{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,24]],"date-time":"2026-10-24T00:52:42Z","timestamp":1792803162901,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":47,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,13]],"date-time":"2023-11-13T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1699833600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,13]],"date-time":"2023-11-13T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1699833600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100007052","name":"Universit\u00e0 degli Studi di Verona","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100007052","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To compare conventional bipolar electrosurgery with advanced bipolar vessel sealing (ABVS) devices for total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A systematic review was conducted by searching Scopus, PubMed\/MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Library from January 1989 to November 2021. We identified all studies comparing ABVS devices with conventional bipolar electrosurgery in\u00a0TLH and reporting at least one of the following outcomes: total blood loss, total operative time, hospital stay, perioperative complications, or costs. Meta-analysis was conducted with a random effect model reporting pooled mean differences and odds ratios (ORs) with related 95% confidence intervals (CIs).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Two randomized controlled trials and two retrospective studies\u00a0encompassing\u00a0314 patients were included out of 615 manuscripts. The pooled estimated total blood loss in the ABVS devices group was lower than conventional bipolar electrosurgery of 39\u00a0mL (95% CI \u2212\u00a065.8 to \u2212\u00a012.6\u00a0mL;\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u2009.004). The use of ABVS devices significantly reduced the total operative time by 8\u00a0min (95% CI \u2212\u00a016.7 to \u2212\u00a00.8\u00a0min;\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u2009.033). Hospital stay length did not differ between the two groups, and a comparable overall surgical complication rate was observed [OR of 0.9 (95% CI 0.256\u00a0\u2013\u00a03.200;\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u2009.878].\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>High-quality evidence comparing ABVS devices with conventional bipolar electrosurgery for TLH is lacking. ABVS devices were associated with reduced total blood loss and operative time; however, observed differences seem clinically irrelevant. Further research is required to clarify the advantages of ABVS devices over conventional bipolar electrosurgery and to identify cases that may benefit more from their use.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-023-07270-8","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,13]],"date-time":"2023-11-13T03:02:01Z","timestamp":1699844521000},"page":"1165-1174","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":15,"title":["Advanced bipolar vessel sealing devices vs conventional bipolar energy in minimally invasive hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"309","author":[{"given":"Pier Carlo","family":"Zorzato","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Filippo Alberto","family":"Ferrari","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5840-699X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Simone","family":"Garzon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Massimo","family":"Franchi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Stefano","family":"Cianci","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Antonio Simone","family":"Lagan\u00e0","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Vito","family":"Chiantera","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jvan","family":"Casarin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Fabio","family":"Ghezzi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Stefano","family":"Uccella","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,13]]},"reference":[{"key":"7270_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"753","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318165f18c","volume":"111","author":"T Falcone","year":"2008","unstructured":"Falcone T, Walters MD (2008) Hysterectomy for benign disease. Obstet Gynecol 111:753\u2013767. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318165f18c","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"7270_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD003677.pub5","author":"JWM Aarts","year":"2015","unstructured":"Aarts JWM, Nieboer TE, Johnson N et al (2015) Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD003677.pub5","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"7270_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"62","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.07.005","volume":"25","author":"S Uccella","year":"2018","unstructured":"Uccella S, Morosi C, Marconi N et al (2018) Laparoscopic versus open hysterectomy for benign disease in uteri weighing >1 kg: a retrospective analysis on 258 patients. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 25:62\u201369. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.07.005","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"7270_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1526","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.16753","volume":"128","author":"S Uccella","year":"2021","unstructured":"Uccella S, Kho RM, Garzon S et al (2021) The large uterus classification system: a prospective observational study. BJOG 128:1526\u20131533. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1471-0528.16753","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"7270_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1568","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2011.03089.x","volume":"118","author":"P Janssen","year":"2011","unstructured":"Janssen P, Br\u00f6lmann H, van Kesteren P et al (2011) Perioperative outcomes using LigaSure compared with conventional bipolar instruments in laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial: LigaSure compared with conventional bipolar during laparoscopic hysterectomy. BJOG Int J Obstetrics Gynaecol 118:1568\u20131575. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2011.03089.x","journal-title":"BJOG Int J Obstetrics Gynaecol"},{"key":"7270_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2220","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.14096","volume":"45","author":"B Aykan Yuksel","year":"2019","unstructured":"Aykan Yuksel B, Karadag B, Mulayim B (2019) Comparison of the efficacy and safety of two advanced vessel sealing technologies in total laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 45:2220\u20132227. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jog.14096","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"key":"7270_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"428","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.6901","volume":"97","author":"PA Sutton","year":"2010","unstructured":"Sutton PA, Awad S, Perkins AC, Lobo DN (2010) Comparison of lateral thermal spread using monopolar and bipolar diathermy, the Harmonic Scalpel and the Ligasure. Br J Surg 97:428\u2013433. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/bjs.6901","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"7270_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"301","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2013.02.012","volume":"20","author":"SD Lyons","year":"2013","unstructured":"Lyons SD, Law KSK (2013) Laparoscopic vessel sealing technologies. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 20:301\u2013307. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2013.02.012","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"7270_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-008-9932-x","volume":"23","author":"WL Newcomb","year":"2009","unstructured":"Newcomb WL, Hope WW, Schmelzer TM et al (2009) Comparison of blood vessel sealing among new electrosurgical and ultrasonic devices. Surg Endosc 23:90\u201396. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-008-9932-x","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"7270_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"640","DOI":"10.5603\/GP.2019.0112","volume":"90","author":"Y Yalcin","year":"2019","unstructured":"Yalcin Y, Yalcin SE (2019) Perioperative outcomes of bipolar energy instruments in total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Ginekol Pol 90:640\u2013644. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5603\/GP.2019.0112","journal-title":"Ginekol Pol"},{"key":"7270_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"130","DOI":"10.4293\/108680812X13291597716348","volume":"16","author":"I Alkatout","year":"2012","unstructured":"Alkatout I, Schollmeyer T, Hawaldar NA et al (2012) Principles and safety measures of electrosurgery in laparoscopy. JSLS 16:130\u2013139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4293\/108680812X13291597716348","journal-title":"JSLS"},{"key":"7270_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"890","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-005-0380-6","volume":"20","author":"S Richter","year":"2006","unstructured":"Richter S, Kollmar O, Schilling MK et al (2006) Efficacy and quality of vessel sealing: comparison of a reusable with a disposable device and effects of clamp surface geometry and structure. Surg Endosc 20:890\u2013894. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-005-0380-6","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"7270_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007886.pub2","author":"S Tou","year":"2011","unstructured":"Tou S, Malik AI, Wexner SD, Nelson RL (2011) Energy source instruments for laparoscopic colectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD007886.pub2","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"7270_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"378","DOI":"10.1089\/lap.2011.0420","volume":"22","author":"J Milsom","year":"2012","unstructured":"Milsom J, Trencheva K, Monette S et al (2012) Evaluation of the safety, efficacy, and versatility of a new surgical energy device (THUNDERBEAT) in comparison with Harmonic ACE, LigaSure V, and EnSeal devices in a porcine model. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 22:378\u2013386. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/lap.2011.0420","journal-title":"J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A"},{"key":"7270_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"123","DOI":"10.1186\/s12893-018-0457-5","volume":"18","author":"R Patrone","year":"2019","unstructured":"Patrone R, Gambardella C, Romano RM et al (2019) The impact of the ultrasonic, bipolar and integrated energy devices in the adrenal gland surgery: literature review and our experience. BMC Surg 18:123. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12893-018-0457-5","journal-title":"BMC Surg"},{"key":"7270_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"976","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2005.19.976","volume":"19","author":"C Leonardo","year":"2005","unstructured":"Leonardo C, Guaglianone S, Carli PD et al (2005) Laparoscopic nephrectomy using LigaSure system: preliminary experience. J Endourol 19:976\u2013978. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2005.19.976","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"key":"7270_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"869","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-020-01180-6","volume":"15","author":"S Hamamoto","year":"2021","unstructured":"Hamamoto S, AbdelRazek M, Naiki T et al (2021) LigaSure versus the standard technique (Hem-o-lok clips) for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a propensity score-matched study. J Robot Surg 15:869\u2013875. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11701-020-01180-6","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"key":"7270_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1038\/s41443-018-0066-y","volume":"31","author":"V Guzelburc","year":"2019","unstructured":"Guzelburc V, Baran C, Yafi FA et al (2019) Vasectomy with vessel sealing device: comparison of different diameters. Int J Impot Res 31:20\u201324. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41443-018-0066-y","journal-title":"Int J Impot Res"},{"key":"7270_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1000097","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1000097","volume":"6","author":"D Moher","year":"2009","unstructured":"Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6:e1000097\u2013e1000097. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pmed.1000097","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"7270_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"i4919","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.i4919","volume":"355","author":"JA Sterne","year":"2016","unstructured":"Sterne JA, Hern\u00e1n MA, Reeves BC et al (2016) ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ 355:i4919. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.i4919","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"7270_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3635","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.1096","volume":"20","author":"J Villar","year":"2001","unstructured":"Villar J, Mackey ME, Carroli G, Donner A (2001) Meta-analyses in systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials in perinatal medicine: comparison of fixed and random effects models. Stat Med 20:3635\u20133647. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/sim.1096","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"key":"7270_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"123","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(97)08468-7","volume":"351","author":"J Lau","year":"1998","unstructured":"Lau J, Ioannidis JP, Schmid CH (1998) Summing up evidence: one answer is not always enough. Lancet 351:123\u2013127. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0140-6736(97)08468-7","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"7270_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1016\/0197-2456(86)90046-2","volume":"7","author":"R DerSimonian","year":"1986","unstructured":"DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7:177\u2013188. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0197-2456(86)90046-2","journal-title":"Control Clin Trials"},{"key":"7270_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.4274\/jtgga.2017.0076","volume":"19","author":"KK Roy","year":"2018","unstructured":"Roy KK, Gc N, Singhal S et al (2018) Impact of energy devices on the post-operative systemic immune response in women undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign disease of the uterus. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc 19:1\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4274\/jtgga.2017.0076","journal-title":"J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc"},{"key":"7270_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"650","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.01.010","volume":"21","author":"H Aytan","year":"2014","unstructured":"Aytan H, Nazik H, Narin R et al (2014) Comparison of the use of LigaSure, HALO PKS cutting forceps, and ENSEAL tissue sealer in total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 21:650\u2013655. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.01.010","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"7270_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"456","DOI":"10.4293\/108680812X13462882736259","volume":"16","author":"H-Y Cho","year":"2012","unstructured":"Cho H-Y, Choi K-J, Lee Y-L et al (2012) Comparison of two bipolar systems in laparoscopic hysterectomy. JSLS 16:456\u2013460. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4293\/108680812X13462882736259","journal-title":"JSLS"},{"key":"7270_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"341","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1447-0756.2007.00533.x","volume":"33","author":"F Demirturk","year":"2007","unstructured":"Demirturk F, Aytan H, Caliskan AC (2007) Comparison of the use of electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer with harmonic scalpel in total laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 33:341\u2013345. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1447-0756.2007.00533.x","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"key":"7270_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"409","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-017-4599-y","volume":"297","author":"M Hasanov","year":"2018","unstructured":"Hasanov M, Denschlag D, Seemann E et al (2018) Bipolar vessel-sealing devices in laparoscopic hysterectomies: a multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet 297:409\u2013414. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-017-4599-y","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"7270_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2018.11.024","volume":"58","author":"C-L Lee","year":"2019","unstructured":"Lee C-L, Wu K-Y, Huang C-Y, Yen C-F (2019) Comparison of LigaSure\u2122 tissue fusion system and a conventional bipolar device in hysterectomy via natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): a randomized controlled trial. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 58:128\u2013132. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.tjog.2018.11.024","journal-title":"Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"7270_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1089\/109264204322973817","volume":"14","author":"C-S Ou","year":"2004","unstructured":"Ou C-S, Joki J, Wells K et al (2004) Total laparoscopic hysterectomy using multifunction grasping, coagulating, and cutting forceps. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 14:67\u201371. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/109264204322973817","journal-title":"J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A"},{"key":"7270_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1016\/s1074-3804(05)80141-0","volume":"3","author":"SR Richards","year":"1995","unstructured":"Richards SR, Simpkins S (1995) Comparison of the harmonic scissors and endostapler in laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 3:87\u201390. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s1074-3804(05)80141-0","journal-title":"J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc"},{"key":"7270_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3852","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-013-2994-4","volume":"27","author":"R Rothmund","year":"2013","unstructured":"Rothmund R, Szyrach M, Reda A et al (2013) A prospective, randomized clinical comparison between UltraCision and the novel sealing and cutting device BiCision in patients with laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. Surg Endosc 27:3852\u20133859. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-013-2994-4","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"7270_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"467","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.10.006","volume":"25","author":"L-DJ Shiber","year":"2018","unstructured":"Shiber L-DJ, Ginn DN, Jan A et al (2018) Comparison of industry-leading energy devices for use in gynecologic laparoscopy: articulating ENSEAL versus LigaSure energy devices. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 25:467-473.e1. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.10.006","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"7270_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"790","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.13217","volume":"60","author":"C Wong","year":"2020","unstructured":"Wong C, Goh A, Merkur H (2020) Comparison of surgical outcomes using Gyrus PKS\u2122 vs LigaSure\u2122 in total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 60:790\u2013796. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/ajo.13217","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"7270_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"620","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2007.01.029","volume":"105","author":"C-L Lee","year":"2007","unstructured":"Lee C-L, Huang K-G, Wang C-J et al (2007) Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy using pulsed bipolar system: comparison with conventional bipolar electrosurgery. Gynecol Oncol 105:620\u2013624. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ygyno.2007.01.029","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"7270_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"447","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2013.12.001","volume":"21","author":"A Fagotti","year":"2014","unstructured":"Fagotti A, Vizzielli G, Fanfani F et al (2014) Randomized study comparing use of THUNDERBEAT technology vs standard electrosurgery during laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for gynecologic cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 21:447\u2013453. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2013.12.001","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"7270_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1089\/109264204322973817","volume":"14","author":"C-S Ou","year":"2004","unstructured":"Ou C-S, Joki J, Wells K et al (2004) Total laparoscopic hysterectomy using multifunction grasping, coagulating, and cutting forceps. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 14:67\u201371. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/109264204322973817","journal-title":"J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech"},{"key":"7270_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1155\/2012\/263850","volume":"2012","author":"E Volpi","year":"2012","unstructured":"Volpi E, Bernardini L, Ferrero AM (2012) The retrograde and retroperitoneal totally laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. Int J Surg Oncol 2012:1\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2012\/263850","journal-title":"Int J Surg Oncol"},{"key":"7270_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1840","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.14238","volume":"100","author":"S Uccella","year":"2021","unstructured":"Uccella S, Garzon S, Lanzo G et al (2021) Uterine artery closure at the origin vs at the uterus level in total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 100:1840\u20131848. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/aogs.14238","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"7270_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"500.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.01.029","volume":"218","author":"S Uccella","year":"2018","unstructured":"Uccella S, Malzoni M, Cromi A et al (2018) Laparoscopic vs transvaginal cuff closure after total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized trial by the Italian Society of Gynecologic Endoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 218:500.e1-500.e13. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.01.029","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"7270_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"950","DOI":"10.1089\/lap.2015.0551","volume":"26","author":"A Yavuz","year":"2016","unstructured":"Yavuz A, Bulus H, Ta\u015f A, Ayd\u0131n A (2016) Evaluation of stump pressure in three types of appendectomy: harmonic scalpel, LigaSure, and conventional technique. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 26:950\u2013953. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/lap.2015.0551","journal-title":"J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A"},{"key":"7270_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1039","DOI":"10.1007\/s00423-013-1137-7","volume":"398","author":"P Contin","year":"2013","unstructured":"Contin P, Goo\u00dfen K, Grummich K et al (2013) ENERgized vessel sealing systems versus CONventional hemostasis techniques in thyroid surgery\u2013the ENERCON systematic review and network meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 398:1039\u20131056. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00423-013-1137-7","journal-title":"Langenbecks Arch Surg"},{"key":"7270_CR43","first-page":"93","volume":"57","author":"M Yoshimoto","year":"2014","unstructured":"Yoshimoto M, Endo K, Hanaki T et al (2014) Effectiveness of the LigaSure small jaw vessel-sealing system in hepatic resection. Yonago Acta Med 57:93\u201398","journal-title":"Yonago Acta Med"},{"key":"7270_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"151","DOI":"10.1177\/1457496919828237","volume":"109","author":"S Giordano","year":"2020","unstructured":"Giordano S, Kangas R, Ver\u00e4j\u00e4nkorva E, Koskivuo I (2020) Ligasure impact\u2122 might reduce blood loss, complications, and re-operation occurrence after abdominoplasty in massive-weight-loss patients: a comparative study. Scand J Surg 109:151\u2013158. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1457496919828237","journal-title":"Scand J Surg"},{"key":"7270_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"759","DOI":"10.1080\/00016489.2018.1453947","volume":"138","author":"C Kanno","year":"2018","unstructured":"Kanno C, Masubuchi T, Tada Y et al (2018) Efficacy and safety of a vessel sealing system in oral cancer resection and reconstructive surgery. Acta Otolaryngol 138:759\u2013762. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/00016489.2018.1453947","journal-title":"Acta Otolaryngol"},{"key":"7270_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1796","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-017-5045-3","volume":"26","author":"T Lan","year":"2017","unstructured":"Lan T, Hu S-Y, Yang X-J et al (2017) The efficacy of bipolar sealer on blood loss in spine surgery: a meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 26:1796\u20131802. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00586-017-5045-3","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"7270_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2583","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-017-5933-y","volume":"32","author":"P Fuchshuber","year":"2018","unstructured":"Fuchshuber P, Schwaitzberg S, Jones D et al (2018) The SAGES fundamental use of surgical energy program (FUSE): history, development, and purpose. Surg Endosc 32:2583\u20132602. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-017-5933-y","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-023-07270-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-023-07270-8\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-023-07270-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,24]],"date-time":"2024-02-24T10:07:23Z","timestamp":1708769243000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-023-07270-8"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,13]]},"references-count":47,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,4]]}},"alternative-id":["7270"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-023-07270-8","relation":{},"ISSN":["1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1432-0711","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,13]]},"assertion":[{"value":"26 July 2022","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"16 October 2023","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"13 November 2023","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Informed consent"}}]}}