","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20","volume":"21","author":"AA Baschat","year":"2003","unstructured":"Baschat AA, Gembruch U (2003) The cerebroplacental Doppler ratio revisited. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 21:124\u2013127. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.20","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"6596_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1223","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2005.24.9.1223","volume":"24","author":"AO Odibo","year":"2005","unstructured":"Odibo AO, Riddick C, Pare E et al (2005) Cerebroplacental Doppler ratio and adverse perinatal outcomes in intrauterine growth restriction: evaluating the impact of using gestational age-specific reference values. J Ultrasound Med 24:1223\u20131228. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7863\/jum.2005.24.9.1223","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"6596_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"287","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.4088","volume":"30","author":"C Ebbing","year":"2007","unstructured":"Ebbing C, Rasmussen S, Kiserud T (2007) Middle cerebral artery blood flow velocities and pulsatility index and the cerebroplacental pulsatility ratio: longitudinal reference ranges and terms for serial measurements. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 30:287\u2013296. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.4088","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"6596_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"416","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-199203000-00018","volume":"79","author":"D Gramellini","year":"1992","unstructured":"Gramellini D, Folli MC, Raboni S et al (1992) Cerebral\u2013umbilical Doppler ratio as a predictor of adverse perinatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol 79:416\u2013420. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00006250-199203000-00018","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"6596_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"535","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.150.2.6691115","volume":"150","author":"FP Hadlock","year":"1984","unstructured":"Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Carpenter RJ et al (1984) Sonographic estimation of fetal weight. The value of femur length in addition to head and abdomen measurements. Radiology 150:535\u2013540. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1148\/radiology.150.2.6691115","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"6596_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(85)90298-4","volume":"151","author":"FP Hadlock","year":"1985","unstructured":"Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Sharman RS et al (1985) Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements\u2014a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 151:333\u2013337. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0002-9378(85)90298-4","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"6596_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.05.008","volume":"288","author":"K Flood","year":"2014","unstructured":"Flood K, Unterscheider J, Daly S et al (2014) The role of brain sparing in the prediction of adverse outcomes in intrauterine growth restriction: results of the multicenter PORTO Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 288:e1-5. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.05.008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"6596_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14714","author":"F Figueras","year":"2015","unstructured":"Figueras F, Savchev S, Triunfo S et al (2015) An integrated model with classification criteria to predict small-for-gestational-age fetuses at risk of adverse perinatal outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.14714","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"6596_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"618","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31820b0884","volume":"117","author":"R Cruz-Mart\u00ednez","year":"2011","unstructured":"Cruz-Mart\u00ednez R, Figueras F, Hernandez-Andrade E et al (2011) Fetal brain Doppler to predict cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal status in term small-for-gestational-age fetuses. Obstet Gynecol 117:618\u2013626. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31820b0884","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"6596_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.11.016","volume":"124","author":"T Prior","year":"2013","unstructured":"Prior T, Mullins E, Bennett P et al (2013) Prediction of intrapartum fetal compromise using the cerebroumbilical ratio: a prospective observational study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 124:e1-6. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.11.016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"6596_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"404","DOI":"10.1055\/a-1072-5161","volume":"42","author":"D Buca","year":"2021","unstructured":"Buca D, Rizzo G, Gustapane S et al (2021) Diagnostische Genauigkeit der Dopplersonografie zur Vorhersage des perinatalen Outcomes bei reifgeborenen F\u00f6ten: Eine prospektive Studie (Diagnostic accuracy of Doppler ultrasound in predicting perinatal outcome in appropriate for gestational age fetuses: a prospective study). Ultraschall Med 42:404\u2013410. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/a-1072-5161","journal-title":"Ultraschall Med"},{"key":"6596_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"65.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.03.002","volume":"221","author":"R Akolekar","year":"2019","unstructured":"Akolekar R, Ciobanu A, Zingler E et al (2019) Routine assessment of cerebroplacental ratio at 35\u201337 weeks\u2019 gestation in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 221:65.e1-65.e18. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.03.002","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"6596_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.10.024","author":"AA Khalil","year":"2015","unstructured":"Khalil AA, Morales-Rosello J, Morlando M et al (2015) Is fetal cerebroplacental ratio an independent predictor of intrapartum fetal compromise and neonatal unit admission? Am J Obstet Gynecol. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.10.024","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"6596_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.2015-2651","author":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Commitee","year":"2015","unstructured":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Commitee (2015) The apgar score. Obstet Gynecol. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1542\/peds.2015-2651","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-022-06596-z.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-022-06596-z\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-022-06596-z.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,12]],"date-time":"2023-01-12T01:09:35Z","timestamp":1673485775000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-022-06596-z"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,22]]},"references-count":19,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,1]]}},"alternative-id":["6596"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-022-06596-z","relation":{},"ISSN":["1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1432-0711","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,22]]},"assertion":[{"value":"6 February 2022","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"25 April 2022","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"22 May 2022","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors have no relevant financial or nonfinancial interests to disclose.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Germany.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}},{"value":"Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to participate"}},{"value":"The manuscript does not contain any individual person\u2019s data in any form.","order":5,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to publish"}}]}}