{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,21]],"date-time":"2026-09-21T19:07:13Z","timestamp":1790017633853,"version":"4.0.1"},"reference-count":38,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,8]],"date-time":"2024-07-08T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1720396800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,8]],"date-time":"2024-07-08T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1720396800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100008376","name":"Helsingin ja Uudenmaan Sairaanhoitopiiri","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["grant from the Women's Clinic"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["grant from the Women's Clinic"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100008376","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"name":"Suomen Gynekologiyhdistys"},{"name":"Gynekologisen kirurgian seura"},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100007083","name":"Orionin Tutkimuss\u00e4\u00e4ti\u00f6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100007083","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/100007797","name":"University of Helsinki","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100007797","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Hysterectomy may be a risk factor for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). We assessed the risk of recurrent POP (operations and visits) after hysterectomy among women with previous POP. We also studied patient and operation related risk factors for POP recurrence.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>This retrospective cohort study included 1697 women having previous POP diagnosis or POP at the time of hysterectomy (FINHYST 2006 cohort). Follow-up was until the end of 2016. The data was derived from the Finnish National Care register linked to the cohort. Hysterectomy approaches and other demographics were compared to the risk of a prolapse diagnosis and\/or surgery. Cox regression model was used to identify hazard ratios.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Following hysterectomy, a total of 280 women (16.5%) had a POP reoperation and 359 (21.2%) had an outpatient visit due to POP. Vaginal vault prolapse repair was the most common POP reoperation (n\u2009=\u2009181, 10.7%), followed by anterior wall repair (n\u2009=\u2009120, 7.1%). Median time to POP reoperation was 3.7\u00a0years. Hysterectomy approach did not affect reoperations or visits. Previous cesarean section and anterior repair during hysterectomy were associated with decreased risk, whereas concomitant sacrospinous fixation and uterus prolapse as the main indication led to increased risk of anterior\/vault prolapse reoperations. Concomitant posterior repair decreased posterior reoperations and visits, but uterus weight over 500\u00a0g caused a fivefold increased risk of posterior prolapse visit. Residential status was associated with elevated risk of any POP reoperations and visits.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Approximately one out of five women suffering from POP ensue POP reoperation or visit after hysterectomy. These high rates are independent on hysterectomy approach, but probably indicate that hysterectomy may worsen previous pelvic floor dysfunction.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-024-07615-x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,8]],"date-time":"2024-07-08T10:03:00Z","timestamp":1720432980000},"page":"2705-2715","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":10,"title":["Recurrent pelvic organ prolapse after hysterectomy; a 10-year national follow-up study"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"310","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8940-376X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Tea","family":"Kuittinen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Maarit","family":"Mentula","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sari","family":"Tulokas","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tea","family":"Brummer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jyrki","family":"Jalkanen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Eija","family":"Tomas","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Juha","family":"M\u00e4kinen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jari","family":"Sj\u00f6berg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"P\u00e4ivi","family":"H\u00e4rkki","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"P\u00e4ivi","family":"Rahkola-Soisalo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,8]]},"reference":[{"key":"7615_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1783","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2169-9","volume":"24","author":"MD Barber","year":"2013","unstructured":"Barber MD, Maher C (2013) Epidemiology and outcome assessment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 24:1783\u20131790. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-013-2169-9","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"7615_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"751","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-016-3175-5","volume":"28","author":"CL Kinman","year":"2017","unstructured":"Kinman CL, Lemieux CA, Agrawal A et al (2017) The relationship between age and pelvic organ prolapse bother. Int Urogynecol J 28:751\u2013755. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-016-3175-5","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"7615_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.04.046","volume":"227","author":"SFM Schulten","year":"2022","unstructured":"Schulten SFM, Claas-Quax MJ, Weemhoff M, van Eijndhoven HW, van Leijsen SA, Vergeldt TF et al (2022) Risk factors for primary pelvic organ prolapse and prolapse recurrence: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 227:192\u2013208. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.04.046","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"7615_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000057","volume":"123","author":"JM Wu","year":"2014","unstructured":"Wu JM, Vaughan CP, Goode PS et al (2014) Prevalence and trends of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in U.S. women. Obstet Gynecol 123:141\u2013148. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000057","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"7615_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.04.004","volume":"214","author":"K Kurkij\u00e4rvi","year":"2009","unstructured":"Kurkij\u00e4rvi K, Aaltonen R, Gissler M, M\u00e4kinen J (2009) Pelvic organ prolapse surgery in Finland from 1987 to 2009: A national register based study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 214:71\u201377. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.04.004","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"7615_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1278","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181c2ce96","volume":"114","author":"JM Wu","year":"2009","unstructured":"Wu JM, Hundley AF, Fulton RG, Myers ER (2009) Forecasting the prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in U.S. women: 2010 to 2050. Obstet Gynecol 114:1278\u20131283","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"7615_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD003677.pub5","author":"WJ Aarts","year":"2015","unstructured":"Aarts WJ, Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Tavender E, Garry R, Mol WB, Kluivers KB (2015) Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD003677.pub5","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"7615_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"43","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-011-1523-z","volume":"23","author":"C Forsgren","year":"2012","unstructured":"Forsgren C, Lundholm C, Johansson AL, Cnattingius S, Zetterstr\u00f6m J, Altman D (2012) Vaginal hysterectomy and risk of pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence surgery. Int Urogynecol J 23:43\u201348. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-011-1523-z","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"7615_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"572.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.01.012","volume":"198","author":"D Altman","year":"2008","unstructured":"Altman D, Falconer C, Cnattingius S, Granath F (2008) Pelvic organ prolapse surgery following hysterectomy on benign indications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 198:572.e1-572.e5726. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.01.012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"7615_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1661","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-015-2757-y","volume":"26","author":"R Lykke","year":"2015","unstructured":"Lykke R, Blaak\u00e6r J, Ottesen B et al (2015) The indication for hysterectomy as a risk factor for subsequent pelvic organ prolapse repair. Int Urogynecol J 26:1661\u20131665. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-015-2757-y","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"7615_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"386","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.10.021","volume":"226","author":"KR Husby","year":"2022","unstructured":"Husby KR, Gradel K, Klarskov N (2022) Pelvic organ prolapse following hysterectomy on benign indication: a nationwide, nulliparous cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 226:386\u2013386. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.10.021","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"7615_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1623","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-008-0718-4","volume":"19","author":"P D\u00e4llenbach","year":"2008","unstructured":"D\u00e4llenbach P, Kaelin-Gambirasio I, Jacob S, Dubuisson J-B, Boulvain M (2008) Incidence rate and risk factors for vaginal vault prolapse repair after hysterectomy. Int Urogynecol J 19:1623\u20131629","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"7615_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1328","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002913","volume":"132","author":"K Dallas","year":"2018","unstructured":"Dallas K, Elliott CS, Syan R, Sohlberg E, Enemchukwu E, Rogo-Gupta MPH, Lisa MD (2018) Association Between Concomitant Hysterectomy and Repeat Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair in a Cohort of Nearly 100,000 Women. Obstet Gynecol 132:1328\u20131336. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002913","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"7615_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1755","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-019-04210-6","volume":"31","author":"S Mairesse","year":"2020","unstructured":"Mairesse S, Chazard E, Giraudet G et al (2020) Complications and reoperation after pelvic organ prolapse, impact of hysterectomy, surgical approach and surgeon experience. Int Urogynecol J 31:1755\u20132176. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-019-04210-6","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"7615_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-017-3395-3","volume":"29","author":"E L\u00f8wenstein","year":"2018","unstructured":"L\u00f8wenstein E, M\u00f8ller LA, Laigaard J (2018) Reoperation for pelvic organ prolapse: a Danish cohort study with 15\u201320 years\u2019 follow-up. Int Urogynecol J 29:119\u2013124","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"7615_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2515","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dep229","volume":"24","author":"TH Brummer","year":"2009","unstructured":"Brummer TH, Jalkanen J, Fraser J et al (2009) FINHYST 2006\u2013national prospective 1-year survey of 5,279 hysterectomies. Hum Reprod 24:2515\u20132522. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/dep229","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"7615_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"556","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.14542","volume":"102","author":"T Kuittinen","year":"2023","unstructured":"Kuittinen T, Tulokas S, Rahkola-Soisalo P, Brummer T, Jalkanen J, Tomas E, Makinen J, Sj\u00f6berg J, H\u00e4rkki P, Mentula M (2023) Pelvic organ prolapse after hysterectomy: a 10-year national follow-up study. Acta Obst Gyn Scand 102:556\u2013566. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/aogs.14542","journal-title":"Acta Obst Gyn Scand"},{"key":"7615_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"489","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000136100.10818.d8","volume":"104","author":"I Nygaard","year":"2008","unstructured":"Nygaard I, Bradley C, Brandt D, Initiative WH (2008) Pelvic organ prolapse in older women: prevalence and risk factors. Obst Gynecol 104:489\u2013497","journal-title":"Obst Gynecol"},{"key":"7615_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-017-3448-7","volume":"29","author":"S Manodoro","year":"2018","unstructured":"Manodoro S, Frigerio M, Cola A et al (2018) Risk factors for recurrence after hysterectomy plus native-tissue repair as primary treatment for genital prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 29:145\u2013151. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-017-3448-7","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"7615_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"601","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.06.022","volume":"215","author":"C Rappa","year":"2016","unstructured":"Rappa C, Saccone G (2016) Recurrence of vaginal prolapse after total vaginal hysterectomy with concurrent vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension: comparison between normal-weight and overweight women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 215:601. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.06.022","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"7615_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1014","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2015.10.138","volume":"195","author":"RSC Lavelle","year":"2016","unstructured":"Lavelle RSC, AL, Alhalabi E and Zimmern P, (2016) Risk of prolapse recurrence after native tissue anterior vaginal suspension procedure with intermediate to long-term follow-up. The J Urology 195:1014\u20131020. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.juro.2015.10.138","journal-title":"The J Urology"},{"key":"7615_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"527","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-014-2490-y","volume":"26","author":"R Lykke","year":"2015","unstructured":"Lykke R, Blaak\u00e6r J, Ottesen B et al (2015) Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery among Danish women hysterectomized for benign conditions: age at hysterectomy, age at subsequent POP operation, and risk of POP after hysterectomy. Int Urogynecol J 26:527\u2013532. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-014-2490-y","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"7615_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"555","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.01.051","volume":"198","author":"MA Denman","year":"2008","unstructured":"Denman MA, Gregory WT, Boyles SH, Smith V, Edwards SR, Clark AL (2008) Reoperation 10 years after surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 198:555","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"7615_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"532","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.14340","volume":"101","author":"M Brunes","year":"2022","unstructured":"Brunes M, Johannesson U, Drca A et al (2022) Recurrent surgery in uterine prolapse: a nationwide register study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 101:532\u2013541. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/aogs.14340","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"7615_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"981","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182a8a5e4","volume":"122","author":"KS Eilber","year":"2013","unstructured":"Eilber KS, Alperin M, Khan A et al (2013) Outcomes of vaginal prolapse surgery among female medicare beneficiaries: the role of apical support. Obstet Gynecol 122:981\u2013987","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"7615_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"775","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-020-04572-2","volume":"32","author":"GL Carlin","year":"2021","unstructured":"Carlin GL, Bodner-Adler B, Husslein H et al (2021) The effectiveness of surgical procedures to prevent post-hysterectomy pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review of the literature. Int Urogynecol J 32:775\u2013783. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-020-04572-2","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"7615_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1670","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.10.036","volume":"25","author":"SR Till","year":"2018","unstructured":"Till SR, Hobbs KA, Moulder JK, Steege JF, Siedhoff MT (2018) McCall culdoplasty during total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a pilot randomized controlled trial. JMIG 25:1670\u20131678. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.10.036","journal-title":"JMIG"},{"key":"7615_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e126","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003519","volume":"134","author":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists\u2019 Committee on Practice Bulletins\u2014Gynecology and American Urogynecologic Society","year":"2019","unstructured":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists\u2019 Committee on Practice Bulletins\u2014Gynecology and American Urogynecologic Society (2019) Pelvic organ prolapse: ACOG practice bulletin, number 214. Obstet Gynecol 134:e126\u2013e142","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"7615_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1023","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2014.1719","volume":"311","author":"MD Barber","year":"2014","unstructured":"Barber MD, Brubaker L, Burgio KL et al (2014) Comparison of 2 Transvaginal surgical approaches and perioperative behavioral therapy for apical vaginal prolapse: the OPTIMAL randomized trial. JAMA 311:1023\u20131034. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.2014.1719","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"7615_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1554","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2018.2827","volume":"319","author":"JE Jelovsek","year":"2018","unstructured":"Jelovsek JE, Barber MD, Brubaker L et al (2018) Effect of uterosacral ligament suspension vs sacrospinous ligament fixation with or without perioperative behavioral therapy for pelvic organ vaginal prolapse on surgical outcomes and prolapse symptoms at 5 years in the OPTIMAL randomized clinical trial. JAMA 319:1554\u20131565. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.2018.2827","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"7615_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"527","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-017-4470-1","volume":"296","author":"R Lykke","year":"2017","unstructured":"Lykke R, L\u00f8wenstein E, Blaak\u00e6r J et al (2017) Hysterectomy technique and risk of pelvic organ prolapse repair: a Danish nationwide cohort study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 296:527\u2013531. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-017-4470-1","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"7615_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"496.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.11.008","volume":"224","author":"I Gabriel","year":"2021","unstructured":"Gabriel I, Kalousdian A, Brito LG, Abdalian T, Vitonis AF, Minassian VA (2021) Pelvic organ prolapse after 3 modes of hysterectomy: long-term follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol 224:496.e1-496.e10. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.11.008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"7615_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"774","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.14561","volume":"102","author":"AH Aagesen","year":"2023","unstructured":"Aagesen AH, Klarskov N, Gradel KO, Husby KR (2023) Hysterectomy on benign indication and risk of pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a national matched cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 102:774\u2013781. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/aogs.14561","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"7615_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"964","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13322","volume":"122","author":"I Voll\u00f8yhaug","year":"2015","unstructured":"Voll\u00f8yhaug I, M\u00f8rkved S, Salvesen \u00d8, Salvesen K\u00c5 (2015) Pelvic organ prolapse and incontinence 15\u201323 years after first delivery: a cross-sectional study. BJOG 122:964\u2013971","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"7615_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2041","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-023-05504-6","volume":"34","author":"WL Tsui","year":"2023","unstructured":"Tsui WL, Deng GH, Hsieh TC, Ding DC (2023) Association between vaginal or cesarean delivery and later development of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse: A retrospective population-based cohort study. Int Urogynecol J 34:2041\u20132047. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-023-05504-6","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"7615_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2438","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2018.18315","volume":"320","author":"JL Blomquist","year":"2018","unstructured":"Blomquist JL, Mu\u00f1oz A, Carroll M, Handa VL (2018) Association of delivery mode with pelvic floor disorders after childbirth. JAMA 320:2438\u20132447. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.2018.18315","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"7615_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2166-z","volume":"25","author":"SH Oversand","year":"2014","unstructured":"Oversand SH, Staff AC, Spydslaug AE et al (2014) Long-term follow-up after native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 25:81\u201389. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-013-2166-z","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"7615_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"102","DOI":"10.1080\/pri.20.2.102.107","volume":"20","author":"YS Hannestad","year":"2002","unstructured":"Hannestad YS, Rortveit G, Hunskaar S (2002) Help-seeking and associated factors in female urinary incontinence. the Norwegian EPINCONT Study. Scand J Prim Health Care 20:102\u2013107. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/pri.20.2.102.107","journal-title":"Scand J Prim Health Care"}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-024-07615-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-024-07615-x\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-024-07615-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,16]],"date-time":"2024-10-16T09:04:07Z","timestamp":1729069447000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-024-07615-x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,8]]},"references-count":38,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,11]]}},"alternative-id":["7615"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-024-07615-x","relation":{},"ISSN":["1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1432-0711","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,8]]},"assertion":[{"value":"13 March 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"25 June 2024","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"8 July 2024","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interests"}},{"value":"This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study protocol received approval from the Ethical Committee of the Helsinki and Uusimaa Hospital District (Dnro 457\/E8\/04 on December 16, 2004, and 343\/13\/03\/03\/2015 on March 3, 2015).","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethichs approval"}},{"value":"The study was registered in the Clinical Trials (NCT00744172). The Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare of Finland authorized the use of the data from the Care Register (THL\/986\/5.05.00\/2018). All participants provided written informed consent to participate in the study.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to participate"}}]}}