{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,6]],"date-time":"2026-05-06T12:20:26Z","timestamp":1778070026509,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,7,13]],"date-time":"2022-07-13T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1657670400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,7,13]],"date-time":"2022-07-13T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1657670400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-022-06661-7","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,7,13]],"date-time":"2022-07-13T06:10:56Z","timestamp":1657692656000},"page":"1273-1280","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Comparison of pregnancy and live birth rates between fresh day 5 morula transfer and fresh day 6 blastocyst transfer following extended culture for slow growing embryos"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"306","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1668-8746","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Firat","family":"Tulek","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1689-2782","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Alper","family":"Kahraman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,7,13]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"6661_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dey351","volume":"34","author":"S Tannus","year":"2019","unstructured":"Tannus S, Cohen Y, Henderson S et al (2019) Fresh transfer of day 5 slow-growing embryos versus deferred transfer of vitrified, fully expanded day 6 blastocysts: which is the optimal approach? Hum Reprod 34(1):44\u201351. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/dey351","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"6661_CR2","volume-title":"Textbook of assisted reproductive techniques","author":"DK Gardner","year":"2018","unstructured":"Gardner DK, Weissman A, Howles CM, Shoham Z (2018) Textbook of assisted reproductive techniques, 5th edn. Taylor & Francis, New York","edition":"5"},{"issue":"6","key":"6661_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1173","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deu033","volume":"29","author":"A Capalbo","year":"2014","unstructured":"Capalbo A, Rienzi L, Cimadomo D et al (2014) Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts. Hum Reprod 29(6):1173\u20131181. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/deu033","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"2","key":"6661_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"332","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2011.11.042","volume":"97","author":"S Hashimoto","year":"2012","unstructured":"Hashimoto S, Kato N, Saeki K, Morimoto Y (2012) Selection of high-potential embryos by culture in poly(dimethylsiloxane) microwells and time-lapse imaging. Fertil Steril 97(2):332\u2013337. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2011.11.042","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"10","key":"6661_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2658","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/der256","volume":"26","author":"M Meseguer","year":"2011","unstructured":"Meseguer M, Herrero J, Tejera A, Hilligs\u00f8e KM, Ramsing NB, Remoh\u00ed J (2011) The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of embryo implantation. Hum Reprod 26(10):2658\u20132671. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/der256","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"2","key":"6661_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"389","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.09.044","volume":"99","author":"BS Shapiro","year":"2013","unstructured":"Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Restrepo H, Garner FC, Aguirre M, Hudson C (2013) Matched-cohort comparison of single-embryo transfers in fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. Fertil Steril 99(2):389\u2013392. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.09.044","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"1","key":"6661_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2004.06.049","volume":"83","author":"G Barrenetxea","year":"2005","unstructured":"Barrenetxea G, L\u00f3pez de Larruzea A, Ganzabal T, Jim\u00e9nez R, Carbonero K, Mandiola M (2005) Blastocyst culture after repeated failure of cleavage-stage embryo transfers: a comparison of day 5 and day 6 transfers. Fertil Steril 83(1):49\u201353. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2004.06.049","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"6","key":"6661_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"925","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-015-0475-5","volume":"32","author":"JD Kort","year":"2015","unstructured":"Kort JD, Lathi RB, Brookfield K, Baker VL, Zhao Q, Behr BR (2015) Aneuploidy rates and blastocyst formation after biopsy of morulae and early blastocysts on day 5. J Assist Reprod Genet 32(6):925\u2013930. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10815-015-0475-5","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"issue":"10","key":"6661_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2245","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dew183","volume":"31","author":"MG Minasi","year":"2016","unstructured":"Minasi MG, Colasante A, Riccio T et al (2016) Correlation between aneuploidy, standard morphology evaluation and morphokinetic development in 1730 biopsied blastocysts: a consecutive case series study. Hum Reprod 31(10):2245\u20132254. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/dew183","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"8","key":"6661_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1906","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deq143","volume":"25","author":"SK Sunkara","year":"2010","unstructured":"Sunkara SK, Siozos A, Bolton VN, Khalaf Y, Braude PR, El-Toukhy T (2010) The influence of delayed blastocyst formation on the outcome of frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 25(8):1906\u20131915. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/deq143","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"1","key":"6661_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"105","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2018.08.053","volume":"111","author":"J Haas","year":"2019","unstructured":"Haas J, Meriano J, Bassil R, Barzilay E, Zilberberg E, Casper RF (2019) Developmental potential of slow-developing embryos: day-5 morulae compared with day-5 cavitating morulae. Fertil Steril 111(1):105\u2013111. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2018.08.053","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"8","key":"6661_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"437","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-010-9443-2","volume":"27","author":"C Racowsky","year":"2010","unstructured":"Racowsky C, Vernon M, Mayer J et al (2010) Standardization of grading embryo morphology. J Assist Reprod Genet 27(8):437\u2013439. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10815-010-9443-2","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"issue":"3","key":"6661_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"393","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2017.06.005","volume":"108","author":"F Zegers-Hochschild","year":"2017","unstructured":"Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, Dyer S et al (2017) The international glossary on infertility and fertility care, 2017. Fertil Steril 108(3):393\u2013406. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2017.06.005","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"6","key":"6661_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1126","DOI":"10.1016\/s0015-0282(01)01771-x","volume":"75","author":"BS Shapiro","year":"2001","unstructured":"Shapiro BS, Richter KS, Harris DC, Daneshmand ST (2001) A comparison of day 5 and day 6 blastocyst transfers. Fertil Steril 75(6):1126\u20131130. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0015-0282(01)01771-x","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"6","key":"6661_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1370","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.07.1095","volume":"106","author":"N Desai","year":"2016","unstructured":"Desai N, Ploskonka S, Goodman L et al (2016) Delayed blastulation, multinucleation, and expansion grade are independently associated with live-birth rates in frozen blastocyst transfer cycles. Fertil Steril 106(6):1370\u20131378. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.07.1095","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"6","key":"6661_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2138","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2007.10.029","volume":"90","author":"ED Levens","year":"2008","unstructured":"Levens ED, Whitcomb BW, Hennessy S, James AN, Yauger BJ, Larsen FW (2008) Blastocyst development rate impacts outcome in cryopreserved blastocyst transfer cycles. Fertil Steril 90(6):2138\u20132143. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2007.10.029","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"12","key":"6661_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1553","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-016-0818-x","volume":"33","author":"J Haas","year":"2016","unstructured":"Haas J, Meriano J, Laskin C et al (2016) Clinical pregnancy rate following frozen embryo transfer is higher with blastocysts vitrified on day 5 than on day 6. J Assist Reprod Genet 33(12):1553\u20131557. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10815-016-0818-x","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"issue":"4","key":"6661_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"485","DOI":"10.1016\/s1472-6483(10)60825-5","volume":"10","author":"B Balaban","year":"2005","unstructured":"Balaban B, Urman B (2005) Comparison of two sequential media for culturing cleavage-stage embryos and blastocysts: embryo characteristics and clinical outcome. Reprod Biomed Online 10(4):485\u2013491. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s1472-6483(10)60825-5","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"issue":"3","key":"6661_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"757","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-021-06219-z","volume":"305","author":"P Tao","year":"2022","unstructured":"Tao P, Zhou W, Yan X, Wu R, Cheng L, Ye Y, Wang Z, Li Y (2022) Effect of sequential versus single-step culture medium on IVF treatments, including embryo and clinical outcomes: a prospective randomized study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 305(3):757\u2013765. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-021-06219-z (Epub 2021 Sep 12 PMID: 34510243)","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"1","key":"6661_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1186\/s12958-019-0535-2","volume":"17","author":"NC Tsai","year":"2019","unstructured":"Tsai NC, Su YT, Lin YJ et al (2019) Developmental potential of surplus morulas with delayed and\/or incomplete compaction after freezing-thawing procedures. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 17(1):87. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12958-019-0535-2","journal-title":"Reprod Biol Endocrinol"},{"issue":"4","key":"6661_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"876","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.06.014","volume":"98","author":"L Kroener","year":"2012","unstructured":"Kroener L, Ambartsumyan G, Briton-Jones C et al (2012) The effect of timing of embryonic progression on chromosomal abnormality. Fertil Steril 98(4):876\u2013880. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.06.014","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"1","key":"6661_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"52","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2017.12.008","volume":"57","author":"RS Li","year":"2018","unstructured":"Li RS, Hwu YM, Lee RK, Li SH, Lin MH (2018) Day 4 good morula embryo transfer provided compatible live birth rate with day 5 blastocyst embryo in fresh IVF\/ET cycles. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 57(1):52\u201357. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.tjog.2017.12.008","journal-title":"Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"6661_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1049","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-019-01475-0","volume":"36","author":"M Simopoulou","year":"2019","unstructured":"Simopoulou M, Sfakianoudis K, Tsioulou P et al (2019) Should the flexibility enabled by performing a day-4 embryo transfer remain as a valid option in the IVF laboratory? a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet 36(6):1049\u20131061. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10815-019-01475-0","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"issue":"6","key":"6661_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"687","DOI":"10.1016\/s1472-6483(10)61650-1","volume":"8","author":"B Kovacic","year":"2004","unstructured":"Kovacic B, Vlaisavljevic V, Reljic M, Cizek-Sajko M (2004) Developmental capacity of different morphological types of day 5 human morulae and blastocysts. Reprod Biomed Online 8(6):687\u2013694. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s1472-6483(10)61650-1","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"issue":"12","key":"6661_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"688237","DOI":"10.3389\/fendo.2021.688237.PMID:34305815;PMCID:PMC8299049","volume":"9","author":"S Mumusoglu","year":"2021","unstructured":"Mumusoglu S, Polat M, Ozbek IY, Bozdag G, Papanikolaou EG, Esteves SC, Humaidan P, Yarali H (2021) Preparation of the endometrium for frozen embryo transfer: a systematic review. Front Endocrinol 9(12):688237. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fendo.2021.688237.PMID:34305815;PMCID:PMC8299049","journal-title":"Front Endocrinol"},{"issue":"4","key":"6661_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"428","DOI":"10.1016\/s1472-6483(10)61134-0","volume":"11","author":"Y Murata","year":"2005","unstructured":"Murata Y, Oku H, Morimoto Y et al (2005) Freeze-thaw programmes rescue the implantation of day 6 blastocysts. Reprod Biomed Online 11(4):428\u2013433. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s1472-6483(10)61134-0","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"issue":"10","key":"6661_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1111","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-012-9837-4","volume":"29","author":"E Elgindy","year":"2012","unstructured":"Elgindy E, Elsedeek MS (2012) Day 5 expanded blastocysts transferred on same day have comparable outcome to those left for more extended culture and transferred on day 6. J Assist Reprod Genet 29(10):1111\u20131115. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10815-012-9837-4","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"issue":"1","key":"6661_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-020-05593-4","volume":"302","author":"FTS Elias","year":"2020","unstructured":"Elias FTS, Weber-Adrian D, Pudwell J, Carter J, Walker M, Gaudet L, Smith G, Velez MP (2020) Neonatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies conceived by fresh or frozen embryo transfer compared to spontaneous conceptions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 302(1):31\u201345. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-020-05593-4","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"2","key":"6661_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.1097\/GRF.0000000000000456","volume":"62","author":"N Pereira","year":"2019","unstructured":"Pereira N, Petrini AC, Hancock KL, Rosenwaks Z (2019) Fresh or frozen embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization: an update. Clin Obstet Gynecol 62(2):293\u2013299. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/GRF.0000000000000456 (PMID: 30994484)","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"6661_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD011184.pub2","author":"KM Wong","year":"2017","unstructured":"Wong KM, van Wely M, Mol F, Repping S, Mastenbroek S (2017) Fresh versus frozen embryo transfers in assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD011184.pub2","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-022-06661-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-022-06661-7\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-022-06661-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,13]],"date-time":"2022-09-13T09:15:13Z","timestamp":1663060513000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-022-06661-7"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,7,13]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,10]]}},"alternative-id":["6661"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-022-06661-7","relation":{},"ISSN":["1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1432-0711","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,7,13]]},"assertion":[{"value":"19 September 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"6 June 2022","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"13 July 2022","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and\/or national research committees and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Ethical approval for this study was obtained from Ethical Committee of Uskudar University at 28\/05\/2021 (Approval number: 61351342\/MAY 2021-24).","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}}]}}