{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,8]],"date-time":"2026-03-08T03:08:31Z","timestamp":1772939311497,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":37,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,23]],"date-time":"2024-10-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1729641600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,23]],"date-time":"2024-10-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1729641600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-024-07764-z","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,23]],"date-time":"2024-10-23T19:02:23Z","timestamp":1729710143000},"page":"2767-2781","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["The effect of sequential embryo transfer on pregnancy outcomes in patients with recurrent implantation failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"310","author":[{"given":"Saeed","family":"Baradwan","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Majed Saeed","family":"Alshahrani","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Hussein","family":"Sabban","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Nabigah","family":"Alzawawi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Hanin Hassan","family":"Abduljabbar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Afnan","family":"Baradwan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mohamed Anwar","family":"Haroun","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ahmed","family":"Alanwar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mohamed Ali","family":"Mohamed","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Yousef Mohamed","family":"El-Mazzally","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9579-8366","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ahmed Mohamed","family":"Abdelhakim","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Yasser","family":"Khamis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,23]]},"reference":[{"key":"7764_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"817","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-019-05424-1","volume":"301","author":"G Bar","year":"2020","unstructured":"Bar G, Harlev A, Alfayumi-Zeadna S et al (2020) Recurrent implantation failure: which patients benefit from endometrial scratching prior to IVF? Arch Gynecol Obstet 301:817\u2013822. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-019-05424-1","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"7764_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1039","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.03.010","volume":"97","author":"A Simon","year":"2012","unstructured":"Simon A, Laufer N (2012) Repeated implantation failure: clinical approach. Fertil Steril 97:1039\u20131043. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.03.010","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"7764_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2019.10.014","volume":"40","author":"A Busnelli","year":"2020","unstructured":"Busnelli A, Reschini M, Cardellicchio L et al (2020) How common is real repeated implantation failure? An indirect estimate of the prevalence. Reprod Biomed Online 40:91\u201397. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.rbmo.2019.10.014","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"7764_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"198","DOI":"10.1097\/GCO.0000000000000620","volume":"32","author":"Y Cakiroglu","year":"2020","unstructured":"Cakiroglu Y, Tiras B (2020) Determining diagnostic criteria and cause of recurrent implantation failure. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 32:198\u2013204. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/GCO.0000000000000620","journal-title":"Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"7764_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1445","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-019-05275-w","volume":"300","author":"Y Wu","year":"2019","unstructured":"Wu Y, Li L, Liu L et al (2019) Autologous peripheral blood mononuclear cells intrauterine instillation to improve pregnancy outcomes after recurrent implantation failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 300:1445\u20131459. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-019-05275-w","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"7764_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"297","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-021-06072-0","volume":"304","author":"H Zeng","year":"2021","unstructured":"Zeng H, Hu L, Xie H et al (2021) Polymorphisms of vascular endothelial growth factor and recurrent implantation failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 304:297\u2013307. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-021-06072-0","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"7764_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2013.08.011","volume":"28","author":"C Coughlan","year":"2014","unstructured":"Coughlan C, Ledger W, Wang Q et al (2014) Recurrent implantation failure: definition and management. Reprod Biomed Online 28:14\u201338. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.rbmo.2013.08.011","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"7764_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"13420","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-021-92955-w","volume":"11","author":"M Enciso","year":"2021","unstructured":"Enciso M, Aizpurua J, Rodr\u00edguez-Estrada B et al (2021) The precise determination of the window of implantation significantly improves ART outcomes. Sci Rep 11:13420. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-021-92955-w","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"key":"7764_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"716","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2015.06.011","volume":"54","author":"V Sotiroska","year":"2015","unstructured":"Sotiroska V, Petanovski Z, Dimitrov G et al (2015) The day of embryo transfer affects delivery rate, birth weights, female-to-male ratio, and monozygotic twin rate. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 54:716\u2013721. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.tjog.2015.06.011","journal-title":"Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"7764_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"17311","DOI":"10.1038\/srep17311","volume":"5","author":"CR White","year":"2015","unstructured":"White CR, Denomme MM, Tekpetey FR et al (2015) High frequency of imprinted methylation errors in human preimplantation embryos. Sci Rep 5:17311. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/srep17311","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"key":"7764_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"869","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dey047","volume":"33","author":"L Yang","year":"2018","unstructured":"Yang L, Cai S, Zhang S et al (2018) Single embryo transfer by day 3 time-lapse selection versus day 5 conventional morphological selection: a randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl 33:869\u2013876. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/dey047","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Oxf Engl"},{"key":"7764_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Glujovsky D, Farquhar C, Quinteiro RAM, et al (2016) Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD002118. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD002118.pub5","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD002118.pub5"},{"key":"7764_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"142","DOI":"10.1186\/s12958-021-00824-y","volume":"19","author":"J Zhang","year":"2021","unstructured":"Zhang J, Wang C, Zhang H, Zhou Y (2021) Sequential cleavage and blastocyst embryo transfer and IVF outcomes: a systematic review. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 19:142. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12958-021-00824-y","journal-title":"Reprod Biol Endocrinol"},{"key":"7764_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"806","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-023-06111-5","volume":"23","author":"J Li","year":"2023","unstructured":"Li J, Ji J, Guo H et al (2023) Stratified analysis of clinical pregnancy outcomes of sequential embryo transfer in frozen embryo transfer cycles based on different factors: a retrospective study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 23:806. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12884-023-06111-5","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"7764_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"721","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2004.07.974","volume":"83","author":"S Goto","year":"2005","unstructured":"Goto S, Shiotani M, Kitagawa M et al (2005) Effectiveness of two-step (consecutive) embryo transfer in patients who have two embryos on day 2: comparison with cleavage-stage embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 83:721\u2013723. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2004.07.974","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"7764_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"264","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2022.10.009","volume":"62","author":"S Salehpour","year":"2023","unstructured":"Salehpour S, Hosseini S, Razghandi Z et al (2023) Comparing the effect of sequential embryo transfer versus double blastocyst embryo transfer on pregnancy outcomes in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles in patients with repeated implantation failure: a randomized controlled trial. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 62:264\u2013269. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.tjog.2022.10.009","journal-title":"Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"7764_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"955","DOI":"10.1080\/09513590.2019.1613639","volume":"35","author":"ES Tehraninejad","year":"2019","unstructured":"Tehraninejad ES, Raisi E, Ghaleh FB et al (2019) The sequential embryo transfer compared to blastocyst embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle in patients with the three repeated consecutive IVF. A randomized controlled trial. Gynecol Endocrinol 35:955\u2013959. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09513590.2019.1613639","journal-title":"Gynecol Endocrinol"},{"key":"7764_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"264","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135","volume":"151","author":"D Moher","year":"2009","unstructured":"Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151:264. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7326\/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"7764_CR19","unstructured":"Green S, Higgins PTJ, Alderson P, Clarke M, Mulrow DCODA (2011) Cochrane handbook: cochrane reviews: ch 8: assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Cochrane Handbook for: Systematic Reviews of Interventions. pp 3\u201310"},{"key":"7764_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"38","DOI":"10.1186\/1472-6963-4-38","volume":"4","author":"D Atkins","year":"2004","unstructured":"Atkins D, Eccles M, Flottorp S et al (2004) Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches the GRADE working group. BMC Health Serv Res 4:38. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1472-6963-4-38","journal-title":"BMC Health Serv Res"},{"key":"7764_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.327.7414.557","volume":"327","author":"T Julian","year":"2003","unstructured":"Julian T, Higgins AP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses rapid responses topic collections. BMJ 327:557\u2013560. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.327.7414.557","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"7764_CR22","first-page":"1","volume":"18","author":"MH Mostafa","year":"2023","unstructured":"Mostafa MH, Samir HM, Sayed MS (2023) Efficacy of sequential embryo transfer in improving pregnancy rate in women with repeated unexplained implantation failure. Ginekol Poloznictwo 18:1\u20135","journal-title":"Ginekol Poloznictwo"},{"key":"7764_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"255","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mefs.2015.04.002","volume":"20","author":"WAI Madkour","year":"2015","unstructured":"Madkour WAI, Noah B, Zaheer H et al (2015) Does sequential embryo transfer improve pregnancy rate in patients with repeated implantation failure? A randomized control study. Middle East Fertil Soc J 20:255\u2013261. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.mefs.2015.04.002","journal-title":"Middle East Fertil Soc J"},{"key":"7764_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Arefi S, Ataei M, Maleki N, et al (2022) Sequential (two-step) day 3\/day 5 frozen-thawed embryo transfer: does it improve the pregnancy rate of patients suffering recurrent implantation failure? J Med Life. 15: 1365\u20131370. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.25122\/jml-2022-0041","DOI":"10.25122\/jml-2022-0041"},{"key":"7764_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S97","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2011.07.385","volume":"96","author":"C Fang","year":"2011","unstructured":"Fang C, Huang R, Liang X (2011) Sequential transfer improves the pregnancy rate in patients with repeated in vitro fertilization \u2013 embryo transfer failures. Fertil Steril 96:S97. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2011.07.385","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"7764_CR26","first-page":"103","volume":"4","author":"AAA Moussa","year":"2017","unstructured":"Moussa AAA, Abo El Seror AG, Khayal AES et al (2017) Outcome of consecutive embryos transfer in repeated implantation failure cases. Eur J Biomed Pharm Sci 4:103\u2013108","journal-title":"Eur J Biomed Pharm Sci"},{"key":"7764_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01131183","volume":"5","author":"H Abramovici","year":"1988","unstructured":"Abramovici H, Dirnfeld M, Weisman Z et al (1988) Pregnancies following the interval double-transfer technique in an in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer program. J Vitro Fertil Embryo Transf IVF 5:175\u2013176. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/BF01131183","journal-title":"J Vitro Fertil Embryo Transf IVF"},{"key":"7764_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1238251","DOI":"10.3389\/fendo.2023.1238251","volume":"14","author":"J Gao","year":"2023","unstructured":"Gao J, Yuan Y, Li J et al (2023) Sequential embryo transfer versus double cleavage-stage embryo or double blastocyst transfer in patients with recurrent implantation failure with frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: a cohort study. Front Endocrinol 14:1238251. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fendo.2023.1238251","journal-title":"Front Endocrinol"},{"key":"7764_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2563","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.15369","volume":"48","author":"M Ji","year":"2022","unstructured":"Ji M, Zhang L, Fu X et al (2022) The outcomes of sequential embryo transfer in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization with frozen\u2013thawed embryos: a retrospective study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 48:2563\u20132570. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jog.15369","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"key":"7764_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"32","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.01.005","volume":"283","author":"Y Li","year":"2023","unstructured":"Li Y, Zhang L, Yu P et al (2023) The efficacy of sequential day 3 embryo and blastocyst transfer in patients with repeated implantation failure. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 283:32\u201336. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.01.005","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"7764_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1303493","DOI":"10.3389\/fmed.2023.1303493","volume":"10","author":"W Teng","year":"2023","unstructured":"Teng W, Xian H, Wang F et al (2023) Effect of sequential embryo transfer on in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Med 10:1303493. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fmed.2023.1303493","journal-title":"Front Med"},{"key":"7764_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1687583","DOI":"10.1155\/2018\/1687583","volume":"2018","author":"GS Stamenov","year":"2018","unstructured":"Stamenov GS, Parvanov DA, Chaushev TA (2018) Successful pregnancy following mixed double embryo transfer in a patient with variable window of implantation. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol 2018:1687583. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2018\/1687583","journal-title":"Case Rep Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"7764_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"378","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2014.12.005","volume":"30","author":"H Gomaa","year":"2015","unstructured":"Gomaa H, Casper RF, Esfandiari N, Bentov Y (2015) Non-synchronized endometrium and its correction in non-ovulatory cryopreserved embryo transfer cycles. Reprod Biomed Online 30:378\u2013384. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.rbmo.2014.12.005","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"7764_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"818","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.05.004","volume":"100","author":"M Ruiz-Alonso","year":"2013","unstructured":"Ruiz-Alonso M, Blesa D, D\u00edaz-Gimeno P et al (2013) The endometrial receptivity array for diagnosis and personalized embryo transfer as a treatment for patients with repeated implantation failure. Fertil Steril 100:818\u2013824. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.05.004","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"7764_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.1007\/s43032-020-00252-0","volume":"28","author":"D Haouzi","year":"2021","unstructured":"Haouzi D, Entezami F, Torre A et al (2021) Customized frozen embryo transfer after identification of the receptivity window with a transcriptomic approach improves the implantation and live birth rates in patients with repeated implantation failure. Reprod Sci Thousand Oaks Calif 28:69\u201378. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s43032-020-00252-0","journal-title":"Reprod Sci Thousand Oaks Calif"},{"key":"7764_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"30","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.10.004","volume":"26","author":"C Fang","year":"2013","unstructured":"Fang C, Huang R, Li T-T et al (2013) Day-2 and day-3 sequential transfer improves pregnancy rate in patients with repeated IVF-embryo transfer failure: a retrospective case-control study. Reprod Biomed Online 26:30\u201335. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.10.004","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"7764_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1501","DOI":"10.1177\/1933719118756750","volume":"25","author":"PAA Monteleone","year":"2018","unstructured":"Monteleone PAA, Peregrino PFM, Baracat EC, Serafini PC (2018) Transfer of 2 embryos using a double-embryo transfer protocol versus 2 sequential single-embryo transfers: the impact on multiple pregnancy. Reprod Sci 25:1501\u20131508. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1933719118756750","journal-title":"Reprod Sci"}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-024-07764-z.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-024-07764-z\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-024-07764-z.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,18]],"date-time":"2024-12-18T02:02:39Z","timestamp":1734487359000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-024-07764-z"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,23]]},"references-count":37,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,12]]}},"alternative-id":["7764"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-024-07764-z","relation":{},"ISSN":["1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1432-0711","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,23]]},"assertion":[{"value":"30 May 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"18 August 2024","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"23 October 2024","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors have no conflicts of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}