{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,2]],"date-time":"2025-12-02T03:33:16Z","timestamp":1764646396246,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":37,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,14]],"date-time":"2022-06-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1655164800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,14]],"date-time":"2022-06-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1655164800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100008340","name":"Elsass Fonden","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100008340","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-022-06649-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,14]],"date-time":"2022-06-14T19:02:49Z","timestamp":1655233369000},"page":"1771-1780","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Cardiotocography combined with ST analysis versus cardiotocography combined with fetal blood sampling in deliveries with abnormal CTG: a randomized trial"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"307","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1486-7329","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Simon Foged","family":"Victor","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Diana B\u00f8ttcher Br\u00f8ndum","family":"Bach","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Anna Carolina","family":"Hvelplund","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Carsten","family":"Nickelsen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jens","family":"Lyndrup","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Charlotte","family":"Wilken-Jensen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Lise Jul","family":"Scharff","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Tom","family":"Weber","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Niels J\u00f8rgen","family":"Secher","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Lone","family":"Krebs","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,14]]},"reference":[{"key":"6649_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006066.pub3","author":"Z Alfirevic","year":"2017","unstructured":"Alfirevic Z, Devane D, Gyte GML, Cuthbert A (2017) Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD006066.pub3","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"1","key":"6649_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2015.06.020","volume":"131","author":"D Ayres-De-Campos","year":"2015","unstructured":"Ayres-De-Campos D, Spong CY, Chandraharan E (2015) FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: cardiotocography. Int J Gynecol Obstet 131(1):13\u201324. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijgo.2015.06.020","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"6649_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"72","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jbi.2014.04.010","volume":"51","author":"J Spilka","year":"2014","unstructured":"Spilka J et al (2014) Analysis of obstetricians\u2019 decision making on CTG recordings. J Biomed Inform 51:72\u201379. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jbi.2014.04.010","journal-title":"J Biomed Inform"},{"issue":"6","key":"6649_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"548","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12421","volume":"93","author":"JS J\u00f8rgensen","year":"2014","unstructured":"J\u00f8rgensen JS, Weber T (2014) Fetal scalp blood sampling in labor\u2014a review. Acta Obstet et Gynecol Scand 93(6):548\u2013555. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/aogs.12421","journal-title":"Acta Obstet et Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"1","key":"6649_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2015.06.021","volume":"131","author":"GH Visser","year":"2015","unstructured":"Visser GH, Ayres-De-Campos D (2015) FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: adjunctive technologies. Int J Gynecol Obstet 131(1):25\u201329. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijgo.2015.06.021","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"22","key":"6649_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3682","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2016.1140740","volume":"29","author":"E Chandraharan","year":"2016","unstructured":"Chandraharan E (2016) Should national guidelines continue to recommend fetal scalp blood sampling during labor? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 29(22):3682\u20133685. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/14767058.2016.1140740","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"6649_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.1016\/J.CLP.2010.12.009","volume":"38","author":"MA Belfort","year":"2011","unstructured":"Belfort MA, Saade GR (2011) ST segment analysis as an adjunct to electronic fetal monitoring, part I: background, physiology, and interpretation. Clin Perinatol 38(1):143\u2013157. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/J.CLP.2010.12.009","journal-title":"Clin Perinatol"},{"issue":"4","key":"6649_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"743","DOI":"10.1067\/MOB.2001.111932","volume":"184","author":"JA Westgate","year":"2001","unstructured":"Westgate JA, Bennet L, Brabyn C, Williams CE, Gunn AJ (2001) ST waveform changes during repeated umbilical cord occlusions in near-term fetal sheep. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184(4):743\u2013751. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1067\/MOB.2001.111932","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1 Pt 1","key":"6649_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"246","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(92)91867-A","volume":"166","author":"T Watanabe","year":"1992","unstructured":"Watanabe T et al (1992) Change in electrocardiogram T-wave amplitude during umbilical cord compression is predictive of fetal condition in sheep. Am J Obstet Gynecol 166(1 Pt 1):246\u2013255. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0002-9378(92)91867-A","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"9281","key":"6649_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"534","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(01)05703-8","volume":"358","author":"I Amer-W\u00e5hlin","year":"2001","unstructured":"Amer-W\u00e5hlin I et al (2001) Cardiotocography only versus cardiotocography plus ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram for intrapartum fetal monitoring: a Swedish randomised controlled trial. Lancet 358(9281):534\u2013538. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0140-6736(01)05703-8","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"6649_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD000116.pub5","author":"JP Neilson","year":"2015","unstructured":"Neilson JP (2015) Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) for fetal monitoring during labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD000116.pub5","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"8","key":"6649_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"657","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0032-1314886","volume":"29","author":"S Potti","year":"2012","unstructured":"Potti S, Berghella V (2012) ST waveform analysis versus cardiotocography alone for intrapartum fetal monitoring: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am J Perinatol 29(8):657\u2013664. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/s-0032-1314886","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"issue":"1","key":"6649_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12009","volume":"92","author":"A Salmelin","year":"2013","unstructured":"Salmelin A et al (2013) Fetal monitoring with computerized ST analysis during labor: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 92(1):28\u201339. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/aogs.12009","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"1","key":"6649_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31823d8230","volume":"119","author":"JH Becker","year":"2012","unstructured":"Becker JH et al (2012) ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram in intrapartum fetal monitoring: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 119(1):145\u2013154. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31823d8230","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"6649_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD000116.pub4","author":"JP Neilson","year":"2013","unstructured":"Neilson JP (2013) Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) for fetal monitoring during labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD000116.pub4","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"3","key":"6649_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"187.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.01.028","volume":"208","author":"E Schuit","year":"2013","unstructured":"Schuit E et al (2013) Effectiveness of electronic fetal monitoring with additional ST analysis in vertex singleton pregnancies at >36 weeks of gestation: an individual participant data metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 208(3):187.e1-187.e13. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.01.028","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"6649_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"571","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12412","volume":"93","author":"P Olofsson","year":"2014","unstructured":"Olofsson P, Ayres-De-Campos D, Kessler J, Tendal B, Yli BM, Devoe L (2014) A critical appraisal of the evidence for using cardiotocography plus ECG ST interval analysis for fetal surveillance in labor. Part II: the meta-analyses. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 93(6):571\u2013586. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/aogs.12412","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"5","key":"6649_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1151","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(93)90273-L","volume":"169","author":"J Westgate","year":"1993","unstructured":"Westgate J, Harris M, Curnow JSH, Greene KR (1993) Plymouth randomized trial of cardiotocogram only versus ST waveform plus cardiotocogram for intrapartum monitoring in 2400 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 169(5):1151\u20131160. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0002-9378(93)90273-L","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"7","key":"6649_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"632","DOI":"10.1056\/nejmoa1500600","volume":"373","author":"MA Belfort","year":"2015","unstructured":"Belfort MA et al (2015) A randomized trial of intrapartum fetal ECG ST-segment analysis. N Engl J Med 373(7):632\u2013641. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1056\/nejmoa1500600","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"6649_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001198","volume":"127","author":"G Saccone","year":"2016","unstructured":"Saccone G, Schuit E, Amer-Wahlin I, Xodo S, Berghella V (2016) Electrocardiogram ST analysis during labor: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Obstet Gynecol 127(1):127\u2013135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001198","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"6649_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12828","volume":"95","author":"E Blix","year":"2016","unstructured":"Blix E, Brurberg KG, Reierth E, Reinar LM, \u00d8ian P (2016) ST waveform analysis versus cardiotocography alone for intrapartum fetal monitoring: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 95(1):16\u201327. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/aogs.12828","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"6","key":"6649_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"577","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.04.003","volume":"221","author":"I Amer-W\u00e5hlin","year":"2019","unstructured":"Amer-W\u00e5hlin I et al (2019) Fetal electrocardiography ST-segment analysis for intrapartum monitoring: a critical appraisal of conflicting evidence and a way forward. Am J Obstet Gynecol 221(6):577-601.e11. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.04.003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"6649_CR23","unstructured":"Neoventa Medical, Fetal monitoring and ST analysis. [Online]. https:\/\/www.neoventa.com\/education\/printed-training-materials\/"},{"key":"6649_CR24","unstructured":"FIGO guidelines for the use of fetal monitoring. Int J Gynecol Obstet 25: 159\u201367, 1987."},{"key":"6649_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/tog.12154","author":"A Sacco","year":"2015","unstructured":"Sacco A, Muglu J, Navaratnarajah RM, Hogg MM (2015) ST analysis for intrapartum fetal monitoring. Obstet Gynecol. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/tog.12154","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"6649_CR26","unstructured":"Intrapartum care Care of healthy women and their babies during childbirth. 2007 [Online]. www.evidence.nhs.uk. 15 Feb 2021"},{"issue":"3","key":"6649_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"404","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2018.1494148","volume":"33","author":"P Olofsson","year":"2020","unstructured":"Olofsson P, Nor\u00e9n H, Carlsson A, Ros\u00e9n KG (2020) Identifying newborns with umbilical cord blood metabolic acidosis by intrapartum cardiotography combined with fetal ECG ST analysis (STAN): comparison of the new and old FIGO systems to classify cardiotocograms. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 33(3):404\u2013409. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/14767058.2018.1494148","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"6649_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"419","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2006.00886.x","volume":"113","author":"K Ojala","year":"2006","unstructured":"Ojala K, V\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4sm\u00e4ki M, M\u00e4kikallio K, Valkama M, Tekay A (2006) A comparison of intrapartum automated fetal electrocardiography and conventional cardiotocography\u2014a randomised controlled study. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 113(4):419\u2013423. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2006.00886.x","journal-title":"BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"2 PART 1","key":"6649_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"406","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182083dcd","volume":"117","author":"MEMH Westerhuis","year":"2011","unstructured":"Westerhuis MEMH, Visser GHA, Moons KGM, Zuithoff N, Mol BWJ, Kwee A (2011) Cardiotocography plus ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram compared with cardiotocography only for intrapartum monitoring: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 117(2 PART 1):406\u2013407. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182083dcd","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"6649_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"299.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.07.007","volume":"197","author":"C Vayssi\u00e8re","year":"2007","unstructured":"Vayssi\u00e8re C et al (2007) A French randomized controlled trial of ST-segment analysis in a population with abnormal cardiotocograms during labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 197(3):299.e1-299.e6. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.07.007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"6649_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"42","DOI":"10.1097\/OGX.0b013e318213e644","volume":"66","author":"TP Schaap","year":"2011","unstructured":"Schaap TP et al (2011) Cerebrospinal fluid leakage, an uncommon complication of fetal blood sampling: a case report and review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol Surv 66(1):42\u201346. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/OGX.0b013e318213e644","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Surv"},{"issue":"2 SUPPL 2 PART","key":"6649_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"419","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181c51aeb","volume":"115","author":"H Sabir","year":"2010","unstructured":"Sabir H, Stannigel H, Schwarz A, Hoehn T (2010) Perinatal hemorrhagic shock after fetal scalp blood sampling. Obstet Gynecol 115(2 SUPPL 2 PART 2):419\u2013420. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181c51aeb","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"6649_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1083","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.105403","volume":"182","author":"R Angioli","year":"2000","unstructured":"Angioli R, G\u00f3mez-Mar\u00edn O, Cantuaria G, O\u2019Sullivan MJ (2000) Severe perineal lacerations during vaginal delivery: the University of Miami experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182(5):1083\u20131085. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1067\/mob.2000.105403","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"6649_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"544","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08322.x","volume":"106","author":"RB Johanson","year":"1999","unstructured":"Johanson RB, Heycock E, Carter J, Sultan AH, Walklate K, Jones PW (1999) Maternal and child health after assisted vaginal delivery: five-year follow up of a randomised controlled study comparing forceps and ventouse. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 106(6):544\u2013549. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08322.x","journal-title":"BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"23","key":"6649_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1709","DOI":"10.1056\/nejm199912023412301","volume":"341","author":"D Towner","year":"1999","unstructured":"Towner D, Castro MA, Eby-Wilkens E, Gilbert WM (1999) Effect of mode of delivery in nulliparous women on neonatal intracranial injury. N Engl J Med 341(23):1709\u20131714. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1056\/nejm199912023412301","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"6649_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"251","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2016.1169527","volume":"30","author":"A Shmueli","year":"2017","unstructured":"Shmueli A et al (2017) Episiotomy\u2013risk factors and outcomes*. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 30(3):251\u2013256. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/14767058.2016.1169527","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"13","key":"6649_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1688","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.01961.x","volume":"115","author":"M Macleod","year":"2008","unstructured":"Macleod M et al (2008) A prospective cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 115(13):1688\u20131694. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.01961.x","journal-title":"BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol."}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-022-06649-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-022-06649-3\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-022-06649-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,28]],"date-time":"2023-04-28T09:10:31Z","timestamp":1682673031000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-022-06649-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,14]]},"references-count":37,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,6]]}},"alternative-id":["6649"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-022-06649-3","relation":{},"ISSN":["1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"type":"electronic","value":"1432-0711"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,14]]},"assertion":[{"value":"13 April 2022","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"25 May 2022","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"14 June 2022","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"All authors have declared to have no conflicts of interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}},{"value":"Information regarding the participants was protected in accordance with the law of treatment of personal information and the law of patient\u2019s legal position. The study was approved by the local science ethics committee under the journal number: (KF) 01 260 768. Good Publication Practice 3 (GPP3) guidelines were followed.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval"}},{"value":"Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to participate"}}]}}