{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,23]],"date-time":"2026-08-23T16:08:14Z","timestamp":1787501294416,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":29,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,1]],"date-time":"2023-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1680307200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,1]],"date-time":"2023-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1680307200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To study the guiding significance of medical history on laparoscopic and vaginal cervical cerclage in the treatment of cervical incompetence and its influence on pregnancy outcome.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A total of 53 cases by laparoscopic abdominal cervical cerclage (LAC group) before pregnancy and 73 cases by transvaginal cervix cerclage (TVC group) at 12\u201314\u00a0weeks of pregnancy were collected. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed on the influencing factors of delivery gestational weeks. Furthermore, the gestational weeks after cervical cerclage were compared between the two groups with high- and low-risk grades.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      The number of previous uterine cavity operations in LAC group was more than that TVC group, and the costs of operation were more than TVC group. At the same time, the hospitalization days and operation time were longer than those in TVC group, and the delivery rate of cesarean section was higher than TVC group, but the total hospitalization times were less than TVC group (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u20090.05). The rate of delivery before 34\u00a0weeks of pregnancy and the incidence of premature rupture of membranes or premature labor in LAC group were lower than those in TVC group (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u20090.05). In TVC group, the increased number of prior PTB or STL and the history of cervical cerclage failure would increase the risk of premature delivery before 34\u00a0weeks of pregnancy. There was no increased risk of preterm delivery before 34\u00a0weeks of pregnancy in LAC group (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&gt;\u20090.05). According to the risk level, in the high-risk group, the delivery rate of LAC group at gestational weeks &lt;\u200937\u00a0weeks, &lt;\u200934\u00a0weeks and\u2009&lt;\u200928\u00a0weeks was lower than that of TVC group.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Laparoscopic cervical cerclage might be more effective in preventing premature delivery before 34\u00a0weeks of gestation, and its influence on delivery gestational weeks was not affected by related medical history. For high-risk patients with the history of prior PTB or STL and failed cerclage, laparoscopic cervical cerclage might be more effective than vaginal cervical cerclage in preventing extremely preterm before 28\u00a0weeks, premature delivery before 34\u00a0weeks and premature delivery before 37\u00a0weeks. Therefore, our limited experience suggested that LAC can be a recommended option for patients with high-risk history.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-023-07007-7","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,3]],"date-time":"2023-04-03T01:57:57Z","timestamp":1680487077000},"page":"1377-1386","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["Effect of different surgical routes on pregnancy outcome of history-indicated cervical cerclage"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"309","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8320-4345","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Feng","family":"Qin","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yong","family":"Yang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Wei","family":"Zhou","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yugang","family":"Chi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Bao","family":"Liu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gongli","family":"Chen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,1]]},"reference":[{"issue":"8","key":"7007_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"771","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.06.004","volume":"44","author":"CY Akladios","year":"2015","unstructured":"Akladios CY, Sananes N, Gaudineau A, Boudier E, Langer B (2015) Cervical cerclage. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 44(8):771\u2013775. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.06.004","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"},{"issue":"3","key":"7007_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"663","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31820ca847","volume":"117","author":"V Berghella","year":"2011","unstructured":"Berghella V, Rafael TJ, Szychowski JM, Rust OA, Owen J (2011) Cerclage for short cervix on ultrasonography in women with singleton gestations and previous preterm birth: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 117(3):663\u2013671. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31820ca847","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"8","key":"7007_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"984","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13143","volume":"96","author":"I Sundtoft","year":"2017","unstructured":"Sundtoft I, Langhoff-Roos J, Sandager P, Sommer S, Uldbjerg N (2017) Cervical collagen is reduced in non-pregnant women with a history of cervical insufficiency and a short cervix. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 96(8):984\u2013990. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/aogs.13143","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"4","key":"7007_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"919","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-018-4663-2","volume":"297","author":"SA Mastrolia","year":"2018","unstructured":"Mastrolia SA, Baumfeld Y, Hershkovitz R et al (2018) Independent association between uterine malformations and cervical insufficiency: a retrospective population-based cohort study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 297(4):919\u2013926. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-018-4663-2","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"7007_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4202","DOI":"10.12659\/MSM.916480","volume":"25","author":"Q Pang","year":"2019","unstructured":"Pang Q, Jia X, Chen L (2019) Perinatal outcomes after emergency cervical cerclage for cervical insufficiency with prolapsed membranes. Med Sci Monit 25:4202\u20134206. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.12659\/MSM.916480","journal-title":"Med Sci Monit"},{"issue":"7","key":"7007_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1178","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.17003","volume":"129","author":"AH Shennan","year":"2022","unstructured":"Royal College of Obstetricians G, Shennan AH, Story L (2022) Cervical cerclage: green-top guideline no 7. BJOG 129(7):1178\u20131210","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"4","key":"7007_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1017","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-020-05893-9","volume":"303","author":"S Tian","year":"2021","unstructured":"Tian S, Zhao S, Hu Y (2021) Comparison of laparoscopic abdominal cerclage and transvaginal cerclage for the treatment of cervical insufficiency: a retrospective study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 303(4):1017\u20131023. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-020-05893-9","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"20","key":"7007_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3408","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2018.1465037","volume":"32","author":"R Figueroa","year":"2019","unstructured":"Figueroa R, Crowell R, Martinez A, Morgan M, Wakefield D (2019) McDonald versus Shirodkar cervical cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth: impact of body mass index. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 32(20):3408\u20133414. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/14767058.2018.1465037","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"6","key":"7007_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"987","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.05.015","volume":"21","author":"T Tulandi","year":"2014","unstructured":"Tulandi T, Alghanaim N, Hakeem G, Tan X (2014) Pre and post-conceptional abdominal cerclage by laparoscopy or laparotomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 21(6):987\u2013993. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.05.015","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"3\u20134","key":"7007_CR10","first-page":"e158","volume":"5","author":"OA Tusheva","year":"2012","unstructured":"Tusheva OA, Cohen SL, McElrath TF, Einarsson JI (2012) Laparoscopic placement of cervical cerclage. Rev Obstet Gynecol 5(3\u20134):e158\u2013e165","journal-title":"Rev Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"7007_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"773","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-022-05108-w","volume":"22","author":"G Huang","year":"2022","unstructured":"Huang G, Deng C, Liao H et al (2022) Comparison of transvaginal cervical cerclage versus laparoscopic abdominal cervical cerclage in cervical insufficiency: a retrospective study from a single centre. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 22(1):773. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12884-022-05108-w","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"13","key":"7007_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2071","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2019.1656195","volume":"34","author":"SV Barinov","year":"2021","unstructured":"Barinov SV, Artymuk NV, Novikova ON et al (2021) Analysis of risk factors and predictors of pregnancy loss and strategies for the management of cervical insufficiency in pregnant women at a high risk of preterm birth. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 34(13):2071\u20132079. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/14767058.2019.1656195","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"5","key":"7007_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1025","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2019.10.019","volume":"27","author":"A Vigueras Smith","year":"2020","unstructured":"Vigueras Smith A, Cabrera R, Zomer MT et al (2020) Laparoscopic transabdominal cerclage for cervical incompetence: a feasible and effective treatment in 10 steps. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 27(5):1025\u20131026. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2019.10.019","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"7007_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"261 e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.040","volume":"222","author":"A Shennan","year":"2020","unstructured":"Shennan A, Chandiramani M, Bennett P et al (2020) MAVRIC: a multicenter randomized controlled trial of transabdominal vs transvaginal cervical cerclage. Am J Obstet Gynecol 222(3):261 e1-261 e9. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.040","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"7007_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"277","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.07.021","volume":"25","author":"GN Moawad","year":"2018","unstructured":"Moawad GN, Tyan P, Bracke T et al (2018) Systematic review of transabdominal cerclage placed via laparoscopy for the prevention of preterm birth. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 25(2):277\u2013286. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.07.021","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"7007_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.12.012","volume":"257","author":"C Demirel","year":"2021","unstructured":"Demirel C, Goksever Celik H, Tulek F et al (2021) Fertility outcomes after preconceptional laparoscopic abdominal cerclage for second-trimester pregnancy losses. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 257:59\u201363. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.12.012","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"6","key":"7007_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1503","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-018-4766-9","volume":"297","author":"Y Liu","year":"2018","unstructured":"Liu Y, Ke Z, Liao W et al (2018) Pregnancy outcomes and superiorities of prophylactic cervical cerclage and therapeutic cervical cerclage in cervical insufficiency pregnant women. Arch Gynecol Obstet 297(6):1503\u20131508. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-018-4766-9","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"1","key":"7007_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2019.11.004","volume":"59","author":"R Chen","year":"2020","unstructured":"Chen R, Huang X, Li B (2020) Pregnancy outcomes and factors affecting the clinical effects of cervical cerclage when used for different indications: a retrospective study of 326 cases. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 59(1):28\u201333. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.tjog.2019.11.004","journal-title":"Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"7007_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1347","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-020-05863-1","volume":"303","author":"A Gokce","year":"2021","unstructured":"Gokce A, Sukur YE, Ozmen B et al (2021) The association between operative hysteroscopy prior to assisted reproductive technology and cervical insufficiency in second trimester. Arch Gynecol Obstet 303(5):1347\u20131352. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-020-05863-1","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"4","key":"7007_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"885","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-016-4285-5","volume":"295","author":"D Bolla","year":"2017","unstructured":"Bolla D, Gasparri ML, Badir S et al (2017) Cervical length after cerclage: comparison between laparoscopic and vaginal approach. Arch Gynecol Obstet 295(4):885\u2013890. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-016-4285-5","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"3","key":"7007_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"645","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-017-4636-x","volume":"297","author":"M Wei","year":"2018","unstructured":"Wei M, Jin X, Li TC et al (2018) A comparison of pregnancy outcome of modified transvaginal cervicoisthmic cerclage performed prior to and during pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 297(3):645\u2013652. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-017-4636-x","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"5","key":"7007_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1345","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-021-06029-3","volume":"304","author":"J Li","year":"2021","unstructured":"Li J, Song D, Feng X et al (2021) The association of chronic endometritis with mid-trimester loss due to cervical incompetence and the outcome of laparoscopic cervical cerclage. Arch Gynecol Obstet 304(5):1345\u20131351. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-021-06029-3","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"7007_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"146","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.04.008","volume":"201","author":"X Huang","year":"2016","unstructured":"Huang X, Ma N, Li TC et al (2016) Simplified laparoscopic cervical cerclage after failure of vaginal suture: technique and results of a consecutive series of 100 cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 201:146\u2013150. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.04.008","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"4","key":"7007_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"836","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.108837","volume":"183","author":"G Davis","year":"2000","unstructured":"Davis G, Berghella V, Talucci M, Wapner RJ (2000) Patients with a prior failed transvaginal cerclage: a comparison of obstetric outcomes with either transabdominal or transvaginal cerclage. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183(4):836\u2013839. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1067\/mob.2000.108837","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"29\u201330","key":"7007_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"489","DOI":"10.3238\/arztebl.2015.0489","volume":"112","author":"I Mylonas","year":"2015","unstructured":"Mylonas I, Friese K (2015) Indications for and risks of elective cesarean section. Dtsch Arztebl Int 112(29\u201330):489\u2013495. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3238\/arztebl.2015.0489","journal-title":"Dtsch Arztebl Int"},{"key":"7007_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.4103\/2277-9175.166154","volume":"4","author":"A Ghahiri","year":"2015","unstructured":"Ghahiri A, Khosravi M (2015) Maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality rate in caesarean section and vaginal delivery. Adv Biomed Res 4:193. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/2277-9175.166154","journal-title":"Adv Biomed Res"},{"key":"7007_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"105","DOI":"10.11606\/S1518-8787.2017051000389","volume":"51","author":"KC Mascarello","year":"2017","unstructured":"Mascarello KC, Horta BL, Silveira MF (2017) Maternal complications and cesarean section without indication: systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev Saude Publica 51:105. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.11606\/S1518-8787.2017051000389","journal-title":"Rev Saude Publica"},{"issue":"6","key":"7007_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1195","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003263","volume":"133","author":"A Ades","year":"2019","unstructured":"Ades A, Hawkins DP (2019) Laparoscopic transabdominal cerclage and subsequent pregnancy outcomes when left in situ. Obstet Gynecol 133(6):1195\u20131198. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003263","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"7007_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.10.026","author":"CE van Dijk","year":"2022","unstructured":"van Dijk CE, Breuking SH, Jansen S et al (2022) Perioperative complications of a transvaginal cervical cerclage in singleton pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.10.026","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-023-07007-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-023-07007-7\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-023-07007-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,24]],"date-time":"2024-02-24T10:04:42Z","timestamp":1708769082000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-023-07007-7"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,1]]},"references-count":29,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,4]]}},"alternative-id":["7007"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-023-07007-7","relation":{"has-preprint":[{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.21203\/rs.3.rs-2122379\/v1","asserted-by":"object"}]},"ISSN":["1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1432-0711","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"1 October 2022","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"8 March 2023","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"1 April 2023","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"The study was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval and consent to participate"}}]}}