{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,15]],"date-time":"2026-10-15T00:17:41Z","timestamp":1792023461159,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":101,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,15]],"date-time":"2024-06-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1718409600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,15]],"date-time":"2024-06-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1718409600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"PlantTec Medical GmbH","award":["unrestricted educational grant"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["unrestricted educational grant"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Importance<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>The formation of adhesions after gynecological surgery not only has detrimental impacts on those affected, including pain, obstruction, and infertility, but also imposes a high economic burden on healthcare systems worldwide.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>The aim of this review was to evaluate the adhesion prevention potential of all currently available adhesion barriers for gynecological surgery.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Evidence acquisition<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>We systematically searched MEDLINE and CENTRAL databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the use of adhesion barriers as compared with peritoneal irrigation or no treatment in gynecological surgery. Only RCTs with second-look surgery to evaluate adhesions in the pelvic\/abdominal (but not intrauterine) cavity were included.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>We included 45 RCTs with a total of 4,120 patients examining a total of 10 unique types of barriers in second-look gynecological surgery. While RCTs on oxidized regenerated cellulose (significant improvement in 6 of 14 trials), polyethylene glycol with\/without other agents (4\/10), hyaluronic acid and hyaluronate\u2009+\u2009carboxymethylcellulose (7\/10), icodextrin (1\/3), dextran (0\/3), fibrin-containing agents (1\/2), expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (1\/1), N,O-carboxymethylchitosan (0\/1), and modified starch (1\/1) overall showed inconsistent findings, results for expanded polytetrafluoroethylene, hyaluronic acid, and modified starch yielded the greatest improvements regarding adhesion reduction at 75%, 0\u201367%, and 85%, respectively.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusions and relevance<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Best results for adhesion prevention were reported after applying Gore-Tex Surgical Membrane, hyaluronic acid, and 4DryField<jats:sup>\u00ae<\/jats:sup>. As Gore-Tex Surgical Membrane is nonabsorbable, it is associated with a greater risk of new adhesion formation due to second-look surgery to remove the product. 4DryField<jats:sup>\u00ae<\/jats:sup> yielded the greatest improvement in adhesion score compared to all other barrier agents (85%). For better comparability, future studies should use standardized scores and put more emphasis on patient-reported outcome measures, such as pain and infertility.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-024-07584-1","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,15]],"date-time":"2024-06-15T15:01:55Z","timestamp":1718463715000},"page":"655-672","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":29,"title":["Prevention of peritoneal adhesions after gynecological surgery: a systematic review"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"310","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8010-1463","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sebastian D.","family":"Schaefer","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ibrahim","family":"Alkatout","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nadja","family":"Dornhoefer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Joerg","family":"Herrmann","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ruediger","family":"Klapdor","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ivo","family":"Meinhold-Heerlein","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jozsef","family":"Meszaros","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alexander","family":"Mustea","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Peter","family":"Oppelt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Markus","family":"Wallwiener","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Bernhard","family":"Kraemer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,15]]},"reference":[{"issue":"6","key":"7584_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1550","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.02.031","volume":"99","author":"Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine in collaboration with Society of Reproductive Surgeons","year":"2013","unstructured":"Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine in collaboration with Society of Reproductive\nSurgeons (2013) Pathogenesis, consequences, and control of peritoneal adhesions in gynecologic surgery: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 99(6):1550\u20131555. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.02.031","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"44","key":"7584_CR2","first-page":"769","volume":"107","author":"D Br\u00fcggmann","year":"2010","unstructured":"Br\u00fcggmann D, Tchartchian G, Wallwiener M, M\u00fcnstedt K, Tinneberg HR, Hackethal A (2010) Intra-abdominal adhesions: definition, origin, significance in surgical practice, and treatment options. Deutsches Arzteblatt Int 107(44):769\u2013775","journal-title":"Deutsches Arzteblatt Int"},{"issue":"3","key":"7584_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"290","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2010.04.021","volume":"21","author":"G Pados","year":"2010","unstructured":"Pados G, Venetis CA, Almaloglou K, Tarlatzis BC (2010) Prevention of intra-peritoneal adhesions in gynaecological surgery: theory and evidence. Reprod Biomed Online 21(3):290\u2013303","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"issue":"2","key":"7584_CR4","first-page":"1","volume":"6","author":"G Trew","year":"2004","unstructured":"Trew G (2004) Consensus in adhesion reduction management. Obstetrician Gynaecologist 6(2):1\u201316","journal-title":"Obstetrician Gynaecologist"},{"issue":"4","key":"7584_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"260","DOI":"10.1159\/000050149","volume":"18","author":"T Liakakos","year":"2001","unstructured":"Liakakos T, Thomakos N, Fine PM, Dervenis C, Young RL (2001) Peritoneal adhesions: etiology, pathophysiology, and clinical significance. Recent advances in prevention and management. Dig Surgery. 18(4):260\u2013273","journal-title":"Dig Surgery."},{"issue":"6","key":"7584_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2133","DOI":"10.1007\/s00423-021-02193-x","volume":"406","author":"B Kr\u00e4mer","year":"2021","unstructured":"Kr\u00e4mer B, Andress J, Neis F, Hoffmann S, Brucker S, Kommoss S, Holler A (2021) Adhesion prevention after endometriosis surgery - results of a randomized, controlled clinical trial with second-look laparoscopy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 406(6):2133\u20132143","journal-title":"Langenbecks Arch Surg"},{"issue":"Suppl 3","key":"7584_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S238","DOI":"10.1016\/j.placenta.2011.06.011","volume":"32","author":"E Somigliana","year":"2011","unstructured":"Somigliana E, Benaglia L, Vigano P, Candiani M, Vercellini P, Fedele L (2011) Surgical measures for endometriosis-related infertility: a plea for research. Placenta 32(Suppl 3):S238\u2013S242","journal-title":"Placenta"},{"key":"7584_CR8","first-page":"221","volume":"38","author":"B Kr\u00e4mer","year":"2021","unstructured":"Kr\u00e4mer B, Neis F, Brucker SY, Kommoss S, Andress J, Hoffmann S (2021) Peritoneal adhesions and their prevention - current trends. Surg Technol Int 38:221\u2013233","journal-title":"Surg Technol Int"},{"issue":"5","key":"7584_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"955","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-015-3717-y","volume":"292","author":"MM Binda","year":"2015","unstructured":"Binda MM (2015) Humidification during laparoscopic surgery: overview of the clinical benefits of using humidified gas during laparoscopic surgery. Arch Gynecol Obstet 292(5):955\u2013971","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"5","key":"7584_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1780","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2010.12.049","volume":"95","author":"A Tinelli","year":"2011","unstructured":"Tinelli A, Malvasi A, Guido M, Tsin DA, Hudelist G, Hurst B et al (2011) Adhesion formation after intracapsular myomectomy with or without adhesion barrier. Fertil Steril 95(5):1780\u20131785","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"6","key":"7584_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1256","DOI":"10.1007\/s11605-011-1819-9","volume":"16","author":"C Brochhausen","year":"2012","unstructured":"Brochhausen C, Schmitt VH, Planck CN, Rajab TK, Hollemann D, Tapprich C et al (2012) Current strategies and future perspectives for intraperitoneal adhesion prevention. J Gastrointest Surg 16(6):1256\u20131274","journal-title":"J Gastrointest Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"7584_CR12","volume":"18","author":"MJ Page","year":"2021","unstructured":"Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. PLoS\u00a0Med 18(3):e1003583","journal-title":"PLoS\u00a0Med"},{"key":"7584_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"(1989) Prevention of postsurgical adhesions by INTERCEED(TC7), an absorbable adhesion barrier: a prospective randomized multicenter clinical study. INTERCEED(TC7) Adhesion Barrier Study Group. Fertility and sterility. 51(6):933\u20138","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)60721-5"},{"key":"7584_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"(1995) The efficacy of Interceed(TC7)* for prevention of reformation of postoperative adhesions on ovaries, fallopian tubes, and fimbriae in microsurgical operations for fertility: a multicenter study. Nordic Adhesion Prevention Study Group. Fertil Steril. 63(4):709\u201314","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)57470-6"},{"issue":"2","key":"7584_CR15","first-page":"135","volume":"177","author":"R Azziz","year":"1993","unstructured":"Azziz R (1993) Microsurgery alone or with INTERCEED absorbable adhesion barrier for pelvic sidewall adhesion re-formation. The INTERCEED (TC7) adhesion barrier study group II. Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics. 177(2):135\u2013139","journal-title":"Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics."},{"issue":"3","key":"7584_CR16","first-page":"335","volume":"86","author":"RR Franklin","year":"1995","unstructured":"Franklin RR (1995) Reduction of ovarian adhesions by the use of Interceed. Ovarian Adhesion Study Group Obstet Gynecol 86(3):335\u2013340","journal-title":"Ovarian Adhesion Study Group Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"7584_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"766","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)56273-6","volume":"60","author":"EM Greenblatt","year":"1993","unstructured":"Greenblatt EM, Casper RF (1993) Adhesion formation after laparoscopic ovarian cautery for polycystic ovarian syndrome: lack of correlation with pregnancy rate. Fertil Steril 60(5):766\u2013770","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"3","key":"7584_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"579","DOI":"10.1093\/HUMREP\/11.3.579","volume":"11","author":"J Keckstein","year":"1996","unstructured":"Keckstein J, Ulrich U, Sasse V, Roth A, Tuttlies F, Karageorgieva E (1996) Reduction of postoperative adhesion formation after laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy. Hum Reprod 11(3):579\u2013582","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"4","key":"7584_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"335","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13621.x","volume":"101","author":"TC Li","year":"1994","unstructured":"Li TC, Cooke ID (1994) The value of an absorbable adhesion barrier, Interceed, in the prevention of adhesion reformation following microsurgical adhesiolysis. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 101(4):335\u2013339","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"4 Pt 1","key":"7584_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"512","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(95)00241-I","volume":"86","author":"V Mais","year":"1995","unstructured":"Mais V, Ajossa S, Marongiu D, Peiretti RF, Guerriero S, Melis GB (1995) Reduction of adhesion reformation after laparoscopic endometriosis surgery: a randomized trial with an oxidized regenerated cellulose absorbable barrier. Obstet Gynecol 86(4 Pt 1):512\u2013515","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"12","key":"7584_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3133","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.humrep.a135873","volume":"10","author":"V Mais","year":"1995","unstructured":"Mais V, Ajossa S, Piras B, Guerriero S, Marongiu D, Melis GB (1995) Prevention of de-novo adhesion formation after laparoscopic myomectomy: a randomized trial to evaluate the effectiveness of an oxidized regenerated cellulose absorbable barrier. Hum Reprod 10(12):3133\u20133135","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"5","key":"7584_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"992","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019337","volume":"11","author":"H Saravelos","year":"1996","unstructured":"Saravelos H, Li TC (1996) Post-operative adhesions after laparoscopic electrosurgical treatment for polycystic ovarian syndrome with the application of Interceed to one ovary: a prospective randomized controlled study. Hum Reprod 11(5):992\u2013997","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"5","key":"7584_CR23","first-page":"387","volume":"45","author":"T Sawada","year":"2000","unstructured":"Sawada T, Nishizawa H, Nishio E, Kadowaki M (2000) Postoperative adhesion prevention with an oxidized regenerated cellulose adhesion barrier in infertile women. J Reprod Med 45(5):387\u2013389","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"7584_CR24","first-page":"518","volume":"79","author":"K Sekiba","year":"1992","unstructured":"Sekiba K (1992) Use of Interceed(TC7) absorbable adhesion barrier to reduce postoperative adhesion reformation in infertility and endometriosis surgery. The Obstetrics and Gynecology Adhesion Prevention Committee. Obstet Gynecol 79(4):518\u2013522","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"7584_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"132","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(97)00429-9","volume":"69","author":"D Wallwiener","year":"1998","unstructured":"Wallwiener D, Meyer A, Bastert G (1998) Adhesion formation of the parietal and visceral peritoneum: an explanation for the controversy on the use of autologous and alloplastic barriers? Fertil Steril 69(1):132\u2013137","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"7584_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Canis MJ, Triopon G, Dara\u00ef E, Madelenat P, LeV\u00eaque J, Panel P, et al. (2014) Adhesion prevention after myomectomy by laparotomy: a prospective multicenter comparative randomized single-blind study with second-look laparoscopy to assess the effectiveness of PREVADH\u2122. Eur J Obstetrics Gynecol Reproductive Biol 178:42\u20137.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.020"},{"issue":"3","key":"7584_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"485","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2006.07.1505","volume":"87","author":"GS diZerega","year":"2007","unstructured":"diZerega GS, Coad J, Donnez J (2007) Clinical evaluation of endometriosis and differential response to surgical therapy with and without application of Oxiplex\/AP* adhesion barrier gel. Fertil Steril 87(3):485\u2013489","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"3","key":"7584_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"334","DOI":"10.1016\/S1074-3804(05)60257-5","volume":"10","author":"DA Johns","year":"2003","unstructured":"Johns DA, Ferland R, Dunn R (2003) Initial feasibility study of a sprayable hydrogel adhesion barrier system in patients undergoing laparoscopic ovarian surgery. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 10(3):334\u2013338","journal-title":"J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc"},{"issue":"2","key":"7584_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"514","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deh651","volume":"20","author":"P Lundorff","year":"2005","unstructured":"Lundorff P, Donnez J, Korell M, Audebert AJ, Block K, diZerega GS (2005) Clinical evaluation of a viscoelastic gel for reduction of adhesions following gynaecological surgery by laparoscopy in Europe. Hum Reprod 20(2):514\u2013520","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"2","key":"7584_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"398","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2003.12.046","volume":"82","author":"L Mettler","year":"2004","unstructured":"Mettler L, Audebert A, Lehmann-Willenbrock E, Schive-Peterhansl K, Jacobs VR (2004) A randomized, prospective, controlled, multicenter clinical trial of a sprayable, site-specific adhesion barrier system in patients undergoing myomectomy. Fertil Steril 82(2):398\u2013404","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"5","key":"7584_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1093","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/den080","volume":"23","author":"L Mettler","year":"2008","unstructured":"Mettler L, Hucke J, Bojahr B, Tinneberg H-R, Leyland N, Avelar R (2008) A safety and efficacy study of a resorbable hydrogel for reduction of post-operative adhesions following myomectomy\u2020. Hum Reprod 23(5):1093\u20131100","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"4","key":"7584_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"697","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-014-3251-3","volume":"290","author":"G Tchartchian","year":"2014","unstructured":"Tchartchian G, Hackethal A, Herrmann A, Bojahr B, Wallwiener C, Ohlinger R et al (2014) Evaluation of SprayShield\u2122 adhesion barrier in a single center: randomized controlled study in 15 women undergoing reconstructive surgery after laparoscopic myomectomy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 290(4):697\u2013704","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"1","key":"7584_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1007\/s10397-011-0698-0","volume":"9","author":"RP Ten Broek","year":"2012","unstructured":"Ten Broek RP, Kok-Krant N, Verhoeve HR, van Goor H, Bakkum EA (2012) Efficacy of polyethylene glycol adhesion barrier after gynecological laparoscopic surgery: results of a randomized controlled pilot study. Gynecol Surg 9(1):29\u201335","journal-title":"Gynecol Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"7584_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-016-4211-x","volume":"295","author":"GH Trew","year":"2017","unstructured":"Trew GH, Pistofidis GA, Brucker SY, Kr\u00e4mer B, Ziegler NM, Korell M et al (2017) A first-in-human, randomized, controlled, subject- and reviewer-blinded multicenter study of Actamax\u2122 adhesion barrier. Arch Gynecol Obstet 295(2):383\u2013395","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"5","key":"7584_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1450","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2005.04.055","volume":"84","author":"P Young","year":"2005","unstructured":"Young P, Johns A, Templeman C, Witz C, Webster B, Ferland R et al (2005) Reduction of postoperative adhesions after laparoscopic gynecological surgery with Oxiplex\/AP Gel: a pilot study. Fertil Steril 84(5):1450\u20131456","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"6","key":"7584_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"904","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)58716-0","volume":"66","author":"MP Diamond","year":"1996","unstructured":"Diamond MP (1996) Reduction of adhesions after uterine myomectomy by Seprafilm membrane (HAL-F): a blinded, prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical study. Seprafilm Adhesion Study Group Fertil Steril 66(6):904\u2013910","journal-title":"Seprafilm Adhesion Study Group Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"6","key":"7584_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1067","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(98)00057-0","volume":"69","author":"MP Diamond","year":"1998","unstructured":"Diamond MP (1998) Reduction of de novo postsurgical adhesions by intraoperative precoating with Sepracoat (HAL-C) solution: a prospective, randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled multicenter study. The Sepracoat Adhesion Study Group. Fertil Steril 69(6):1067\u20131074","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"2","key":"7584_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"487","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2011.05.081","volume":"96","author":"GT Fossum","year":"2011","unstructured":"Fossum GT, Silverberg KM, Miller CE, Diamond MP, Holmdahl L (2011) Gynecologic use of sepraspray adhesion barrier for reduction of adhesion development after laparoscopic myomectomy: a pilot study. Fertil Steril 96(2):487\u2013491","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"3","key":"7584_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"595","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(01)01954-9","volume":"76","author":"DB Johns","year":"2001","unstructured":"Johns DB, Keyport GM, Hoehler F, diZerega GS (2001) Reduction of postsurgical adhesions with Intergel adhesion prevention solution: a multicenter study of safety and efficacy after conservative gynecologic surgery. Fertil Steril 76(3):595\u2013604","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"3","key":"7584_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"373e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.012","volume":"214","author":"DG Kiefer","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kiefer DG, Muscat JC, Santorelli J, Chavez MR, Ananth CV, Smulian JC, Vintzileos AM (2016) Effectiveness and short-term safety of modified sodium hyaluronic acid-carboxymethylcellulose at cesarean delivery: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 214(3):373e1-e12","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"7584_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"853","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2015.04.011","volume":"22","author":"C Liu","year":"2015","unstructured":"Liu C, Lu Q, Zhang Z, Xue M, Zhang Y, Zhang Y et al (2015) A randomized controlled trial on the efficacy and safety of a new crosslinked hyaluronan gel in reducing adhesions after gynecologic laparoscopic surgeries. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 22(5):853\u2013863","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"9","key":"7584_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1982","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/16.9.1982","volume":"16","author":"P Lundorff","year":"2001","unstructured":"Lundorff P, van Geldorp H, Tronstad SE, Lalos O, Larsson B, Johns DB, diZerega GS (2001) Reduction of post-surgical adhesions with ferric hyaluronate gel: a European study. Hum Reprod 16(9):1982\u20131988","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"5","key":"7584_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1248","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dei488","volume":"21","author":"V Mais","year":"2006","unstructured":"Mais V, Bracco GL, Litta P, Gargiulo T, Melis GB (2006) Reduction of postoperative adhesions with an auto-crosslinked hyaluronan gel in gynaecological laparoscopic surgery: a blinded, controlled, randomized, multicentre study. Hum Reprod 21(5):1248\u20131254","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"2","key":"7584_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"441","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(03)00597-1","volume":"80","author":"M Pellicano","year":"2003","unstructured":"Pellicano M, Bramante S, Cirillo D, Palomba S, Bifulco G, Zullo F, Nappi C (2003) Effectiveness of autocrosslinked hyaluronic acid gel after laparoscopic myomectomy in infertile patients: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Fertil Steril 80(2):441\u2013444","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"6","key":"7584_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1480","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/13.6.1480","volume":"13","author":"MH Thornton","year":"1998","unstructured":"Thornton MH, Johns DB, Campeau JD, Hoehler F, DiZerega GS (1998) Clinical evaluation of 0.5% ferric hyaluronate adhesion prevention gel for the reduction of adhesions following peritoneal cavity surgery: open-label pilot study. Human Reprod (Oxford, England). 13(6):1480\u20135","journal-title":"Human Reprod (Oxford, England)."},{"issue":"8","key":"7584_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2015","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/der135","volume":"26","author":"G Trew","year":"2011","unstructured":"Trew G, Pistofidis G, Pados G, Lower A, Mettler L, Wallwiener D et al (2011) Gynaecological endoscopic evaluation of 4% icodextrin solution: a European, multicentre, double-blind, randomized study of the efficacy and safety in the reduction of de novo adhesions after laparoscopic gynaecological surgery. Human Reprod (Oxford, England) 26(8):2015\u20132027","journal-title":"Human Reprod (Oxford, England)"},{"issue":"5","key":"7584_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1413","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2006.12.084","volume":"88","author":"CB Brown","year":"2007","unstructured":"Brown CB, Luciano AA, Martin D, Peers E, Scrimgeour A, diZerega GS (2007) Adept (icodextrin 4% solution) reduces adhesions after laparoscopic surgery for adhesiolysis: a double-blind, randomized, controlled study. Fertil Steril 88(5):1413\u20131426","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"4","key":"7584_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1031","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/17.4.1031","volume":"17","author":"GS diZerega","year":"2002","unstructured":"diZerega GS, Verco SJ, Young P, Kettel M, Kobak W, Martin D et al (2002) A randomized, controlled pilot study of the safety and efficacy of 4% icodextrin solution in the reduction of adhesions following laparoscopic gynaecological surgery. Hum Reprod 17(4):1031\u20131038","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"7584_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"(1983) Reduction of postoperative pelvic adhesions with intraperitoneal 32% dextran 70: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Fertility Steril 40(5):612\u20139","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)47419-4"},{"issue":"5","key":"7584_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"437","DOI":"10.3109\/00016348509155163","volume":"64","author":"B Larsson","year":"1985","unstructured":"Larsson B, Lalos O, Marsk L, Tronstad SE, Bygdeman M, Pehrson S, Joelsson I (1985) Effect of intraperitoneal instillation of 32% dextran 70 on postoperative adhesion formation after tubal surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 64(5):437\u2013441","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"4","key":"7584_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"380","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(84)90711-7","volume":"148","author":"SM Rosenberg","year":"1984","unstructured":"Rosenberg SM, Board JA (1984) High-molecular weight dextran in human infertility surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 148(4):380\u2013385","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"7584_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1086","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2010.11.024","volume":"95","author":"MP Diamond","year":"2011","unstructured":"Diamond MP, Korell M, Martinez S, Kurman E, Kamar M (2011) A prospective, controlled, randomized, multicenter, exploratory pilot study evaluating the safety and potential trends in efficacy of Adhexil. Fertil Steril 95(3):1086\u20131090","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"8","key":"7584_CR53","first-page":"571","volume":"50","author":"H Takeuchi","year":"2005","unstructured":"Takeuchi H, Kitade M, Kikuchi I, Shimanuki H, Kumakiri J, Kinoshita K (2005) Adhesion-prevention effects of fibrin sealants after laparoscopic myomectomy as determined by second-look laparoscopy: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. J Reprod Med 50(8):571\u2013577","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"7584_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"491","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)57414-7","volume":"63","author":"Group TMAMS","year":"1995","unstructured":"Group TMAMS (1995) An expanded polytetrafluoroethylene barrier (Gore-Tex surgical membrane) reduces post-myomectomy adhesion formation. The myomectomy adhesion multicenter study group. Fertil Steril 63(3):491\u20133","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"3","key":"7584_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"631","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(03)00759-3","volume":"80","author":"MP Diamond","year":"2003","unstructured":"Diamond MP, Luciano A, Johns DA, Dunn R, Young P, Bieber E (2003) Reduction of postoperative adhesions by N, O-carboxymethylchitosan: a pilot study. Fertil Steril 80(3):631\u2013636","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"9","key":"7584_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"753","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2013.07.019","volume":"11","author":"TK Rajab","year":"2013","unstructured":"Rajab TK, Kimonis KO, Ali E, Offodile AC, Brady M, Bleday R (2013) Practical implications of postoperative adhesions for preoperative consent and operative technique. Int J Surg 11(9):753\u2013756","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"7584_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"498","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2004.09.019","volume":"83","author":"M Pellicano","year":"2005","unstructured":"Pellicano M, Guida M, Bramante S, Acunzo G, Di Spiezio SA, Tommaselli GA, Nappi C (2005) Reproductive outcome after autocrosslinked hyaluronic acid gel application in infertile patients who underwent laparoscopic myomectomy. Fertil Steril 83(2):498\u2013500","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"10","key":"7584_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3597","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm12103597","volume":"12","author":"B Kr\u00e4mer","year":"2023","unstructured":"Kr\u00e4mer B, Andress J, Neis F, Hoffmann S, Brucker S, Kommoss S, H\u00f6ller A (2023) Improvement in fertility and pain after endometriosis resection and adhesion prevention with 4DryField\u00ae PH: follow-up of a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Med 12(10):3597","journal-title":"J Clin Med"},{"key":"7584_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"471","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.1800520616","volume":"52","author":"H Ellis","year":"1965","unstructured":"Ellis H, Harrison W, Hugh TB (1965) The healing of peritoneum under normal and pathological conditions. Br J Surg 52:471\u2013476","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"7584_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"908","DOI":"10.1097\/00000658-196706000-00006","volume":"165","author":"TB Hubbard Jr","year":"1967","unstructured":"Hubbard TB Jr, Khan MZ, Carag VR Jr, Albites VE, Hricko GM (1967) The pathology of peritoneal repair: its relation to the formation of adhesions. Ann Surg 165(6):908\u2013916","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"7584_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"86","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2015.06.071","volume":"22","author":"L Shapiro","year":"2015","unstructured":"Shapiro L, Holste JL, Muench T, diZerega G (2015) Rapid reperitonealization and wound healing in a preclinical model of abdominal trauma repair with a composite mesh. Int J Surg 22:86\u201391","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"7584_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"187","DOI":"10.1159\/000337741","volume":"48","author":"M Ditzel","year":"2012","unstructured":"Ditzel M, Deerenberg EB, Komen N, Mulder IM, Jeekel H, Lange JF (2012) Postoperative adhesion prevention with a new barrier: an experimental study. Eur Surg Res 48(4):187\u2013193","journal-title":"Eur Surg Res"},{"issue":"8","key":"7584_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1117","DOI":"10.1007\/s00384-013-1679-8","volume":"28","author":"HJ Hwang","year":"2013","unstructured":"Hwang HJ, An MS, Ha TK, Kim KH, Kim TH, Choi CS et al (2013) All the commercially available adhesion barriers have the same effect on adhesion prophylaxis?; A comparison of barrier agents using a newly developed, severe intra-abdominal adhesion model. Int J Colorectal Dis 28(8):1117\u20131125","journal-title":"Int J Colorectal Dis"},{"key":"7584_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2482-13-34","author":"CD Klink","year":"2013","unstructured":"Klink CD, Schickhaus P, Binneb\u00f6sel M, Jockenhoevel S, Rosch R, Tolba R, Neumann UP, Klinge U (2013) Influence of 4% icodextrin solution on peritoneal tissue response and adhesion formation. BMC Surg. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1471-2482-13-34","journal-title":"BMC Surg"},{"issue":"7","key":"7584_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"524","DOI":"10.7150\/ijms.15167","volume":"13","author":"D Poehnert","year":"2016","unstructured":"Poehnert D, Grethe L, Maegel L, Jonigk D, Lippmann T, Kaltenborn A et al (2016) Evaluation of the effectiveness of peritoneal adhesion prevention devices in a rat model. Int J Med Sci 13(7):524\u2013532","journal-title":"Int J Med Sci"},{"issue":"3","key":"7584_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"286","DOI":"10.1001\/archsurg.138.3.286","volume":"138","author":"SA M\u00fcller","year":"2003","unstructured":"M\u00fcller SA, Treutner KH, Haase G, Kinzel S, Tietze L, Schumpelick V (2003) Effect of intraperitoneal antiadhesive fluids in a rat peritonitis model. Arch Surg 138(3):286\u2013290","journal-title":"Arch Surg"},{"issue":"9","key":"7584_CR67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"995","DOI":"10.1007\/s00595-013-0490-z","volume":"43","author":"WS Lee","year":"2013","unstructured":"Lee WS, Baek JH, Lee WK (2013) Direct comparison of Seprafilm (R) versus Adept (R) versus no additive for reducing the risk of small-bowel obstruction in colorectal cancer surgery. Surg Today 43(9):995\u20131002","journal-title":"Surg Today"},{"issue":"11","key":"7584_CR68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e21657","DOI":"10.1016\/j.heliyon.2023.e21657","volume":"9","author":"T-M Liu","year":"2023","unstructured":"Liu T-M, Kiu K-T, Yen M-H, Tam K-W, Chang T-C (2023) Efficacy and safety of purified starch for adhesion prevention in colorectal surgery. Heliyon. 9(11):e21657","journal-title":"Heliyon."},{"key":"7584_CR69","first-page":"6","volume":"20","author":"M Korell","year":"2010","unstructured":"Korell M, Studien W (2010) Methoden der Adh\u00e4sionsprophylaxe - Pro und Kontra. J f\u00fcr Gyn\u00e4kologische Endokrinologie 20:6\u201313","journal-title":"J f\u00fcr Gyn\u00e4kologische Endokrinologie"},{"issue":"5","key":"7584_CR70","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1021","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)57541-4","volume":"63","author":"AF Haney","year":"1995","unstructured":"Haney AF, Hesla J, Hurst BS, Kettel LM, Murphy AA, Rock JA et al (1995) Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (Gore-Tex Surgical Membrane) is superior to oxidized regenerated cellulose (Interceed TC7+) in preventing adhesions. Fertil Steril 63(5):1021\u20131026","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"4","key":"7584_CR71","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"817","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)55333-3","volume":"58","author":"CL Best","year":"1992","unstructured":"Best CL, Rittenhouse D, Vasquez C, Norng T, Subias E, Sueldo CE (1992) Evaluation of Interceed (TC7) for reduction of postoperative adhesions in rabbits. Fertil Steril 58(4):817\u2013820","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"1","key":"7584_CR72","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)54801-8","volume":"57","author":"K Pagidas","year":"1992","unstructured":"Pagidas K, Tulandi T (1992) Effects of Ringer\u2019s lactate, lnterceed(TC7) and Gore-Tex\u2020 surgical membrane on postsurgical adhesion formation. Fertil Steril 57(1):199\u2013201","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"2","key":"7584_CR73","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"160","DOI":"10.1159\/000293688","volume":"26","author":"WS Maxson","year":"1988","unstructured":"Maxson WS, Herbert CM, Oldfield EL, Hill GA (1988) Efficacy of a modified oxidized cellulose fabric in the prevention of adhesion formation. Gynecol Obstet Invest 26(2):160\u2013165","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Invest"},{"issue":"6","key":"7584_CR74","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"701","DOI":"10.1163\/156856209X435835","volume":"21","author":"WJ Cho","year":"2010","unstructured":"Cho WJ, Oh SH, Lee JH (2010) Alginate film as a novel post-surgical tissue adhesion barrier. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 21(6):701\u2013713","journal-title":"J Biomater Sci Polym Ed"},{"issue":"1","key":"7584_CR75","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e13","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jss.2012.01.056","volume":"179","author":"K Takagi","year":"2013","unstructured":"Takagi K, Tsuchiya T, Araki M, Yamasaki N, Nagayasu T, Hyon SH, Nakajima N (2013) Novel biodegradable powder for preventing postoperative pleural adhesion. J Surg Res 179(1):e13\u2013e19","journal-title":"J Surg Res"},{"issue":"2","key":"7584_CR76","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"545","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jss.2012.07.053","volume":"178","author":"CC Peyton","year":"2012","unstructured":"Peyton CC, Keys T, Tomblyn S, Burmeister D, Beumer JH, Holleran JL et al (2012) Halofuginone infused keratin hydrogel attenuates adhesions in a rodent cecal abrasion model. J Surg Res 178(2):545\u2013552","journal-title":"J Surg Res"},{"issue":"3","key":"7584_CR77","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"671","DOI":"10.1016\/S0039-6109(05)70574-0","volume":"77","author":"AH DeCherney","year":"1997","unstructured":"DeCherney AH, diZerega GS (1997) Clinical problem of intraperitoneal postsurgical adhesion formation following general surgery and the use of adhesion prevention barriers. Surg Clin N Am 77(3):671\u2013688","journal-title":"Surg Clin N Am"},{"key":"7584_CR78","first-page":"370","volume-title":"Polymeric site-specific pharmacotherapy","author":"D Wiseman","year":"1994","unstructured":"Wiseman D (1994) Polymers for the prevention of surgical adhesions. In: Domb AJ (ed) Polymeric site-specific pharmacotherapy. Wiley, New York, pp 370\u2013421"},{"issue":"1","key":"7584_CR79","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"202","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)54802-X","volume":"57","author":"AF Haney","year":"1992","unstructured":"Haney AF, Doty E (1992) Murine peritoneal injury and de novo adhesion formation caused by oxidized-regenerated cellulose (Interceed [TC7]) but not expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (Gore-Tex Surgical Membrane). Fertil Steril 57(1):202\u2013208","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"3","key":"7584_CR80","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"339","DOI":"10.1016\/S1074-3804(05)60258-7","volume":"10","author":"L Mettler","year":"2003","unstructured":"Mettler L, Audebert A, Lehmann-Willenbrock E, Schive K, Jacobs VR (2003) Prospective clinical trial of SprayGel as a barrier to adhesion formation: an interim analysis. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 10(3):339\u2013344","journal-title":"J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc"},{"issue":"4","key":"7584_CR81","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"462","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.04.007","volume":"18","author":"SA Di Spiezio","year":"2011","unstructured":"Di Spiezio SA, Spinelli M, Bramante S, Scognamiglio M, Greco E, Guida M et al (2011) Efficacy of a polyethylene oxide-sodium carboxymethylcellulose gel in prevention of intrauterine adhesions after hysteroscopic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 18(4):462\u2013469","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"7584_CR82","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"126","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2013.07.019","volume":"21","author":"N Fuchs","year":"2014","unstructured":"Fuchs N, Smorgick N, Ben Ami I, Vaknin Z, Tovbin Y, Halperin R, Pansky M (2014) Intercoat (Oxiplex\/AP gel) for preventing intrauterine adhesions after operative hysteroscopy for suspected retained products of conception: double-blind, prospective, randomized pilot study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 21(1):126\u2013130","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"7584_CR83","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"94","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2018.03.032","volume":"26","author":"X Li","year":"2019","unstructured":"Li X, Wu L, Zhou Y, Fan X, Huang J, Wu J et al (2019) New crosslinked hyaluronan gel for the prevention of intrauterine adhesions after dilation and curettage in patients with delayed miscarriage: a prospective, multicenter, randomized. Controlled Trial J Minim Invasive Gynecol 26(1):94\u201399","journal-title":"Controlled Trial J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"9","key":"7584_CR84","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1918","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deg368","volume":"18","author":"G Acunzo","year":"2003","unstructured":"Acunzo G, Guida M, Pellicano M, Tommaselli GA, Di Spiezio SA, Bifulco G et al (2003) Effectiveness of auto-cross-linked hyaluronic acid gel in the prevention of intrauterine adhesions after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Hum Reprod 18(9):1918\u20131921","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"7","key":"7584_CR85","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"691","DOI":"10.1016\/S0368-2315(06)76465-1","volume":"35","author":"G Ducarme","year":"2006","unstructured":"Ducarme G, Davitian C, Zarrouk S, Uzan M, Poncelet C (2006) Interest of auto-cross-linked hyaluronic acid gel in the prevention of intrauterine adhesions after hysteroscopic surgery: a case-control study. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 35(7):691\u2013695","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"},{"key":"7584_CR86","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2015.06.025","volume":"193","author":"T Thubert","year":"2015","unstructured":"Thubert T, Dussaux C, Demoulin G, Rivain AL, Trichot C, Deffieux X (2015) Influence of auto-cross-linked hyaluronic acid gel on pregnancy rate and hysteroscopic outcomes following surgical removal of intra-uterine adhesions. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 193:65\u201369","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"2","key":"7584_CR87","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"255","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jss.2006.06.021","volume":"136","author":"CJ Sikkink","year":"2006","unstructured":"Sikkink CJ, de Man B, Bleichrodt RP, van Goor H (2006) Auto-cross-linked hyaluronic acid gel does not reduce intra-abdominal adhesions or abscess formation in a rat model of peritonitis. J Surg Res 136(2):255\u2013259","journal-title":"J Surg Res"},{"key":"7584_CR88","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1016\/j.biomaterials.2016.04.012","volume":"96","author":"K De Clercq","year":"2016","unstructured":"De Clercq K, Schelfhout C, Bracke M, De Wever O, Van Bockstal M, Ceelen W et al (2016) Genipin-crosslinked gelatin microspheres as a strategy to prevent postsurgical peritoneal adhesions: In vitro and in vivo characterization. Biomaterials 96:33\u201346","journal-title":"Biomaterials"},{"issue":"7","key":"7584_CR89","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"887","DOI":"10.1177\/0885328220954188","volume":"35","author":"S van Steensel","year":"2020","unstructured":"van Steensel S, Liu H, Vercoulen TF, Hadfoune M, Breukink SO, Stassen LP et al (2020) Prevention of intra-abdominal adhesions by a hyaluronic acid gel; an experimental study in rats. J Biomater Appl 35(7):887\u2013897","journal-title":"J Biomater Appl"},{"issue":"4","key":"7584_CR90","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"449","DOI":"10.1097\/01.sla.0000207837.71831.a2","volume":"243","author":"CL Tang","year":"2006","unstructured":"Tang CL, Jayne DG, Seow-Choen F, Ng YY, Eu KW, Mustapha N (2006) A randomized controlled trial of 0.5% ferric hyaluronate gel (Intergel) in the prevention of adhesions following abdominal surgery. Ann Surg 243(4):449\u201355","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"issue":"7","key":"7584_CR91","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4593","DOI":"10.1074\/jbc.R100039200","volume":"277","author":"BP Toole","year":"2002","unstructured":"Toole BP, Wight TN, Tammi MI (2002) Hyaluronan-cell interactions in cancer and vascular disease. J Biol Chem 277(7):4593\u20134596","journal-title":"J Biol Chem"},{"issue":"2","key":"7584_CR92","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"499","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-008-0235-1","volume":"16","author":"A Tan","year":"2009","unstructured":"Tan A, Argenta P, Ramirez R, Bliss R, Geller M (2009) The use of sodium hyaluronate-carboxymethylcellulose (HA-CMC) barrier in gynecologic malignancies: a retrospective review of outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 16(2):499\u2013505","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"10","key":"7584_CR93","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1310","DOI":"10.1007\/s10350-004-6739-2","volume":"46","author":"DE Beck","year":"2003","unstructured":"Beck DE, Cohen Z, Fleshman JW, Kaufman HS, van Goor H, Wolff BG, Adhesion Study Group Steering C. (2003) A prospective, randomized, multicenter, controlled study of the safety of Seprafilm adhesion barrier in abdominopelvic surgery of the intestine. Dis Colon Rectum 46(10):1310\u20139","journal-title":"Dis Colon Rectum"},{"issue":"3","key":"7584_CR94","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"865","DOI":"10.1007\/s13304-021-01117-0","volume":"74","author":"S Hajibandeh","year":"2022","unstructured":"Hajibandeh S, Hajibandeh S, Saeed S, Bird J, Kannappa L, Ratnayake I (2022) Effect of hyaluronate-based bioresorbable membrane (Seprafilm) on outcomes of abdominal surgery: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomised controlled trials. Updates Surg 74(3):865\u2013881","journal-title":"Updates Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"7584_CR95","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1113","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-020-05483-9","volume":"301","author":"LA Torres-de la Roche","year":"2020","unstructured":"Torres-de la Roche LA, Devassy R, de Wilde MS, Cezar C, Krentel H, Korell M, De Wilde RL (2020) A new approach to avoid ovarian failure as well function-impairing adhesion formation in endometrioma infertility surgery. Arch Gynecol Obstet 301(5):1113\u20131115","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"4","key":"7584_CR96","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"658","DOI":"10.1080\/01443615.2021.1928030","volume":"42","author":"N Ziegler","year":"2022","unstructured":"Ziegler N, De Wilde RL (2022) Reduction of adhesion formation after gynaecological adhesiolysis surgery with 4DryField PH - a retrospective, controlled study with second look laparoscopies. J Obstet Gynaecol 42(4):658\u2013664","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"7584_CR97","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e28","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0039-1687857","volume":"5","author":"M Ahmad","year":"2019","unstructured":"Ahmad M, Crescenti F (2019) Significant adhesion reduction with 4DryField PH after release of adhesive small bowel obstruction. Surg J (N Y) 5(1):e28\u2013e34","journal-title":"Surg J (N Y)"},{"issue":"10","key":"7584_CR98","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1350","DOI":"10.7150\/ijms.33277","volume":"16","author":"D Poehnert","year":"2019","unstructured":"Poehnert D, Neubert L, Klempnauer J, Borchert P, Jonigk D, Winny M (2019) Comparison of adhesion prevention capabilities of the modified starch powder-based medical devices 4DryField((R)) PH and arista AH in the optimized peritoneal adhesion model. Int J Med Sci 16(10):1350\u20131355","journal-title":"Int J Med Sci"},{"issue":"S1","key":"7584_CR99","first-page":"120","volume":"122","author":"MY Li","year":"2015","unstructured":"Li MY, Khoo CK, Hunan R (2015) Use of an alternative haemostatic agent, HaemoCer, in minimally invasive and open gynaecological surgeries: a single centre experience. BJOG 122(S1):120","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"3","key":"7584_CR100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"424","DOI":"10.7150\/ijms.90024","volume":"21","author":"D Poehnert","year":"2024","unstructured":"Poehnert D, Neubert L, Winny M (2024) Comparison of adhesion prevention capabilities of the modified starch powder-based medical devices 4DryField((R)) PH, HaemoCer PLUS and StarSil((R)) in the optimized peritoneal adhesion model. Int J Med Sci 21(3):424\u2013430","journal-title":"Int J Med Sci"},{"issue":"3","key":"7584_CR101","first-page":"Cd000475","volume":"3","author":"G Ahmad","year":"2020","unstructured":"Ahmad G, Kim K, Thompson M, Agarwal P, O\u2019Flynn H, Hindocha A, Watson A (2020) Barrier agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3(3):Cd000475","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-024-07584-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-024-07584-1\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-024-07584-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,18]],"date-time":"2024-07-18T14:14:37Z","timestamp":1721312077000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-024-07584-1"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,15]]},"references-count":101,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,8]]}},"alternative-id":["7584"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-024-07584-1","relation":{},"ISSN":["1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1432-0711","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,15]]},"assertion":[{"value":"8 February 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"3 June 2024","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"15 June 2024","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"This study was made possible by an unrestricted educational grant from PlantTec Medical GmbH (Lueneburg, Germany). The company had no influence on the authors or results; medical writing and editing were supported by co.medical (Berlin, Germany). The authors declare the following disclosures. Authors who are not listed separately below have no disclosures to declare. SS: royalties from PlantTec Medical GmbH, Baxter, and Eisei; member of advisory board of German working group on gynecological endoscopy (AGE); and vice president of German working group on endometriosis (AGEM). IMH: royalties from PlantTec, Tesaro\/GSK, MSD, and Roche and unrestricted research grants from Gedeon Richter, Bayer, Jenapharm, Takeda, and Storz. AM: royalties from PlantTec Medical GmbH, GSK, MSD, Novartis, Olympus, and Stryker. BK: royalties from PlantTec, Baxter, and Medtronic and member of the advisory board of the German working group on gynecological endoscopy (AGE) and the European Society of Gynecological Endoscopy (ESGE).","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}